Logo image of MT.AS

ARCELORMITTAL (MT.AS) Stock Fundamental Analysis

Europe - Euronext Amsterdam - AMS:MT - LU1598757687 - Common Stock

46 EUR
+0.39 (+0.86%)
Last: 1/27/2026, 3:46:19 PM
Fundamental Rating

3

Overall MT gets a fundamental rating of 3 out of 10. We evaluated MT against 45 industry peers in the Metals & Mining industry. While MT is still in line with the averages on profitability rating, there are concerns on its financial health. MT has a valuation in line with the averages, but on the other hand it scores bad on growth.


Dividend Valuation Growth Profitability Health

4

1. Profitability

1.1 Basic Checks

  • In the past year MT was profitable.
  • In the past year MT had a positive cash flow from operations.
  • MT had positive earnings in 4 of the past 5 years.
  • Each year in the past 5 years MT had a positive operating cash flow.
MT.AS Yearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCFMT.AS Yearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCFYearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCF 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 5B 10B 15B

1.2 Ratios

  • With a Return On Assets value of 2.62%, MT perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 46.67% of the companies in the same industry.
  • MT has a worse Return On Equity (4.73%) than 60.00% of its industry peers.
  • MT has a worse Return On Invested Capital (2.71%) than 60.00% of its industry peers.
  • MT had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 5.89%. This is below the industry average of 8.05%.
Industry RankSector Rank
ROA 2.62%
ROE 4.73%
ROIC 2.71%
ROA(3y)4.11%
ROA(5y)5.59%
ROE(3y)7.31%
ROE(5y)10.09%
ROIC(3y)5.89%
ROIC(5y)6.85%
MT.AS Yearly ROA, ROE, ROICMT.AS Yearly ROA, ROE, ROICYearly ROA, ROE, ROIC 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 10 20 30

1.3 Margins

  • MT's Profit Margin of 4.23% is in line compared to the rest of the industry. MT outperforms 51.11% of its industry peers.
  • MT's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
  • MT's Operating Margin of 5.21% is in line compared to the rest of the industry. MT outperforms 44.44% of its industry peers.
  • MT's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
  • The Gross Margin of MT (10.02%) is worse than 84.44% of its industry peers.
  • MT's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
Industry RankSector Rank
OM 5.21%
PM (TTM) 4.23%
GM 10.02%
OM growth 3Y-35.65%
OM growth 5Y25.94%
PM growth 3Y-52.12%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-26.65%
GM growth 5Y13.62%
MT.AS Yearly Profit, Operating, Gross MarginsMT.AS Yearly Profit, Operating, Gross MarginsYearly Profit, Operating, Gross Margins 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 5 10 15 20

2

2. Health

2.1 Basic Checks

  • With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) below the Cost of Capital (WACC), MT is destroying value.
  • The number of shares outstanding for MT has been reduced compared to 1 year ago.
  • MT has less shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
  • MT has a worse debt/assets ratio than last year.
MT.AS Yearly Shares OutstandingMT.AS Yearly Shares OutstandingYearly Shares Outstanding 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 200M 400M 600M 800M 1B
MT.AS Yearly Total Debt VS Total AssetsMT.AS Yearly Total Debt VS Total AssetsYearly Total Debt VS Total Assets 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 20B 40B 60B 80B

2.2 Solvency

  • The Debt to FCF ratio of MT is 323.22, which is on the high side as it means it would take MT, 323.22 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
  • The Debt to FCF ratio of MT (323.22) is worse than 60.00% of its industry peers.
  • MT has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.19. This is a healthy value indicating a solid balance between debt and equity.
  • The Debt to Equity ratio of MT (0.19) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
Industry RankSector Rank
Debt/Equity 0.19
Debt/FCF 323.22
Altman-Z N/A
ROIC/WACC0.3
WACC8.92%
MT.AS Yearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCFMT.AS Yearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCFYearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCF 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 10B 20B 30B 40B 50B

2.3 Liquidity

  • A Current Ratio of 1.39 indicates that MT should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
  • Looking at the Current ratio, with a value of 1.39, MT is doing worse than 82.22% of the companies in the same industry.
  • MT has a Quick Ratio of 1.39. This is a bad value and indicates that MT is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
  • Looking at the Quick ratio, with a value of 0.58, MT is doing worse than 82.22% of the companies in the same industry.
Industry RankSector Rank
Current Ratio 1.39
Quick Ratio 0.58
MT.AS Yearly Current Assets VS Current LiabilitesMT.AS Yearly Current Assets VS Current LiabilitesYearly Current Assets VS Current Liabilites 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 10B 20B 30B

3

3. Growth

3.1 Past

  • The earnings per share for MT have decreased by -2.78% in the last year.
  • The earnings per share for MT have been decreasing by -39.64% on average. This is quite bad
  • The Revenue has decreased by -1.90% in the past year.
  • MT shows a decrease in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been decreasing by -2.43% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-2.78%
EPS 3Y-39.64%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-1.59%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-1.9%
Revenue growth 3Y-6.57%
Revenue growth 5Y-2.43%
Sales Q2Q%3.03%

3.2 Future

  • Based on estimates for the next years, MT will show a very strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 27.53% on average per year.
  • Based on estimates for the next years, MT will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 2.09% on average per year.
EPS Next Y25.82%
EPS Next 2Y31.04%
EPS Next 3Y27.53%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-1.71%
Revenue Next 2Y2.99%
Revenue Next 3Y2.89%
Revenue Next 5Y2.09%

3.3 Evolution

  • The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
  • The Revenue growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
MT.AS Yearly Revenue VS EstimatesMT.AS Yearly Revenue VS EstimatesYearly Revenue VS Estimates 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 20B 40B 60B 80B
MT.AS Yearly EPS VS EstimatesMT.AS Yearly EPS VS EstimatesYearly EPS VS Estimates 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 0 5 10

6

4. Valuation

4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio

  • The Price/Earnings ratio is 15.54, which indicates a correct valuation of MT.
  • MT's Price/Earnings ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. MT is cheaper than 84.44% of the companies in the same industry.
  • MT's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a valuation a bit cheaper than the S&P500 average which is at 27.25.
  • A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 10.78 indicates a reasonable valuation of MT.
  • Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, MT is valued cheaper than 93.33% of the companies in the same industry.
  • When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of MT to the average of the S&P500 Index (25.98), we can say MT is valued rather cheaply.
Industry RankSector Rank
PE 15.54
Fwd PE 10.78
MT.AS Price Earnings VS Forward Price EarningsMT.AS Price Earnings VS Forward Price Earnings ChartPrice Earnings - Forward Price Earnings PE FPE 10 20 30

4.2 Price Multiples

  • MT's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. MT is cheaper than 73.33% of the companies in the same industry.
  • Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, MT is valued a bit more expensive than the industry average as 60.00% of the companies are valued more cheaply.
Industry RankSector Rank
P/FCF 917.29
EV/EBITDA 8.31
MT.AS Per share dataMT.AS EPS, Sales, OCF, FCF, BookValue per sharePer Share Data Per Share 20 40 60

4.3 Compensation for Growth

  • MT's low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
  • A more expensive valuation may be justified as MT's earnings are expected to grow with 27.53% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)0.6
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y31.04%
EPS Next 3Y27.53%

3

5. Dividend

5.1 Amount

  • MT has a yearly dividend return of 0.96%, which is pretty low.
  • Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 1.67, MT has a dividend in line with its industry peers.
  • With a Dividend Yield of 0.96, MT pays less dividend than the S&P500 average, which is at 1.82.
Industry RankSector Rank
Dividend Yield 0.96%

5.2 History

  • The dividend of MT is nicely growing with an annual growth rate of 37.57%!
Dividend Growth(5Y)37.57%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
MT.AS Yearly Dividends per shareMT.AS Yearly Dividends per shareYearly Dividends per share 2021 2024 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

5.3 Sustainability

  • MT pays out 15.59% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
  • The dividend of MT is growing, but the earnings are growing slower. This means the dividend growth is not sustainable.
DP15.59%
EPS Next 2Y31.04%
EPS Next 3Y27.53%
MT.AS Yearly Income VS Free CF VS DividendMT.AS Yearly Income VS Free CF VS DividendYearly Income VS Free CF VS Dividend 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 5B 10B
MT.AS Dividend Payout.MT.AS Dividend Payout, showing the Payout Ratio.MT.AS Dividend Payout.PayoutRetained Earnings

ARCELORMITTAL / MT.AS FAQ

What is the fundamental rating for MT stock?

ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 3 / 10 to MT.AS.


What is the valuation status for MT stock?

ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 6 / 10 to ARCELORMITTAL (MT.AS). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.


How profitable is ARCELORMITTAL (MT.AS) stock?

ARCELORMITTAL (MT.AS) has a profitability rating of 4 / 10.


What are the PE and PB ratios of ARCELORMITTAL (MT.AS) stock?

The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for ARCELORMITTAL (MT.AS) is 15.54 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 0.77.


Is the dividend of ARCELORMITTAL sustainable?

The dividend rating of ARCELORMITTAL (MT.AS) is 3 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 15.59%.