56.8 USD
-0.03 (-0.05%)
56.8 USD
0 (0%)
RUSHA gets a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 50 industry peers in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. RUSHA has only an average score on both its financial health and profitability. RUSHA is valued correctly, but it does not seem to be growing.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year RUSHA was profitable.
RUSHA had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
In the past 5 years RUSHA has always been profitable.
RUSHA had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
RUSHA has a better Return On Assets (6.02%) than 64.00% of its industry peers.
RUSHA has a better Return On Equity (12.38%) than 62.00% of its industry peers.
RUSHA's Return On Invested Capital of 7.99% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. RUSHA outperforms 64.00% of its industry peers.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for RUSHA is in line with the industry average of 9.63%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 6.02% | ||
| ROE | 12.38% | ||
| ROIC | 7.99% |
ROA(3y)8.26%
ROA(5y)7.27%
ROE(3y)18.4%
ROE(5y)16.14%
ROIC(3y)10.25%
ROIC(5y)8.85%
1.3 Margins
RUSHA's Profit Margin of 3.57% is in line compared to the rest of the industry. RUSHA outperforms 50.00% of its industry peers.
RUSHA's Profit Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
The Operating Margin of RUSHA (5.40%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of RUSHA has grown nicely.
With a Gross Margin value of 19.32%, RUSHA is not doing good in the industry: 76.00% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of RUSHA has grown nicely.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 5.4% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 3.57% | ||
| GM | 19.32% |
OM growth 3Y-0.3%
OM growth 5Y9.86%
PM growth 3Y-6.12%
PM growth 5Y9.84%
GM growth 3Y-2.77%
GM growth 5Y2.14%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so RUSHA is still creating some value.
RUSHA has more shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
Compared to 5 years ago, RUSHA has less shares outstanding
RUSHA has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
RUSHA has an Altman-Z score of 3.84. This indicates that RUSHA is financially healthy and has little risk of bankruptcy at the moment.
With a decent Altman-Z score value of 3.84, RUSHA is doing good in the industry, outperforming 62.00% of the companies in the same industry.
The Debt to FCF ratio of RUSHA is 2.01, which is a good value as it means it would take RUSHA, 2.01 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
RUSHA has a better Debt to FCF ratio (2.01) than 80.00% of its industry peers.
RUSHA has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.61. This is a neutral value indicating RUSHA is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
RUSHA's Debt to Equity ratio of 0.61 is in line compared to the rest of the industry. RUSHA outperforms 50.00% of its industry peers.
Although RUSHA does not score too well on debt/equity it has very limited outstanding debt, which is well covered by the FCF. We will not put too much weight on the debt/equity number as it may be because of low equity, which could be a consequence of a share buyback program for instance. This needs to be investigated.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.61 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 2.01 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.84 |
ROIC/WACC0.86
WACC9.34%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.37 indicates that RUSHA should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
Looking at the Current ratio, with a value of 1.37, RUSHA is doing worse than 68.00% of the companies in the same industry.
A Quick Ratio of 0.34 indicates that RUSHA may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
With a Quick ratio value of 0.34, RUSHA is not doing good in the industry: 86.00% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.37 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.34 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
RUSHA shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -10.61%.
The Earnings Per Share has been growing by 8.22% on average over the past years. This is quite good.
Looking at the last year, RUSHA shows a decrease in Revenue. The Revenue has decreased by -1.95% in the last year.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 6.08% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-10.61%
EPS 3Y-3.65%
EPS 5Y8.22%
EPS Q2Q%-14.43%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-1.95%
Revenue growth 3Y15.04%
Revenue growth 5Y6.08%
Sales Q2Q%-0.81%
3.2 Future
RUSHA is expected to show a small growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 3.18% yearly.
RUSHA is expected to show a small growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will grow by 0.90% yearly.
EPS Next Y-12.99%
EPS Next 2Y3.18%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-4.25%
Revenue Next 2Y0.9%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
RUSHA is valuated correctly with a Price/Earnings ratio of 16.85.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, RUSHA is valued a bit cheaper than 78.00% of the companies in the same industry.
The average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio is at 26.43. RUSHA is valued slightly cheaper when compared to this.
A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 14.30 indicates a correct valuation of RUSHA.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of RUSHA indicates a rather cheap valuation: RUSHA is cheaper than 86.00% of the companies listed in the same industry.
RUSHA is valuated rather cheaply when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 23.66, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 16.85 | ||
| Fwd PE | 14.3 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, RUSHA is valued cheaper than 90.00% of the companies in the same industry.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, RUSHA is valued cheaply inside the industry as 96.00% of the companies are valued more expensively.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 6.31 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 6.83 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
RUSHA has a very decent profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)2.05
EPS Next 2Y3.18%
EPS Next 3YN/A
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 1.29%, RUSHA has a reasonable but not impressive dividend return.
RUSHA's Dividend Yield is a higher than the industry average which is at 0.97.
RUSHA's Dividend Yield is slightly below the S&P500 average, which is at 1.87.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.29% |
5.2 History
On average, the dividend of RUSHA grows each year by 26.01%, which is quite nice.
RUSHA has been paying a dividend for over 5 years, so it has already some track record.
As RUSHA did not decrease their dividend in the past 5 years, we can say the dividend looks stable.
Dividend Growth(5Y)26.01%
Div Incr Years6
Div Non Decr Years6
5.3 Sustainability
21.15% of the earnings are spent on dividend by RUSHA. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
RUSHA's earnings are growing slower than its dividend. This means the dividend growth is not sustainable.
DP21.15%
EPS Next 2Y3.18%
EPS Next 3YN/A
56.8
-0.03 (-0.05%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupCapital Goods
GICS IndustryTrading Companies & Distributors
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners106.75%
Inst Owner Change-1.81%
Ins Owners1.19%
Ins Owner Change-0.25%
Market Cap4.38B
Revenue(TTM)7.67B
Net Income(TTM)274.20M
Analysts88
Price Target58.65 (3.26%)
Short Float %5.11%
Short Ratio4.93
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.29% |
Yearly Dividend0.71
Dividend Growth(5Y)26.01%
DP21.15%
Div Incr Years6
Div Non Decr Years6
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)6.18%
Min EPS beat(2)-1.13%
Max EPS beat(2)13.48%
EPS beat(4)2
Avg EPS beat(4)3.98%
Min EPS beat(4)-2.24%
Max EPS beat(4)13.48%
EPS beat(8)6
Avg EPS beat(8)9.08%
EPS beat(12)10
Avg EPS beat(12)9.74%
EPS beat(16)14
Avg EPS beat(16)12.63%
Revenue beat(2)1
Avg Revenue beat(2)0.63%
Min Revenue beat(2)-1.39%
Max Revenue beat(2)2.66%
Revenue beat(4)2
Avg Revenue beat(4)0.79%
Min Revenue beat(4)-3.15%
Max Revenue beat(4)5.05%
Revenue beat(8)4
Avg Revenue beat(8)1.34%
Revenue beat(12)7
Avg Revenue beat(12)1.42%
Revenue beat(16)11
Avg Revenue beat(16)2.91%
PT rev (1m)-4.17%
PT rev (3m)-4.17%
EPS NQ rev (1m)0%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-1.43%
EPS NY rev (1m)0.19%
EPS NY rev (3m)-3.06%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-1.24%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0.49%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 16.85 | ||
| Fwd PE | 14.3 | ||
| P/S | 0.57 | ||
| P/FCF | 6.31 | ||
| P/OCF | 3.84 | ||
| P/B | 1.98 | ||
| P/tB | 2.47 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 6.83 |
EPS(TTM)3.37
EY5.93%
EPS(NY)3.97
Fwd EY6.99%
FCF(TTM)9
FCFY15.84%
OCF(TTM)14.81
OCFY26.07%
SpS99.53
BVpS28.73
TBVpS23.01
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)2.05
Graham Number46.67
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 6.02% | ||
| ROE | 12.38% | ||
| ROCE | 14.13% | ||
| ROIC | 7.99% | ||
| ROICexc | 8.52% | ||
| ROICexgc | 9.67% | ||
| OM | 5.4% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 3.57% | ||
| GM | 19.32% | ||
| FCFM | 9.04% |
ROA(3y)8.26%
ROA(5y)7.27%
ROE(3y)18.4%
ROE(5y)16.14%
ROIC(3y)10.25%
ROIC(5y)8.85%
ROICexc(3y)10.85%
ROICexc(5y)9.45%
ROICexgc(3y)12.34%
ROICexgc(5y)10.82%
ROCE(3y)18.8%
ROCE(5y)15.85%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-0.3%
ROICexgc growth 5Y8.95%
ROICexc growth 3Y0.88%
ROICexc growth 5Y8.84%
OM growth 3Y-0.3%
OM growth 5Y9.86%
PM growth 3Y-6.12%
PM growth 5Y9.84%
GM growth 3Y-2.77%
GM growth 5Y2.14%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.68
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.61 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 2.01 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 2.05 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 179.76% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 5.83% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 6.81 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 172.1% | ||
| Profit Quality | 252.95% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.37 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.34 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.84 |
F-Score6
WACC9.34%
ROIC/WACC0.86
Cap/Depr(3y)157.44%
Cap/Depr(5y)129.56%
Cap/Sales(3y)4.54%
Cap/Sales(5y)3.95%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-10.61%
EPS 3Y-3.65%
EPS 5Y8.22%
EPS Q2Q%-14.43%
EPS Next Y-12.99%
EPS Next 2Y3.18%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-1.95%
Revenue growth 3Y15.04%
Revenue growth 5Y6.08%
Sales Q2Q%-0.81%
Revenue Next Year-4.25%
Revenue Next 2Y0.9%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y-12.83%
EBIT growth 3Y14.7%
EBIT growth 5Y16.54%
EBIT Next Year34.63%
EBIT Next 3YN/A
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y2093.05%
FCF growth 3Y-9.91%
FCF growth 5Y7.85%
OCF growth 1Y254.2%
OCF growth 3Y13.63%
OCF growth 5Y8.02%
RUSH ENTERPRISES INC-CL A / RUSHA FAQ
What is the fundamental rating for RUSHA stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to RUSHA.
What is the valuation status for RUSHA stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 6 / 10 to RUSH ENTERPRISES INC-CL A (RUSHA). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
What is the profitability of RUSHA stock?
RUSH ENTERPRISES INC-CL A (RUSHA) has a profitability rating of 6 / 10.
Can you provide the PE and PB ratios for RUSHA stock?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for RUSH ENTERPRISES INC-CL A (RUSHA) is 16.85 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 1.98.
Can you provide the expected EPS growth for RUSHA stock?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of RUSH ENTERPRISES INC-CL A (RUSHA) is expected to decline by -12.99% in the next year.