ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) Stock Fundamental Analysis
USA - New York Stock Exchange - NYSE:ZIM - IL0065100930 - Common Stock
21.91 USD
+0.68 (+3.2%)
21.89 USD
-0.02 (-0.09%)
Overall ZIM gets a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10. We evaluated ZIM against 35 industry peers in the Marine Transportation industry. Both the profitability and the financial health of ZIM get a neutral evaluation. Nothing too spectacular is happening here. ZIM has a valuation in line with the averages, but it does not seem to be growing.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
ZIM had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year ZIM had a positive cash flow from operations.
ZIM had positive earnings in 4 of the past 5 years.
In the past 5 years ZIM always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
1.2 Ratios
With an excellent Return On Assets value of 9.23%, ZIM belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 82.86% of the companies in the same industry.
Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 24.99%, ZIM belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 94.29% of the companies in the same industry.
The Return On Invested Capital of ZIM (13.46%) is better than 94.29% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 9.23% | ||
| ROE | 24.99% | ||
| ROIC | 13.46% |
ROA(3y)8.76%
ROA(5y)18.36%
ROE(3y)7.27%
ROE(5y)63.37%
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
Looking at the Profit Margin, with a value of 13.23%, ZIM is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 71.43% of the companies in the same industry.
ZIM's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
ZIM's Operating Margin of 19.63% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. ZIM outperforms 65.71% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of ZIM has grown nicely.
The Gross Margin of ZIM (24.03%) is worse than 68.57% of its industry peers.
ZIM's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 19.63% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 13.23% | ||
| GM | 24.03% |
OM growth 3Y-18.26%
OM growth 5Y53.61%
PM growth 3Y-16.16%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-16.4%
GM growth 5Y32.89%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
ZIM has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is creating some value.
Compared to 1 year ago, ZIM has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
ZIM has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
ZIM has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 1.97 indicates that ZIM is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
ZIM's Altman-Z score of 1.97 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. ZIM outperforms 68.57% of its industry peers.
ZIM has a debt to FCF ratio of 2.00. This is a very positive value and a sign of high solvency as it would only need 2.00 years to pay back of all of its debts.
ZIM has a better Debt to FCF ratio (2.00) than 94.29% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 1.12 is on the high side and indicates that ZIM has dependencies on debt financing.
ZIM has a worse Debt to Equity ratio (1.12) than 77.14% of its industry peers.
Even though the debt/equity ratio score it not favorable for ZIM, it has very limited outstanding debt, so we won't put too much weight on the DE evaluation.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.12 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 2 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.97 |
ROIC/WACC1.41
WACC9.55%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.30 indicates that ZIM should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
Looking at the Current ratio, with a value of 1.30, ZIM is doing worse than 65.71% of the companies in the same industry.
ZIM has a Quick Ratio of 1.22. This is a normal value and indicates that ZIM is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
ZIM has a worse Quick ratio (1.22) than 62.86% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.3 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.22 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
ZIM shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -30.32%.
ZIM shows a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been decreasing by -22.88% yearly.
ZIM shows a small growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 1.63%.
ZIM shows a strong growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 20.62% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-30.32%
EPS 3Y-22.88%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-89.08%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)1.63%
Revenue growth 3Y-7.73%
Revenue growth 5Y20.62%
Sales Q2Q%-35.73%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to decrease by -29.41% on average over the next years. This is quite bad
ZIM is expected to show a very negative growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will decrease by -11.36% yearly.
EPS Next Y-83.78%
EPS Next 2Y-48.8%
EPS Next 3Y-29.41%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-16.46%
Revenue Next 2Y-16.36%
Revenue Next 3Y-11.36%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio of 2.63, the valuation of ZIM can be described as very cheap.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of ZIM indicates a rather cheap valuation: ZIM is cheaper than 91.43% of the companies listed in the same industry.
ZIM's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 26.60.
ZIM is expected to report negative earnings next year, which makes the Forward Price/Earnings Ratio negative.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 2.63 | ||
| Fwd PE | N/A |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, ZIM is valued cheaply inside the industry as 85.71% of the companies are valued more expensively.
97.14% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than ZIM, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 0.93 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 2.06 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The decent profitability rating of ZIM may justify a higher PE ratio.
ZIM's earnings are expected to decrease with -29.41% in the coming years. This may justify a cheaper valuation.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y-48.8%
EPS Next 3Y-29.41%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
ZIM has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 20.16%, which is a nice return.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 4.83, ZIM pays a better dividend. On top of this ZIM pays more dividend than 94.29% of the companies listed in the same industry.
ZIM's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 1.94.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 20.16% |
5.2 History
ZIM has been paying a dividend for over 5 years, so it has already some track record.
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
ZIM pays out 91.47% of its income as dividend. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
DP91.47%
EPS Next 2Y-48.8%
EPS Next 3Y-29.41%
21.91
+0.68 (+3.2%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupTransportation
GICS IndustryMarine Transportation
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners40.64%
Inst Owner Change0%
Ins Owners1.17%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap2.64B
Revenue(TTM)7.59B
Net Income(TTM)1.00B
Analysts42.86
Price Target14.48 (-33.91%)
Short Float %18.28%
Short Ratio4.46
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 20.16% |
Yearly Dividend4.81
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DP91.47%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)-27.91%
Min EPS beat(2)-76.76%
Max EPS beat(2)20.95%
EPS beat(4)3
Avg EPS beat(4)4.95%
Min EPS beat(4)-76.76%
Max EPS beat(4)46.04%
EPS beat(8)6
Avg EPS beat(8)9.74%
EPS beat(12)7
Avg EPS beat(12)-1095.56%
EPS beat(16)10
Avg EPS beat(16)-821.42%
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-3.77%
Min Revenue beat(2)-7.17%
Max Revenue beat(2)-0.38%
Revenue beat(4)2
Avg Revenue beat(4)0.99%
Min Revenue beat(4)-7.17%
Max Revenue beat(4)7.25%
Revenue beat(8)4
Avg Revenue beat(8)1.83%
Revenue beat(12)5
Avg Revenue beat(12)-0.41%
Revenue beat(16)8
Avg Revenue beat(16)-0.14%
PT rev (1m)6.5%
PT rev (3m)2.65%
EPS NQ rev (1m)19.5%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-6.5%
EPS NY rev (1m)-0.93%
EPS NY rev (3m)-3.79%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)1.68%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-1.88%
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.4%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-1.16%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 2.63 | ||
| Fwd PE | N/A | ||
| P/S | 0.35 | ||
| P/FCF | 0.93 | ||
| P/OCF | 0.86 | ||
| P/B | 0.66 | ||
| P/tB | 0.68 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 2.06 |
EPS(TTM)8.32
EY37.97%
EPS(NY)-3.82
Fwd EYN/A
FCF(TTM)23.53
FCFY107.38%
OCF(TTM)25.54
OCFY116.57%
SpS62.98
BVpS33.33
TBVpS32.43
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number79
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 9.23% | ||
| ROE | 24.99% | ||
| ROCE | 17.04% | ||
| ROIC | 13.46% | ||
| ROICexc | 17.33% | ||
| ROICexgc | 17.61% | ||
| OM | 19.63% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 13.23% | ||
| GM | 24.03% | ||
| FCFM | 37.35% |
ROA(3y)8.76%
ROA(5y)18.36%
ROE(3y)7.27%
ROE(5y)63.37%
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
ROICexc(3y)N/A
ROICexc(5y)N/A
ROICexgc(3y)N/A
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)N/A
ROCE(5y)N/A
ROICexgc growth 3Y-39.31%
ROICexgc growth 5Y21.82%
ROICexc growth 3Y-39.21%
ROICexc growth 5Y23.31%
OM growth 3Y-18.26%
OM growth 5Y53.61%
PM growth 3Y-16.16%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-16.4%
GM growth 5Y32.89%
F-Score4
Asset Turnover0.7
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.12 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 2 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.62 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 18.95% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 3.2% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 3.08 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 111.06% | ||
| Profit Quality | 282.44% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.3 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.22 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.97 |
F-Score4
WACC9.55%
ROIC/WACC1.41
Cap/Depr(3y)17.11%
Cap/Depr(5y)N/A
Cap/Sales(3y)2.51%
Cap/Sales(5y)N/A
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-30.32%
EPS 3Y-22.88%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-89.08%
EPS Next Y-83.78%
EPS Next 2Y-48.8%
EPS Next 3Y-29.41%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)1.63%
Revenue growth 3Y-7.73%
Revenue growth 5Y20.62%
Sales Q2Q%-35.73%
Revenue Next Year-16.46%
Revenue Next 2Y-16.36%
Revenue Next 3Y-11.36%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y-16.25%
EBIT growth 3Y-24.58%
EBIT growth 5Y85.29%
EBIT Next Year-10.61%
EBIT Next 3Y-18.28%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y88.22%
FCF growth 3Y-10.68%
FCF growth 5Y57.03%
OCF growth 1Y59.71%
OCF growth 3Y-14.34%
OCF growth 5Y58.89%
ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV / ZIM FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to ZIM.
What is the valuation status for ZIM stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 5 / 10 to ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
How profitable is ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) stock?
ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) has a profitability rating of 6 / 10.
Can you provide the financial health for ZIM stock?
The financial health rating of ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) is 5 / 10.
How sustainable is the dividend of ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) stock?
The dividend rating of ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) is 5 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 91.47%.