SESA SPA (SES.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Milan - BIT:SES - IT0004729759 - Common Stock
84.2 EUR
+0.6 (+0.72%)
Overall SES gets a fundamental rating of 6 out of 10. We evaluated SES against 51 industry peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. While SES has a great profitability rating, there are some minor concerns on its financial health. SES is not valued too expensively and it also shows a decent growth rate.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
SES had positive earnings in the past year.
SES had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
In the past 5 years SES has always been profitable.
Each year in the past 5 years SES had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
With a decent Return On Assets value of 4.90%, SES is doing good in the industry, outperforming 76.47% of the companies in the same industry.
SES's Return On Equity of 23.60% is amongst the best of the industry. SES outperforms 94.12% of its industry peers.
With an excellent Return On Invested Capital value of 12.76%, SES belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 94.12% of the companies in the same industry.
SES had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 8.40%. This is in line with the industry average of 7.59%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (12.76%) for SES is above the 3 year average (8.40%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 4.9% | ||
| ROE | 23.6% | ||
| ROIC | 12.76% |
ROA(3y)3.62%
ROA(5y)3.97%
ROE(3y)18.23%
ROE(5y)19.35%
ROIC(3y)8.4%
ROIC(5y)8.99%
1.3 Margins
Looking at the Profit Margin, with a value of 2.18%, SES is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 64.71% of the companies in the same industry.
SES's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
SES's Operating Margin of 3.91% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. SES outperforms 60.78% of its industry peers.
SES's Operating Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
SES has a Gross Margin of 25.88%. This is in the lower half of the industry: SES underperforms 76.47% of its industry peers.
SES's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 3.91% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.18% | ||
| GM | 25.88% |
OM growth 3Y-6.32%
OM growth 5Y1.36%
PM growth 3Y-14.65%
PM growth 5Y-2.09%
GM growth 3Y4.88%
GM growth 5Y7.04%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), SES is creating some value.
Compared to 1 year ago, SES has less shares outstanding
The number of shares outstanding for SES has been reduced compared to 5 years ago.
The debt/assets ratio for SES is higher compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 3.38 indicates that SES is not in any danger for bankruptcy at the moment.
SES has a better Altman-Z score (3.38) than 60.78% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of SES is 4.25, which is a neutral value as it means it would take SES, 4.25 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
SES has a Debt to FCF ratio (4.25) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.43 indicates that SES is not too dependend on debt financing.
SES has a Debt to Equity ratio (0.43) which is in line with its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.43 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 4.25 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.38 |
ROIC/WACC1.57
WACC8.1%
2.3 Liquidity
SES has a Current Ratio of 1.25. This is a normal value and indicates that SES is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
SES has a worse Current ratio (1.25) than 76.47% of its industry peers.
SES has a Quick Ratio of 1.08. This is a normal value and indicates that SES is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
SES has a Quick ratio (1.08) which is in line with its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.25 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.08 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for SES have decreased by -9.97% in the last year.
Measured over the past years, SES shows a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been growing by 10.41% on average per year.
SES shows a small growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 4.37%.
Measured over the past years, SES shows a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 12.77% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-9.97%
EPS 3Y-5.42%
EPS 5Y10.41%
EPS Q2Q%2.26%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)4.37%
Revenue growth 3Y10.81%
Revenue growth 5Y12.77%
Sales Q2Q%7.96%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 5.09% on average over the next years.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 10.28% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
EPS Next Y-5.57%
EPS Next 2Y2.37%
EPS Next 3Y5.09%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year4.07%
Revenue Next 2Y4.65%
Revenue Next 3Y4.91%
Revenue Next 5Y10.28%
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is stable.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
The Price/Earnings ratio is 11.55, which indicates a very decent valuation of SES.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, SES is valued cheaply inside the industry as 92.16% of the companies are valued more expensively.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of SES to the average of the S&P500 Index (26.59), we can say SES is valued rather cheaply.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 10.98, the valuation of SES can be described as reasonable.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, SES is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 72.55% of the companies are valued more expensively.
SES is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 23.80, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.55 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.98 |
4.2 Price Multiples
SES's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. SES is cheaper than 86.27% of the companies in the same industry.
SES's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. SES is cheaper than 64.71% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 13.08 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 4.27 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The decent profitability rating of SES may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)1.11
EPS Next 2Y2.37%
EPS Next 3Y5.09%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
SES has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 1.18%. Purely for dividend investing, there may be better candidates out there.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 2.80, SES has a dividend in line with its industry peers.
With a Dividend Yield of 1.18, SES pays less dividend than the S&P500 average, which is at 2.31.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.18% |
5.2 History
On average, the dividend of SES grows each year by 8.18%, which is quite nice.
Dividend Growth(5Y)8.18%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
13.26% of the earnings are spent on dividend by SES. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
SES's earnings are growing slower than its dividend. This means the dividend growth is not sustainable.
DP13.26%
EPS Next 2Y2.37%
EPS Next 3Y5.09%
BIT:SES (12/10/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
84.2
+0.6 (+0.72%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorInformation Technology
GICS IndustryGroupTechnology Hardware & Equipment
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners30.88%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins OwnersN/A
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap1.29B
Revenue(TTM)5.03B
Net Income(TTM)109.44M
Analysts87.5
Price Target116.31 (38.14%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.18% |
Yearly Dividend1.01
Dividend Growth(5Y)8.18%
DP13.26%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)6.29%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)-2.33%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0.85%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.55 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.98 | ||
| P/S | 0.26 | ||
| P/FCF | 13.08 | ||
| P/OCF | 10.84 | ||
| P/B | 2.78 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 4.27 |
EPS(TTM)7.29
EY8.66%
EPS(NY)7.67
Fwd EY9.1%
FCF(TTM)6.44
FCFY7.64%
OCF(TTM)7.77
OCFY9.22%
SpS327.81
BVpS30.23
TBVpS-4.48
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)1.11
Graham Number70.42
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 4.9% | ||
| ROE | 23.6% | ||
| ROCE | 18.77% | ||
| ROIC | 12.76% | ||
| ROICexc | 24.35% | ||
| ROICexgc | 820.18% | ||
| OM | 3.91% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.18% | ||
| GM | 25.88% | ||
| FCFM | 1.96% |
ROA(3y)3.62%
ROA(5y)3.97%
ROE(3y)18.23%
ROE(5y)19.35%
ROIC(3y)8.4%
ROIC(5y)8.99%
ROICexc(3y)17.81%
ROICexc(5y)23.84%
ROICexgc(3y)145.91%
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)13.17%
ROCE(5y)13.97%
ROICexgc growth 3YN/A
ROICexgc growth 5Y15.12%
ROICexc growth 3Y-28.63%
ROICexc growth 5Y-11.45%
OM growth 3Y-6.32%
OM growth 5Y1.36%
PM growth 3Y-14.65%
PM growth 5Y-2.09%
GM growth 3Y4.88%
GM growth 5Y7.04%
F-Score5
Asset Turnover2.25
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.43 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 4.25 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 0.71 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 23.96% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 0.41% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 3.89 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 42.27% | ||
| Profit Quality | 90.21% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.25 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.08 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.38 |
F-Score5
WACC8.1%
ROIC/WACC1.57
Cap/Depr(3y)34.94%
Cap/Depr(5y)40.36%
Cap/Sales(3y)0.75%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.78%
Profit Quality(3y)135.35%
Profit Quality(5y)165.8%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-9.97%
EPS 3Y-5.42%
EPS 5Y10.41%
EPS Q2Q%2.26%
EPS Next Y-5.57%
EPS Next 2Y2.37%
EPS Next 3Y5.09%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)4.37%
Revenue growth 3Y10.81%
Revenue growth 5Y12.77%
Sales Q2Q%7.96%
Revenue Next Year4.07%
Revenue Next 2Y4.65%
Revenue Next 3Y4.91%
Revenue Next 5Y10.28%
EBIT growth 1Y-8.12%
EBIT growth 3Y3.81%
EBIT growth 5Y14.31%
EBIT Next Year50.87%
EBIT Next 3Y20.51%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-15.29%
FCF growth 3Y-9.53%
FCF growth 5Y2.42%
OCF growth 1Y-12.94%
OCF growth 3Y-6.94%
OCF growth 5Y4.24%
SESA SPA / SES.MI FAQ
What is the fundamental rating for SES stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to SES.MI.
Can you provide the valuation status for SESA SPA?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 6 / 10 to SESA SPA (SES.MI). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
What is the profitability of SES stock?
SESA SPA (SES.MI) has a profitability rating of 7 / 10.
What is the valuation of SESA SPA based on its PE and PB ratios?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for SESA SPA (SES.MI) is 11.55 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 2.78.
How financially healthy is SESA SPA?
The financial health rating of SESA SPA (SES.MI) is 5 / 10.