NOKIA OYJ (NOKIA.PA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Paris - EPA:NOKIA - FI0009000681 - Common Stock
5.55 EUR
-0.03 (-0.54%)
We assign a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10 to NOKIA. NOKIA was compared to 31 industry peers in the Communications Equipment industry. Both the profitability and the financial health of NOKIA get a neutral evaluation. Nothing too spectacular is happening here. NOKIA has a valuation in line with the averages, but on the other hand it scores bad on growth.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year NOKIA was profitable.
NOKIA had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
Of the past 5 years NOKIA 4 years were profitable.
NOKIA had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
NOKIA has a better Return On Assets (2.57%) than 70.97% of its industry peers.
The Return On Equity of NOKIA (4.74%) is better than 64.52% of its industry peers.
NOKIA has a better Return On Invested Capital (2.84%) than 64.52% of its industry peers.
NOKIA had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 4.06%. This is significantly below the industry average of 11.02%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 2.57% | ||
| ROE | 4.74% | ||
| ROIC | 2.84% |
ROA(3y)4.94%
ROA(5y)2.38%
ROE(3y)9.78%
ROE(5y)3.69%
ROIC(3y)4.06%
ROIC(5y)4.02%
1.3 Margins
NOKIA has a better Profit Margin (4.70%) than 64.52% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of NOKIA has grown nicely.
Looking at the Operating Margin, with a value of 6.02%, NOKIA is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 67.74% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of NOKIA has grown nicely.
The Gross Margin of NOKIA (43.88%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of NOKIA has grown nicely.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 6.02% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 4.7% | ||
| GM | 43.88% |
OM growth 3Y-2.82%
OM growth 5Y14.53%
PM growth 3Y-3.13%
PM growth 5Y194.44%
GM growth 3Y5.04%
GM growth 5Y5.25%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) below the Cost of Capital (WACC), NOKIA is destroying value.
Compared to 1 year ago, NOKIA has less shares outstanding
NOKIA has less shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
NOKIA has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
NOKIA has an Altman-Z score of 2.56. This is not the best score and indicates that NOKIA is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
NOKIA has a Altman-Z score (2.56) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
NOKIA has a debt to FCF ratio of 3.16. This is a good value and a sign of high solvency as NOKIA would need 3.16 years to pay back of all of its debts.
NOKIA's Debt to FCF ratio of 3.16 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. NOKIA outperforms 67.74% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.16 indicates that NOKIA is not too dependend on debt financing.
NOKIA's Debt to Equity ratio of 0.16 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. NOKIA outperforms 77.42% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.16 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.16 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.56 |
ROIC/WACC0.4
WACC7.08%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.48 indicates that NOKIA should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
NOKIA has a Current ratio (1.48) which is in line with its industry peers.
NOKIA has a Quick Ratio of 1.23. This is a normal value and indicates that NOKIA is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
NOKIA has a Quick ratio (1.23) which is in line with its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.48 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.23 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
NOKIA shows a slight negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has decreased by 0.00%.
NOKIA shows quite a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been growing by 11.14% yearly.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 3.04% in the past year.
NOKIA shows a decrease in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been decreasing by -3.79% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)0%
EPS 3Y1.77%
EPS 5Y11.14%
EPS Q2Q%0%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)3.04%
Revenue growth 3Y-4.69%
Revenue growth 5Y-3.79%
Sales Q2Q%11.6%
3.2 Future
NOKIA is expected to show a small growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 0.30% yearly.
NOKIA is expected to show a small growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will grow by 3.15% yearly.
EPS Next Y-28.02%
EPS Next 2Y-5.57%
EPS Next 3Y0.02%
EPS Next 5Y0.3%
Revenue Next Year4.09%
Revenue Next 2Y4.03%
Revenue Next 3Y3.74%
Revenue Next 5Y3.15%
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
The Revenue growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio of 17.90, the valuation of NOKIA can be described as rather expensive.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, NOKIA is valued cheaper than 87.10% of the companies in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio of 27.00, NOKIA is valued a bit cheaper.
The Price/Forward Earnings ratio is 15.96, which indicates a correct valuation of NOKIA.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, NOKIA is valued cheaper than 80.65% of the companies in the same industry.
NOKIA is valuated rather cheaply when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 23.70, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 17.9 | ||
| Fwd PE | 15.96 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, NOKIA is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 77.42% of the companies are valued more expensively.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio of NOKIA indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: NOKIA is cheaper than 61.29% of the companies listed in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 23.9 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 12.17 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
NOKIA has a very decent profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)1.61
EPS Next 2Y-5.57%
EPS Next 3Y0.02%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
NOKIA has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 2.74%. Purely for dividend investing, there may be better candidates out there.
NOKIA's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 2.73. NOKIA pays more dividend than 80.65% of the companies in the same industry.
NOKIA's Dividend Yield is a higher than the S&P500 average which is at 1.94.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.74% |
5.2 History
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
Div Incr Years2
Div Non Decr Years2
5.3 Sustainability
81.90% of the earnings are spent on dividend by NOKIA. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
DP81.9%
EPS Next 2Y-5.57%
EPS Next 3Y0.02%
EPA:NOKIA (12/30/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
5.55
-0.03 (-0.54%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorInformation Technology
GICS IndustryGroupTechnology Hardware & Equipment
GICS IndustryCommunications Equipment
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners34.4%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners0.08%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap30.78B
Revenue(TTM)19.75B
Net Income(TTM)928.00M
Analysts71.11
Price Target5.61 (1.08%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.74% |
Yearly Dividend0.06
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DP81.9%
Div Incr Years2
Div Non Decr Years2
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)-4.03%
Min EPS beat(2)-24.77%
Max EPS beat(2)16.71%
EPS beat(4)2
Avg EPS beat(4)-1.21%
Min EPS beat(4)-27.18%
Max EPS beat(4)30.42%
EPS beat(8)4
Avg EPS beat(8)-0.71%
EPS beat(12)5
Avg EPS beat(12)-3.87%
EPS beat(16)9
Avg EPS beat(16)-1.37%
Revenue beat(2)1
Avg Revenue beat(2)-3.52%
Min Revenue beat(2)-7.83%
Max Revenue beat(2)0.79%
Revenue beat(4)2
Avg Revenue beat(4)-2.39%
Min Revenue beat(4)-7.83%
Max Revenue beat(4)1.17%
Revenue beat(8)2
Avg Revenue beat(8)-6.37%
Revenue beat(12)3
Avg Revenue beat(12)-5.91%
Revenue beat(16)4
Avg Revenue beat(16)-4.64%
PT rev (1m)-1.77%
PT rev (3m)22.2%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-0.57%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-1.75%
EPS NY rev (1m)2.2%
EPS NY rev (3m)2.92%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-0.72%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0.12%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0.74%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 17.9 | ||
| Fwd PE | 15.96 | ||
| P/S | 1.56 | ||
| P/FCF | 23.9 | ||
| P/OCF | 16.16 | ||
| P/B | 1.57 | ||
| P/tB | 2.55 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 12.17 |
EPS(TTM)0.31
EY5.59%
EPS(NY)0.35
Fwd EY6.27%
FCF(TTM)0.23
FCFY4.18%
OCF(TTM)0.34
OCFY6.19%
SpS3.56
BVpS3.53
TBVpS2.18
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)1.61
Graham Number4.96
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 2.57% | ||
| ROE | 4.74% | ||
| ROCE | 4.51% | ||
| ROIC | 2.84% | ||
| ROICexc | 3.7% | ||
| ROICexgc | 5.87% | ||
| OM | 6.02% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 4.7% | ||
| GM | 43.88% | ||
| FCFM | 6.52% |
ROA(3y)4.94%
ROA(5y)2.38%
ROE(3y)9.78%
ROE(5y)3.69%
ROIC(3y)4.06%
ROIC(5y)4.02%
ROICexc(3y)5.84%
ROICexc(5y)5.9%
ROICexgc(3y)8.74%
ROICexgc(5y)9.29%
ROCE(3y)6.44%
ROCE(5y)6.38%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-10%
ROICexgc growth 5Y11.31%
ROICexc growth 3Y-8.21%
ROICexc growth 5Y12.5%
OM growth 3Y-2.82%
OM growth 5Y14.53%
PM growth 3Y-3.13%
PM growth 5Y194.44%
GM growth 3Y5.04%
GM growth 5Y5.25%
F-Score7
Asset Turnover0.55
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.16 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.16 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.39 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 57.04% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 3.12% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 5.45 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 83.95% | ||
| Profit Quality | 138.79% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.48 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.23 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.56 |
F-Score7
WACC7.08%
ROIC/WACC0.4
Cap/Depr(3y)53.08%
Cap/Depr(5y)50.54%
Cap/Sales(3y)2.65%
Cap/Sales(5y)2.53%
Profit Quality(3y)92.93%
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)0%
EPS 3Y1.77%
EPS 5Y11.14%
EPS Q2Q%0%
EPS Next Y-28.02%
EPS Next 2Y-5.57%
EPS Next 3Y0.02%
EPS Next 5Y0.3%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)3.04%
Revenue growth 3Y-4.69%
Revenue growth 5Y-3.79%
Sales Q2Q%11.6%
Revenue Next Year4.09%
Revenue Next 2Y4.03%
Revenue Next 3Y3.74%
Revenue Next 5Y3.15%
EBIT growth 1Y-28.3%
EBIT growth 3Y-7.39%
EBIT growth 5Y10.19%
EBIT Next Year8.19%
EBIT Next 3Y12.97%
EBIT Next 5Y9.55%
FCF growth 1Y288.3%
FCF growth 3Y-0.72%
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y13500%
OCF growth 3Y-1.71%
OCF growth 5Y44.92%
NOKIA OYJ / NOKIA.PA FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for NOKIA OYJ?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to NOKIA.PA.
What is the valuation status for NOKIA stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 5 / 10 to NOKIA OYJ (NOKIA.PA). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
What is the profitability of NOKIA stock?
NOKIA OYJ (NOKIA.PA) has a profitability rating of 6 / 10.
What is the earnings growth outlook for NOKIA OYJ?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of NOKIA OYJ (NOKIA.PA) is expected to decline by -28.02% in the next year.
Can you provide the dividend sustainability for NOKIA stock?
The dividend rating of NOKIA OYJ (NOKIA.PA) is 4 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 81.9%.