NU SKIN ENTERPRISES INC - A (NUS) Stock Fundamental Analysis
USA - New York Stock Exchange - NYSE:NUS - US67018T1051 - Common Stock
9.84 USD
-0.21 (-2.09%)
9.84 USD
0 (0%)
We assign a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10 to NUS. NUS was compared to 36 industry peers in the Personal Care Products industry. NUS has an average financial health and profitability rating. NUS is cheap, but on the other hand it scores bad on growth.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
NUS had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year NUS had a positive cash flow from operations.
Of the past 5 years NUS 4 years were profitable.
NUS had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
NUS has a better Return On Assets (7.69%) than 75.00% of its industry peers.
Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 13.70%, NUS belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 80.56% of the companies in the same industry.
The Return On Invested Capital of NUS (4.08%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for NUS is significantly below the industry average of 11.83%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 7.69% | ||
| ROE | 13.7% | ||
| ROIC | 4.08% |
ROA(3y)-1.25%
ROA(5y)2.75%
ROE(3y)-3.26%
ROE(5y)5.55%
ROIC(3y)5.22%
ROIC(5y)9.29%
1.3 Margins
With a decent Profit Margin value of 7.02%, NUS is doing good in the industry, outperforming 75.00% of the companies in the same industry.
NUS has a Operating Margin (3.87%) which is in line with its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of NUS has declined.
The Gross Margin of NUS (67.20%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
NUS's Gross Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 3.87% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 7.02% | ||
| GM | 67.2% |
OM growth 3Y-34.86%
OM growth 5Y-23.31%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-3.08%
GM growth 5Y-2.13%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), so NUS is destroying value.
The number of shares outstanding for NUS has been increased compared to 1 year ago.
Compared to 5 years ago, NUS has less shares outstanding
The debt/assets ratio for NUS has been reduced compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
NUS has an Altman-Z score of 3.77. This indicates that NUS is financially healthy and has little risk of bankruptcy at the moment.
NUS's Altman-Z score of 3.77 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. NUS outperforms 75.00% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of NUS is 4.29, which is a neutral value as it means it would take NUS, 4.29 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 4.29, NUS belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 83.33% of the companies in the same industry.
NUS has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.26. This is a healthy value indicating a solid balance between debt and equity.
NUS has a Debt to Equity ratio of 0.26. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: NUS outperforms 58.33% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.26 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 4.29 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.77 |
ROIC/WACC0.52
WACC7.88%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 2.15 indicates that NUS has no problem at all paying its short term obligations.
Looking at the Current ratio, with a value of 2.15, NUS is in line with its industry, outperforming 52.78% of the companies in the same industry.
A Quick Ratio of 1.45 indicates that NUS should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
Looking at the Quick ratio, with a value of 1.45, NUS is in line with its industry, outperforming 55.56% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.15 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.45 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
NUS shows a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has been growing by 64.29%, which is quite impressive.
Measured over the past years, NUS shows a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been decreasing by -22.85% on average per year.
Looking at the last year, NUS shows a very negative growth in Revenue. The Revenue has decreased by -12.10% in the last year.
NUS shows a decrease in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been decreasing by -6.47% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)64.29%
EPS 3Y-41.01%
EPS 5Y-22.85%
EPS Q2Q%100%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-12.1%
Revenue growth 3Y-13.71%
Revenue growth 5Y-6.47%
Sales Q2Q%-15.33%
3.2 Future
NUS is expected to show a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 29.90% yearly.
NUS is expected to show a decrease in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will decrease by -5.77% yearly.
EPS Next Y54.47%
EPS Next 2Y29.9%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-13.05%
Revenue Next 2Y-5.77%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is stable: in the next years the growth will be about the same than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio of 7.13, the valuation of NUS can be described as very cheap.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, NUS is valued cheaper than 91.67% of the companies in the same industry.
NUS's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 26.57.
NUS is valuated cheaply with a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 6.86.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, NUS is valued cheaply inside the industry as 88.89% of the companies are valued more expensively.
NUS is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 24.04, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 7.13 | ||
| Fwd PE | 6.86 |
4.2 Price Multiples
94.44% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than NUS, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
91.67% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than NUS, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 8.99 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 4 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
NUS's low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
NUS's earnings are expected to grow with 29.90% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)0.13
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y29.9%
EPS Next 3YN/A
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
NUS has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 2.39%. Purely for dividend investing, there may be better candidates out there.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 2.04, NUS pays a bit more dividend than its industry peers.
NUS's Dividend Yield is a higher than the S&P500 average which is at 1.88.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.39% |
5.2 History
The dividend of NUS decreases each year by -30.50%.
NUS has been paying a dividend for at least 10 years, so it has a reliable track record.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-30.5%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
10.87% of the earnings are spent on dividend by NUS. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
DP10.87%
EPS Next 2Y29.9%
EPS Next 3YN/A
9.84
-0.21 (-2.09%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryGroupHousehold & Personal Products
GICS IndustryPersonal Care Products
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners77.08%
Inst Owner Change1.34%
Ins Owners2.12%
Ins Owner Change-1.16%
Market Cap479.70M
Revenue(TTM)1.56B
Net Income(TTM)109.61M
Analysts45
Price TargetN/A
Short Float %5.01%
Short Ratio5.32
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.39% |
Yearly Dividend0.24
Dividend Growth(5Y)-30.5%
DP10.87%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)2
Avg EPS beat(2)42.99%
Min EPS beat(2)12.21%
Max EPS beat(2)73.77%
EPS beat(4)4
Avg EPS beat(4)59.11%
Min EPS beat(4)12.21%
Max EPS beat(4)76.64%
EPS beat(8)7
Avg EPS beat(8)43.78%
EPS beat(12)10
Avg EPS beat(12)34.6%
EPS beat(16)13
Avg EPS beat(16)24.83%
Revenue beat(2)1
Avg Revenue beat(2)-1.07%
Min Revenue beat(2)-3.63%
Max Revenue beat(2)1.5%
Revenue beat(4)3
Avg Revenue beat(4)0.39%
Min Revenue beat(4)-3.63%
Max Revenue beat(4)2.51%
Revenue beat(8)5
Avg Revenue beat(8)-0.35%
Revenue beat(12)5
Avg Revenue beat(12)-1.28%
Revenue beat(16)7
Avg Revenue beat(16)-1.32%
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)0%
EPS NQ rev (1m)0%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-9.09%
EPS NY rev (1m)3.17%
EPS NY rev (3m)3.17%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-2.4%
Revenue NY rev (1m)-1.24%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-1.24%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 7.13 | ||
| Fwd PE | 6.86 | ||
| P/S | 0.31 | ||
| P/FCF | 8.99 | ||
| P/OCF | 5.36 | ||
| P/B | 0.6 | ||
| P/tB | 0.71 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 4 |
EPS(TTM)1.38
EY14.02%
EPS(NY)1.43
Fwd EY14.58%
FCF(TTM)1.09
FCFY11.12%
OCF(TTM)1.83
OCFY18.65%
SpS32.01
BVpS16.41
TBVpS13.78
PEG (NY)0.13
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number22.57
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 7.69% | ||
| ROE | 13.7% | ||
| ROCE | 5.16% | ||
| ROIC | 4.08% | ||
| ROICexc | 5.21% | ||
| ROICexgc | 6.05% | ||
| OM | 3.87% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 7.02% | ||
| GM | 67.2% | ||
| FCFM | 3.42% |
ROA(3y)-1.25%
ROA(5y)2.75%
ROE(3y)-3.26%
ROE(5y)5.55%
ROIC(3y)5.22%
ROIC(5y)9.29%
ROICexc(3y)6.41%
ROICexc(5y)12.52%
ROICexgc(3y)8.32%
ROICexgc(5y)17.24%
ROCE(3y)6.61%
ROCE(5y)11.76%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-45.58%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-28.67%
ROICexc growth 3Y-42.83%
ROICexc growth 5Y-26.9%
OM growth 3Y-34.86%
OM growth 5Y-23.31%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-3.08%
GM growth 5Y-2.13%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.1
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.26 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 4.29 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.8 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 64.7% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 2.31% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 76.96% | ||
| Profit Quality | 48.67% | ||
| Current Ratio | 2.15 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.45 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.77 |
F-Score6
WACC7.88%
ROIC/WACC0.52
Cap/Depr(3y)74.52%
Cap/Depr(5y)79.94%
Cap/Sales(3y)2.68%
Cap/Sales(5y)2.61%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)64.29%
EPS 3Y-41.01%
EPS 5Y-22.85%
EPS Q2Q%100%
EPS Next Y54.47%
EPS Next 2Y29.9%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-12.1%
Revenue growth 3Y-13.71%
Revenue growth 5Y-6.47%
Sales Q2Q%-15.33%
Revenue Next Year-13.05%
Revenue Next 2Y-5.77%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y-28.1%
EBIT growth 3Y-43.79%
EBIT growth 5Y-28.27%
EBIT Next Year155.65%
EBIT Next 3YN/A
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y39.66%
FCF growth 3Y-1.31%
FCF growth 5Y-8.9%
OCF growth 1Y-0.72%
OCF growth 3Y-7.59%
OCF growth 5Y-8.88%
NU SKIN ENTERPRISES INC - A / NUS FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for NU SKIN ENTERPRISES INC - A?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to NUS.
Can you provide the valuation status for NU SKIN ENTERPRISES INC - A?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 9 / 10 to NU SKIN ENTERPRISES INC - A (NUS). This can be considered as Undervalued.
Can you provide the profitability details for NU SKIN ENTERPRISES INC - A?
NU SKIN ENTERPRISES INC - A (NUS) has a profitability rating of 4 / 10.
What is the valuation of NU SKIN ENTERPRISES INC - A based on its PE and PB ratios?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for NU SKIN ENTERPRISES INC - A (NUS) is 7.13 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 0.6.
Is the dividend of NU SKIN ENTERPRISES INC - A sustainable?
The dividend rating of NU SKIN ENTERPRISES INC - A (NUS) is 5 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 10.87%.