ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) Stock Fundamental Analysis
USA - New York Stock Exchange - NYSE:ZIM - IL0065100930 - Common Stock
21.095 USD
+1.21 (+6.11%)
Taking everything into account, ZIM scores 5 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. ZIM was compared to 35 industry peers in the Marine Transportation industry. ZIM has an average financial health and profitability rating. ZIM has a valuation in line with the averages, but it does not seem to be growing.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year ZIM was profitable.
In the past year ZIM had a positive cash flow from operations.
ZIM had positive earnings in 4 of the past 5 years.
ZIM had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
ZIM has a better Return On Assets (9.23%) than 82.86% of its industry peers.
ZIM's Return On Equity of 24.99% is amongst the best of the industry. ZIM outperforms 94.29% of its industry peers.
ZIM has a better Return On Invested Capital (13.46%) than 94.29% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 9.23% | ||
| ROE | 24.99% | ||
| ROIC | 13.46% |
ROA(3y)8.76%
ROA(5y)18.36%
ROE(3y)7.27%
ROE(5y)63.37%
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
Looking at the Profit Margin, with a value of 13.23%, ZIM is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 71.43% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of ZIM has declined.
The Operating Margin of ZIM (19.63%) is better than 62.86% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of ZIM has grown nicely.
ZIM has a worse Gross Margin (24.03%) than 71.43% of its industry peers.
ZIM's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 19.63% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 13.23% | ||
| GM | 24.03% |
OM growth 3Y-18.26%
OM growth 5Y53.61%
PM growth 3Y-16.16%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-16.4%
GM growth 5Y32.89%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
ZIM has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is creating some value.
The number of shares outstanding for ZIM remains at a similar level compared to 1 year ago.
The number of shares outstanding for ZIM has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
ZIM has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 1.95 indicates that ZIM is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
ZIM's Altman-Z score of 1.95 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. ZIM outperforms 65.71% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of ZIM is 2.00, which is an excellent value as it means it would take ZIM, only 2.00 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
ZIM's Debt to FCF ratio of 2.00 is amongst the best of the industry. ZIM outperforms 91.43% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 1.12 is on the high side and indicates that ZIM has dependencies on debt financing.
ZIM has a worse Debt to Equity ratio (1.12) than 82.86% of its industry peers.
Although ZIM does not score too well on debt/equity it has very limited outstanding debt, which is well covered by the FCF. We will not put too much weight on the debt/equity number as it may be because of low equity, which could be a consequence of a share buyback program for instance. This needs to be investigated.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.12 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 2 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.95 |
ROIC/WACC1.44
WACC9.37%
2.3 Liquidity
ZIM has a Current Ratio of 1.30. This is a normal value and indicates that ZIM is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
ZIM has a worse Current ratio (1.30) than 65.71% of its industry peers.
ZIM has a Quick Ratio of 1.22. This is a normal value and indicates that ZIM is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
The Quick ratio of ZIM (1.22) is worse than 62.86% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.3 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.22 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for ZIM have decreased strongly by -30.32% in the last year.
The earnings per share for ZIM have been decreasing by -22.88% on average. This is quite bad
Looking at the last year, ZIM shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has grown by 1.63% in the last year.
The Revenue has been growing by 20.62% on average over the past years. This is a very strong growth!
EPS 1Y (TTM)-30.32%
EPS 3Y-22.88%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-89.08%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)1.63%
Revenue growth 3Y-7.73%
Revenue growth 5Y20.62%
Sales Q2Q%-35.73%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to decrease by -30.09% on average over the next years. This is quite bad
ZIM is expected to show a very negative growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will decrease by -10.94% yearly.
EPS Next Y-83.63%
EPS Next 2Y-49.51%
EPS Next 3Y-30.09%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-16.12%
Revenue Next 2Y-16.34%
Revenue Next 3Y-10.94%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
A Price/Earnings ratio of 2.54 indicates a rather cheap valuation of ZIM.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of ZIM indicates a rather cheap valuation: ZIM is cheaper than 88.57% of the companies listed in the same industry.
ZIM's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 26.61.
ZIM is expected to report negative earnings next year, which makes the Forward Price/Earnings Ratio negative.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 2.54 | ||
| Fwd PE | N/A |
4.2 Price Multiples
ZIM's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. ZIM is cheaper than 80.00% of the companies in the same industry.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, ZIM is valued cheaper than 97.14% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 0.9 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 1.97 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The decent profitability rating of ZIM may justify a higher PE ratio.
A cheap valuation may be justified as ZIM's earnings are expected to decrease with -30.09% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y-49.51%
EPS Next 3Y-30.09%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 49.49%, ZIM is a good candidate for dividend investing.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 5.65, ZIM pays a better dividend. On top of this ZIM pays more dividend than 100.00% of the companies listed in the same industry.
ZIM's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 1.87.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 49.49% |
5.2 History
ZIM has been paying a dividend for over 5 years, so it has already some track record.
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
ZIM pays out 91.47% of its income as dividend. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
DP91.47%
EPS Next 2Y-49.51%
EPS Next 3Y-30.09%
NYSE:ZIM (12/23/2025, 3:12:07 PM)
21.095
+1.21 (+6.11%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupTransportation
GICS IndustryMarine Transportation
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners40.68%
Inst Owner Change-25.54%
Ins Owners1.17%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap2.54B
Revenue(TTM)7.59B
Net Income(TTM)1.00B
Analysts42.86
Price Target13.57 (-35.67%)
Short Float %18.77%
Short Ratio4.48
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 49.49% |
Yearly Dividend4.81
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DP91.47%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)-27.91%
Min EPS beat(2)-76.76%
Max EPS beat(2)20.95%
EPS beat(4)3
Avg EPS beat(4)4.95%
Min EPS beat(4)-76.76%
Max EPS beat(4)46.04%
EPS beat(8)6
Avg EPS beat(8)9.74%
EPS beat(12)7
Avg EPS beat(12)-1095.56%
EPS beat(16)10
Avg EPS beat(16)-821.42%
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-3.77%
Min Revenue beat(2)-7.17%
Max Revenue beat(2)-0.38%
Revenue beat(4)2
Avg Revenue beat(4)0.99%
Min Revenue beat(4)-7.17%
Max Revenue beat(4)7.25%
Revenue beat(8)4
Avg Revenue beat(8)1.83%
Revenue beat(12)5
Avg Revenue beat(12)-0.41%
Revenue beat(16)8
Avg Revenue beat(16)-0.14%
PT rev (1m)-0.25%
PT rev (3m)-8.28%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-33.07%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-6.5%
EPS NY rev (1m)8.56%
EPS NY rev (3m)-19.13%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)-3.12%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-5.88%
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.7%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-1.36%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 2.54 | ||
| Fwd PE | N/A | ||
| P/S | 0.33 | ||
| P/FCF | 0.9 | ||
| P/OCF | 0.83 | ||
| P/B | 0.63 | ||
| P/tB | 0.65 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 1.97 |
EPS(TTM)8.32
EY39.44%
EPS(NY)-4.19
Fwd EYN/A
FCF(TTM)23.53
FCFY111.53%
OCF(TTM)25.54
OCFY121.08%
SpS62.98
BVpS33.33
TBVpS32.43
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number79
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 9.23% | ||
| ROE | 24.99% | ||
| ROCE | 17.04% | ||
| ROIC | 13.46% | ||
| ROICexc | 17.33% | ||
| ROICexgc | 17.61% | ||
| OM | 19.63% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 13.23% | ||
| GM | 24.03% | ||
| FCFM | 37.35% |
ROA(3y)8.76%
ROA(5y)18.36%
ROE(3y)7.27%
ROE(5y)63.37%
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
ROICexc(3y)N/A
ROICexc(5y)N/A
ROICexgc(3y)N/A
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)N/A
ROCE(5y)N/A
ROICexgc growth 3Y-39.31%
ROICexgc growth 5Y21.82%
ROICexc growth 3Y-39.21%
ROICexc growth 5Y23.31%
OM growth 3Y-18.26%
OM growth 5Y53.61%
PM growth 3Y-16.16%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-16.4%
GM growth 5Y32.89%
F-Score4
Asset Turnover0.7
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.12 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 2 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.62 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 18.95% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 3.2% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 3.08 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 111.06% | ||
| Profit Quality | 282.44% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.3 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.22 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.95 |
F-Score4
WACC9.37%
ROIC/WACC1.44
Cap/Depr(3y)17.11%
Cap/Depr(5y)N/A
Cap/Sales(3y)2.51%
Cap/Sales(5y)N/A
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-30.32%
EPS 3Y-22.88%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-89.08%
EPS Next Y-83.63%
EPS Next 2Y-49.51%
EPS Next 3Y-30.09%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)1.63%
Revenue growth 3Y-7.73%
Revenue growth 5Y20.62%
Sales Q2Q%-35.73%
Revenue Next Year-16.12%
Revenue Next 2Y-16.34%
Revenue Next 3Y-10.94%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y-16.25%
EBIT growth 3Y-24.58%
EBIT growth 5Y85.29%
EBIT Next Year-9.9%
EBIT Next 3Y-19.13%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y88.22%
FCF growth 3Y-10.68%
FCF growth 5Y57.03%
OCF growth 1Y59.71%
OCF growth 3Y-14.34%
OCF growth 5Y58.89%
ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV / ZIM FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to ZIM.
What is the valuation status of ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 5 / 10 to ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
How profitable is ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) stock?
ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) has a profitability rating of 6 / 10.
Can you provide the financial health for ZIM stock?
The financial health rating of ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) is 5 / 10.
What is the earnings growth outlook for ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) is expected to decline by -83.63% in the next year.