SUZANO SA - SPON ADR (SUZ) Stock Fundamental Analysis
NYSE:SUZ • US86959K1051
10.94 USD
+0.06 (+0.55%)
At close: Feb 19, 2026
10.78 USD
-0.16 (-1.46%)
Pre-Market: 2/20/2026, 9:25:22 AM
Taking everything into account, SUZ scores 5 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. SUZ was compared to 9 industry peers in the Paper & Forest Products industry. SUZ has only an average score on both its financial health and profitability. SUZ may be a bit undervalued, certainly considering the very reasonable score on growth With these ratings, SUZ could be worth investigating further for value investing!.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
- In the past year SUZ was profitable.
- SUZ had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
- Of the past 5 years SUZ 4 years were profitable.
- Each year in the past 5 years SUZ had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
- SUZ has a Return On Assets of 7.98%. This is in the better half of the industry: SUZ outperforms 77.78% of its industry peers.
- SUZ has a better Return On Equity (30.60%) than 100.00% of its industry peers.
- SUZ has a Return On Invested Capital of 4.24%. This is in the better half of the industry: SUZ outperforms 77.78% of its industry peers.
- The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for SUZ is in line with the industry average of 5.38%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 7.98% | ||
| ROE | 30.6% | ||
| ROIC | 4.24% |
ROA(3y)4.51%
ROA(5y)7.67%
ROE(3y)13.4%
ROE(5y)33.63%
ROIC(3y)5.46%
ROIC(5y)7.6%
1.3 Margins
- SUZ's Profit Margin of 26.75% is amongst the best of the industry. SUZ outperforms 100.00% of its industry peers.
- SUZ's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
- Looking at the Operating Margin, with a value of 19.81%, SUZ belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 100.00% of the companies in the same industry.
- In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of SUZ has declined.
- The Gross Margin of SUZ (32.38%) is better than 100.00% of its industry peers.
- In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of SUZ has declined.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 19.81% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 26.75% | ||
| GM | 32.38% |
OM growth 3Y-21.92%
OM growth 5Y-5.67%
PM growth 3Y-17.08%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-13.59%
GM growth 5Y-3.18%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
- SUZ has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is destroying value.
- The number of shares outstanding for SUZ has been reduced compared to 1 year ago.
- SUZ has less shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
- SUZ has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
- Based on the Altman-Z score of 1.22, we must say that SUZ is in the distress zone and has some risk of bankruptcy.
- SUZ has a Altman-Z score (1.22) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
- The Debt to FCF ratio of SUZ is 19.28, which is on the high side as it means it would take SUZ, 19.28 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
- SUZ has a Debt to FCF ratio (19.28) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
- SUZ has a Debt/Equity ratio of 2.23. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
- SUZ has a worse Debt to Equity ratio (2.23) than 77.78% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.23 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 19.28 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.22 |
ROIC/WACC0.7
WACC6.09%
2.3 Liquidity
- SUZ has a Current Ratio of 3.19. This indicates that SUZ is financially healthy and has no problem in meeting its short term obligations.
- SUZ has a better Current ratio (3.19) than 100.00% of its industry peers.
- A Quick Ratio of 2.59 indicates that SUZ has no problem at all paying its short term obligations.
- SUZ's Quick ratio of 2.59 is amongst the best of the industry. SUZ outperforms 100.00% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.19 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 2.59 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
- The Earnings Per Share has grown by an impressive 298.21% over the past year.
- Measured over the past years, SUZ shows a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been decreasing by -14.55% on average per year.
- The Revenue has been growing slightly by 5.72% in the past year.
- Measured over the past years, SUZ shows a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 10.47% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)298.21%
EPS 3Y-14.55%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%104.82%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)5.72%
Revenue growth 3Y0.19%
Revenue growth 5Y10.47%
Sales Q2Q%-7.5%
3.2 Future
- The Earnings Per Share is expected to decrease by -22.22% on average over the next years. This is quite bad
- The Revenue is expected to grow by 10.67% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
EPS Next Y-45.54%
EPS Next 2Y-22.22%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year12.16%
Revenue Next 2Y12.79%
Revenue Next 3Y8.73%
Revenue Next 5Y10.67%
3.3 Evolution
- The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
- When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is stable.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- SUZ is valuated cheaply with a Price/Earnings ratio of 5.21.
- Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of SUZ indicates a rather cheap valuation: SUZ is cheaper than 100.00% of the companies listed in the same industry.
- SUZ's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 27.09.
- A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 9.57 indicates a reasonable valuation of SUZ.
- Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of SUZ indicates a rather cheap valuation: SUZ is cheaper than 88.89% of the companies listed in the same industry.
- When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of SUZ to the average of the S&P500 Index (27.98), we can say SUZ is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.21 | ||
| Fwd PE | 9.57 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- SUZ's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. SUZ is cheaper than 66.67% of the companies in the same industry.
- SUZ's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. SUZ is cheaper than 77.78% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 13.41 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 6.48 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- SUZ has a very decent profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
- SUZ's earnings are expected to decrease with -22.22% in the coming years. This may justify a cheaper valuation.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y-22.22%
EPS Next 3YN/A
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
- With a yearly dividend of 0.36%, SUZ is not a good candidate for dividend investing.
- Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 1.61, SUZ has a dividend in line with its industry peers.
- With a Dividend Yield of 0.36, SUZ pays less dividend than the S&P500 average, which is at 1.85.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% |
5.2 History
- SUZ has paid a dividend for at least 10 years, which is a reliable track record.
- SUZ has decreased its dividend recently.
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
5.3 Sustainability
- 16.47% of the earnings are spent on dividend by SUZ. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
DP16.47%
EPS Next 2Y-22.22%
EPS Next 3YN/A
10.94
+0.06 (+0.55%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorMaterials
GICS IndustryGroupMaterials
GICS IndustryPaper & Forest Products
Earnings (Last)02-10 2026-02-10/amc
Earnings (Next)05-07 2026-05-07
Inst Owners27.72%
Inst Owner Change22.08%
Ins Owners15.51%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap13.52B
Revenue(TTM)50.12B
Net Income(TTM)13.41B
Analysts83.81
Price Target13.36 (22.12%)
Short Float %1.04%
Short Ratio2.54
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% |
Yearly Dividend0.34
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DP16.47%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)2
Avg EPS beat(2)72.56%
Min EPS beat(2)9.47%
Max EPS beat(2)135.65%
EPS beat(4)4
Avg EPS beat(4)88.67%
Min EPS beat(4)9.47%
Max EPS beat(4)196.69%
EPS beat(8)6
Avg EPS beat(8)-51.25%
EPS beat(12)9
Avg EPS beat(12)-26.17%
EPS beat(16)12
Avg EPS beat(16)-18.47%
Revenue beat(2)1
Avg Revenue beat(2)-0.1%
Min Revenue beat(2)-1.91%
Max Revenue beat(2)1.72%
Revenue beat(4)2
Avg Revenue beat(4)-1.48%
Min Revenue beat(4)-6.63%
Max Revenue beat(4)1.72%
Revenue beat(8)4
Avg Revenue beat(8)-1.04%
Revenue beat(12)6
Avg Revenue beat(12)-0.88%
Revenue beat(16)9
Avg Revenue beat(16)-0.42%
PT rev (1m)-2.93%
PT rev (3m)-6.29%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-180.7%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-168.61%
EPS NY rev (1m)7.07%
EPS NY rev (3m)16%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0.59%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-2.67%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.65%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.21 | ||
| Fwd PE | 9.57 | ||
| P/S | 1.41 | ||
| P/FCF | 13.41 | ||
| P/OCF | 3.9 | ||
| P/B | 1.62 | ||
| P/tB | 2.29 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 6.48 |
EPS(TTM)2.1
EY19.2%
EPS(NY)1.14
Fwd EY10.45%
FCF(TTM)0.82
FCFY7.46%
OCF(TTM)2.81
OCFY25.65%
SpS7.75
BVpS6.77
TBVpS4.77
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number17.89
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 7.98% | ||
| ROE | 30.6% | ||
| ROCE | 6.44% | ||
| ROIC | 4.24% | ||
| ROICexc | 5.06% | ||
| ROICexgc | 5.63% | ||
| OM | 19.81% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 26.75% | ||
| GM | 32.38% | ||
| FCFM | 10.53% |
ROA(3y)4.51%
ROA(5y)7.67%
ROE(3y)13.4%
ROE(5y)33.63%
ROIC(3y)5.46%
ROIC(5y)7.6%
ROICexc(3y)6.5%
ROICexc(5y)9.16%
ROICexgc(3y)7.38%
ROICexgc(5y)10.77%
ROCE(3y)8.29%
ROCE(5y)11.54%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-29.09%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-6.41%
ROICexc growth 3Y-27.76%
ROICexc growth 5Y-4.23%
OM growth 3Y-21.92%
OM growth 5Y-5.67%
PM growth 3Y-17.08%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-13.59%
GM growth 5Y-3.18%
F-Score8
Asset Turnover0.3
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.23 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 19.28 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 4.61 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 113.96% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 25.69% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 1.71 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 85.52% | ||
| Profit Quality | 39.36% | ||
| Current Ratio | 3.19 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 2.59 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.22 |
F-Score8
WACC6.09%
ROIC/WACC0.7
Cap/Depr(3y)181.88%
Cap/Depr(5y)168.52%
Cap/Sales(3y)35.7%
Cap/Sales(5y)30.69%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)298.21%
EPS 3Y-14.55%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%104.82%
EPS Next Y-45.54%
EPS Next 2Y-22.22%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)5.72%
Revenue growth 3Y0.19%
Revenue growth 5Y10.47%
Sales Q2Q%-7.5%
Revenue Next Year12.16%
Revenue Next 2Y12.79%
Revenue Next 3Y8.73%
Revenue Next 5Y10.67%
EBIT growth 1Y-31.23%
EBIT growth 3Y-21.77%
EBIT growth 5Y4.21%
EBIT Next Year155.42%
EBIT Next 3Y46.5%
EBIT Next 5Y26.57%
FCF growth 1Y39.75%
FCF growth 3Y-6.45%
FCF growth 5Y-8.5%
OCF growth 1Y-11.9%
OCF growth 3Y-5.69%
OCF growth 5Y6.7%
SUZANO SA - SPON ADR / SUZ FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of SUZANO SA - SPON ADR (SUZ) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to SUZ.
What is the valuation status for SUZ stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to SUZANO SA - SPON ADR (SUZ). This can be considered as Undervalued.
What is the profitability of SUZ stock?
SUZANO SA - SPON ADR (SUZ) has a profitability rating of 6 / 10.
What is the valuation of SUZANO SA - SPON ADR based on its PE and PB ratios?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for SUZANO SA - SPON ADR (SUZ) is 5.21 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 1.62.
What is the expected EPS growth for SUZANO SA - SPON ADR (SUZ) stock?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of SUZANO SA - SPON ADR (SUZ) is expected to decline by -45.54% in the next year.