124.02 USD
-0.82 (-0.66%)
124.02 USD
0 (0%)
Overall TRI gets a fundamental rating of 6 out of 10. We evaluated TRI against 88 industry peers in the Professional Services industry. TRI scores excellent on profitability, but there are some minor concerns on its financial health. TRI is valied quite expensively at the moment, while it does show a decent growth rate.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
- In the past year TRI was profitable.
- In the past year TRI had a positive cash flow from operations.
- TRI had positive earnings in each of the past 5 years.
- In the past 5 years TRI always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
1.2 Ratios
- TRI has a better Return On Assets (9.82%) than 79.55% of its industry peers.
- TRI's Return On Equity of 14.91% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. TRI outperforms 67.05% of its industry peers.
- TRI's Return On Invested Capital of 11.73% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. TRI outperforms 76.14% of its industry peers.
- The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for TRI is below the industry average of 11.85%.
- The 3 year average ROIC (9.36%) for TRI is below the current ROIC(11.73%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 9.82% | ||
| ROE | 14.91% | ||
| ROIC | 11.73% |
ROA(3y)10.84%
ROA(5y)12.89%
ROE(3y)17.97%
ROE(5y)21.25%
ROIC(3y)9.36%
ROIC(5y)7.9%
1.3 Margins
- TRI has a better Profit Margin (23.77%) than 93.18% of its industry peers.
- In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of TRI has grown nicely.
- The Operating Margin of TRI (29.45%) is better than 96.59% of its industry peers.
- TRI's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 29.45% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 23.77% | ||
| GM | N/A |
OM growth 3Y14.62%
OM growth 5Y14.34%
PM growth 3Y-30.27%
PM growth 5Y2.82%
GM growth 3YN/A
GM growth 5YN/A
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
- TRI has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is creating some value.
- Compared to 1 year ago, TRI has less shares outstanding
- Compared to 5 years ago, TRI has less shares outstanding
- TRI has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
- An Altman-Z score of 6.87 indicates that TRI is not in any danger for bankruptcy at the moment.
- Looking at the Altman-Z score, with a value of 6.87, TRI belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 89.77% of the companies in the same industry.
- The Debt to FCF ratio of TRI is 1.33, which is an excellent value as it means it would take TRI, only 1.33 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
- TRI has a Debt to FCF ratio of 1.33. This is in the better half of the industry: TRI outperforms 77.27% of its industry peers.
- A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.16 indicates that TRI is not too dependend on debt financing.
- Looking at the Debt to Equity ratio, with a value of 0.16, TRI is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 65.91% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.16 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 1.33 | ||
| Altman-Z | 6.87 |
ROIC/WACC1.5
WACC7.81%
2.3 Liquidity
- TRI has a Current Ratio of 0.61. This is a bad value and indicates that TRI is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
- TRI has a Current ratio of 0.61. This is amonst the worse of the industry: TRI underperforms 86.36% of its industry peers.
- A Quick Ratio of 0.61 indicates that TRI may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
- TRI has a Quick ratio of 0.61. This is amonst the worse of the industry: TRI underperforms 85.23% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.61 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.61 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
- TRI shows a small growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has grown by 2.94%.
- TRI shows a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been growing by 23.02% yearly.
- Looking at the last year, TRI shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has grown by 2.96% in the last year.
- TRI shows a small growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 4.21% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)2.94%
EPS 3Y23.06%
EPS 5Y23.02%
EPS Q2Q%6.25%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)2.96%
Revenue growth 3Y4.57%
Revenue growth 5Y4.21%
Sales Q2Q%3.36%
3.2 Future
- Based on estimates for the next years, TRI will show a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 10.21% on average per year.
- The Revenue is expected to grow by 7.25% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y4.36%
EPS Next 2Y9.33%
EPS Next 3Y10.66%
EPS Next 5Y10.21%
Revenue Next Year2.96%
Revenue Next 2Y5.32%
Revenue Next 3Y6.35%
Revenue Next 5Y7.25%
3.3 Evolution
- The estimated forward EPS growth is still strong, although it is decreasing when compared to the stronger growth in the past years.
- When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- Based on the Price/Earnings ratio of 32.21, the valuation of TRI can be described as expensive.
- TRI's Price/Earnings is on the same level as the industry average.
- TRI's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a similar valuation than the S&P500 average which is at 27.38.
- With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 27.52, TRI can be considered very expensive at the moment.
- TRI's Price/Forward Earnings is on the same level as the industry average.
- TRI is valuated at similar levels of the S&P average when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 24.29, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 32.21 | ||
| Fwd PE | 27.52 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- TRI's Enterprise Value to EBITDA is on the same level as the industry average.
- TRI's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is in line with the industry average.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 30.28 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 18.43 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates TRI does not grow enough to justify the current Price/Earnings ratio.
- The decent profitability rating of TRI may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)7.39
PEG (5Y)1.4
EPS Next 2Y9.33%
EPS Next 3Y10.66%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
- With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 1.69%, TRI has a reasonable but not impressive dividend return.
- In the last 3 months the price of TRI has falen by -21.77%. A price decline artificially increases the dividend yield. It may be a sign investors do not expect the dividend to last.
- TRI's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 1.41. TRI pays more dividend than 80.68% of the companies in the same industry.
- TRI's Dividend Yield is comparable with the S&P500 average which is at 1.85.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.69% |
5.2 History
- On average, the dividend of TRI grows each year by 8.41%, which is quite nice.
- TRI has been paying a dividend for at least 10 years, so it has a reliable track record.
Dividend Growth(5Y)8.41%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
- TRI pays out 58.13% of its income as dividend. This is a bit on the high side, but may be sustainable.
- TRI's earnings are growing more than its dividend. This makes the dividend growth sustainable.
DP58.13%
EPS Next 2Y9.33%
EPS Next 3Y10.66%
124.02
-0.82 (-0.66%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupCommercial & Professional Services
GICS IndustryProfessional Services
Earnings (Last)11-04 2025-11-04/bmo
Earnings (Next)02-05 2026-02-05/amc
Inst Owners26.35%
Inst Owner Change0.03%
Ins Owners0.08%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap55.17B
Revenue(TTM)7.38B
Net Income(TTM)1.75B
Analysts77
Price Target133.85 (7.93%)
Short Float %5.05%
Short Ratio6.11
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.69% |
Yearly Dividend2.1
Dividend Growth(5Y)8.41%
DP58.13%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)2
Avg EPS beat(2)3.61%
Min EPS beat(2)1.96%
Max EPS beat(2)5.25%
EPS beat(4)4
Avg EPS beat(4)4.37%
Min EPS beat(4)1.96%
Max EPS beat(4)6.03%
EPS beat(8)8
Avg EPS beat(8)6.04%
EPS beat(12)12
Avg EPS beat(12)6.89%
EPS beat(16)15
Avg EPS beat(16)6.69%
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-1.08%
Min Revenue beat(2)-1.33%
Max Revenue beat(2)-0.83%
Revenue beat(4)0
Avg Revenue beat(4)-1.44%
Min Revenue beat(4)-2.71%
Max Revenue beat(4)-0.83%
Revenue beat(8)1
Avg Revenue beat(8)-1.06%
Revenue beat(12)1
Avg Revenue beat(12)-1.12%
Revenue beat(16)2
Avg Revenue beat(16)-0.97%
PT rev (1m)0.27%
PT rev (3m)-3.55%
EPS NQ rev (1m)0%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-0.57%
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)0.08%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-1.08%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0.01%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.15%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 32.21 | ||
| Fwd PE | 27.52 | ||
| P/S | 7.48 | ||
| P/FCF | 30.28 | ||
| P/OCF | 22.44 | ||
| P/B | 4.69 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 18.43 |
EPS(TTM)3.85
EY3.1%
EPS(NY)4.51
Fwd EY3.63%
FCF(TTM)4.1
FCFY3.3%
OCF(TTM)5.53
OCFY4.46%
SpS16.58
BVpS26.44
TBVpS-2.15
PEG (NY)7.39
PEG (5Y)1.4
Graham Number47.86
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 9.82% | ||
| ROE | 14.91% | ||
| ROCE | 15.2% | ||
| ROIC | 11.73% | ||
| ROICexc | 12.21% | ||
| ROICexgc | 127.52% | ||
| OM | 29.45% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 23.77% | ||
| GM | N/A | ||
| FCFM | 24.7% |
ROA(3y)10.84%
ROA(5y)12.89%
ROE(3y)17.97%
ROE(5y)21.25%
ROIC(3y)9.36%
ROIC(5y)7.9%
ROICexc(3y)10.43%
ROICexc(5y)8.83%
ROICexgc(3y)71.36%
ROICexgc(5y)52.66%
ROCE(3y)12.07%
ROCE(5y)10.13%
ROICexgc growth 3Y134.34%
ROICexgc growth 5Y38.62%
ROICexc growth 3Y35.26%
ROICexc growth 5Y18.64%
OM growth 3Y14.62%
OM growth 5Y14.34%
PM growth 3Y-30.27%
PM growth 5Y2.82%
GM growth 3YN/A
GM growth 5YN/A
F-Score6
Asset Turnover0.41
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.16 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 1.33 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 0.6 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 70.94% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 8.64% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 80.1% | ||
| Profit Quality | 103.94% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.61 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.61 | ||
| Altman-Z | 6.87 |
F-Score6
WACC7.81%
ROIC/WACC1.5
Cap/Depr(3y)77.02%
Cap/Depr(5y)71.59%
Cap/Sales(3y)8.45%
Cap/Sales(5y)8.29%
Profit Quality(3y)83.19%
Profit Quality(5y)76.6%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)2.94%
EPS 3Y23.06%
EPS 5Y23.02%
EPS Q2Q%6.25%
EPS Next Y4.36%
EPS Next 2Y9.33%
EPS Next 3Y10.66%
EPS Next 5Y10.21%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)2.96%
Revenue growth 3Y4.57%
Revenue growth 5Y4.21%
Sales Q2Q%3.36%
Revenue Next Year2.96%
Revenue Next 2Y5.32%
Revenue Next 3Y6.35%
Revenue Next 5Y7.25%
EBIT growth 1Y12.77%
EBIT growth 3Y19.85%
EBIT growth 5Y19.16%
EBIT Next Year40.64%
EBIT Next 3Y19.57%
EBIT Next 5Y15.35%
FCF growth 1Y3.23%
FCF growth 3Y12.89%
FCF growth 5Y56.51%
OCF growth 1Y6.36%
OCF growth 3Y11.49%
OCF growth 5Y28.47%
THOMSON REUTERS CORP / TRI FAQ
What is the fundamental rating for TRI stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to TRI.
What is the valuation status for TRI stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 2 / 10 to THOMSON REUTERS CORP (TRI). This can be considered as Overvalued.
Can you provide the profitability details for THOMSON REUTERS CORP?
THOMSON REUTERS CORP (TRI) has a profitability rating of 7 / 10.
How financially healthy is THOMSON REUTERS CORP?
The financial health rating of THOMSON REUTERS CORP (TRI) is 6 / 10.
Is the dividend of THOMSON REUTERS CORP sustainable?
The dividend rating of THOMSON REUTERS CORP (TRI) is 6 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 58.13%.