UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC (UBER)
US90353T1007 - Common Stock
We assign a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10 to UBER. UBER was compared to 38 industry peers in the Ground Transportation industry. UBER has an excellent financial health rating, but there are some minor concerns on its profitability. UBER is growing strongly while it is still valued neutral. This is a good combination!
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
UBER had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year UBER had a positive cash flow from operations.
UBER had negative earnings in 4 of the past 5 years.
The reported operating cash flow has been mixed in the past 5 years: UBER reported negative operating cash flow in multiple years.
1.2 Ratios
Looking at the Return On Assets, with a value of 9.34%, UBER belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 81.58% of the companies in the same industry.
UBER's Return On Equity of 29.78% is amongst the best of the industry. UBER outperforms 92.11% of its industry peers.
Looking at the Return On Invested Capital, with a value of 6.71%, UBER is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 63.16% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 9.34% | ||
| ROE | 29.78% | ||
| ROIC | 6.71% |
ROA(3y)-8.29%
ROA(5y)-14.4%
ROE(3y)-37.06%
ROE(5y)-45.26%
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
UBER's Profit Margin of 10.49% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. UBER outperforms 73.68% of its industry peers.
UBER's Operating Margin of 6.39% is in line compared to the rest of the industry. UBER outperforms 50.00% of its industry peers.
With a Gross Margin value of 32.71%, UBER is not doing good in the industry: 60.53% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of UBER has declined.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 6.39% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 10.49% | ||
| GM | 32.71% |
OM growth 3YN/A
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-5.8%
GM growth 5Y-3.84%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) below the Cost of Capital (WACC), UBER is destroying value.
Compared to 1 year ago, UBER has more shares outstanding
Compared to 5 years ago, UBER has more shares outstanding
Compared to 1 year ago, UBER has an improved debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 3.23 indicates that UBER is not in any danger for bankruptcy at the moment.
UBER has a Altman-Z score of 3.23. This is in the better half of the industry: UBER outperforms 71.05% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of UBER is 1.84, which is an excellent value as it means it would take UBER, only 1.84 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
UBER has a Debt to FCF ratio of 1.84. This is amongst the best in the industry. UBER outperforms 89.47% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.74 indicates that UBER is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
The Debt to Equity ratio of UBER (0.74) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
Even though the debt/equity ratio score it not favorable for UBER, it has very limited outstanding debt, so we won't put too much weight on the DE evaluation.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.74 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 1.84 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.23 |
ROIC/WACC0.76
WACC8.88%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.41 indicates that UBER should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
Looking at the Current ratio, with a value of 1.41, UBER is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 73.68% of the companies in the same industry.
UBER has a Quick Ratio of 1.41. This is a normal value and indicates that UBER is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
The Quick ratio of UBER (1.41) is better than 76.32% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.41 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.41 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
UBER shows a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has been growing by 312.24%, which is quite impressive.
Looking at the last year, UBER shows a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue has grown by 16.70% in the last year.
UBER shows a strong growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 29.01% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)312.24%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%1100%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)16.7%
Revenue growth 3Y49.58%
Revenue growth 5Y29.01%
Sales Q2Q%20.4%
3.2 Future
UBER is expected to show a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 59.01% yearly.
Based on estimates for the next years, UBER will show a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 14.25% on average per year.
EPS Next Y111.02%
EPS Next 2Y67.38%
EPS Next 3Y59.2%
EPS Next 5Y59.01%
Revenue Next Year18.01%
Revenue Next 2Y16.87%
Revenue Next 3Y16.59%
Revenue Next 5Y14.25%
3.3 Evolution
Although the future Revenue growth is still strong, it is not able to hold up the even more excellent growth rate of the past years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
With a Price/Earnings ratio of 33.84, UBER can be considered very expensive at the moment.
UBER's Price/Earnings ratio is in line with the industry average.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of UBER to the average of the S&P500 Index (28.53), we can say UBER is valued inline with the index average.
With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 28.37, UBER can be considered very expensive at the moment.
UBER's Price/Forward Earnings is on the same level as the industry average.
UBER's Price/Forward Earnings ratio indicates a valuation a bit more expensive than the S&P500 average which is at 23.40.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 33.84 | ||
| Fwd PE | 28.37 |
4.2 Price Multiples
78.95% of the companies in the same industry are cheaper than UBER, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio of UBER indicates a rather cheap valuation: UBER is cheaper than 84.21% of the companies listed in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 24.17 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 44.49 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
UBER's low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
A more expensive valuation may be justified as UBER's earnings are expected to grow with 59.20% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)0.3
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y67.38%
EPS Next 3Y59.2%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
UBER does not give a dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
NYSE:UBER (11/18/2024, 12:29:10 PM)
68.365
-4.89 (-6.67%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupTransportation
GICS IndustryGround Transportation
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners
Inst Owner Change
Ins Owners
Ins Owner Change
Market Cap143.96B
Analysts
Price Target
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
Dividend Growth(5Y)
DP
Div Incr Years
Div Non Decr Years
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)
Avg EPS beat(2)
Min EPS beat(2)
Max EPS beat(2)
EPS beat(4)
Avg EPS beat(4)
Min EPS beat(4)
Max EPS beat(4)
EPS beat(8)
Avg EPS beat(8)
EPS beat(12)
Avg EPS beat(12)
EPS beat(16)
Avg EPS beat(16)
Revenue beat(2)
Avg Revenue beat(2)
Min Revenue beat(2)
Max Revenue beat(2)
Revenue beat(4)
Avg Revenue beat(4)
Min Revenue beat(4)
Max Revenue beat(4)
Revenue beat(8)
Avg Revenue beat(8)
Revenue beat(12)
Avg Revenue beat(12)
Revenue beat(16)
Avg Revenue beat(16)
PT rev (1m)
PT rev (3m)
EPS NQ rev (1m)
EPS NQ rev (3m)
EPS NY rev (1m)
EPS NY rev (3m)
Revenue NQ rev (1m)
Revenue NQ rev (3m)
Revenue NY rev (1m)
Revenue NY rev (3m)
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 33.84 | ||
| Fwd PE | 28.37 | ||
| P/S | |||
| P/FCF | |||
| P/OCF | |||
| P/B | |||
| P/tB | |||
| EV/EBITDA |
EPS(TTM)
EY
EPS(NY)
Fwd EY
FCF(TTM)
FCFY
OCF(TTM)
OCFY
SpS
BVpS
TBVpS
PEG (NY)0.3
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 9.34% | ||
| ROE | 29.78% | ||
| ROCE | |||
| ROIC | |||
| ROICexc | |||
| ROICexgc | |||
| OM | 6.39% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 10.49% | ||
| GM | 32.71% | ||
| FCFM |
ROA(3y)
ROA(5y)
ROE(3y)
ROE(5y)
ROIC(3y)
ROIC(5y)
ROICexc(3y)
ROICexc(5y)
ROICexgc(3y)
ROICexgc(5y)
ROCE(3y)
ROCE(5y)
ROICexcg growth 3Y
ROICexcg growth 5Y
ROICexc growth 3Y
ROICexc growth 5Y
OM growth 3Y
OM growth 5Y
PM growth 3Y
PM growth 5Y
GM growth 3Y
GM growth 5Y
F-Score
Asset Turnover0.89
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.74 | ||
| Debt/FCF | |||
| Debt/EBITDA | |||
| Cap/Depr | |||
| Cap/Sales | |||
| Interest Coverage | |||
| Cash Conversion | |||
| Profit Quality | |||
| Current Ratio | 1.41 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.41 | ||
| Altman-Z |
F-Score
WACC
ROIC/WACC
Cap/Depr(3y)
Cap/Depr(5y)
Cap/Sales(3y)
Cap/Sales(5y)
Profit Quality(3y)
Profit Quality(5y)
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)312.24%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5Y
EPS Q2Q%
EPS Next Y111.02%
EPS Next 2Y
EPS Next 3Y
EPS Next 5Y
Revenue 1Y (TTM)16.7%
Revenue growth 3Y49.58%
Revenue growth 5Y
Sales Q2Q%
Revenue Next Year
Revenue Next 2Y
Revenue Next 3Y
Revenue Next 5Y
EBIT growth 1Y
EBIT growth 3Y
EBIT growth 5Y
EBIT Next Year
EBIT Next 3Y
EBIT Next 5Y
FCF growth 1Y
FCF growth 3Y
FCF growth 5Y
OCF growth 1Y
OCF growth 3Y
OCF growth 5Y