ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis

BIT:MN • IT0001469383

2.06 EUR
0 (0%)
Last: Feb 27, 2026, 07:00 PM
Fundamental Rating

6

We assign a fundamental rating of 6 out of 10 to MN. MN was compared to 66 industry peers in the Media industry. MN has an excellent profitability rating, but there are some minor concerns on its financial health. MN is valued quite cheap, but it does not seem to be growing. MN also has an excellent dividend rating.


Dividend Valuation Growth Profitability Health

8

1. Profitability

1.1 Basic Checks

  • MN had positive earnings in the past year.
  • MN had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
  • MN had positive earnings in each of the past 5 years.
  • Each year in the past 5 years MN had a positive operating cash flow.
MN.MI Yearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCFMN.MI Yearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCFYearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCF 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 100M -100M

1.2 Ratios

  • Looking at the Return On Assets, with a value of 8.78%, MN belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 95.38% of the companies in the same industry.
  • The Return On Equity of MN (34.27%) is better than 93.85% of its industry peers.
  • MN has a better Return On Invested Capital (19.38%) than 96.92% of its industry peers.
  • Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for MN is above the industry average of 8.08%.
  • The 3 year average ROIC (11.34%) for MN is below the current ROIC(19.38%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
Industry RankSector Rank
ROA 8.78%
ROE 34.27%
ROIC 19.38%
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
MN.MI Yearly ROA, ROE, ROICMN.MI Yearly ROA, ROE, ROICYearly ROA, ROE, ROIC 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 -50 -100

1.3 Margins

  • With a decent Profit Margin value of 6.75%, MN is doing good in the industry, outperforming 75.38% of the companies in the same industry.
  • In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of MN has grown nicely.
  • MN has a better Operating Margin (10.52%) than 69.23% of its industry peers.
  • In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of MN has grown nicely.
  • MN has a worse Gross Margin (34.59%) than 64.62% of its industry peers.
  • MN's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
Industry RankSector Rank
OM 10.52%
PM (TTM) 6.75%
GM 34.59%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
MN.MI Yearly Profit, Operating, Gross MarginsMN.MI Yearly Profit, Operating, Gross MarginsYearly Profit, Operating, Gross Margins 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 10 -10 20 30

4

2. Health

2.1 Basic Checks

  • MN has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is creating value.
  • The number of shares outstanding for MN remains at a similar level compared to 1 year ago.
  • MN has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
  • Compared to 1 year ago, MN has a worse debt to assets ratio.
MN.MI Yearly Shares OutstandingMN.MI Yearly Shares OutstandingYearly Shares Outstanding 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 50M 100M 150M 200M 250M
MN.MI Yearly Total Debt VS Total AssetsMN.MI Yearly Total Debt VS Total AssetsYearly Total Debt VS Total Assets 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 500M 1B

2.2 Solvency

  • MN has an Altman-Z score of 2.14. This is not the best score and indicates that MN is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
  • Looking at the Altman-Z score, with a value of 2.14, MN is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 70.77% of the companies in the same industry.
  • MN has a debt to FCF ratio of 3.46. This is a good value and a sign of high solvency as MN would need 3.46 years to pay back of all of its debts.
  • With a decent Debt to FCF ratio value of 3.46, MN is doing good in the industry, outperforming 69.23% of the companies in the same industry.
  • A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.69 indicates that MN is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
  • The Debt to Equity ratio of MN (0.69) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
Industry RankSector Rank
Debt/Equity 0.69
Debt/FCF 3.46
Altman-Z 2.14
ROIC/WACC3.22
WACC6.01%
MN.MI Yearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCFMN.MI Yearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCFYearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCF 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 100M 200M 300M

2.3 Liquidity

  • MN has a Current Ratio of 0.97. This is a bad value and indicates that MN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
  • MN has a Current ratio (0.97) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
  • A Quick Ratio of 0.62 indicates that MN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
  • MN has a worse Quick ratio (0.62) than 72.31% of its industry peers.
Industry RankSector Rank
Current Ratio 0.97
Quick Ratio 0.62
MN.MI Yearly Current Assets VS Current LiabilitesMN.MI Yearly Current Assets VS Current LiabilitesYearly Current Assets VS Current Liabilites 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 200M 400M 600M

3

3. Growth

3.1 Past

  • The earnings per share for MN have decreased by -8.79% in the last year.
  • MN shows quite a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been growing by 15.47% yearly.
  • Looking at the last year, MN shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has grown by 0.49% in the last year.
  • Measured over the past years, MN shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 1.10% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%

3.2 Future

  • Based on estimates for the next years, MN will show a small growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 1.31% on average per year.
  • Based on estimates for the next years, MN will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 0.71% on average per year.
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.62%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year0.67%
Revenue Next 2Y1.17%
Revenue Next 3Y1.25%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%

3.3 Evolution

  • The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
  • When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
MN.MI Yearly Revenue VS EstimatesMN.MI Yearly Revenue VS EstimatesYearly Revenue VS Estimates 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 200M 400M 600M 800M 1B
MN.MI Yearly EPS VS EstimatesMN.MI Yearly EPS VS EstimatesYearly EPS VS Estimates 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

7

4. Valuation

4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio

  • MN is valuated cheaply with a Price/Earnings ratio of 5.72.
  • Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of MN indicates a rather cheap valuation: MN is cheaper than 92.31% of the companies listed in the same industry.
  • Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio of 27.10, MN is valued rather cheaply.
  • Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 7.89, the valuation of MN can be described as very cheap.
  • Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of MN indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: MN is cheaper than 78.46% of the companies listed in the same industry.
  • When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of MN to the average of the S&P500 Index (28.06), we can say MN is valued rather cheaply.
Industry RankSector Rank
PE 5.72
Fwd PE 7.89
MN.MI Price Earnings VS Forward Price EarningsMN.MI Price Earnings VS Forward Price Earnings ChartPrice Earnings - Forward Price Earnings PE FPE 20 40 60 80

4.2 Price Multiples

  • Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, MN is valued cheaply inside the industry as 84.62% of the companies are valued more expensively.
  • Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, MN is valued a bit cheaper than 78.46% of the companies in the same industry.
Industry RankSector Rank
P/FCF 6.4
EV/EBITDA 3.78
MN.MI Per share dataMN.MI EPS, Sales, OCF, FCF, BookValue per sharePer Share Data Per Share 0 1 2 3 4 5

4.3 Compensation for Growth

  • The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates an expensive valuation of the company.
  • The excellent profitability rating of MN may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)7.02
PEG (5Y)0.37
EPS Next 2Y1.62%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%

7

5. Dividend

5.1 Amount

  • MN has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 6.75%, which is a nice return.
  • MN's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 3.35. MN pays more dividend than 87.69% of the companies in the same industry.
  • Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.80, MN pays a better dividend.
Industry RankSector Rank
Dividend Yield 6.75%

5.2 History

  • The dividend of MN decreases each year by -6.82%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0

5.3 Sustainability

  • MN pays out 19.05% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
DP19.05%
EPS Next 2Y1.62%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
MN.MI Yearly Income VS Free CF VS DividendMN.MI Yearly Income VS Free CF VS DividendYearly Income VS Free CF VS Dividend 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 50M -50M 100M -100M -150M
MN.MI Dividend Payout.MN.MI Dividend Payout, showing the Payout Ratio.MN.MI Dividend Payout.PayoutRetained Earnings

ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE

BIT:MN (2/27/2026, 7:00:00 PM)

2.06

0 (0%)

Chartmill FA Rating
GICS IndustryGroupMedia & Entertainment
GICS IndustryMedia
Earnings (Last)11-13
Earnings (Next)03-10
Inst Owners25.91%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners53.3%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap538.61M
Revenue(TTM)1.42B
Net Income(TTM)95.81M
Analysts85
Price Target2.81 (36.41%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
Industry RankSector Rank
Dividend Yield 6.75%
Yearly Dividend0.12
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
DP19.05%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)0.92%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.55%
Valuation
Industry RankSector Rank
PE 5.72
Fwd PE 7.89
P/S 0.38
P/FCF 6.4
P/OCF 5.22
P/B 1.93
P/tB N/A
EV/EBITDA 3.78
EPS(TTM)0.36
EY17.48%
EPS(NY)0.26
Fwd EY12.68%
FCF(TTM)0.32
FCFY15.62%
OCF(TTM)0.39
OCFY19.15%
SpS5.43
BVpS1.07
TBVpS-0.44
PEG (NY)7.02
PEG (5Y)0.37
Graham Number2.94
Profitability
Industry RankSector Rank
ROA 8.78%
ROE 34.27%
ROCE 25.55%
ROIC 19.38%
ROICexc 20.09%
ROICexgc 66.52%
OM 10.52%
PM (TTM) 6.75%
GM 34.59%
FCFM 5.92%
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
ROICexc(3y)12.8%
ROICexc(5y)11.61%
ROICexgc(3y)52.6%
ROICexgc(5y)44.45%
ROCE(3y)14.93%
ROCE(5y)12.88%
ROICexgc growth 3Y21.82%
ROICexgc growth 5Y18.04%
ROICexc growth 3Y17.34%
ROICexc growth 5Y2.38%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.3
Health
Industry RankSector Rank
Debt/Equity 0.69
Debt/FCF 3.46
Debt/EBITDA 0.91
Cap/Depr 29.53%
Cap/Sales 1.34%
Interest Coverage 51.7
Cash Conversion 48.24%
Profit Quality 87.81%
Current Ratio 0.97
Quick Ratio 0.62
Altman-Z 2.14
F-Score6
WACC6.01%
ROIC/WACC3.22
Cap/Depr(3y)19.72%
Cap/Depr(5y)13.93%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.34%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.97%
Profit Quality(3y)177.69%
Profit Quality(5y)503.09%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.62%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
Revenue Next Year0.67%
Revenue Next 2Y1.17%
Revenue Next 3Y1.25%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%
EBIT growth 1Y-5.07%
EBIT growth 3Y21.04%
EBIT growth 5Y7.37%
EBIT Next Year67.25%
EBIT Next 3Y19.67%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-15.02%
FCF growth 3Y4.95%
FCF growth 5Y6.26%
OCF growth 1Y-8.3%
OCF growth 3Y8.91%
OCF growth 5Y7.93%

ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE / MN.MI FAQ

Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?

ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to MN.MI.


What is the valuation status for MN stock?

ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI). This can be considered as Undervalued.


What is the profitability of MN stock?

ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) has a profitability rating of 8 / 10.


What are the PE and PB ratios of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?

The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is 5.72 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 1.93.


Can you provide the expected EPS growth for MN stock?

The Earnings per Share (EPS) of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is expected to grow by 0.81% in the next year.