ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - BIT:MN - IT0001469383 - Common Stock
2.065 EUR
+0 (+0.24%)
We assign a fundamental rating of 6 out of 10 to MN. MN was compared to 65 industry peers in the Media industry. MN scores excellent on profitability, but there are some minor concerns on its financial health. MN is valued quite cheap, but it does not seem to be growing. Finally MN also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year MN was profitable.
In the past year MN had a positive cash flow from operations.
Each year in the past 5 years MN has been profitable.
Each year in the past 5 years MN had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
Looking at the Return On Assets, with a value of 8.78%, MN belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 96.88% of the companies in the same industry.
The Return On Equity of MN (34.27%) is better than 93.75% of its industry peers.
The Return On Invested Capital of MN (19.38%) is better than 98.44% of its industry peers.
MN had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 11.34%. This is above the industry average of 7.57%.
The 3 year average ROIC (11.34%) for MN is below the current ROIC(19.38%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
1.3 Margins
MN's Profit Margin of 6.75% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. MN outperforms 79.69% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of MN has grown nicely.
With a decent Operating Margin value of 10.52%, MN is doing good in the industry, outperforming 71.88% of the companies in the same industry.
MN's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
MN has a worse Gross Margin (34.59%) than 67.19% of its industry peers.
MN's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% |
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so MN is creating value.
The number of shares outstanding for MN remains at a similar level compared to 1 year ago.
Compared to 5 years ago, MN has more shares outstanding
Compared to 1 year ago, MN has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
MN has an Altman-Z score of 2.14. This is not the best score and indicates that MN is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
Looking at the Altman-Z score, with a value of 2.14, MN is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 73.44% of the companies in the same industry.
MN has a debt to FCF ratio of 3.46. This is a good value and a sign of high solvency as MN would need 3.46 years to pay back of all of its debts.
With a decent Debt to FCF ratio value of 3.46, MN is doing good in the industry, outperforming 70.31% of the companies in the same industry.
MN has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.69. This is a neutral value indicating MN is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
The Debt to Equity ratio of MN (0.69) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.14 |
ROIC/WACC3.2
WACC6.06%
2.3 Liquidity
MN has a Current Ratio of 0.97. This is a bad value and indicates that MN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
MN's Current ratio of 0.97 is in line compared to the rest of the industry. MN outperforms 51.56% of its industry peers.
MN has a Quick Ratio of 0.97. This is a bad value and indicates that MN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
MN has a Quick ratio of 0.62. This is in the lower half of the industry: MN underperforms 76.56% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
MN shows a slight negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has decreased by -8.79%.
Measured over the past years, MN shows a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been growing by 15.47% on average per year.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 0.49% in the past year.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 1.10% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 1.31% on average over the next years.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 0.71% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.21%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year1.23%
Revenue Next 2Y1.5%
Revenue Next 3Y1.48%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio of 5.74, the valuation of MN can be described as very cheap.
93.75% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than MN, based on the Price/Earnings ratio.
MN's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 25.51.
The Price/Forward Earnings ratio is 7.97, which indicates a rather cheap valuation of MN.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, MN is valued a bit cheaper than 73.44% of the companies in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of MN to the average of the S&P500 Index (34.98), we can say MN is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.74 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.97 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, MN is valued cheaply inside the industry as 85.94% of the companies are valued more expensively.
68.75% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than MN, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 6.42 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.78 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates MN does not grow enough to justify the current Price/Earnings ratio.
MN has an outstanding profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)7.04
PEG (5Y)0.37
EPS Next 2Y1.21%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
MN has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 6.62%, which is a nice return.
MN's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 6.31. MN pays more dividend than 87.50% of the companies in the same industry.
MN's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 2.44.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.62% |
5.2 History
The dividend of MN decreases each year by -6.82%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
MN pays out 19.05% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
DP19.05%
EPS Next 2Y1.21%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
BIT:MN (11/19/2025, 12:24:44 PM)
2.065
+0 (+0.24%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorCommunication Services
GICS IndustryGroupMedia & Entertainment
GICS IndustryMedia
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners26.29%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners53.3%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap539.91M
Revenue(TTM)1.42B
Net Income(TTM)95.81M
Analysts85
Price Target2.78 (34.62%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.62% |
Yearly Dividend0.12
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
DP19.05%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)-0.91%
PT rev (3m)-0.91%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0.34%
EPS NY rev (3m)-4.62%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.74%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.25%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.74 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.97 | ||
| P/S | 0.38 | ||
| P/FCF | 6.42 | ||
| P/OCF | 5.23 | ||
| P/B | 1.93 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.78 |
EPS(TTM)0.36
EY17.43%
EPS(NY)0.26
Fwd EY12.54%
FCF(TTM)0.32
FCFY15.58%
OCF(TTM)0.39
OCFY19.11%
SpS5.43
BVpS1.07
TBVpS-0.44
PEG (NY)7.04
PEG (5Y)0.37
Graham Number2.94
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROCE | 25.55% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% | ||
| ROICexc | 20.09% | ||
| ROICexgc | 66.52% | ||
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% | ||
| FCFM | 5.92% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
ROICexc(3y)12.8%
ROICexc(5y)11.61%
ROICexgc(3y)52.6%
ROICexgc(5y)44.45%
ROCE(3y)14.93%
ROCE(5y)12.88%
ROICexgc growth 3Y21.82%
ROICexgc growth 5Y18.04%
ROICexc growth 3Y17.34%
ROICexc growth 5Y2.38%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.3
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 0.91 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 29.53% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.34% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 51.7 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 48.24% | ||
| Profit Quality | 87.81% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.14 |
F-Score6
WACC6.06%
ROIC/WACC3.2
Cap/Depr(3y)19.72%
Cap/Depr(5y)13.93%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.34%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.97%
Profit Quality(3y)177.69%
Profit Quality(5y)503.09%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.21%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
Revenue Next Year1.23%
Revenue Next 2Y1.5%
Revenue Next 3Y1.48%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%
EBIT growth 1Y-5.07%
EBIT growth 3Y21.04%
EBIT growth 5Y7.37%
EBIT Next Year68.82%
EBIT Next 3Y19.92%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-15.02%
FCF growth 3Y4.95%
FCF growth 5Y6.26%
OCF growth 1Y-8.3%
OCF growth 3Y8.91%
OCF growth 5Y7.93%
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE / MN.MI FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to MN.MI.
What is the valuation status of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI). This can be considered as Undervalued.
How profitable is ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) has a profitability rating of 8 / 10.
What is the earnings growth outlook for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is expected to grow by 0.81% in the next year.
How sustainable is the dividend of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
The dividend rating of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is 7 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 19.05%.