We assign a fundamental rating of 4 out of 10 to VTS. VTS was compared to 207 industry peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. Both the profitability and the financial health of VTS get a neutral evaluation. Nothing too spectacular is happening here. VTS does not seem to be growing, but still is valued expensively.

Quickly go to:

1. Profitability

2. Health

3. Growth

4. Valuation

5. Dividend

1. Profitability

1.1 Basic Checks

VTS had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year VTS had a positive cash flow from operations.
The reported net income has been mixed in the past 5 years: VTS reported negative net income in multiple years.
In the past 5 years VTS always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.

1.2 Ratios

The Return On Assets of VTS (2.20%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 3.15%, VTS is in line with its industry, outperforming 40.10% of the companies in the same industry.
Looking at the Return On Invested Capital, with a value of 1.75%, VTS is doing worse than 69.08% of the companies in the same industry.
VTS had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 9.31%. This is significantly below the industry average of 21.94%.
The 3 year average ROIC (9.31%) for VTS is well above the current ROIC(1.75%). The reason for the recent decline needs to be investigated.

		Industry Rank	Sector Rank
ROA	2.2%
ROE	3.15%
ROIC	1.75%

ROA(3y)5.93%

ROA(5y)3.86%

ROE(3y)7.05%

ROE(5y)4.6%

ROIC(3y)9.31%

ROIC(5y)N/A

1.3 Margins

VTS has a Profit Margin of 7.56%. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: VTS outperforms 51.69% of its industry peers.
VTS's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
Looking at the Operating Margin, with a value of 7.06%, VTS is doing worse than 61.84% of the companies in the same industry.
VTS's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
The Gross Margin of VTS (67.94%) is better than 74.88% of its industry peers.
VTS's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.

		Industry Rank	Sector Rank
OM	7.06%
PM (TTM)	7.56%
GM	67.94%

OM growth 3Y-16.52%

OM growth 5Y-4.69%

PM growth 3Y-3.82%

PM growth 5Y-16.11%

GM growth 3Y1.44%

GM growth 5Y1.64%

More info and screens

ROA

ROE

ROIC

Operating and Profit Margin

Show most profitable peers

2. Health

2.1 Basic Checks

VTS has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is creating some value.
Compared to 1 year ago, VTS has less shares outstanding
Compared to 1 year ago, VTS has a worse debt to assets ratio.

2.2 Solvency

An Altman-Z score of 2.06 indicates that VTS is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
The Altman-Z score of VTS (2.06) is better than 67.15% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of VTS is 2.75, which is a good value as it means it would take VTS, 2.75 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 2.75, VTS is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 77.29% of the companies in the same industry.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.18 indicates that VTS is not too dependend on debt financing.
VTS has a Debt to Equity ratio of 0.18. This is in the better half of the industry: VTS outperforms 75.36% of its industry peers.

		Industry Rank	Sector Rank
Debt/Equity	0.18
Debt/FCF	2.75
Altman-Z	2.06

ROIC/WACC0.2

WACC8.82%

2.3 Liquidity

VTS has a Current Ratio of 0.85. This is a bad value and indicates that VTS is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
Looking at the Current ratio, with a value of 0.85, VTS is doing worse than 64.73% of the companies in the same industry.
A Quick Ratio of 0.85 indicates that VTS may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
VTS's Quick ratio of 0.85 is in line compared to the rest of the industry. VTS outperforms 43.48% of its industry peers.

		Industry Rank	Sector Rank
Current Ratio	0.85
Quick Ratio	0.85

More info and screens

WACC

Debt/Equity

How to determine the health of a company

Altman-Z score

Show peers with great health

3. Growth

3.1 Past

VTS shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -33.33%.
VTS shows a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been decreasing by -13.85% yearly.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 6.23% in the past year.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 7.15% on average over the past years.

EPS 1Y (TTM)-33.33%

EPS 3Y-2.03%

EPS 5Y-13.85%

EPS Q2Q%-56.52%

Revenue 1Y (TTM)6.23%

Revenue growth 3Y9.33%

Revenue growth 5Y7.15%

Sales Q2Q%15.72%

3.2 Future

The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 3.28% on average over the next years.
Based on estimates for the next years, VTS will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 0.15% on average per year.

EPS Next Y-8.18%

EPS Next 2Y-30.31%

EPS Next 3Y3.28%

EPS Next 5YN/A

Revenue Next Year15.33%

Revenue Next 2Y3.21%

Revenue Next 3Y0.15%

Revenue Next 5YN/A

3.3 Evolution

The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.

More info and screens

Find the best growth stocks

Show best growing peers

4. Valuation

4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio

With a Price/Earnings ratio of 21.83, VTS is valued on the expensive side.
The rest of the industry has a similar Price/Earnings ratio as VTS.
VTS is valuated rather cheaply when we compare the Price/Earnings ratio to 28.32, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 39.23, VTS can be considered very expensive at the moment.
60.87% of the companies in the same industry are cheaper than VTS, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 25.57, VTS is valued quite expensively.

		Industry Rank	Sector Rank
PE	21.83
Fwd PE	39.23

4.2 Price Multiples

VTS's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. VTS is cheaper than 67.63% of the companies in the same industry.
The rest of the industry has a similar Price/Free Cash Flow ratio as VTS.

		Industry Rank	Sector Rank
P/FCF	19.54
EV/EBITDA	6.52

4.3 Compensation for Growth

PEG (NY)N/A

PEG (5Y)N/A

EPS Next 2Y-30.31%

EPS Next 3Y3.28%

More info and screens

Show best valued peers

5. Dividend

5.1 Amount

VTS has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 10.68%, which is a nice return.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 3.64, VTS pays a better dividend. On top of this VTS pays more dividend than 94.20% of the companies listed in the same industry.
VTS's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 1.83.

		Industry Rank	Sector Rank
Dividend Yield	10.68%

5.2 History

VTS has paid a dividend for less than 5 years, so there is no long track record yet.

Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A

Div Incr Years1

Div Non Decr Years1

5.3 Sustainability

VTS pays out 418.47% of its income as dividend. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.

DP418.47%

EPS Next 2Y-30.31%

EPS Next 3Y3.28%

More info and screens

Find the best dividend stocks

Show peers with best dividend

VITESSE ENERGY INC / VTS FAQ

What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of VITESSE ENERGY INC (VTS) stock?

ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 4 / 10 to VTS.

Can you provide the valuation status for VITESSE ENERGY INC?

ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 2 / 10 to VITESSE ENERGY INC (VTS). This can be considered as Overvalued.

Can you provide the profitability details for VITESSE ENERGY INC?

VITESSE ENERGY INC (VTS) has a profitability rating of 4 / 10.

What are the PE and PB ratios of VITESSE ENERGY INC (VTS) stock?

The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for VITESSE ENERGY INC (VTS) is 21.83 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 1.25.

Is the dividend of VITESSE ENERGY INC sustainable?

The dividend rating of VITESSE ENERGY INC (VTS) is 4 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 418.47%.