SENSATA TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING (ST)
GB00BFMBMT84 - Common Stock
Taking everything into account, ST scores 5 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. ST was compared to 90 industry peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. Both the profitability and the financial health of ST get a neutral evaluation. Nothing too spectacular is happening here. ST scores decently on growth, while it is valued quite cheap. This could make an interesting combination. This makes ST very considerable for value investing!
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
ST had positive earnings in the past year.
ST had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
Of the past 5 years ST 4 years were profitable.
Each year in the past 5 years ST had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
Looking at the Return On Assets, with a value of -1.09%, ST is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 65.17% of the companies in the same industry.
Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of -2.69%, ST is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 66.29% of the companies in the same industry.
With a decent Return On Invested Capital value of 5.97%, ST is doing good in the industry, outperforming 76.40% of the companies in the same industry.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for ST is below the industry average of 9.59%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -1.09% | ||
| ROE | -2.69% | ||
| ROIC | 5.97% |
ROA(3y)2.57%
ROA(5y)2.79%
ROE(3y)7.2%
ROE(5y)7.73%
ROIC(3y)6.43%
ROIC(5y)6.41%
1.3 Margins
With an excellent Operating Margin value of 12.25%, ST belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 84.27% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of ST has declined.
With a decent Gross Margin value of 29.87%, ST is doing good in the industry, outperforming 69.66% of the companies in the same industry.
ST's Gross Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 12.25% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 29.87% |
OM growth 3Y1.57%
OM growth 5Y-6.07%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-0.29%
GM growth 5Y-2.68%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), so ST is destroying value.
The number of shares outstanding for ST has been reduced compared to 1 year ago.
Compared to 5 years ago, ST has less shares outstanding
The debt/assets ratio for ST has been reduced compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
ST has an Altman-Z score of 2.09. This is not the best score and indicates that ST is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
ST's Altman-Z score of 2.09 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. ST outperforms 62.92% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of ST is 10.29, which is on the high side as it means it would take ST, 10.29 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
ST has a Debt to FCF ratio of 10.29. This is in the better half of the industry: ST outperforms 68.54% of its industry peers.
ST has a Debt/Equity ratio of 1.08. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
ST has a worse Debt to Equity ratio (1.08) than 70.79% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.08 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 10.29 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.09 |
ROIC/WACC0.66
WACC9.09%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 2.60 indicates that ST has no problem at all paying its short term obligations.
ST has a better Current ratio (2.60) than 69.66% of its industry peers.
ST has a Quick Ratio of 1.76. This is a normal value and indicates that ST is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
ST's Quick ratio of 1.76 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. ST outperforms 69.66% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.6 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.76 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for ST have decreased by -7.18% in the last year.
Measured over the past years, ST shows a decrease in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been decreasing by -0.17% on average per year.
ST shows a decrease in Revenue. In the last year, the revenue decreased by -1.44%.
Measured over the past years, ST shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 2.86% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-7.18%
EPS 3Y17.59%
EPS 5Y-0.17%
EPS Q2Q%-5.49%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-1.44%
Revenue growth 3Y10%
Revenue growth 5Y2.86%
Sales Q2Q%-1.84%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, ST will show a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 9.07% on average per year.
Based on estimates for the next years, ST will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 5.67% on average per year.
EPS Next Y-1.61%
EPS Next 2Y-0.84%
EPS Next 3Y5.04%
EPS Next 5Y9.07%
Revenue Next Year-2.81%
Revenue Next 2Y-2.86%
Revenue Next 3Y1.08%
Revenue Next 5Y5.67%
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
The Revenue growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
A Price/Earnings ratio of 9.14 indicates a reasonable valuation of ST.
ST's Price/Earnings ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. ST is cheaper than 96.63% of the companies in the same industry.
ST's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 29.29.
The Price/Forward Earnings ratio is 8.98, which indicates a very decent valuation of ST.
94.38% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than ST, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of ST to the average of the S&P500 Index (24.01), we can say ST is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 9.14 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.98 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio of ST indicates a rather cheap valuation: ST is cheaper than 89.89% of the companies listed in the same industry.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, ST is valued cheaper than 88.76% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 15.35 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 9.45 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y-0.84%
EPS Next 3Y5.04%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
ST has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 1.55%. Purely for dividend investing, there may be better candidates out there.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 1.76, ST pays a better dividend. On top of this ST pays more dividend than 93.26% of the companies listed in the same industry.
ST's Dividend Yield is slightly below the S&P500 average, which is at 2.19.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.55% |
5.2 History
ST has paid a dividend for less than 5 years, so there is no long track record yet.
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
The earnings of ST are negative and hence is the payout ratio. ST will probably not be able to sustain this dividend level.
DP-91.05%
EPS Next 2Y-0.84%
EPS Next 3Y5.04%
SENSATA TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING
NYSE:ST (11/22/2024, 8:06:35 PM)
After market: 31.89 0 (0%)31.89
+1.02 (+3.3%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupCapital Goods
GICS IndustryElectrical Equipment
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners
Inst Owner Change
Ins Owners
Ins Owner Change
Market Cap4.77B
Analysts
Price Target
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.55% |
Dividend Growth(5Y)
DP
Div Incr Years
Div Non Decr Years
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)
Avg EPS beat(2)
Min EPS beat(2)
Max EPS beat(2)
EPS beat(4)
Avg EPS beat(4)
Min EPS beat(4)
Max EPS beat(4)
EPS beat(8)
Avg EPS beat(8)
EPS beat(12)
Avg EPS beat(12)
EPS beat(16)
Avg EPS beat(16)
Revenue beat(2)
Avg Revenue beat(2)
Min Revenue beat(2)
Max Revenue beat(2)
Revenue beat(4)
Avg Revenue beat(4)
Min Revenue beat(4)
Max Revenue beat(4)
Revenue beat(8)
Avg Revenue beat(8)
Revenue beat(12)
Avg Revenue beat(12)
Revenue beat(16)
Avg Revenue beat(16)
PT rev (1m)
PT rev (3m)
EPS NQ rev (1m)
EPS NQ rev (3m)
EPS NY rev (1m)
EPS NY rev (3m)
Revenue NQ rev (1m)
Revenue NQ rev (3m)
Revenue NY rev (1m)
Revenue NY rev (3m)
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 9.14 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.98 | ||
| P/S | |||
| P/FCF | |||
| P/OCF | |||
| P/B | |||
| P/tB | |||
| EV/EBITDA |
EPS(TTM)
EY
EPS(NY)
Fwd EY
FCF(TTM)
FCFY
OCF(TTM)
OCFY
SpS
BVpS
TBVpS
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -1.09% | ||
| ROE | -2.69% | ||
| ROCE | |||
| ROIC | |||
| ROICexc | |||
| ROICexgc | |||
| OM | 12.25% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 29.87% | ||
| FCFM |
ROA(3y)
ROA(5y)
ROE(3y)
ROE(5y)
ROIC(3y)
ROIC(5y)
ROICexc(3y)
ROICexc(5y)
ROICexgc(3y)
ROICexgc(5y)
ROCE(3y)
ROCE(5y)
ROICexcg growth 3Y
ROICexcg growth 5Y
ROICexc growth 3Y
ROICexc growth 5Y
OM growth 3Y
OM growth 5Y
PM growth 3Y
PM growth 5Y
GM growth 3Y
GM growth 5Y
F-Score
Asset Turnover0.55
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.08 | ||
| Debt/FCF | |||
| Debt/EBITDA | |||
| Cap/Depr | |||
| Cap/Sales | |||
| Interest Coverage | |||
| Cash Conversion | |||
| Profit Quality | |||
| Current Ratio | 2.6 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.76 | ||
| Altman-Z |
F-Score
WACC
ROIC/WACC
Cap/Depr(3y)
Cap/Depr(5y)
Cap/Sales(3y)
Cap/Sales(5y)
Profit Quality(3y)
Profit Quality(5y)
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-7.18%
EPS 3Y17.59%
EPS 5Y
EPS Q2Q%
EPS Next Y-1.61%
EPS Next 2Y
EPS Next 3Y
EPS Next 5Y
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-1.44%
Revenue growth 3Y10%
Revenue growth 5Y
Sales Q2Q%
Revenue Next Year
Revenue Next 2Y
Revenue Next 3Y
Revenue Next 5Y
EBIT growth 1Y
EBIT growth 3Y
EBIT growth 5Y
EBIT Next Year
EBIT Next 3Y
EBIT Next 5Y
FCF growth 1Y
FCF growth 3Y
FCF growth 5Y
OCF growth 1Y
OCF growth 3Y
OCF growth 5Y