PHILLIPS 66 (R66.DE) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Frankfurt Stock Exchange - FRA:R66 - US7185461040 - Common Stock
110.1 EUR
-1.42 (-1.27%)
We assign a fundamental rating of 3 out of 10 to R66. R66 was compared to 67 industry peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. The financial health of R66 is average, but there are quite some concerns on its profitability. R66 does not seem to be growing, but still is valued expensively.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year R66 was profitable.
R66 had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
Of the past 5 years R66 4 years were profitable.
In the past 5 years R66 always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
1.2 Ratios
R66 has a worse Return On Assets (1.97%) than 67.16% of its industry peers.
With a Return On Equity value of 5.56%, R66 is not doing good in the industry: 68.66% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
R66's Return On Invested Capital of 3.56% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. R66 is outperformed by 71.64% of its industry peers.
R66 had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 8.67%. This is in line with the industry average of 9.19%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (3.56%) for R66 is well below the 3 year average (8.67%), which needs to be investigated, but indicates that R66 had better years and this may not be a problem.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.97% | ||
| ROE | 5.56% | ||
| ROIC | 3.56% |
ROA(3y)8.86%
ROA(5y)4.33%
ROE(3y)22.64%
ROE(5y)10.75%
ROIC(3y)8.67%
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
The Profit Margin of R66 (1.13%) is worse than 74.63% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of R66 has declined.
R66's Operating Margin of 1.99% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. R66 is outperformed by 79.10% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of R66 has declined.
Looking at the Gross Margin, with a value of 10.79%, R66 is doing worse than 80.60% of the companies in the same industry.
R66's Gross Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 1.99% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 1.13% | ||
| GM | 10.79% |
OM growth 3Y52.02%
OM growth 5Y-14.16%
PM growth 3Y7.9%
PM growth 5Y-12.42%
GM growth 3Y3.1%
GM growth 5Y-3.37%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), R66 is creating some value.
R66 has less shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
The number of shares outstanding for R66 has been reduced compared to 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, R66 has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 3.11 indicates that R66 is not in any danger for bankruptcy at the moment.
R66 has a Altman-Z score of 3.11. This is amongst the best in the industry. R66 outperforms 82.09% of its industry peers.
R66 has a debt to FCF ratio of 16.10. This is a negative value and a sign of low solvency as R66 would need 16.10 years to pay back of all of its debts.
R66 has a worse Debt to FCF ratio (16.10) than 61.19% of its industry peers.
R66 has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.71. This is a neutral value indicating R66 is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
Looking at the Debt to Equity ratio, with a value of 0.71, R66 is doing worse than 64.18% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.71 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 16.1 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.11 |
ROIC/WACC0.45
WACC7.94%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.23 indicates that R66 should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
Looking at the Current ratio, with a value of 1.23, R66 is in line with its industry, outperforming 46.27% of the companies in the same industry.
A Quick Ratio of 0.87 indicates that R66 may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
R66 has a Quick ratio (0.87) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.23 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.87 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
R66 shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -58.78%.
The Earnings Per Share has been decreasing by -5.44% on average over the past years.
The Revenue for R66 has decreased by -10.68% in the past year. This is quite bad
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 5.91% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-58.78%
EPS 3Y2.29%
EPS 5Y-5.44%
EPS Q2Q%23.53%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-10.68%
Revenue growth 3Y8.69%
Revenue growth 5Y5.91%
Sales Q2Q%-3.27%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, R66 will show a very strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 22.11% on average per year.
R66 is expected to show a decrease in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will decrease by -4.36% yearly.
EPS Next Y6.2%
EPS Next 2Y39.71%
EPS Next 3Y28.08%
EPS Next 5Y22.11%
Revenue Next Year-6.5%
Revenue Next 2Y-5.36%
Revenue Next 3Y-2.4%
Revenue Next 5Y-4.36%
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio of 33.57, the valuation of R66 can be described as expensive.
R66's Price/Earnings ratio is a bit more expensive when compared to the industry. R66 is more expensive than 71.64% of the companies in the same industry.
R66 is valuated rather expensively when we compare the Price/Earnings ratio to 26.51, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 10.86, the valuation of R66 can be described as very reasonable.
R66's Price/Forward Earnings ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. R66 is cheaper than 62.69% of the companies in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 23.13, R66 is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 33.57 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.86 |
4.2 Price Multiples
74.63% of the companies in the same industry are cheaper than R66, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
62.69% of the companies in the same industry are cheaper than R66, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 38.58 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 12.25 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates R66 does not grow enough to justify the current Price/Earnings ratio.
R66's earnings are expected to grow with 28.08% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)5.41
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y39.71%
EPS Next 3Y28.08%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 3.74%, R66 has a reasonable but not impressive dividend return.
R66's Dividend Yield is comparable with the industry average which is at 5.76.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.00, R66 pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.74% |
5.2 History
The dividend of R66 has a limited annual growth rate of 5.09%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)5.09%
Div Incr Years5
Div Non Decr Years5
5.3 Sustainability
127.72% of the earnings are spent on dividend by R66. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
The dividend of R66 is growing, but earnings are growing more, so the dividend growth is sustainable.
DP127.72%
EPS Next 2Y39.71%
EPS Next 3Y28.08%
FRA:R66 (12/22/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
110.1
-1.42 (-1.27%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorEnergy
GICS IndustryGroupEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners78%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners0.16%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap44.36B
Revenue(TTM)131.95B
Net Income(TTM)1.50B
Analysts72.31
Price Target128.32 (16.55%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.74% |
Yearly Dividend3.81
Dividend Growth(5Y)5.09%
DP127.72%
Div Incr Years5
Div Non Decr Years5
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)2
Avg EPS beat(2)26.64%
Min EPS beat(2)15.17%
Max EPS beat(2)38.11%
EPS beat(4)3
Avg EPS beat(4)17.18%
Min EPS beat(4)-21.28%
Max EPS beat(4)38.11%
EPS beat(8)6
Avg EPS beat(8)15.4%
EPS beat(12)8
Avg EPS beat(12)11.29%
EPS beat(16)12
Avg EPS beat(16)14.14%
Revenue beat(2)2
Avg Revenue beat(2)5.33%
Min Revenue beat(2)3.59%
Max Revenue beat(2)7.06%
Revenue beat(4)4
Avg Revenue beat(4)3.82%
Min Revenue beat(4)0.25%
Max Revenue beat(4)7.06%
Revenue beat(8)8
Avg Revenue beat(8)5.26%
Revenue beat(12)11
Avg Revenue beat(12)4.05%
Revenue beat(16)14
Avg Revenue beat(16)4.57%
PT rev (1m)10.12%
PT rev (3m)10.12%
EPS NQ rev (1m)5.99%
EPS NQ rev (3m)41.53%
EPS NY rev (1m)10.33%
EPS NY rev (3m)27.66%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0.47%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)0.19%
Revenue NY rev (1m)1.4%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0.5%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 33.57 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.86 | ||
| P/S | 0.4 | ||
| P/FCF | 38.58 | ||
| P/OCF | 15.29 | ||
| P/B | 1.94 | ||
| P/tB | 2.13 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 12.25 |
EPS(TTM)3.28
EY2.98%
EPS(NY)10.13
Fwd EY9.2%
FCF(TTM)2.85
FCFY2.59%
OCF(TTM)7.2
OCFY6.54%
SpS278.72
BVpS56.86
TBVpS51.65
PEG (NY)5.41
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number64.78
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.97% | ||
| ROE | 5.56% | ||
| ROCE | 4.52% | ||
| ROIC | 3.56% | ||
| ROICexc | 3.68% | ||
| ROICexgc | 3.85% | ||
| OM | 1.99% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 1.13% | ||
| GM | 10.79% | ||
| FCFM | 1.02% |
ROA(3y)8.86%
ROA(5y)4.33%
ROE(3y)22.64%
ROE(5y)10.75%
ROIC(3y)8.67%
ROIC(5y)N/A
ROICexc(3y)9.38%
ROICexc(5y)N/A
ROICexgc(3y)9.81%
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)10.99%
ROCE(5y)N/A
ROICexgc growth 3Y47.02%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-13.51%
ROICexc growth 3Y47.48%
ROICexc growth 5Y-12.72%
OM growth 3Y52.02%
OM growth 5Y-14.16%
PM growth 3Y7.9%
PM growth 5Y-12.42%
GM growth 3Y3.1%
GM growth 5Y-3.37%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.73
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.71 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 16.1 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 3.26 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 63.25% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.56% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 57.96% | ||
| Profit Quality | 90.25% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.23 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.87 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.11 |
F-Score6
WACC7.94%
ROIC/WACC0.45
Cap/Depr(3y)111.89%
Cap/Depr(5y)132.17%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.41%
Cap/Sales(5y)2.09%
Profit Quality(3y)84.92%
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-58.78%
EPS 3Y2.29%
EPS 5Y-5.44%
EPS Q2Q%23.53%
EPS Next Y6.2%
EPS Next 2Y39.71%
EPS Next 3Y28.08%
EPS Next 5Y22.11%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-10.68%
Revenue growth 3Y8.69%
Revenue growth 5Y5.91%
Sales Q2Q%-3.27%
Revenue Next Year-6.5%
Revenue Next 2Y-5.36%
Revenue Next 3Y-2.4%
Revenue Next 5Y-4.36%
EBIT growth 1Y-22.77%
EBIT growth 3Y65.23%
EBIT growth 5Y-9.09%
EBIT Next Year112.69%
EBIT Next 3Y38.2%
EBIT Next 5Y23.87%
FCF growth 1Y-80.95%
FCF growth 3Y-17.53%
FCF growth 5Y20.06%
OCF growth 1Y-64.46%
OCF growth 3Y-11.36%
OCF growth 5Y-2.71%
PHILLIPS 66 / R66.DE FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for PHILLIPS 66?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 3 / 10 to R66.DE.
What is the valuation status of PHILLIPS 66 (R66.DE) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 2 / 10 to PHILLIPS 66 (R66.DE). This can be considered as Overvalued.
Can you provide the profitability details for PHILLIPS 66?
PHILLIPS 66 (R66.DE) has a profitability rating of 3 / 10.
Can you provide the financial health for R66 stock?
The financial health rating of PHILLIPS 66 (R66.DE) is 4 / 10.
How sustainable is the dividend of PHILLIPS 66 (R66.DE) stock?
The dividend rating of PHILLIPS 66 (R66.DE) is 4 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 127.72%.