ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Milan - BIT:MN - IT0001469383 - Common Stock
2.058 EUR
+0 (+0.15%)
Overall MN gets a fundamental rating of 6 out of 10. We evaluated MN against 66 industry peers in the Media industry. While MN belongs to the best of the industry regarding profitability, there are some minor concerns on its financial health. MN is valued quite cheap, but it does not seem to be growing. Finally MN also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
MN had positive earnings in the past year.
MN had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
Each year in the past 5 years MN has been profitable.
MN had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
The Return On Assets of MN (8.78%) is better than 96.92% of its industry peers.
MN's Return On Equity of 34.27% is amongst the best of the industry. MN outperforms 93.85% of its industry peers.
MN has a better Return On Invested Capital (19.38%) than 96.92% of its industry peers.
MN had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 11.34%. This is above the industry average of 8.24%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (19.38%) for MN is above the 3 year average (11.34%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
1.3 Margins
MN has a Profit Margin of 6.75%. This is in the better half of the industry: MN outperforms 76.92% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of MN has grown nicely.
The Operating Margin of MN (10.52%) is better than 69.23% of its industry peers.
MN's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
Looking at the Gross Margin, with a value of 34.59%, MN is doing worse than 64.62% of the companies in the same industry.
MN's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% |
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), MN is creating value.
Compared to 1 year ago, MN has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
The number of shares outstanding for MN has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, MN has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 2.14 indicates that MN is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
MN's Altman-Z score of 2.14 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. MN outperforms 75.38% of its industry peers.
MN has a debt to FCF ratio of 3.46. This is a good value and a sign of high solvency as MN would need 3.46 years to pay back of all of its debts.
Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 3.46, MN is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 69.23% of the companies in the same industry.
MN has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.69. This is a neutral value indicating MN is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
With a Debt to Equity ratio value of 0.69, MN perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 58.46% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.14 |
ROIC/WACC3.24
WACC5.99%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 0.97 indicates that MN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
With a Current ratio value of 0.97, MN perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 56.92% of the companies in the same industry.
MN has a Quick Ratio of 0.97. This is a bad value and indicates that MN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
MN's Quick ratio of 0.62 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. MN is outperformed by 72.31% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
MN shows a slight negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has decreased by -8.79%.
MN shows quite a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been growing by 15.47% yearly.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 0.49% in the past year.
MN shows a small growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 1.10% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 1.31% on average over the next years.
MN is expected to show a small growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will grow by 0.71% yearly.
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year0.67%
Revenue Next 2Y1.17%
Revenue Next 3Y1.25%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
With a Price/Earnings ratio of 5.72, the valuation of MN can be described as very cheap.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, MN is valued cheaper than 92.31% of the companies in the same industry.
MN's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 26.39.
A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 7.96 indicates a rather cheap valuation of MN.
MN's Price/Forward Earnings ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. MN is cheaper than 80.00% of the companies in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of MN to the average of the S&P500 Index (23.84), we can say MN is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.72 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.96 |
4.2 Price Multiples
MN's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. MN is cheaper than 84.62% of the companies in the same industry.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, MN is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 72.31% of the companies are valued more expensively.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 6.4 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.77 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates MN does not grow enough to justify the current Price/Earnings ratio.
The excellent profitability rating of MN may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)7.02
PEG (5Y)0.37
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
MN has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 6.78%, which is a nice return.
MN's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 3.20. MN pays more dividend than 90.77% of the companies in the same industry.
MN's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 1.87.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.78% |
5.2 History
The dividend of MN decreases each year by -6.82%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
19.05% of the earnings are spent on dividend by MN. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
DP19.05%
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
BIT:MN (12/22/2025, 5:29:58 PM)
2.058
+0 (+0.15%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorCommunication Services
GICS IndustryGroupMedia & Entertainment
GICS IndustryMedia
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners25.97%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners53.3%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap538.08M
Revenue(TTM)1.42B
Net Income(TTM)95.81M
Analysts85
Price Target2.78 (35.08%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.78% |
Yearly Dividend0.12
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
DP19.05%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)-0.91%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.55%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.8%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.72 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.96 | ||
| P/S | 0.38 | ||
| P/FCF | 6.4 | ||
| P/OCF | 5.22 | ||
| P/B | 1.92 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.77 |
EPS(TTM)0.36
EY17.49%
EPS(NY)0.26
Fwd EY12.56%
FCF(TTM)0.32
FCFY15.63%
OCF(TTM)0.39
OCFY19.17%
SpS5.43
BVpS1.07
TBVpS-0.44
PEG (NY)7.02
PEG (5Y)0.37
Graham Number2.94
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROCE | 25.55% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% | ||
| ROICexc | 20.09% | ||
| ROICexgc | 66.52% | ||
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% | ||
| FCFM | 5.92% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
ROICexc(3y)12.8%
ROICexc(5y)11.61%
ROICexgc(3y)52.6%
ROICexgc(5y)44.45%
ROCE(3y)14.93%
ROCE(5y)12.88%
ROICexgc growth 3Y21.82%
ROICexgc growth 5Y18.04%
ROICexc growth 3Y17.34%
ROICexc growth 5Y2.38%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.3
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 0.91 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 29.53% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.34% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 51.7 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 48.24% | ||
| Profit Quality | 87.81% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.14 |
F-Score6
WACC5.99%
ROIC/WACC3.24
Cap/Depr(3y)19.72%
Cap/Depr(5y)13.93%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.34%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.97%
Profit Quality(3y)177.69%
Profit Quality(5y)503.09%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
Revenue Next Year0.67%
Revenue Next 2Y1.17%
Revenue Next 3Y1.25%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%
EBIT growth 1Y-5.07%
EBIT growth 3Y21.04%
EBIT growth 5Y7.37%
EBIT Next Year67.44%
EBIT Next 3Y19.67%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-15.02%
FCF growth 3Y4.95%
FCF growth 5Y6.26%
OCF growth 1Y-8.3%
OCF growth 3Y8.91%
OCF growth 5Y7.93%
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE / MN.MI FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to MN.MI.
What is the valuation status of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI). This can be considered as Undervalued.
How profitable is ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) has a profitability rating of 8 / 10.
What is the earnings growth outlook for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is expected to grow by 0.81% in the next year.
How sustainable is the dividend of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
The dividend rating of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is 7 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 19.05%.