RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) Fundamental Analysis & Valuation
AMS:RAND • NL0000379121
Current stock price
21.61 EUR
-0.18 (-0.83%)
Last:
This RAND.AS fundamental analysis includes valuation metrics, fair value assessment, financial health analysis, profitability trends, growth metrics and dividend sustainability analysis.
1. RAND.AS Profitability Analysis
1.1 Basic Checks
- In the past year RAND was profitable.
- In the past year RAND had a positive cash flow from operations.
- In the past 5 years RAND has always been profitable.
- In the past 5 years RAND always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
1.2 Ratios
- With a Return On Assets value of 2.72%, RAND perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 50.00% of the companies in the same industry.
- With a Return On Equity value of 7.27%, RAND perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 43.75% of the companies in the same industry.
- The Return On Invested Capital of RAND (5.86%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
- The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for RAND is below the industry average of 11.71%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 2.72% | ||
| ROE | 7.27% | ||
| ROIC | 5.86% |
ROA(3y)3.17%
ROA(5y)4.94%
ROE(3y)7.72%
ROE(5y)11.48%
ROIC(3y)7.56%
ROIC(5y)9.37%
1.3 Margins
- The Profit Margin of RAND (1.26%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
- In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of RAND has declined.
- RAND has a Operating Margin of 2.22%. This is in the lower half of the industry: RAND underperforms 68.75% of its industry peers.
- In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of RAND has remained more or less at the same level.
- RAND has a worse Gross Margin (18.67%) than 71.88% of its industry peers.
- RAND's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 2.22% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 1.26% | ||
| GM | 18.67% |
OM growth 3Y-17.75%
OM growth 5Y0.5%
PM growth 3Y-27.73%
PM growth 5Y-2.47%
GM growth 3Y-3.52%
GM growth 5Y-0.34%
2. RAND.AS Health Analysis
2.1 Basic Checks
- With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), RAND is creating some value.
- RAND has about the same amout of shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
- RAND has less shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
- The debt/assets ratio for RAND has been reduced compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
- An Altman-Z score of 2.98 indicates that RAND is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
- RAND's Altman-Z score of 2.98 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. RAND outperforms 62.50% of its industry peers.
- The Debt to FCF ratio of RAND is 2.39, which is a good value as it means it would take RAND, 2.39 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
- Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 2.39, RAND belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 90.63% of the companies in the same industry.
- RAND has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.39. This is a healthy value indicating a solid balance between debt and equity.
- The Debt to Equity ratio of RAND (0.39) is better than 71.88% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.39 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 2.39 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.98 |
ROIC/WACC0.98
WACC6%
2.3 Liquidity
- RAND has a Current Ratio of 1.21. This is a normal value and indicates that RAND is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
- RAND has a Current ratio of 1.21. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: RAND outperforms 59.38% of its industry peers.
- A Quick Ratio of 1.21 indicates that RAND should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
- The Quick ratio of RAND (1.21) is better than 62.50% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.21 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.21 |
3. RAND.AS Growth Analysis
3.1 Past
- The earnings per share for RAND have decreased by -1.75% in the last year.
- Measured over the past years, RAND shows a decrease in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been decreasing by -2.47% on average per year.
- RAND shows a decrease in Revenue. In the last year, the revenue decreased by -4.33%.
- RAND shows a small growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 2.18% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-1.75%
EPS 3Y-26.47%
EPS 5Y-2.47%
EPS Q2Q%117.39%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-4.33%
Revenue growth 3Y-5.76%
Revenue growth 5Y2.18%
Sales Q2Q%-4.39%
3.2 Future
- The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 14.05% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
- RAND is expected to show a small growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will grow by 2.11% yearly.
EPS Next Y18.02%
EPS Next 2Y16.46%
EPS Next 3Y14.05%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-0.16%
Revenue Next 2Y1.56%
Revenue Next 3Y2.06%
Revenue Next 5Y2.11%
3.3 Evolution
- The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
- When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is stable.
4. RAND.AS Valuation Analysis
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- The Price/Earnings ratio is 9.60, which indicates a very decent valuation of RAND.
- Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, RAND is valued cheaply inside the industry as 90.63% of the companies are valued more expensively.
- RAND's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 26.86.
- With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 8.14, the valuation of RAND can be described as very reasonable.
- Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, RAND is valued cheaply inside the industry as 87.50% of the companies are valued more expensively.
- RAND's Price/Forward Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 37.39.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 9.6 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.14 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- RAND's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. RAND is cheaper than 84.38% of the companies in the same industry.
- Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, RAND is valued cheaply inside the industry as 96.88% of the companies are valued more expensively.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 4.76 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- The low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
- RAND's earnings are expected to grow with 14.05% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)0.53
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y16.46%
EPS Next 3Y14.05%
5. RAND.AS Dividend Analysis
5.1 Amount
- RAND has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 7.42%, which is a nice return.
- In the last 3 months the price of RAND has falen by -31.84%. A price decline artificially increases the dividend yield. It may be a sign investors do not expect the dividend to last.
- Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 1.97, RAND pays a better dividend. On top of this RAND pays more dividend than 100.00% of the companies listed in the same industry.
- RAND's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 1.82.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 7.42% |
5.2 History
- The dividend of RAND is nicely growing with an annual growth rate of 91.04%!
Dividend Growth(5Y)91.04%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years1
5.3 Sustainability
- RAND pays out 100.34% of its income as dividend. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
- RAND's earnings are growing slower than its dividend. This means the dividend growth is not sustainable.
DP100.34%
EPS Next 2Y16.46%
EPS Next 3Y14.05%
RAND.AS Fundamentals: All Metrics, Ratios and Statistics
AMS:RAND (4/13/2026, 5:35:15 PM)
21.61
-0.18 (-0.83%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupCommercial & Professional Services
GICS IndustryProfessional Services
Earnings (Last)02-11 2026-02-11/bmo
Earnings (Next)04-22 2026-04-22
Inst Owners39.49%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners0.07%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap3.80B
Revenue(TTM)23.08B
Net Income(TTM)291.00M
Analysts68.46
Price Target34.62 (60.2%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 7.42% |
Yearly Dividend1.67
Dividend Growth(5Y)91.04%
DP100.34%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years1
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)-11.85%
Min EPS beat(2)-29.62%
Max EPS beat(2)5.92%
EPS beat(4)2
Avg EPS beat(4)-7.92%
Min EPS beat(4)-29.62%
Max EPS beat(4)5.92%
EPS beat(8)2
Avg EPS beat(8)-15.78%
EPS beat(12)4
Avg EPS beat(12)-6.99%
EPS beat(16)7
Avg EPS beat(16)-1.91%
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-2.09%
Min Revenue beat(2)-2.11%
Max Revenue beat(2)-2.07%
Revenue beat(4)0
Avg Revenue beat(4)-1.81%
Min Revenue beat(4)-2.35%
Max Revenue beat(4)-0.7%
Revenue beat(8)0
Avg Revenue beat(8)-1.8%
Revenue beat(12)0
Avg Revenue beat(12)-2.07%
Revenue beat(16)0
Avg Revenue beat(16)-1.72%
PT rev (1m)-8.43%
PT rev (3m)-15.75%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-22.58%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-22.58%
EPS NY rev (1m)-7.06%
EPS NY rev (3m)-13.97%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)-0.51%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-0.11%
Revenue NY rev (1m)-1.48%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-2.94%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 9.6 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.14 | ||
| P/S | 0.16 | ||
| P/FCF | 4.76 | ||
| P/OCF | 4.36 | ||
| P/B | 0.95 | ||
| P/tB | 6.11 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3 |
EPS(TTM)2.25
EY10.41%
EPS(NY)2.66
Fwd EY12.29%
FCF(TTM)4.54
FCFY21.01%
OCF(TTM)4.96
OCFY22.93%
SpS131.13
BVpS22.74
TBVpS3.53
PEG (NY)0.53
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number33.93
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 2.72% | ||
| ROE | 7.27% | ||
| ROCE | 8.76% | ||
| ROIC | 5.86% | ||
| ROICexc | 6.29% | ||
| ROICexgc | 16.57% | ||
| OM | 2.22% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 1.26% | ||
| GM | 18.67% | ||
| FCFM | 3.46% |
ROA(3y)3.17%
ROA(5y)4.94%
ROE(3y)7.72%
ROE(5y)11.48%
ROIC(3y)7.56%
ROIC(5y)9.37%
ROICexc(3y)8.01%
ROICexc(5y)10.12%
ROICexgc(3y)21.35%
ROICexgc(5y)25.74%
ROCE(3y)11.31%
ROCE(5y)14%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-18.4%
ROICexgc growth 5Y1.26%
ROICexc growth 3Y-20.8%
ROICexc growth 5Y0.99%
OM growth 3Y-17.75%
OM growth 5Y0.5%
PM growth 3Y-27.73%
PM growth 5Y-2.47%
GM growth 3Y-3.52%
GM growth 5Y-0.34%
F-Score7
Asset Turnover2.16
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.39 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 2.39 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.85 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 21.73% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 0.32% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 102.83% | ||
| Profit Quality | 274.57% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.21 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.21 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.98 |
F-Score7
WACC6%
ROIC/WACC0.98
Cap/Depr(3y)21.1%
Cap/Depr(5y)27.91%
Cap/Sales(3y)0.34%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.4%
Profit Quality(3y)314.87%
Profit Quality(5y)230.26%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-1.75%
EPS 3Y-26.47%
EPS 5Y-2.47%
EPS Q2Q%117.39%
EPS Next Y18.02%
EPS Next 2Y16.46%
EPS Next 3Y14.05%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-4.33%
Revenue growth 3Y-5.76%
Revenue growth 5Y2.18%
Sales Q2Q%-4.39%
Revenue Next Year-0.16%
Revenue Next 2Y1.56%
Revenue Next 3Y2.06%
Revenue Next 5Y2.11%
EBIT growth 1Y26.42%
EBIT growth 3Y-22.48%
EBIT growth 5Y2.69%
EBIT Next Year43.42%
EBIT Next 3Y18.9%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y41.42%
FCF growth 3Y-5.64%
FCF growth 5Y-10.04%
OCF growth 1Y34.36%
OCF growth 3Y-6.68%
OCF growth 5Y-9.82%
RANDSTAD NV / RAND.AS Fundamental Analysis FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for RANDSTAD NV?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to RAND.AS.
Can you provide the valuation status for RANDSTAD NV?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 8 / 10 to RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS). This can be considered as Undervalued.
How profitable is RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) stock?
RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) has a profitability rating of 4 / 10.
How financially healthy is RANDSTAD NV?
The financial health rating of RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) is 7 / 10.
What is the earnings growth outlook for RANDSTAD NV?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) is expected to grow by 18.02% in the next year.