18.7 USD
+0.68 (+3.77%)
At close: Feb 11, 2026
18.7 USD
0 (0%)
After Hours: 2/11/2026, 8:00:01 PM
TWIN gets a fundamental rating of 4 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 131 industry peers in the Machinery industry. Both the profitability and financial health of TWIN have multiple concerns. TWIN is not valued too expensively and it also shows a decent growth rate.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
- In the past year TWIN was profitable.
- TWIN had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
- The reported net income has been mixed in the past 5 years: TWIN reported negative net income in multiple years.
- TWIN had a positive operating cash flow in 4 of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
- TWIN has a worse Return On Assets (0.10%) than 67.94% of its industry peers.
- TWIN's Return On Equity of 0.22% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. TWIN is outperformed by 65.65% of its industry peers.
- TWIN has a Return On Invested Capital of 4.66%. This is in the lower half of the industry: TWIN underperforms 61.83% of its industry peers.
- The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for TWIN is significantly below the industry average of 10.21%.
- The last Return On Invested Capital (4.66%) for TWIN is above the 3 year average (4.31%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.1% | ||
| ROE | 0.22% | ||
| ROIC | 4.66% |
ROA(3y)2.19%
ROA(5y)-0.08%
ROE(3y)4.37%
ROE(5y)-0.33%
ROIC(3y)4.31%
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
- With a Profit Margin value of 0.10%, TWIN is not doing good in the industry: 67.18% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
- Looking at the Operating Margin, with a value of 4.09%, TWIN is doing worse than 65.65% of the companies in the same industry.
- TWIN's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
- The Gross Margin of TWIN (28.16%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
- TWIN's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 4.09% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 0.1% | ||
| GM | 28.16% |
OM growth 3Y-6.57%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-1.33%
GM growth 5Y3.81%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
- TWIN has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is destroying value.
- The number of shares outstanding for TWIN has been increased compared to 1 year ago.
- The number of shares outstanding for TWIN has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
- TWIN has a worse debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
- An Altman-Z score of 2.77 indicates that TWIN is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
- The Altman-Z score of TWIN (2.77) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
- The Debt to FCF ratio of TWIN is 10.88, which is on the high side as it means it would take TWIN, 10.88 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
- TWIN has a worse Debt to FCF ratio (10.88) than 60.31% of its industry peers.
- TWIN has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.29. This is a healthy value indicating a solid balance between debt and equity.
- Looking at the Debt to Equity ratio, with a value of 0.29, TWIN is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 64.89% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.29 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 10.88 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.77 |
ROIC/WACC0.49
WACC9.54%
2.3 Liquidity
- A Current Ratio of 2.08 indicates that TWIN has no problem at all paying its short term obligations.
- With a Current ratio value of 2.08, TWIN perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 51.91% of the companies in the same industry.
- A Quick Ratio of 0.79 indicates that TWIN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
- TWIN has a worse Quick ratio (0.79) than 76.34% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.08 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.79 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
- The Earnings Per Share has grown by an impressive 226.09% over the past year.
- TWIN shows quite a strong growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 15.45%.
- Measured over the past years, TWIN shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 6.66% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)226.09%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%2114.29%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)15.45%
Revenue growth 3Y11.94%
Revenue growth 5Y6.66%
Sales Q2Q%0.29%
3.2 Future
- The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 244.03% on average over the next years. This is a very strong growth
- Based on estimates for the next years, TWIN will show a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 8.72% on average per year.
EPS Next Y726.57%
EPS Next 2Y244.03%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year9.01%
Revenue Next 2Y8.72%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
- When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- With a Price/Earnings ratio of 12.47, TWIN is valued correctly.
- Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of TWIN indicates a rather cheap valuation: TWIN is cheaper than 94.66% of the companies listed in the same industry.
- Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio of 28.23, TWIN is valued rather cheaply.
- Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 13.58, the valuation of TWIN can be described as correct.
- 91.60% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than TWIN, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
- The average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio is at 28.01. TWIN is valued rather cheaply when compared to this.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 12.47 | ||
| Fwd PE | 13.58 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- 86.26% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than TWIN, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
- Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, TWIN is valued a bit more expensive than 62.60% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 58.95 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 10.06 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- TWIN's low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
- TWIN's earnings are expected to grow with 244.03% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)0.02
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y244.03%
EPS Next 3YN/A
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
- TWIN has a yearly dividend return of 0.89%, which is pretty low.
- Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 1.14, TWIN pays a bit more dividend than its industry peers.
- With a Dividend Yield of 0.89, TWIN pays less dividend than the S&P500 average, which is at 1.79.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.89% |
5.2 History
- The dividend of TWIN decreases each year by -14.70%.
- TWIN has been paying a dividend for at least 10 years, so it has a reliable track record.
- The dividend of TWIN decreased recently.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-14.7%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
5.3 Sustainability
- 647.73% of the earnings are spent on dividend by TWIN. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
DP647.73%
EPS Next 2Y244.03%
EPS Next 3YN/A
18.7
+0.68 (+3.77%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupCapital Goods
GICS IndustryMachinery
Earnings (Last)02-04 2026-02-04/bmo
Earnings (Next)05-05 2026-05-05
Inst Owners63.07%
Inst Owner Change0.95%
Ins Owners21.1%
Ins Owner Change-3.07%
Market Cap269.65M
Revenue(TTM)340.74M
Net Income(TTM)352.00K
Analysts82.86
Price Target24.48 (30.91%)
Short Float %0.33%
Short Ratio1.25
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.89% |
Yearly Dividend0.16
Dividend Growth(5Y)-14.7%
DP647.73%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
Ex-Date02-18 2026-02-18 (0.04)
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)0
Avg EPS beat(2)-179.19%
Min EPS beat(2)-296.08%
Max EPS beat(2)-62.29%
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)1
Avg Revenue beat(2)-0.19%
Min Revenue beat(2)-1.97%
Max Revenue beat(2)1.59%
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)37.14%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-52.38%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-52.38%
EPS NY rev (1m)-19.63%
EPS NY rev (3m)-23.21%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)0%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 12.47 | ||
| Fwd PE | 13.58 | ||
| P/S | 0.78 | ||
| P/FCF | 58.95 | ||
| P/OCF | 12.96 | ||
| P/B | 1.68 | ||
| P/tB | 1.86 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 10.06 |
EPS(TTM)1.5
EY8.02%
EPS(NY)1.38
Fwd EY7.36%
FCF(TTM)0.32
FCFY1.7%
OCF(TTM)1.44
OCFY7.71%
SpS24.12
BVpS11.12
TBVpS10.05
PEG (NY)0.02
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number19.37
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.1% | ||
| ROE | 0.22% | ||
| ROCE | 5.9% | ||
| ROIC | 4.66% | ||
| ROICexc | 4.95% | ||
| ROICexgc | 5.31% | ||
| OM | 4.09% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 0.1% | ||
| GM | 28.16% | ||
| FCFM | 1.31% |
ROA(3y)2.19%
ROA(5y)-0.08%
ROE(3y)4.37%
ROE(5y)-0.33%
ROIC(3y)4.31%
ROIC(5y)N/A
ROICexc(3y)4.68%
ROICexc(5y)N/A
ROICexgc(3y)5.04%
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)5.46%
ROCE(5y)N/A
ROICexgc growth 3Y-0.52%
ROICexgc growth 5YN/A
ROICexc growth 3Y-0.7%
ROICexc growth 5YN/A
OM growth 3Y-6.57%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-1.33%
GM growth 5Y3.81%
F-Score4
Asset Turnover0.96
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.29 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 10.88 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.56 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 107.27% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 4.66% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 70.86% | ||
| Profit Quality | 1299.43% | ||
| Current Ratio | 2.08 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.79 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.77 |
F-Score4
WACC9.54%
ROIC/WACC0.49
Cap/Depr(3y)91.19%
Cap/Depr(5y)72.56%
Cap/Sales(3y)3.42%
Cap/Sales(5y)2.85%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)226.09%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%2114.29%
EPS Next Y726.57%
EPS Next 2Y244.03%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)15.45%
Revenue growth 3Y11.94%
Revenue growth 5Y6.66%
Sales Q2Q%0.29%
Revenue Next Year9.01%
Revenue Next 2Y8.72%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y20.41%
EBIT growth 3Y4.58%
EBIT growth 5YN/A
EBIT Next Year150%
EBIT Next 3YN/A
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-80.97%
FCF growth 3YN/A
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y-37.73%
OCF growth 3YN/A
OCF growth 5Y21.33%
TWIN DISC INC / TWIN FAQ
What is the fundamental rating for TWIN stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 4 / 10 to TWIN.
Can you provide the valuation status for TWIN DISC INC?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 6 / 10 to TWIN DISC INC (TWIN). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
How profitable is TWIN DISC INC (TWIN) stock?
TWIN DISC INC (TWIN) has a profitability rating of 3 / 10.
What is the valuation of TWIN DISC INC based on its PE and PB ratios?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for TWIN DISC INC (TWIN) is 12.47 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 1.68.
How financially healthy is TWIN DISC INC?
The financial health rating of TWIN DISC INC (TWIN) is 3 / 10.