HERMES INTERNATIONAL (RMS.PA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - EPA:RMS - FR0000052292 - Common Stock
2114 EUR
+6 (+0.28%)
RMS gets a fundamental rating of 7 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 43 industry peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. RMS scores excellent points on both the profitability and health parts. This is a solid base for a good stock. RMS is valied quite expensively at the moment, while it does show a decent growth rate. This makes RMS very considerable for quality investing!
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year RMS was profitable.
RMS had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
Each year in the past 5 years RMS has been profitable.
In the past 5 years RMS always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
1.2 Ratios
The Return On Assets of RMS (20.53%) is better than 93.02% of its industry peers.
Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 26.99%, RMS belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 86.05% of the companies in the same industry.
Looking at the Return On Invested Capital, with a value of 24.91%, RMS belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 90.70% of the companies in the same industry.
The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for RMS is significantly above the industry average of 11.78%.
The 3 year average ROIC (23.47%) for RMS is below the current ROIC(24.91%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 20.53% | ||
| ROE | 26.99% | ||
| ROIC | 24.91% |
ROA(3y)20.1%
ROA(5y)18.1%
ROE(3y)27.33%
ROE(5y)25.35%
ROIC(3y)23.47%
ROIC(5y)21.82%
1.3 Margins
The Profit Margin of RMS (28.54%) is better than 97.67% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of RMS has grown nicely.
RMS has a Operating Margin of 41.21%. This is amongst the best in the industry. RMS outperforms 97.67% of its industry peers.
RMS's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
RMS has a Gross Margin of 70.31%. This is in the better half of the industry: RMS outperforms 67.44% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of RMS has remained more or less at the same level.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 41.21% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 28.54% | ||
| GM | 70.31% |
OM growth 3Y0.88%
OM growth 5Y3.62%
PM growth 3Y3.69%
PM growth 5Y6.45%
GM growth 3Y-0.48%
GM growth 5Y0.33%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), RMS is creating value.
RMS has more shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
The number of shares outstanding for RMS has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, RMS has an improved debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 28.92 indicates that RMS is not in any danger for bankruptcy at the moment.
Looking at the Altman-Z score, with a value of 28.92, RMS belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 100.00% of the companies in the same industry.
RMS has a debt to FCF ratio of 0.49. This is a very positive value and a sign of high solvency as it would only need 0.49 years to pay back of all of its debts.
The Debt to FCF ratio of RMS (0.49) is better than 90.70% of its industry peers.
RMS has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.10. This is a healthy value indicating a solid balance between debt and equity.
RMS has a Debt to Equity ratio of 0.10. This is amongst the best in the industry. RMS outperforms 88.37% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.1 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 0.49 | ||
| Altman-Z | 28.92 |
ROIC/WACC3.07
WACC8.11%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 4.50 indicates that RMS has no problem at all paying its short term obligations.
The Current ratio of RMS (4.50) is better than 95.35% of its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 3.65 indicates that RMS has no problem at all paying its short term obligations.
The Quick ratio of RMS (3.65) is better than 97.67% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.5 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 3.65 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
RMS shows a small growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has grown by 0.57%.
The Earnings Per Share has been growing by 24.70% on average over the past years. This is a very strong growth
Looking at the last year, RMS shows a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue has grown by 10.31% in the last year.
RMS shows quite a strong growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 17.12% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)0.57%
EPS 3Y23.48%
EPS 5Y24.7%
EPS Q2Q%-5.27%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)10.31%
Revenue growth 3Y19.09%
Revenue growth 5Y17.12%
Sales Q2Q%7.06%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, RMS will show a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 10.04% on average per year.
RMS is expected to show quite a strong growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will grow by 9.50% yearly.
EPS Next Y-2.23%
EPS Next 2Y5.81%
EPS Next 3Y7.56%
EPS Next 5Y10.04%
Revenue Next Year7.3%
Revenue Next 2Y7.81%
Revenue Next 3Y8.4%
Revenue Next 5Y9.5%
3.3 Evolution
Although the future EPS growth is still strong, it is not able to hold up the even more excellent growth rate of the past years.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
With a Price/Earnings ratio of 49.53, RMS can be considered very expensive at the moment.
67.44% of the companies in the same industry are cheaper than RMS, based on the Price/Earnings ratio.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio of 25.07, RMS is valued quite expensively.
A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 43.04 indicates a quite expensive valuation of RMS.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, RMS is valued a bit more expensive than 65.12% of the companies in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 34.08, RMS is valued a bit more expensive.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 49.53 | ||
| Fwd PE | 43.04 |
4.2 Price Multiples
RMS's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is rather expensive when compared to the industry. RMS is more expensive than 81.40% of the companies in the same industry.
67.44% of the companies in the same industry are cheaper than RMS, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 53.58 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 28.98 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The excellent profitability rating of RMS may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)2.01
EPS Next 2Y5.81%
EPS Next 3Y7.56%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
RMS has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 1.20%.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 2.88, RMS is paying slightly less dividend.
With a Dividend Yield of 1.20, RMS pays less dividend than the S&P500 average, which is at 2.44.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.2% |
5.2 History
On average, the dividend of RMS grows each year by 40.81%, which is quite nice.
Dividend Growth(5Y)40.81%
Div Incr Years4
Div Non Decr Years4
5.3 Sustainability
62.91% of the earnings are spent on dividend by RMS. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
The dividend of RMS is growing, but the earnings are growing slower. This means the dividend growth is not sustainable.
DP62.91%
EPS Next 2Y5.81%
EPS Next 3Y7.56%
EPA:RMS (11/21/2025, 4:04:08 PM)
2114
+6 (+0.28%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryGroupConsumer Durables & Apparel
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners11.46%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners0.23%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap223.17B
Revenue(TTM)15.70B
Net Income(TTM)4.48B
Analysts71.85
Price Target2480.74 (17.35%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.2% |
Yearly Dividend25.85
Dividend Growth(5Y)40.81%
DP62.91%
Div Incr Years4
Div Non Decr Years4
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0.02%
PT rev (3m)-3.46%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)-1.19%
EPS NY rev (3m)-7.59%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.45%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-2.15%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 49.53 | ||
| Fwd PE | 43.04 | ||
| P/S | 14.21 | ||
| P/FCF | 53.58 | ||
| P/OCF | 42.72 | ||
| P/B | 13.44 | ||
| P/tB | 13.8 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 28.98 |
EPS(TTM)42.68
EY2.02%
EPS(NY)49.12
Fwd EY2.32%
FCF(TTM)39.45
FCFY1.87%
OCF(TTM)49.48
OCFY2.34%
SpS148.72
BVpS157.25
TBVpS153.16
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)2.01
Graham Number388.6
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 20.53% | ||
| ROE | 26.99% | ||
| ROCE | 34.71% | ||
| ROIC | 24.91% | ||
| ROICexc | 55.83% | ||
| ROICexgc | 58.88% | ||
| OM | 41.21% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 28.54% | ||
| GM | 70.31% | ||
| FCFM | 26.53% |
ROA(3y)20.1%
ROA(5y)18.1%
ROE(3y)27.33%
ROE(5y)25.35%
ROIC(3y)23.47%
ROIC(5y)21.82%
ROICexc(3y)N/A
ROICexc(5y)N/A
ROICexgc(3y)N/A
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)32.7%
ROCE(5y)30.42%
ROICexgc growth 3YN/A
ROICexgc growth 5YN/A
ROICexc growth 3YN/A
ROICexc growth 5YN/A
OM growth 3Y0.88%
OM growth 5Y3.62%
PM growth 3Y3.69%
PM growth 5Y6.45%
GM growth 3Y-0.48%
GM growth 5Y0.33%
F-Score7
Asset Turnover0.72
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.1 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 0.49 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 0.23 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 114.61% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 6.75% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 70.65% | ||
| Profit Quality | 92.95% | ||
| Current Ratio | 4.5 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 3.65 | ||
| Altman-Z | 28.92 |
F-Score7
WACC8.11%
ROIC/WACC3.07
Cap/Depr(3y)109.61%
Cap/Depr(5y)102.11%
Cap/Sales(3y)6.07%
Cap/Sales(5y)6.23%
Profit Quality(3y)92.27%
Profit Quality(5y)96.1%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)0.57%
EPS 3Y23.48%
EPS 5Y24.7%
EPS Q2Q%-5.27%
EPS Next Y-2.23%
EPS Next 2Y5.81%
EPS Next 3Y7.56%
EPS Next 5Y10.04%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)10.31%
Revenue growth 3Y19.09%
Revenue growth 5Y17.12%
Sales Q2Q%7.06%
Revenue Next Year7.3%
Revenue Next 2Y7.81%
Revenue Next 3Y8.4%
Revenue Next 5Y9.5%
EBIT growth 1Y10.35%
EBIT growth 3Y20.13%
EBIT growth 5Y21.36%
EBIT Next Year20.02%
EBIT Next 3Y13.11%
EBIT Next 5Y12.54%
FCF growth 1Y4.67%
FCF growth 3Y11.86%
FCF growth 5Y20.11%
OCF growth 1Y14.81%
OCF growth 3Y14.7%
OCF growth 5Y19.75%
HERMES INTERNATIONAL / RMS.PA FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for HERMES INTERNATIONAL?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 7 / 10 to RMS.PA.
Can you provide the valuation status for HERMES INTERNATIONAL?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 1 / 10 to HERMES INTERNATIONAL (RMS.PA). This can be considered as Overvalued.
Can you provide the profitability details for HERMES INTERNATIONAL?
HERMES INTERNATIONAL (RMS.PA) has a profitability rating of 9 / 10.
What is the valuation of HERMES INTERNATIONAL based on its PE and PB ratios?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for HERMES INTERNATIONAL (RMS.PA) is 49.53 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 13.44.
Is the dividend of HERMES INTERNATIONAL sustainable?
The dividend rating of HERMES INTERNATIONAL (RMS.PA) is 2 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 62.91%.