17.09 USD
-0.39 (-2.23%)
Overall TWIN gets a fundamental rating of 4 out of 10. We evaluated TWIN against 132 industry peers in the Machinery industry. Both the profitability and financial health of TWIN have multiple concerns. TWIN is not valued too expensively and it also shows a decent growth rate.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
TWIN had positive earnings in the past year.
TWIN had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
The reported net income has been mixed in the past 5 years: TWIN reported negative net income in multiple years.
TWIN had a positive operating cash flow in 4 of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
With a Return On Assets value of 0.10%, TWIN is not doing good in the industry: 68.18% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
With a Return On Equity value of 0.22%, TWIN is not doing good in the industry: 65.91% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
With a Return On Invested Capital value of 4.66%, TWIN is not doing good in the industry: 62.12% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for TWIN is significantly below the industry average of 10.25%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (4.66%) for TWIN is above the 3 year average (4.31%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.1% | ||
| ROE | 0.22% | ||
| ROIC | 4.66% |
ROA(3y)2.19%
ROA(5y)-0.08%
ROE(3y)4.37%
ROE(5y)-0.33%
ROIC(3y)4.31%
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
The Profit Margin of TWIN (0.10%) is worse than 67.42% of its industry peers.
The Operating Margin of TWIN (4.09%) is worse than 65.91% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of TWIN has declined.
With a Gross Margin value of 28.16%, TWIN perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 44.70% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of TWIN has grown nicely.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 4.09% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 0.1% | ||
| GM | 28.16% |
OM growth 3Y-6.57%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-1.33%
GM growth 5Y3.81%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), so TWIN is destroying value.
Compared to 1 year ago, TWIN has more shares outstanding
The number of shares outstanding for TWIN has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, TWIN has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 2.74 indicates that TWIN is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
TWIN has a Altman-Z score of 2.74. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: TWIN outperforms 46.21% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of TWIN is 10.88, which is on the high side as it means it would take TWIN, 10.88 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
TWIN has a Debt to FCF ratio (10.88) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.29 indicates that TWIN is not too dependend on debt financing.
With a decent Debt to Equity ratio value of 0.29, TWIN is doing good in the industry, outperforming 65.91% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.29 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 10.88 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.74 |
ROIC/WACC0.49
WACC9.45%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 2.08 indicates that TWIN has no problem at all paying its short term obligations.
TWIN has a Current ratio (2.08) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
TWIN has a Quick Ratio of 2.08. This is a bad value and indicates that TWIN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
With a Quick ratio value of 0.79, TWIN is not doing good in the industry: 78.03% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.08 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.79 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for TWIN have decreased strongly by -95.65% in the last year.
TWIN shows quite a strong growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 14.24%.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 6.66% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-95.65%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%80%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)14.24%
Revenue growth 3Y11.94%
Revenue growth 5Y6.66%
Sales Q2Q%9.73%
3.2 Future
TWIN is expected to show a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 251.36% yearly.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 8.72% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
EPS Next Y879.57%
EPS Next 2Y251.36%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year9.01%
Revenue Next 2Y8.72%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
The Revenue growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
TWIN is valuated quite expensively with a Price/Earnings ratio of 854.50.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, TWIN is valued a bit more expensive than the industry average as 72.73% of the companies are valued more cheaply.
TWIN is valuated expensively when we compare the Price/Earnings ratio to 27.25, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
TWIN is valuated reasonably with a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 11.80.
TWIN's Price/Forward Earnings ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. TWIN is cheaper than 93.18% of the companies in the same industry.
The average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio is at 23.98. TWIN is valued rather cheaply when compared to this.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 854.5 | ||
| Fwd PE | 11.8 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, TWIN is valued cheaply inside the industry as 84.09% of the companies are valued more expensively.
TWIN's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is a bit more expensive when compared to the industry. TWIN is more expensive than 63.64% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 53.77 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 9.78 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
TWIN's earnings are expected to grow with 251.36% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)0.97
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y251.36%
EPS Next 3YN/A
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a yearly dividend of 0.92%, TWIN is not a good candidate for dividend investing.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 0.80, TWIN pays a bit more dividend than its industry peers.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.92, TWIN's dividend is way lower than the S&P500 average.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.92% |
5.2 History
The dividend of TWIN decreases each year by -14.70%.
TWIN has been paying a dividend for at least 10 years, so it has a reliable track record.
The dividend of TWIN decreased recently.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-14.7%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
5.3 Sustainability
647.73% of the earnings are spent on dividend by TWIN. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
DP647.73%
EPS Next 2Y251.36%
EPS Next 3YN/A
NASDAQ:TWIN (1/12/2026, 8:00:02 PM)
17.09
-0.39 (-2.23%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupCapital Goods
GICS IndustryMachinery
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners63.07%
Inst Owner Change0%
Ins Owners21.1%
Ins Owner Change4.95%
Market Cap245.93M
Revenue(TTM)347.84M
Net Income(TTM)352.00K
Analysts82.86
Price Target24.48 (43.24%)
Short Float %0.27%
Short Ratio0.87
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.92% |
Yearly Dividend0.16
Dividend Growth(5Y)-14.7%
DP647.73%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)0
Avg EPS beat(2)-179.19%
Min EPS beat(2)-296.08%
Max EPS beat(2)-62.29%
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)1
Avg Revenue beat(2)-0.19%
Min Revenue beat(2)-1.97%
Max Revenue beat(2)1.59%
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)37.14%
EPS NQ rev (1m)0%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-34.37%
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)-4.46%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)0%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 854.5 | ||
| Fwd PE | 11.8 | ||
| P/S | 0.71 | ||
| P/FCF | 53.77 | ||
| P/OCF | 11.82 | ||
| P/B | 1.53 | ||
| P/tB | 1.7 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 9.78 |
EPS(TTM)0.02
EY0.12%
EPS(NY)1.45
Fwd EY8.48%
FCF(TTM)0.32
FCFY1.86%
OCF(TTM)1.45
OCFY8.46%
SpS24.17
BVpS11.14
TBVpS10.07
PEG (NY)0.97
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number2.24
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.1% | ||
| ROE | 0.22% | ||
| ROCE | 5.9% | ||
| ROIC | 4.66% | ||
| ROICexc | 4.95% | ||
| ROICexgc | 5.31% | ||
| OM | 4.09% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 0.1% | ||
| GM | 28.16% | ||
| FCFM | 1.31% |
ROA(3y)2.19%
ROA(5y)-0.08%
ROE(3y)4.37%
ROE(5y)-0.33%
ROIC(3y)4.31%
ROIC(5y)N/A
ROICexc(3y)4.68%
ROICexc(5y)N/A
ROICexgc(3y)5.04%
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)5.46%
ROCE(5y)N/A
ROICexgc growth 3Y-0.52%
ROICexgc growth 5YN/A
ROICexc growth 3Y-0.7%
ROICexc growth 5YN/A
OM growth 3Y-6.57%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-1.33%
GM growth 5Y3.81%
F-Score4
Asset Turnover0.96
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.29 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 10.88 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.56 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 107.27% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 4.66% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 70.86% | ||
| Profit Quality | 1299.43% | ||
| Current Ratio | 2.08 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.79 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.74 |
F-Score4
WACC9.45%
ROIC/WACC0.49
Cap/Depr(3y)91.19%
Cap/Depr(5y)72.56%
Cap/Sales(3y)3.42%
Cap/Sales(5y)2.85%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-95.65%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%80%
EPS Next Y879.57%
EPS Next 2Y251.36%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)14.24%
Revenue growth 3Y11.94%
Revenue growth 5Y6.66%
Sales Q2Q%9.73%
Revenue Next Year9.01%
Revenue Next 2Y8.72%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y20.41%
EBIT growth 3Y4.58%
EBIT growth 5YN/A
EBIT Next Year183.78%
EBIT Next 3YN/A
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-80.97%
FCF growth 3YN/A
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y-37.73%
OCF growth 3YN/A
OCF growth 5Y21.33%
TWIN DISC INC / TWIN FAQ
What is the fundamental rating for TWIN stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 4 / 10 to TWIN.
Can you provide the valuation status for TWIN DISC INC?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 5 / 10 to TWIN DISC INC (TWIN). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
How profitable is TWIN DISC INC (TWIN) stock?
TWIN DISC INC (TWIN) has a profitability rating of 3 / 10.
What is the valuation of TWIN DISC INC based on its PE and PB ratios?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for TWIN DISC INC (TWIN) is 854.5 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 1.53.
How financially healthy is TWIN DISC INC?
The financial health rating of TWIN DISC INC (TWIN) is 3 / 10.