ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) Stock Fundamental Analysis
USA - NYSE:ZIM - IL0065100930 - Common Stock
15.14 USD
+0.79 (+5.51%)
We assign a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10 to ZIM. ZIM was compared to 35 industry peers in the Marine Transportation industry. While ZIM belongs to the best of the industry regarding profitability, there are some minor concerns on its financial health. ZIM has a decent growth rate and is not valued too expensively.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
ZIM had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year ZIM had a positive cash flow from operations.
ZIM had positive earnings in 4 of the past 5 years.
ZIM had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
The Return On Assets of ZIM (18.07%) is better than 91.43% of its industry peers.
ZIM has a better Return On Equity (51.44%) than 100.00% of its industry peers.
ZIM has a Return On Invested Capital of 22.14%. This is amongst the best in the industry. ZIM outperforms 97.14% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 18.07% | ||
| ROE | 51.44% | ||
| ROIC | 22.14% |
ROA(3y)8.76%
ROA(5y)18.36%
ROE(3y)7.27%
ROE(5y)63.37%
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
ZIM has a better Profit Margin (23.38%) than 82.86% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of ZIM has declined.
The Operating Margin of ZIM (28.74%) is better than 77.14% of its industry peers.
ZIM's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
Looking at the Gross Margin, with a value of 32.54%, ZIM is doing worse than 68.57% of the companies in the same industry.
ZIM's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 28.74% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 23.38% | ||
| GM | 32.54% |
OM growth 3Y-18.26%
OM growth 5Y53.61%
PM growth 3Y-16.16%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-16.4%
GM growth 5Y32.89%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
ZIM has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is creating value.
Compared to 1 year ago, ZIM has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
ZIM has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
The debt/assets ratio for ZIM has been reduced compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 2.19 indicates that ZIM is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
With a decent Altman-Z score value of 2.19, ZIM is doing good in the industry, outperforming 74.29% of the companies in the same industry.
ZIM has a debt to FCF ratio of 1.59. This is a very positive value and a sign of high solvency as it would only need 1.59 years to pay back of all of its debts.
ZIM has a Debt to FCF ratio of 1.59. This is in the better half of the industry: ZIM outperforms 80.00% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 1.21 is on the high side and indicates that ZIM has dependencies on debt financing.
ZIM has a Debt to Equity ratio of 1.21. This is amonst the worse of the industry: ZIM underperforms 80.00% of its industry peers.
Although ZIM does not score too well on debt/equity it has very limited outstanding debt, which is well covered by the FCF. We will not put too much weight on the debt/equity number as it may be because of low equity, which could be a consequence of a share buyback program for instance. This needs to be investigated.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.21 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 1.59 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.19 |
ROIC/WACC2.5
WACC8.84%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.20 indicates that ZIM should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
ZIM has a Current ratio of 1.20. This is in the lower half of the industry: ZIM underperforms 60.00% of its industry peers.
ZIM has a Quick Ratio of 1.11. This is a normal value and indicates that ZIM is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
ZIM's Quick ratio of 1.11 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. ZIM is outperformed by 60.00% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.2 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.11 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The Earnings Per Share has grown by an impressive 1834.88% over the past year.
The earnings per share for ZIM have been decreasing by -22.88% on average. This is quite bad
Looking at the last year, ZIM shows a very strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue has grown by 43.57%.
ZIM shows a strong growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 20.62% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)1834.88%
EPS 3Y-22.88%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-93.83%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)43.57%
Revenue growth 3Y-7.73%
Revenue growth 5Y20.62%
Sales Q2Q%-15.36%
3.2 Future
ZIM is expected to show a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will decrease by -29.76% yearly.
Based on estimates for the next years, ZIM will show a very negative growth in Revenue. The Revenue will decrease by -10.71% on average per year.
EPS Next Y-84.95%
EPS Next 2Y-49.9%
EPS Next 3Y-29.76%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-15.53%
Revenue Next 2Y-15.3%
Revenue Next 3Y-10.71%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio of 0.91, the valuation of ZIM can be described as very cheap.
ZIM's Price/Earnings ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. ZIM is cheaper than 97.14% of the companies in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio of 27.08, ZIM is valued rather cheaply.
The Forward Price/Earnings Ratio is negative for ZIM. No positive earnings are expected for the next year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 0.91 | ||
| Fwd PE | N/A |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, ZIM is valued cheaper than 85.71% of the companies in the same industry.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, ZIM is valued cheaply inside the industry as 100.00% of the companies are valued more expensively.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 0.49 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 1.43 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The decent profitability rating of ZIM may justify a higher PE ratio.
ZIM's earnings are expected to decrease with -29.76% in the coming years. This may justify a cheaper valuation.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y-49.9%
EPS Next 3Y-29.76%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
ZIM has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 49.49%, which is a nice return.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 7.34, ZIM pays a better dividend. On top of this ZIM pays more dividend than 100.00% of the companies listed in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.30, ZIM pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 49.49% |
5.2 History
ZIM has been paying a dividend for over 5 years, so it has already some track record.
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
51.00% of the earnings are spent on dividend by ZIM. This is a bit on the high side, but may be sustainable.
DP51%
EPS Next 2Y-49.9%
EPS Next 3Y-29.76%
NYSE:ZIM (10/28/2025, 10:49:09 AM)
15.14
+0.79 (+5.51%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupTransportation
GICS IndustryMarine Transportation
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners53.44%
Inst Owner Change-0.05%
Ins Owners1.17%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap1.82B
Revenue(TTM)8.58B
Net Income(TTM)2.00B
Analysts42.67
Price Target14.11 (-6.8%)
Short Float %19.84%
Short Ratio5.06
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 49.49% |
Yearly Dividend4.81
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DP51%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)-23.6%
Min EPS beat(2)-76.76%
Max EPS beat(2)29.56%
EPS beat(4)3
Avg EPS beat(4)7.52%
Min EPS beat(4)-76.76%
Max EPS beat(4)46.04%
EPS beat(8)5
Avg EPS beat(8)3.03%
EPS beat(12)7
Avg EPS beat(12)-1097.29%
EPS beat(16)10
Avg EPS beat(16)-820.85%
Revenue beat(2)1
Avg Revenue beat(2)0.04%
Min Revenue beat(2)-7.17%
Max Revenue beat(2)7.25%
Revenue beat(4)3
Avg Revenue beat(4)4.22%
Min Revenue beat(4)-7.17%
Max Revenue beat(4)12.54%
Revenue beat(8)4
Avg Revenue beat(8)1.28%
Revenue beat(12)6
Avg Revenue beat(12)-0.32%
Revenue beat(16)9
Avg Revenue beat(16)0.64%
PT rev (1m)-4.6%
PT rev (3m)-9.85%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-24.17%
EPS NQ rev (3m)45.3%
EPS NY rev (1m)-10.77%
EPS NY rev (3m)-7.66%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)-2.78%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)3.42%
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.67%
Revenue NY rev (3m)1.73%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 0.91 | ||
| Fwd PE | N/A | ||
| P/S | 0.21 | ||
| P/FCF | 0.49 | ||
| P/OCF | 0.46 | ||
| P/B | 0.47 | ||
| P/tB | 0.48 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 1.43 |
EPS(TTM)16.64
EY109.91%
EPS(NY)-4.41
Fwd EYN/A
FCF(TTM)30.88
FCFY203.98%
OCF(TTM)32.76
OCFY216.35%
SpS71.19
BVpS32.35
TBVpS31.44
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number110.06
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 18.07% | ||
| ROE | 51.44% | ||
| ROCE | 28.03% | ||
| ROIC | 22.14% | ||
| ROICexc | 27.73% | ||
| ROICexgc | 28.17% | ||
| OM | 28.74% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 23.38% | ||
| GM | 32.54% | ||
| FCFM | 43.38% |
ROA(3y)8.76%
ROA(5y)18.36%
ROE(3y)7.27%
ROE(5y)63.37%
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
ROICexc(3y)N/A
ROICexc(5y)N/A
ROICexgc(3y)N/A
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)N/A
ROCE(5y)N/A
ROICexgc growth 3Y-39.31%
ROICexgc growth 5Y21.82%
ROICexc growth 3Y-39.21%
ROICexc growth 5Y23.31%
OM growth 3Y-18.26%
OM growth 5Y53.61%
PM growth 3Y-16.16%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-16.4%
GM growth 5Y32.89%
F-Score7
Asset Turnover0.77
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.21 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 1.59 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.27 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 18.16% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 2.63% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 5.07 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 106.43% | ||
| Profit Quality | 185.54% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.2 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.11 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.19 |
F-Score7
WACC8.84%
ROIC/WACC2.5
Cap/Depr(3y)17.11%
Cap/Depr(5y)N/A
Cap/Sales(3y)2.51%
Cap/Sales(5y)N/A
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)1834.88%
EPS 3Y-22.88%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-93.83%
EPS Next Y-84.95%
EPS Next 2Y-49.9%
EPS Next 3Y-29.76%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)43.57%
Revenue growth 3Y-7.73%
Revenue growth 5Y20.62%
Sales Q2Q%-15.36%
Revenue Next Year-15.53%
Revenue Next 2Y-15.3%
Revenue Next 3Y-10.71%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y691.65%
EBIT growth 3Y-24.58%
EBIT growth 5Y85.29%
EBIT Next Year-11.28%
EBIT Next 3Y-20.41%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y30.37%
FCF growth 3Y-10.68%
FCF growth 5Y57.03%
OCF growth 1Y21.02%
OCF growth 3Y-14.34%
OCF growth 5Y58.89%
ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV / ZIM FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to ZIM.
What is the valuation status of ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 5 / 10 to ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
How profitable is ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) stock?
ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) has a profitability rating of 7 / 10.
Can you provide the financial health for ZIM stock?
The financial health rating of ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) is 5 / 10.
What is the earnings growth outlook for ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) is expected to decline by -84.95% in the next year.