ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis

BIT:MN • IT0001469383

1.982 EUR
-0.04 (-2.12%)
Last: Mar 3, 2026, 07:00 PM
Overview Stock Chart Technical Analysis Fundamental Analysis Analyst Ratings Earnings Estimates Financials Ownership
Fundamental Rating

6

Taking everything into account, MN scores 6 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. MN was compared to 65 industry peers in the Media industry. MN has an excellent profitability rating, but there are some minor concerns on its financial health. MN is valued quite cheap, but it does not seem to be growing. Finally MN also has an excellent dividend rating.


Dividend Valuation Growth Profitability Health

8

1. Profitability

1.1 Basic Checks

  • In the past year MN was profitable.
  • In the past year MN had a positive cash flow from operations.
  • MN had positive earnings in each of the past 5 years.
  • In the past 5 years MN always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
MN.MI Yearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCFMN.MI Yearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCFYearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCF 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 100M -100M

1.2 Ratios

  • Looking at the Return On Assets, with a value of 8.78%, MN belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 95.38% of the companies in the same industry.
  • MN has a better Return On Equity (34.27%) than 93.85% of its industry peers.
  • MN has a better Return On Invested Capital (19.38%) than 96.92% of its industry peers.
  • Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for MN is above the industry average of 7.97%.
  • The 3 year average ROIC (11.34%) for MN is below the current ROIC(19.38%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
Industry RankSector Rank
ROA 8.78%
ROE 34.27%
ROIC 19.38%
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
MN.MI Yearly ROA, ROE, ROICMN.MI Yearly ROA, ROE, ROICYearly ROA, ROE, ROIC 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 -50 -100

1.3 Margins

  • MN's Profit Margin of 6.75% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. MN outperforms 75.38% of its industry peers.
  • MN's Profit Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
  • The Operating Margin of MN (10.52%) is better than 69.23% of its industry peers.
  • In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of MN has grown nicely.
  • MN has a worse Gross Margin (34.59%) than 66.15% of its industry peers.
  • In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of MN has grown nicely.
Industry RankSector Rank
OM 10.52%
PM (TTM) 6.75%
GM 34.59%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
MN.MI Yearly Profit, Operating, Gross MarginsMN.MI Yearly Profit, Operating, Gross MarginsYearly Profit, Operating, Gross Margins 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 10 -10 20 30

More info and screens

ROAROEROICOperating and Profit MarginShow most profitable peers

4

2. Health

2.1 Basic Checks

  • MN has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is creating value.
  • Compared to 1 year ago, MN has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
  • Compared to 5 years ago, MN has more shares outstanding
  • Compared to 1 year ago, MN has a worse debt to assets ratio.
MN.MI Yearly Shares OutstandingMN.MI Yearly Shares OutstandingYearly Shares Outstanding 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 50M 100M 150M 200M 250M
MN.MI Yearly Total Debt VS Total AssetsMN.MI Yearly Total Debt VS Total AssetsYearly Total Debt VS Total Assets 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 500M 1B

2.2 Solvency

  • MN has an Altman-Z score of 2.14. This is not the best score and indicates that MN is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
  • MN's Altman-Z score of 2.14 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. MN outperforms 69.23% of its industry peers.
  • MN has a debt to FCF ratio of 3.46. This is a good value and a sign of high solvency as MN would need 3.46 years to pay back of all of its debts.
  • MN has a Debt to FCF ratio of 3.46. This is in the better half of the industry: MN outperforms 66.15% of its industry peers.
  • A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.69 indicates that MN is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
  • Looking at the Debt to Equity ratio, with a value of 0.69, MN is in line with its industry, outperforming 53.85% of the companies in the same industry.
Industry RankSector Rank
Debt/Equity 0.69
Debt/FCF 3.46
Altman-Z 2.14
ROIC/WACC3.25
WACC5.96%
MN.MI Yearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCFMN.MI Yearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCFYearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCF 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 100M 200M 300M

2.3 Liquidity

  • MN has a Current Ratio of 0.97. This is a bad value and indicates that MN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
  • MN has a Current ratio (0.97) which is in line with its industry peers.
  • MN has a Quick Ratio of 0.97. This is a bad value and indicates that MN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
  • MN's Quick ratio of 0.62 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. MN is outperformed by 70.77% of its industry peers.
Industry RankSector Rank
Current Ratio 0.97
Quick Ratio 0.62
MN.MI Yearly Current Assets VS Current LiabilitesMN.MI Yearly Current Assets VS Current LiabilitesYearly Current Assets VS Current Liabilites 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 200M 400M 600M

More info and screens

WACCDebt/EquityHow to determine the health of a companyAltman-Z scoreShow peers with great health

3

3. Growth

3.1 Past

  • The earnings per share for MN have decreased by -8.79% in the last year.
  • Measured over the past years, MN shows a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been growing by 15.47% on average per year.
  • MN shows a small growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 0.49%.
  • Measured over the past years, MN shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 1.10% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%

3.2 Future

  • The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 1.31% on average over the next years.
  • The Revenue is expected to grow by 0.71% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.62%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year0.04%
Revenue Next 2Y1.45%
Revenue Next 3Y1.32%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%

3.3 Evolution

  • The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
  • When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
MN.MI Yearly Revenue VS EstimatesMN.MI Yearly Revenue VS EstimatesYearly Revenue VS Estimates 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 200M 400M 600M 800M 1B
MN.MI Yearly EPS VS EstimatesMN.MI Yearly EPS VS EstimatesYearly EPS VS Estimates 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

More info and screens

Find the best growth stocksShow best growing peers

8

4. Valuation

4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio

  • The Price/Earnings ratio is 5.51, which indicates a rather cheap valuation of MN.
  • Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, MN is valued cheaper than 90.77% of the companies in the same industry.
  • MN's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 26.83.
  • With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 7.59, the valuation of MN can be described as very cheap.
  • 81.54% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than MN, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
  • When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of MN to the average of the S&P500 Index (24.95), we can say MN is valued rather cheaply.
Industry RankSector Rank
PE 5.51
Fwd PE 7.59
MN.MI Price Earnings VS Forward Price EarningsMN.MI Price Earnings VS Forward Price Earnings ChartPrice Earnings - Forward Price Earnings PE FPE 20 40 60 80

4.2 Price Multiples

  • MN's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. MN is cheaper than 84.62% of the companies in the same industry.
  • Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, MN is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 78.46% of the companies are valued more expensively.
Industry RankSector Rank
P/FCF 6.16
EV/EBITDA 3.74
MN.MI Per share dataMN.MI EPS, Sales, OCF, FCF, BookValue per sharePer Share Data Per Share 0 1 2 3 4 5

4.3 Compensation for Growth

  • The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates MN does not grow enough to justify the current Price/Earnings ratio.
  • The excellent profitability rating of MN may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)6.76
PEG (5Y)0.36
EPS Next 2Y1.62%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%

More info and screens

Price/EarningsPrice/FCFFCF per shareEV/EBITDAPEG RATIOShow best valued peers

7

5. Dividend

5.1 Amount

  • MN has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 6.80%, which is a nice return.
  • MN's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 2.49. MN pays more dividend than 89.23% of the companies in the same industry.
  • MN's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 1.82.
Industry RankSector Rank
Dividend Yield 6.8%

5.2 History

  • The dividend of MN decreases each year by -6.82%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0

5.3 Sustainability

  • 19.05% of the earnings are spent on dividend by MN. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
DP19.05%
EPS Next 2Y1.62%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
MN.MI Yearly Income VS Free CF VS DividendMN.MI Yearly Income VS Free CF VS DividendYearly Income VS Free CF VS Dividend 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 50M -50M 100M -100M -150M
MN.MI Dividend Payout.MN.MI Dividend Payout, showing the Payout Ratio.MN.MI Dividend Payout.PayoutRetained Earnings

More info and screens

Find the best dividend stocksShow peers with best dividend

ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE

BIT:MN (3/3/2026, 7:00:00 PM)

1.982

-0.04 (-2.12%)

Chartmill FA Rating
GICS IndustryGroupMedia & Entertainment
GICS IndustryMedia
Earnings (Last)11-13
Earnings (Next)03-19
Inst Owners25.91%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners53.3%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap518.21M
Revenue(TTM)1.42B
Net Income(TTM)95.81M
Analysts85
Price Target2.75 (38.75%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
Industry RankSector Rank
Dividend Yield 6.8%
Yearly Dividend0.12
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
DP19.05%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)-1.82%
PT rev (3m)-0.92%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.63%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-1.17%
Valuation
Industry RankSector Rank
PE 5.51
Fwd PE 7.59
P/S 0.36
P/FCF 6.16
P/OCF 5.02
P/B 1.85
P/tB N/A
EV/EBITDA 3.74
EPS(TTM)0.36
EY18.16%
EPS(NY)0.26
Fwd EY13.17%
FCF(TTM)0.32
FCFY16.23%
OCF(TTM)0.39
OCFY19.91%
SpS5.43
BVpS1.07
TBVpS-0.44
PEG (NY)6.76
PEG (5Y)0.36
Graham Number2.94
Profitability
Industry RankSector Rank
ROA 8.78%
ROE 34.27%
ROCE 25.55%
ROIC 19.38%
ROICexc 20.09%
ROICexgc 66.52%
OM 10.52%
PM (TTM) 6.75%
GM 34.59%
FCFM 5.92%
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
ROICexc(3y)12.8%
ROICexc(5y)11.61%
ROICexgc(3y)52.6%
ROICexgc(5y)44.45%
ROCE(3y)14.93%
ROCE(5y)12.88%
ROICexgc growth 3Y21.82%
ROICexgc growth 5Y18.04%
ROICexc growth 3Y17.34%
ROICexc growth 5Y2.38%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.3
Health
Industry RankSector Rank
Debt/Equity 0.69
Debt/FCF 3.46
Debt/EBITDA 0.91
Cap/Depr 29.53%
Cap/Sales 1.34%
Interest Coverage 51.7
Cash Conversion 48.24%
Profit Quality 87.81%
Current Ratio 0.97
Quick Ratio 0.62
Altman-Z 2.14
F-Score6
WACC5.96%
ROIC/WACC3.25
Cap/Depr(3y)19.72%
Cap/Depr(5y)13.93%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.34%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.97%
Profit Quality(3y)177.69%
Profit Quality(5y)503.09%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.62%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
Revenue Next Year0.04%
Revenue Next 2Y1.45%
Revenue Next 3Y1.32%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%
EBIT growth 1Y-5.07%
EBIT growth 3Y21.04%
EBIT growth 5Y7.37%
EBIT Next Year66.72%
EBIT Next 3Y20.15%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-15.02%
FCF growth 3Y4.95%
FCF growth 5Y6.26%
OCF growth 1Y-8.3%
OCF growth 3Y8.91%
OCF growth 5Y7.93%

ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE / MN.MI FAQ

Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?

ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to MN.MI.


What is the valuation status for MN stock?

ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 8 / 10 to ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI). This can be considered as Undervalued.


What is the profitability of MN stock?

ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) has a profitability rating of 8 / 10.


What are the PE and PB ratios of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?

The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is 5.51 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 1.85.


Can you provide the expected EPS growth for MN stock?

The Earnings per Share (EPS) of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is expected to grow by 0.81% in the next year.