ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) Fundamental Analysis & Valuation
BIT:MN • IT0001469383
Current stock price
2.09 EUR
0 (0%)
Last:
This MN.MI fundamental analysis includes valuation metrics, fair value assessment, financial health analysis, profitability trends, growth metrics and dividend sustainability analysis.
1. MN.MI Profitability Analysis
1.1 Basic Checks
- MN had positive earnings in the past year.
- In the past year MN had a positive cash flow from operations.
- In the past 5 years MN has always been profitable.
- MN had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
- MN has a Return On Assets of 8.27%. This is amongst the best in the industry. MN outperforms 93.75% of its industry peers.
- Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 26.94%, MN belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 92.19% of the companies in the same industry.
- Looking at the Return On Invested Capital, with a value of 17.50%, MN belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 98.44% of the companies in the same industry.
- Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for MN is above the industry average of 7.57%.
- The 3 year average ROIC (10.99%) for MN is below the current ROIC(17.50%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.27% | ||
| ROE | 26.94% | ||
| ROIC | 17.5% |
ROA(3y)5.44%
ROA(5y)5.16%
ROE(3y)19.01%
ROE(5y)19.44%
ROIC(3y)10.99%
ROIC(5y)10.05%
1.3 Margins
- MN has a better Profit Margin (6.33%) than 70.31% of its industry peers.
- MN's Profit Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
- MN has a Operating Margin of 10.03%. This is in the better half of the industry: MN outperforms 68.75% of its industry peers.
- In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of MN has grown nicely.
- With a Gross Margin value of 34.65%, MN is not doing good in the industry: 65.63% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
- MN's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 10.03% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.33% | ||
| GM | 34.65% |
OM growth 3Y1.73%
OM growth 5Y9.4%
PM growth 3Y0.2%
PM growth 5Y57.14%
GM growth 3Y2.63%
GM growth 5Y4.51%
2. MN.MI Health Analysis
2.1 Basic Checks
- With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), MN is creating value.
- The number of shares outstanding for MN remains at a similar level compared to 1 year ago.
- Compared to 5 years ago, MN has more shares outstanding
- MN has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
- An Altman-Z score of 2.24 indicates that MN is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
- With a decent Altman-Z score value of 2.24, MN is doing good in the industry, outperforming 75.00% of the companies in the same industry.
- The Debt to FCF ratio of MN is 2.14, which is a good value as it means it would take MN, 2.14 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
- MN has a Debt to FCF ratio of 2.14. This is in the better half of the industry: MN outperforms 73.44% of its industry peers.
- MN has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.47. This is a healthy value indicating a solid balance between debt and equity.
- MN has a Debt to Equity ratio (0.47) which is in line with its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.47 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 2.14 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.24 |
ROIC/WACC2.96
WACC5.91%
2.3 Liquidity
- A Current Ratio of 0.97 indicates that MN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
- MN has a Current ratio (0.97) which is in line with its industry peers.
- MN has a Quick Ratio of 0.97. This is a bad value and indicates that MN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
- MN has a Quick ratio of 0.66. This is in the lower half of the industry: MN underperforms 71.88% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.66 |
3. MN.MI Growth Analysis
3.1 Past
- MN shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -15.45%.
- The Earnings Per Share has been growing by 63.98% on average over the past years. This is a very strong growth
- The Revenue has decreased by -0.61% in the past year.
- The Revenue has been growing slightly by 4.60% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-15.45%
EPS 3Y1.04%
EPS 5Y63.98%
EPS Q2Q%-5.1%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-0.61%
Revenue growth 3Y1.04%
Revenue growth 5Y4.6%
Sales Q2Q%-1.01%
3.2 Future
- MN is expected to show a small growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 0.20% yearly.
- Based on estimates for the next years, MN will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 0.70% on average per year.
EPS Next Y-3.54%
EPS Next 2Y-0.66%
EPS Next 3Y0.2%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year2.78%
Revenue Next 2Y1.81%
Revenue Next 3Y1.54%
Revenue Next 5Y0.7%
3.3 Evolution
- The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
- When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
4. MN.MI Valuation Analysis
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- With a Price/Earnings ratio of 6.15, the valuation of MN can be described as very cheap.
- 89.06% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than MN, based on the Price/Earnings ratio.
- MN is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Earnings ratio to 27.42, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
- Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 8.50, the valuation of MN can be described as reasonable.
- MN's Price/Forward Earnings ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. MN is cheaper than 75.00% of the companies in the same industry.
- MN is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 22.24, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 6.15 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.5 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- MN's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. MN is cheaper than 89.06% of the companies in the same industry.
- 79.69% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than MN, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 5.31 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.4 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- MN has an outstanding profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)0.1
EPS Next 2Y-0.66%
EPS Next 3Y0.2%
5. MN.MI Dividend Analysis
5.1 Amount
- With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 7.33%, MN is a good candidate for dividend investing.
- MN's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 3.34. MN pays more dividend than 95.31% of the companies in the same industry.
- MN's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 1.81.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 7.33% |
5.2 History
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
- 40.90% of the earnings are spent on dividend by MN. This is a bit on the high side, but may be sustainable.
DP40.9%
EPS Next 2Y-0.66%
EPS Next 3Y0.2%
MN.MI Fundamentals: All Metrics, Ratios and Statistics
BIT:MN (4/24/2026, 5:23:11 PM)
2.09
0 (0%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorCommunication Services
GICS IndustryGroupMedia & Entertainment
GICS IndustryMedia
Earnings (Last)03-19 2026-03-19
Earnings (Next)05-13 2026-05-13
Inst Owners25.28%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners53.3%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap546.45M
Revenue(TTM)1.41B
Net Income(TTM)89.25M
Analysts85
Price Target2.73 (30.62%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 7.33% |
Yearly Dividend0.14
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DP40.9%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)-0.93%
PT rev (3m)-2.73%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)-2.05%
EPS NY rev (3m)-5.82%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.1%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0.46%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 6.15 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.5 | ||
| P/S | 0.39 | ||
| P/FCF | 5.31 | ||
| P/OCF | 4.67 | ||
| P/B | 1.65 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.4 |
EPS(TTM)0.34
EY16.27%
EPS(NY)0.25
Fwd EY11.77%
FCF(TTM)0.39
FCFY18.82%
OCF(TTM)0.45
OCFY21.41%
SpS5.4
BVpS1.27
TBVpS-0.26
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)0.1
Graham Number3.11321 (48.96%)
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.27% | ||
| ROE | 26.94% | ||
| ROCE | 23.81% | ||
| ROIC | 17.5% | ||
| ROICexc | 19.37% | ||
| ROICexgc | 75.44% | ||
| OM | 10.03% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.33% | ||
| GM | 34.65% | ||
| FCFM | 7.29% |
ROA(3y)5.44%
ROA(5y)5.16%
ROE(3y)19.01%
ROE(5y)19.44%
ROIC(3y)10.99%
ROIC(5y)10.05%
ROICexc(3y)12.54%
ROICexc(5y)11.39%
ROICexgc(3y)52.64%
ROICexgc(5y)46.08%
ROCE(3y)14.96%
ROCE(5y)13.68%
ROICexgc growth 3Y4.2%
ROICexgc growth 5Y8.64%
ROICexc growth 3Y1.42%
ROICexc growth 5Y1.44%
OM growth 3Y1.73%
OM growth 5Y9.4%
PM growth 3Y0.2%
PM growth 5Y57.14%
GM growth 3Y2.63%
GM growth 5Y4.51%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.31
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.47 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 2.14 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 0.75 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 21.15% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 41.37 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 56.1% | ||
| Profit Quality | 115.22% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.66 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.24 |
F-Score6
WACC5.91%
ROIC/WACC2.96
Cap/Depr(3y)21.43%
Cap/Depr(5y)16.91%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.5%
Cap/Sales(5y)1.15%
Profit Quality(3y)183.04%
Profit Quality(5y)187.86%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-15.45%
EPS 3Y1.04%
EPS 5Y63.98%
EPS Q2Q%-5.1%
EPS Next Y-3.54%
EPS Next 2Y-0.66%
EPS Next 3Y0.2%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-0.61%
Revenue growth 3Y1.04%
Revenue growth 5Y4.6%
Sales Q2Q%-1.01%
Revenue Next Year2.78%
Revenue Next 2Y1.81%
Revenue Next 3Y1.54%
Revenue Next 5Y0.7%
EBIT growth 1Y-11.13%
EBIT growth 3Y2.8%
EBIT growth 5Y14.43%
EBIT Next Year77.36%
EBIT Next 3Y21.98%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-6.81%
FCF growth 3Y4.26%
FCF growth 5Y5.27%
OCF growth 1Y-7.02%
OCF growth 3Y5.36%
OCF growth 5Y6.87%
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE / MN.MI Fundamental Analysis FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to MN.MI.
Can you provide the valuation status for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI). This can be considered as Undervalued.
Can you provide the profitability details for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) has a profitability rating of 8 / 10.
What is the valuation of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE based on its PE and PB ratios?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is 6.15 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 1.65.
Can you provide the dividend sustainability for MN stock?
The dividend rating of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is 6 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 40.9%.