ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis

Europe • Euronext Milan • BIT:MN • IT0001469383

2.13 EUR
+0.02 (+1.19%)
Last: Jan 30, 2026, 07:00 PM
Fundamental Rating

6

Overall MN gets a fundamental rating of 6 out of 10. We evaluated MN against 68 industry peers in the Media industry. MN has an excellent profitability rating, but there are some minor concerns on its financial health. MN is valued quite cheap, but it does not seem to be growing. MN also has an excellent dividend rating.


Dividend Valuation Growth Profitability Health

8

1. Profitability

1.1 Basic Checks

  • In the past year MN was profitable.
  • In the past year MN had a positive cash flow from operations.
  • MN had positive earnings in each of the past 5 years.
  • In the past 5 years MN always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
MN.MI Yearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCFMN.MI Yearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCFYearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCF 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 100M -100M

1.2 Ratios

  • MN has a Return On Assets of 8.78%. This is amongst the best in the industry. MN outperforms 97.01% of its industry peers.
  • MN has a Return On Equity of 34.27%. This is amongst the best in the industry. MN outperforms 94.03% of its industry peers.
  • The Return On Invested Capital of MN (19.38%) is better than 98.51% of its industry peers.
  • MN had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 11.34%. This is above the industry average of 7.53%.
  • The 3 year average ROIC (11.34%) for MN is below the current ROIC(19.38%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
Industry RankSector Rank
ROA 8.78%
ROE 34.27%
ROIC 19.38%
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
MN.MI Yearly ROA, ROE, ROICMN.MI Yearly ROA, ROE, ROICYearly ROA, ROE, ROIC 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 -50 -100

1.3 Margins

  • The Profit Margin of MN (6.75%) is better than 76.12% of its industry peers.
  • In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of MN has grown nicely.
  • With a decent Operating Margin value of 10.52%, MN is doing good in the industry, outperforming 70.15% of the companies in the same industry.
  • In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of MN has grown nicely.
  • The Gross Margin of MN (34.59%) is worse than 64.18% of its industry peers.
  • In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of MN has grown nicely.
Industry RankSector Rank
OM 10.52%
PM (TTM) 6.75%
GM 34.59%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
MN.MI Yearly Profit, Operating, Gross MarginsMN.MI Yearly Profit, Operating, Gross MarginsYearly Profit, Operating, Gross Margins 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 10 -10 20 30

4

2. Health

2.1 Basic Checks

  • With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), MN is creating value.
  • MN has about the same amout of shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
  • MN has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
  • Compared to 1 year ago, MN has a worse debt to assets ratio.
MN.MI Yearly Shares OutstandingMN.MI Yearly Shares OutstandingYearly Shares Outstanding 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 50M 100M 150M 200M 250M
MN.MI Yearly Total Debt VS Total AssetsMN.MI Yearly Total Debt VS Total AssetsYearly Total Debt VS Total Assets 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 500M 1B

2.2 Solvency

  • MN has an Altman-Z score of 2.16. This is not the best score and indicates that MN is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
  • MN has a better Altman-Z score (2.16) than 71.64% of its industry peers.
  • The Debt to FCF ratio of MN is 3.46, which is a good value as it means it would take MN, 3.46 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
  • MN's Debt to FCF ratio of 3.46 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. MN outperforms 68.66% of its industry peers.
  • A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.69 indicates that MN is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
  • MN's Debt to Equity ratio of 0.69 is in line compared to the rest of the industry. MN outperforms 55.22% of its industry peers.
Industry RankSector Rank
Debt/Equity 0.69
Debt/FCF 3.46
Altman-Z 2.16
ROIC/WACC3.17
WACC6.11%
MN.MI Yearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCFMN.MI Yearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCFYearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCF 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 100M 200M 300M

2.3 Liquidity

  • A Current Ratio of 0.97 indicates that MN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
  • MN has a Current ratio (0.97) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
  • A Quick Ratio of 0.62 indicates that MN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
  • The Quick ratio of MN (0.62) is worse than 70.15% of its industry peers.
Industry RankSector Rank
Current Ratio 0.97
Quick Ratio 0.62
MN.MI Yearly Current Assets VS Current LiabilitesMN.MI Yearly Current Assets VS Current LiabilitesYearly Current Assets VS Current Liabilites 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 200M 400M 600M

3

3. Growth

3.1 Past

  • MN shows a slight negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has decreased by -8.79%.
  • The Earnings Per Share has been growing by 15.47% on average over the past years. This is quite good.
  • MN shows a small growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 0.49%.
  • Measured over the past years, MN shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 1.10% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%

3.2 Future

  • Based on estimates for the next years, MN will show a small growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 1.31% on average per year.
  • The Revenue is expected to grow by 0.71% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.62%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year0.67%
Revenue Next 2Y1.17%
Revenue Next 3Y1.25%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%

3.3 Evolution

  • When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
  • The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
MN.MI Yearly Revenue VS EstimatesMN.MI Yearly Revenue VS EstimatesYearly Revenue VS Estimates 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 200M 400M 600M 800M 1B
MN.MI Yearly EPS VS EstimatesMN.MI Yearly EPS VS EstimatesYearly EPS VS Estimates 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

7

4. Valuation

4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio

  • Based on the Price/Earnings ratio of 5.92, the valuation of MN can be described as very cheap.
  • Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, MN is valued cheaper than 89.55% of the companies in the same industry.
  • Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio of 28.32, MN is valued rather cheaply.
  • A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 8.16 indicates a reasonable valuation of MN.
  • Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, MN is valued a bit cheaper than 79.10% of the companies in the same industry.
  • MN is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 25.57, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
Industry RankSector Rank
PE 5.92
Fwd PE 8.16
MN.MI Price Earnings VS Forward Price EarningsMN.MI Price Earnings VS Forward Price Earnings ChartPrice Earnings - Forward Price Earnings PE FPE 20 40 60 80

4.2 Price Multiples

  • Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, MN is valued cheaper than 85.07% of the companies in the same industry.
  • Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, MN is valued a bit cheaper than 79.10% of the companies in the same industry.
Industry RankSector Rank
P/FCF 6.62
EV/EBITDA 3.87
MN.MI Per share dataMN.MI EPS, Sales, OCF, FCF, BookValue per sharePer Share Data Per Share 0 1 2 3 4 5

4.3 Compensation for Growth

  • The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates an expensive valuation of the company.
  • MN has an outstanding profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)7.26
PEG (5Y)0.38
EPS Next 2Y1.62%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%

7

5. Dividend

5.1 Amount

  • MN has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 6.65%, which is a nice return.
  • Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 3.09, MN pays a better dividend. On top of this MN pays more dividend than 88.06% of the companies listed in the same industry.
  • Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.83, MN pays a better dividend.
Industry RankSector Rank
Dividend Yield 6.65%

5.2 History

  • The dividend of MN decreases each year by -6.82%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0

5.3 Sustainability

  • MN pays out 19.05% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
DP19.05%
EPS Next 2Y1.62%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
MN.MI Yearly Income VS Free CF VS DividendMN.MI Yearly Income VS Free CF VS DividendYearly Income VS Free CF VS Dividend 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 50M -50M 100M -100M -150M
MN.MI Dividend Payout.MN.MI Dividend Payout, showing the Payout Ratio.MN.MI Dividend Payout.PayoutRetained Earnings

ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE / MN.MI FAQ

Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?

ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to MN.MI.


What is the valuation status for MN stock?

ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI). This can be considered as Undervalued.


What is the profitability of MN stock?

ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) has a profitability rating of 8 / 10.


What are the PE and PB ratios of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?

The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is 5.92 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 1.99.


Can you provide the expected EPS growth for MN stock?

The Earnings per Share (EPS) of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is expected to grow by 0.81% in the next year.