ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) Stock Fundamental Analysis
USA - New York Stock Exchange - NYSE:ZIM - IL0065100930 - Common Stock
20.92 USD
-0.99 (-4.52%)
20.8 USD
-0.12 (-0.57%)
Taking everything into account, ZIM scores 5 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. ZIM was compared to 35 industry peers in the Marine Transportation industry. Both the profitability and the financial health of ZIM get a neutral evaluation. Nothing too spectacular is happening here. ZIM is valued correctly, but it does not seem to be growing.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
ZIM had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year ZIM had a positive cash flow from operations.
Of the past 5 years ZIM 4 years were profitable.
ZIM had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
With an excellent Return On Assets value of 9.23%, ZIM belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 82.86% of the companies in the same industry.
Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 24.99%, ZIM belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 94.29% of the companies in the same industry.
The Return On Invested Capital of ZIM (13.46%) is better than 94.29% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 9.23% | ||
| ROE | 24.99% | ||
| ROIC | 13.46% |
ROA(3y)8.76%
ROA(5y)18.36%
ROE(3y)7.27%
ROE(5y)63.37%
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
Looking at the Profit Margin, with a value of 13.23%, ZIM is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 71.43% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of ZIM has declined.
Looking at the Operating Margin, with a value of 19.63%, ZIM is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 65.71% of the companies in the same industry.
ZIM's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
With a Gross Margin value of 24.03%, ZIM is not doing good in the industry: 68.57% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
ZIM's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 19.63% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 13.23% | ||
| GM | 24.03% |
OM growth 3Y-18.26%
OM growth 5Y53.61%
PM growth 3Y-16.16%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-16.4%
GM growth 5Y32.89%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so ZIM is still creating some value.
ZIM has about the same amout of shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
Compared to 5 years ago, ZIM has more shares outstanding
Compared to 1 year ago, ZIM has an improved debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
ZIM has an Altman-Z score of 1.96. This is not the best score and indicates that ZIM is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
ZIM's Altman-Z score of 1.96 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. ZIM outperforms 68.57% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of ZIM is 2.00, which is an excellent value as it means it would take ZIM, only 2.00 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
ZIM has a better Debt to FCF ratio (2.00) than 94.29% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 1.12 is on the high side and indicates that ZIM has dependencies on debt financing.
ZIM has a Debt to Equity ratio of 1.12. This is in the lower half of the industry: ZIM underperforms 77.14% of its industry peers.
Even though the debt/equity ratio score it not favorable for ZIM, it has very limited outstanding debt, so we won't put too much weight on the DE evaluation.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.12 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 2 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.96 |
ROIC/WACC1.42
WACC9.46%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.30 indicates that ZIM should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
ZIM has a Current ratio of 1.30. This is in the lower half of the industry: ZIM underperforms 65.71% of its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 1.22 indicates that ZIM should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
The Quick ratio of ZIM (1.22) is worse than 62.86% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.3 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.22 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
ZIM shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -30.32%.
The earnings per share for ZIM have been decreasing by -22.88% on average. This is quite bad
ZIM shows a small growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 1.63%.
The Revenue has been growing by 20.62% on average over the past years. This is a very strong growth!
EPS 1Y (TTM)-30.32%
EPS 3Y-22.88%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-89.08%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)1.63%
Revenue growth 3Y-7.73%
Revenue growth 5Y20.62%
Sales Q2Q%-35.73%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, ZIM will show a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will decrease by -29.41% on average per year.
Based on estimates for the next years, ZIM will show a very negative growth in Revenue. The Revenue will decrease by -11.36% on average per year.
EPS Next Y-83.78%
EPS Next 2Y-48.8%
EPS Next 3Y-29.41%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-16.46%
Revenue Next 2Y-16.36%
Revenue Next 3Y-11.36%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio of 2.51, the valuation of ZIM can be described as very cheap.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of ZIM indicates a rather cheap valuation: ZIM is cheaper than 91.43% of the companies listed in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of ZIM to the average of the S&P500 Index (26.87), we can say ZIM is valued rather cheaply.
ZIM is expected to report negative earnings next year, which makes the Forward Price/Earnings Ratio negative.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 2.51 | ||
| Fwd PE | N/A |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, ZIM is valued cheaply inside the industry as 85.71% of the companies are valued more expensively.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, ZIM is valued cheaper than 97.14% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 0.89 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 2.01 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The decent profitability rating of ZIM may justify a higher PE ratio.
ZIM's earnings are expected to decrease with -29.41% in the coming years. This may justify a cheaper valuation.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y-48.8%
EPS Next 3Y-29.41%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
ZIM has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 20.16%, which is a nice return.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 4.83, ZIM pays a better dividend. On top of this ZIM pays more dividend than 94.29% of the companies listed in the same industry.
ZIM's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 1.94.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 20.16% |
5.2 History
ZIM has been paying a dividend for over 5 years, so it has already some track record.
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
ZIM pays out 91.47% of its income as dividend. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
DP91.47%
EPS Next 2Y-48.8%
EPS Next 3Y-29.41%
20.92
-0.99 (-4.52%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupTransportation
GICS IndustryMarine Transportation
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners40.64%
Inst Owner Change0%
Ins Owners1.17%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap2.52B
Revenue(TTM)7.59B
Net Income(TTM)1.00B
Analysts42.86
Price Target14.48 (-30.78%)
Short Float %18.28%
Short Ratio4.46
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 20.16% |
Yearly Dividend4.81
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DP91.47%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)-27.91%
Min EPS beat(2)-76.76%
Max EPS beat(2)20.95%
EPS beat(4)3
Avg EPS beat(4)4.95%
Min EPS beat(4)-76.76%
Max EPS beat(4)46.04%
EPS beat(8)6
Avg EPS beat(8)9.74%
EPS beat(12)7
Avg EPS beat(12)-1095.56%
EPS beat(16)10
Avg EPS beat(16)-821.42%
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-3.77%
Min Revenue beat(2)-7.17%
Max Revenue beat(2)-0.38%
Revenue beat(4)2
Avg Revenue beat(4)0.99%
Min Revenue beat(4)-7.17%
Max Revenue beat(4)7.25%
Revenue beat(8)4
Avg Revenue beat(8)1.83%
Revenue beat(12)5
Avg Revenue beat(12)-0.41%
Revenue beat(16)8
Avg Revenue beat(16)-0.14%
PT rev (1m)6.5%
PT rev (3m)2.65%
EPS NQ rev (1m)19.5%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-6.5%
EPS NY rev (1m)-0.93%
EPS NY rev (3m)-3.79%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)1.68%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-1.88%
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.4%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-1.16%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 2.51 | ||
| Fwd PE | N/A | ||
| P/S | 0.33 | ||
| P/FCF | 0.89 | ||
| P/OCF | 0.82 | ||
| P/B | 0.63 | ||
| P/tB | 0.65 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 2.01 |
EPS(TTM)8.32
EY39.77%
EPS(NY)-3.82
Fwd EYN/A
FCF(TTM)23.53
FCFY112.46%
OCF(TTM)25.54
OCFY122.09%
SpS62.98
BVpS33.33
TBVpS32.43
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number79
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 9.23% | ||
| ROE | 24.99% | ||
| ROCE | 17.04% | ||
| ROIC | 13.46% | ||
| ROICexc | 17.33% | ||
| ROICexgc | 17.61% | ||
| OM | 19.63% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 13.23% | ||
| GM | 24.03% | ||
| FCFM | 37.35% |
ROA(3y)8.76%
ROA(5y)18.36%
ROE(3y)7.27%
ROE(5y)63.37%
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
ROICexc(3y)N/A
ROICexc(5y)N/A
ROICexgc(3y)N/A
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)N/A
ROCE(5y)N/A
ROICexgc growth 3Y-39.31%
ROICexgc growth 5Y21.82%
ROICexc growth 3Y-39.21%
ROICexc growth 5Y23.31%
OM growth 3Y-18.26%
OM growth 5Y53.61%
PM growth 3Y-16.16%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-16.4%
GM growth 5Y32.89%
F-Score4
Asset Turnover0.7
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.12 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 2 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.62 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 18.95% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 3.2% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 3.08 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 111.06% | ||
| Profit Quality | 282.44% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.3 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.22 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.96 |
F-Score4
WACC9.46%
ROIC/WACC1.42
Cap/Depr(3y)17.11%
Cap/Depr(5y)N/A
Cap/Sales(3y)2.51%
Cap/Sales(5y)N/A
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-30.32%
EPS 3Y-22.88%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-89.08%
EPS Next Y-83.78%
EPS Next 2Y-48.8%
EPS Next 3Y-29.41%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)1.63%
Revenue growth 3Y-7.73%
Revenue growth 5Y20.62%
Sales Q2Q%-35.73%
Revenue Next Year-16.46%
Revenue Next 2Y-16.36%
Revenue Next 3Y-11.36%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y-16.25%
EBIT growth 3Y-24.58%
EBIT growth 5Y85.29%
EBIT Next Year-10.61%
EBIT Next 3Y-18.28%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y88.22%
FCF growth 3Y-10.68%
FCF growth 5Y57.03%
OCF growth 1Y59.71%
OCF growth 3Y-14.34%
OCF growth 5Y58.89%
ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV / ZIM FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to ZIM.
What is the valuation status for ZIM stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 5 / 10 to ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
How profitable is ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) stock?
ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) has a profitability rating of 6 / 10.
Can you provide the financial health for ZIM stock?
The financial health rating of ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) is 5 / 10.
How sustainable is the dividend of ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) stock?
The dividend rating of ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) is 5 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 91.47%.