16.99 USD
-0.13 (-0.76%)
Overall TWIN gets a fundamental rating of 4 out of 10. We evaluated TWIN against 132 industry peers in the Machinery industry. TWIN has a bad profitability rating. Also its financial health evaluation is rather negative. TWIN has a decent growth rate and is not valued too expensively.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year TWIN was profitable.
In the past year TWIN had a positive cash flow from operations.
The reported net income has been mixed in the past 5 years: TWIN reported negative net income in multiple years.
Of the past 5 years TWIN 4 years had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
With a Return On Assets value of 0.10%, TWIN is not doing good in the industry: 67.42% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
TWIN's Return On Equity of 0.22% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. TWIN is outperformed by 65.91% of its industry peers.
TWIN has a worse Return On Invested Capital (4.66%) than 61.36% of its industry peers.
The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for TWIN is significantly below the industry average of 10.27%.
The 3 year average ROIC (4.31%) for TWIN is below the current ROIC(4.66%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.1% | ||
| ROE | 0.22% | ||
| ROIC | 4.66% |
ROA(3y)2.19%
ROA(5y)-0.08%
ROE(3y)4.37%
ROE(5y)-0.33%
ROIC(3y)4.31%
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
Looking at the Profit Margin, with a value of 0.10%, TWIN is doing worse than 66.67% of the companies in the same industry.
The Operating Margin of TWIN (4.09%) is worse than 65.15% of its industry peers.
TWIN's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
TWIN has a Gross Margin (28.16%) which is in line with its industry peers.
TWIN's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 4.09% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 0.1% | ||
| GM | 28.16% |
OM growth 3Y-6.57%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-1.33%
GM growth 5Y3.81%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) below the Cost of Capital (WACC), TWIN is destroying value.
The number of shares outstanding for TWIN has been increased compared to 1 year ago.
The number of shares outstanding for TWIN has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
TWIN has a worse debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
TWIN has an Altman-Z score of 2.72. This is not the best score and indicates that TWIN is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
Looking at the Altman-Z score, with a value of 2.72, TWIN is in line with its industry, outperforming 43.94% of the companies in the same industry.
TWIN has a debt to FCF ratio of 10.88. This is a negative value and a sign of low solvency as TWIN would need 10.88 years to pay back of all of its debts.
The Debt to FCF ratio of TWIN (10.88) is worse than 60.61% of its industry peers.
TWIN has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.29. This is a healthy value indicating a solid balance between debt and equity.
TWIN has a Debt to Equity ratio of 0.29. This is in the better half of the industry: TWIN outperforms 65.91% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.29 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 10.88 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.72 |
ROIC/WACC0.49
WACC9.42%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 2.08 indicates that TWIN has no problem at all paying its short term obligations.
With a Current ratio value of 2.08, TWIN perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 51.52% of the companies in the same industry.
A Quick Ratio of 0.79 indicates that TWIN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
TWIN has a worse Quick ratio (0.79) than 77.27% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.08 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.79 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
TWIN shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -95.65%.
The Revenue has grown by 14.24% in the past year. This is quite good.
Measured over the past years, TWIN shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 6.66% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-95.65%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%80%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)14.24%
Revenue growth 3Y11.94%
Revenue growth 5Y6.66%
Sales Q2Q%9.73%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, TWIN will show a very strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 251.36% on average per year.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 8.72% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
EPS Next Y879.57%
EPS Next 2Y251.36%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year9.01%
Revenue Next 2Y8.72%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
TWIN is valuated quite expensively with a Price/Earnings ratio of 849.50.
TWIN's Price/Earnings ratio is a bit more expensive when compared to the industry. TWIN is more expensive than 71.97% of the companies in the same industry.
TWIN's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a rather expensive valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 26.57.
With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 11.73, the valuation of TWIN can be described as very reasonable.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, TWIN is valued cheaply inside the industry as 92.42% of the companies are valued more expensively.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of TWIN to the average of the S&P500 Index (24.04), we can say TWIN is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 849.5 | ||
| Fwd PE | 11.73 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, TWIN is valued cheaply inside the industry as 84.09% of the companies are valued more expensively.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, TWIN is valued a bit more expensive than the industry average as 63.64% of the companies are valued more cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 53.45 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 9.54 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
A more expensive valuation may be justified as TWIN's earnings are expected to grow with 251.36% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)0.97
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y251.36%
EPS Next 3YN/A
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
TWIN has a yearly dividend return of 0.93%, which is pretty low.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 0.98, TWIN pays a bit more dividend than its industry peers.
With a Dividend Yield of 0.93, TWIN pays less dividend than the S&P500 average, which is at 2.00.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.93% |
5.2 History
The dividend of TWIN decreases each year by -14.70%.
TWIN has paid a dividend for at least 10 years, which is a reliable track record.
TWIN has decreased its dividend recently.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-14.7%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
5.3 Sustainability
647.73% of the earnings are spent on dividend by TWIN. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
DP647.73%
EPS Next 2Y251.36%
EPS Next 3YN/A
NASDAQ:TWIN (12/26/2025, 8:19:31 PM)
16.99
-0.13 (-0.76%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupCapital Goods
GICS IndustryMachinery
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners63.33%
Inst Owner Change0.66%
Ins Owners21.1%
Ins Owner Change4.95%
Market Cap244.49M
Revenue(TTM)347.84M
Net Income(TTM)352.00K
Analysts82.86
Price Target24.48 (44.08%)
Short Float %0.26%
Short Ratio0.8
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.93% |
Yearly Dividend0.16
Dividend Growth(5Y)-14.7%
DP647.73%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)0
Avg EPS beat(2)-179.19%
Min EPS beat(2)-296.08%
Max EPS beat(2)-62.29%
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)1
Avg Revenue beat(2)-0.19%
Min Revenue beat(2)-1.97%
Max Revenue beat(2)1.59%
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)100%
EPS NQ rev (1m)0%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-19.23%
EPS NY rev (1m)-4.46%
EPS NY rev (3m)-4.46%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)0%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 849.5 | ||
| Fwd PE | 11.73 | ||
| P/S | 0.7 | ||
| P/FCF | 53.45 | ||
| P/OCF | 11.75 | ||
| P/B | 1.53 | ||
| P/tB | 1.69 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 9.54 |
EPS(TTM)0.02
EY0.12%
EPS(NY)1.45
Fwd EY8.53%
FCF(TTM)0.32
FCFY1.87%
OCF(TTM)1.45
OCFY8.51%
SpS24.17
BVpS11.14
TBVpS10.07
PEG (NY)0.97
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number2.24
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.1% | ||
| ROE | 0.22% | ||
| ROCE | 5.9% | ||
| ROIC | 4.66% | ||
| ROICexc | 4.95% | ||
| ROICexgc | 5.31% | ||
| OM | 4.09% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 0.1% | ||
| GM | 28.16% | ||
| FCFM | 1.31% |
ROA(3y)2.19%
ROA(5y)-0.08%
ROE(3y)4.37%
ROE(5y)-0.33%
ROIC(3y)4.31%
ROIC(5y)N/A
ROICexc(3y)4.68%
ROICexc(5y)N/A
ROICexgc(3y)5.04%
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)5.46%
ROCE(5y)N/A
ROICexgc growth 3Y-0.52%
ROICexgc growth 5YN/A
ROICexc growth 3Y-0.7%
ROICexc growth 5YN/A
OM growth 3Y-6.57%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-1.33%
GM growth 5Y3.81%
F-Score4
Asset Turnover0.96
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.29 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 10.88 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.56 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 107.27% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 4.66% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 70.86% | ||
| Profit Quality | 1299.43% | ||
| Current Ratio | 2.08 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.79 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.72 |
F-Score4
WACC9.42%
ROIC/WACC0.49
Cap/Depr(3y)91.19%
Cap/Depr(5y)72.56%
Cap/Sales(3y)3.42%
Cap/Sales(5y)2.85%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-95.65%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%80%
EPS Next Y879.57%
EPS Next 2Y251.36%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)14.24%
Revenue growth 3Y11.94%
Revenue growth 5Y6.66%
Sales Q2Q%9.73%
Revenue Next Year9.01%
Revenue Next 2Y8.72%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y20.41%
EBIT growth 3Y4.58%
EBIT growth 5YN/A
EBIT Next Year183.78%
EBIT Next 3YN/A
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-80.97%
FCF growth 3YN/A
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y-37.73%
OCF growth 3YN/A
OCF growth 5Y21.33%
TWIN DISC INC / TWIN FAQ
What is the fundamental rating for TWIN stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 4 / 10 to TWIN.
What is the valuation status of TWIN DISC INC (TWIN) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 5 / 10 to TWIN DISC INC (TWIN). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
How profitable is TWIN DISC INC (TWIN) stock?
TWIN DISC INC (TWIN) has a profitability rating of 3 / 10.
What is the financial health of TWIN DISC INC (TWIN) stock?
The financial health rating of TWIN DISC INC (TWIN) is 3 / 10.
Can you provide the expected EPS growth for TWIN stock?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of TWIN DISC INC (TWIN) is expected to grow by 879.57% in the next year.