ARCELORMITTAL (MT.AS) Fundamental Analysis & Valuation
AMS:MT • LU1598757687
Current stock price
49.275 EUR
-1.02 (-2.04%)
Last:
This MT.AS fundamental analysis includes valuation metrics, fair value assessment, financial health analysis, profitability trends, growth metrics and dividend sustainability analysis.
1. MT.AS Profitability Analysis
1.1 Basic Checks
- MT had positive earnings in the past year.
- MT had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
- In the past 5 years MT has always been profitable.
- Each year in the past 5 years MT had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
- MT's Return On Assets of 3.23% is in line compared to the rest of the industry. MT outperforms 52.63% of its industry peers.
- Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 5.79%, MT is in line with its industry, outperforming 50.00% of the companies in the same industry.
- The Return On Invested Capital of MT (2.42%) is worse than 60.53% of its industry peers.
- MT had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 3.52%. This is significantly below the industry average of 8.54%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 3.23% | ||
| ROE | 5.79% | ||
| ROIC | 2.42% |
ROA(3y)1.9%
ROA(5y)6.41%
ROE(3y)3.4%
ROE(5y)11.63%
ROIC(3y)3.52%
ROIC(5y)7.66%
1.3 Margins
- The Profit Margin of MT (5.14%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
- MT's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
- With a Operating Margin value of 4.32%, MT perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 44.74% of the companies in the same industry.
- MT's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
- The Gross Margin of MT (8.33%) is worse than 81.58% of its industry peers.
- MT's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 4.32% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 5.14% | ||
| GM | 8.33% |
OM growth 3Y-33.9%
OM growth 5Y33.31%
PM growth 3Y-23.88%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-21.13%
GM growth 5Y11.82%
2. MT.AS Health Analysis
2.1 Basic Checks
- The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), so MT is destroying value.
- The number of shares outstanding for MT has been reduced compared to 1 year ago.
- The number of shares outstanding for MT has been reduced compared to 5 years ago.
- Compared to 1 year ago, MT has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
- MT has an Altman-Z score of 1.87. This is not the best score and indicates that MT is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
- MT has a worse Altman-Z score (1.87) than 68.42% of its industry peers.
- MT has a debt to FCF ratio of 28.65. This is a negative value and a sign of low solvency as MT would need 28.65 years to pay back of all of its debts.
- MT has a Debt to FCF ratio (28.65) which is in line with its industry peers.
- A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.20 indicates that MT is not too dependend on debt financing.
- MT has a Debt to Equity ratio (0.20) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.2 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 28.65 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.87 |
ROIC/WACC0.25
WACC9.69%
2.3 Liquidity
- MT has a Current Ratio of 1.36. This is a normal value and indicates that MT is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
- With a Current ratio value of 1.36, MT is not doing good in the industry: 81.58% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
- A Quick Ratio of 0.53 indicates that MT may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
- MT has a Quick ratio of 0.53. This is amonst the worse of the industry: MT underperforms 84.21% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.36 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.53 |
3. MT.AS Growth Analysis
3.1 Past
- The Earnings Per Share has grown by an impressive 30.61% over the past year.
- Measured over the past years, MT shows a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been decreasing by -29.57% on average per year.
- The Revenue has decreased by -1.74% in the past year.
- Measured over the past years, MT shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 2.87% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)30.61%
EPS 3Y-29.57%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%65.38%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-1.74%
Revenue growth 3Y-8.41%
Revenue growth 5Y2.87%
Sales Q2Q%1.75%
3.2 Future
- MT is expected to show quite a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 13.53% yearly.
- MT is expected to show a small growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will grow by 3.26% yearly.
EPS Next Y35.58%
EPS Next 2Y30.54%
EPS Next 3Y20.23%
EPS Next 5Y13.53%
Revenue Next Year7.47%
Revenue Next 2Y6.2%
Revenue Next 3Y4.18%
Revenue Next 5Y3.26%
3.3 Evolution
- When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
- The Revenue growth rate is stable: in the next years the growth will be about the same than in the last years.
4. MT.AS Valuation Analysis
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- With a Price/Earnings ratio of 15.07, MT is valued correctly.
- Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, MT is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 78.95% of the companies are valued more expensively.
- MT's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a valuation a bit cheaper than the S&P500 average which is at 27.15.
- Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 11.12, the valuation of MT can be described as reasonable.
- MT's Price/Forward Earnings ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. MT is cheaper than 63.16% of the companies in the same industry.
- Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 22.12, MT is valued a bit cheaper.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 15.07 | ||
| Fwd PE | 11.12 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- 63.16% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than MT, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
- Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio of MT is on the same level as its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 95.87 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 9.6 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- The low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
- MT's earnings are expected to grow with 20.23% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)0.42
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y30.54%
EPS Next 3Y20.23%
5. MT.AS Dividend Analysis
5.1 Amount
- With a yearly dividend of 0.98%, MT is not a good candidate for dividend investing.
- MT's Dividend Yield is a higher than the industry average which is at 1.51.
- With a Dividend Yield of 0.98, MT pays less dividend than the S&P500 average, which is at 1.82.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% |
5.2 History
- The dividend of MT is nicely growing with an annual growth rate of 22.39%!
Dividend Growth(5Y)22.39%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
- MT pays out 13.36% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
- MT's earnings are growing slower than its dividend. This means the dividend growth is not sustainable.
DP13.36%
EPS Next 2Y30.54%
EPS Next 3Y20.23%
MT.AS Fundamentals: All Metrics, Ratios and Statistics
AMS:MT (4/28/2026, 1:53:17 PM)
49.275
-1.02 (-2.04%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorMaterials
GICS IndustryGroupMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & Mining
Earnings (Last)02-05 2026-02-05/bmo
Earnings (Next)04-30 2026-04-30/bmo
Inst Owners25.92%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins OwnersN/A
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap38.19B
Revenue(TTM)61.35B
Net Income(TTM)3.15B
Analysts78.46
Price Target55.71 (13.06%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% |
Yearly Dividend0.47
Dividend Growth(5Y)22.39%
DP13.36%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)19.07%
Min EPS beat(2)-14.82%
Max EPS beat(2)52.97%
EPS beat(4)2
Avg EPS beat(4)18.13%
Min EPS beat(4)-14.82%
Max EPS beat(4)52.97%
EPS beat(8)4
Avg EPS beat(8)8.11%
EPS beat(12)8
Avg EPS beat(12)27.48%
EPS beat(16)11
Avg EPS beat(16)41.51%
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-4.24%
Min Revenue beat(2)-6.52%
Max Revenue beat(2)-1.96%
Revenue beat(4)0
Avg Revenue beat(4)-3.57%
Min Revenue beat(4)-6.52%
Max Revenue beat(4)-0.12%
Revenue beat(8)0
Avg Revenue beat(8)-3.68%
Revenue beat(12)1
Avg Revenue beat(12)-3.16%
Revenue beat(16)4
Avg Revenue beat(16)-1.24%
PT rev (1m)9.8%
PT rev (3m)43.84%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-18.56%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-15.09%
EPS NY rev (1m)-3.1%
EPS NY rev (3m)3.13%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)-1.16%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-2.74%
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.79%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0.15%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 15.07 | ||
| Fwd PE | 11.12 | ||
| P/S | 0.73 | ||
| P/FCF | 95.87 | ||
| P/OCF | 9.34 | ||
| P/B | 0.82 | ||
| P/tB | 0.91 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 9.6 |
EPS(TTM)3.27
EY6.64%
EPS(NY)4.43
Fwd EY8.99%
FCF(TTM)0.51
FCFY1.04%
OCF(TTM)5.28
OCFY10.71%
SpS67.38
BVpS59.82
TBVpS54.05
PEG (NY)0.42
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number66.3402 (34.63%)
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 3.23% | ||
| ROE | 5.79% | ||
| ROCE | 3.52% | ||
| ROIC | 2.42% | ||
| ROICexc | 2.61% | ||
| ROICexgc | 2.82% | ||
| OM | 4.32% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 5.14% | ||
| GM | 8.33% | ||
| FCFM | 0.76% |
ROA(3y)1.9%
ROA(5y)6.41%
ROE(3y)3.4%
ROE(5y)11.63%
ROIC(3y)3.52%
ROIC(5y)7.66%
ROICexc(3y)3.89%
ROICexc(5y)8.42%
ROICexgc(3y)4.21%
ROICexgc(5y)9.08%
ROCE(3y)5.16%
ROCE(5y)11.28%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-41.59%
ROICexgc growth 5Y30.43%
ROICexc growth 3Y-41.53%
ROICexc growth 5Y30.54%
OM growth 3Y-33.9%
OM growth 5Y33.31%
PM growth 3Y-23.88%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-21.13%
GM growth 5Y11.82%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover0.63
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.2 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 28.65 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.91 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 147.27% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 7.07% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 3.2 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 85.88% | ||
| Profit Quality | 14.85% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.36 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.53 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.87 |
F-Score6
WACC9.69%
ROIC/WACC0.25
Cap/Depr(3y)160.05%
Cap/Depr(5y)146.76%
Cap/Sales(3y)6.96%
Cap/Sales(5y)5.83%
Profit Quality(3y)126.05%
Profit Quality(5y)99.34%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)30.61%
EPS 3Y-29.57%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%65.38%
EPS Next Y35.58%
EPS Next 2Y30.54%
EPS Next 3Y20.23%
EPS Next 5Y13.53%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-1.74%
Revenue growth 3Y-8.41%
Revenue growth 5Y2.87%
Sales Q2Q%1.75%
Revenue Next Year7.47%
Revenue Next 2Y6.2%
Revenue Next 3Y4.18%
Revenue Next 5Y3.26%
EBIT growth 1Y-27.24%
EBIT growth 3Y-39.46%
EBIT growth 5Y37.13%
EBIT Next Year124.23%
EBIT Next 3Y38.51%
EBIT Next 5Y23.71%
FCF growth 1Y4.7%
FCF growth 3Y-58.89%
FCF growth 5Y-22.18%
OCF growth 1Y-0.97%
OCF growth 3Y-22.2%
OCF growth 5Y3.33%
ARCELORMITTAL / MT.AS Fundamental Analysis FAQ
What is the fundamental rating for MT stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 4 / 10 to MT.AS.
What is the valuation status for MT stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 6 / 10 to ARCELORMITTAL (MT.AS). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
Can you provide the profitability details for ARCELORMITTAL?
ARCELORMITTAL (MT.AS) has a profitability rating of 4 / 10.
Can you provide the financial health for MT stock?
The financial health rating of ARCELORMITTAL (MT.AS) is 3 / 10.
Can you provide the dividend sustainability for MT stock?
The dividend rating of ARCELORMITTAL (MT.AS) is 4 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 13.36%.