ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Milan - BIT:MN - IT0001469383 - Common Stock
2.108 EUR
-0.05 (-2.41%)
MN gets a fundamental rating of 6 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 67 industry peers in the Media industry. MN has an excellent profitability rating, but there are some minor concerns on its financial health. MN is cheap, but on the other hand it scores bad on growth. Finally MN also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
- In the past year MN was profitable.
- MN had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
- In the past 5 years MN has always been profitable.
- Each year in the past 5 years MN had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
- MN has a better Return On Assets (8.78%) than 95.45% of its industry peers.
- MN has a better Return On Equity (34.27%) than 92.42% of its industry peers.
- MN has a better Return On Invested Capital (19.38%) than 96.97% of its industry peers.
- Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for MN is above the industry average of 7.95%.
- The 3 year average ROIC (11.34%) for MN is below the current ROIC(19.38%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
1.3 Margins
- MN has a Profit Margin of 6.75%. This is in the better half of the industry: MN outperforms 72.73% of its industry peers.
- In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of MN has grown nicely.
- Looking at the Operating Margin, with a value of 10.52%, MN is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 65.15% of the companies in the same industry.
- In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of MN has grown nicely.
- The Gross Margin of MN (34.59%) is worse than 66.67% of its industry peers.
- MN's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% |
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
- With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), MN is creating value.
- Compared to 1 year ago, MN has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
- MN has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
- The debt/assets ratio for MN is higher compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
- MN has an Altman-Z score of 2.16. This is not the best score and indicates that MN is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
- MN's Altman-Z score of 2.16 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. MN outperforms 71.21% of its industry peers.
- MN has a debt to FCF ratio of 3.46. This is a good value and a sign of high solvency as MN would need 3.46 years to pay back of all of its debts.
- With a decent Debt to FCF ratio value of 3.46, MN is doing good in the industry, outperforming 69.70% of the companies in the same industry.
- A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.69 indicates that MN is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
- MN has a Debt to Equity ratio (0.69) which is in line with its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.16 |
ROIC/WACC3.21
WACC6.03%
2.3 Liquidity
- A Current Ratio of 0.97 indicates that MN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
- MN has a Current ratio (0.97) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
- MN has a Quick Ratio of 0.97. This is a bad value and indicates that MN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
- Looking at the Quick ratio, with a value of 0.62, MN is doing worse than 74.24% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
- The earnings per share for MN have decreased by -8.79% in the last year.
- Measured over the past years, MN shows a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been growing by 15.47% on average per year.
- MN shows a small growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 0.49%.
- MN shows a small growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 1.10% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
3.2 Future
- Based on estimates for the next years, MN will show a small growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 1.31% on average per year.
- Based on estimates for the next years, MN will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 0.71% on average per year.
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year0.67%
Revenue Next 2Y1.17%
Revenue Next 3Y1.25%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%
3.3 Evolution
- When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
- The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- A Price/Earnings ratio of 5.86 indicates a rather cheap valuation of MN.
- MN's Price/Earnings ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. MN is cheaper than 89.39% of the companies in the same industry.
- MN's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 27.47.
- Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 8.15, the valuation of MN can be described as reasonable.
- Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of MN indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: MN is cheaper than 77.27% of the companies listed in the same industry.
- When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of MN to the average of the S&P500 Index (24.26), we can say MN is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.86 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.15 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, MN is valued cheaply inside the industry as 81.82% of the companies are valued more expensively.
- 69.70% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than MN, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 6.55 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.9 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates MN does not grow enough to justify the current Price/Earnings ratio.
- The excellent profitability rating of MN may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)7.19
PEG (5Y)0.38
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
- With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 6.64%, MN is a good candidate for dividend investing.
- Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 3.27, MN pays a better dividend. On top of this MN pays more dividend than 87.88% of the companies listed in the same industry.
- Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.89, MN pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.64% |
5.2 History
- The dividend of MN decreases each year by -6.82%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
- MN pays out 19.05% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
DP19.05%
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
BIT:MN (1/16/2026, 5:29:50 PM)
2.108
-0.05 (-2.41%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorCommunication Services
GICS IndustryGroupMedia & Entertainment
GICS IndustryMedia
Earnings (Last)11-13 2025-11-13
Earnings (Next)03-10 2026-03-10
Inst Owners25.91%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners53.3%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap551.16M
Revenue(TTM)1.42B
Net Income(TTM)95.81M
Analysts85
Price Target2.78 (31.88%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.64% |
Yearly Dividend0.12
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
DP19.05%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)-0.91%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)0.34%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.52%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-1.28%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.86 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.15 | ||
| P/S | 0.39 | ||
| P/FCF | 6.55 | ||
| P/OCF | 5.34 | ||
| P/B | 1.97 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.9 |
EPS(TTM)0.36
EY17.08%
EPS(NY)0.26
Fwd EY12.26%
FCF(TTM)0.32
FCFY15.26%
OCF(TTM)0.39
OCFY18.72%
SpS5.43
BVpS1.07
TBVpS-0.44
PEG (NY)7.19
PEG (5Y)0.38
Graham Number2.94
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROCE | 25.55% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% | ||
| ROICexc | 20.09% | ||
| ROICexgc | 66.52% | ||
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% | ||
| FCFM | 5.92% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
ROICexc(3y)12.8%
ROICexc(5y)11.61%
ROICexgc(3y)52.6%
ROICexgc(5y)44.45%
ROCE(3y)14.93%
ROCE(5y)12.88%
ROICexgc growth 3Y21.82%
ROICexgc growth 5Y18.04%
ROICexc growth 3Y17.34%
ROICexc growth 5Y2.38%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.3
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 0.91 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 29.53% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.34% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 51.7 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 48.24% | ||
| Profit Quality | 87.81% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.16 |
F-Score6
WACC6.03%
ROIC/WACC3.21
Cap/Depr(3y)19.72%
Cap/Depr(5y)13.93%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.34%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.97%
Profit Quality(3y)177.69%
Profit Quality(5y)503.09%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
Revenue Next Year0.67%
Revenue Next 2Y1.17%
Revenue Next 3Y1.25%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%
EBIT growth 1Y-5.07%
EBIT growth 3Y21.04%
EBIT growth 5Y7.37%
EBIT Next Year67.25%
EBIT Next 3Y19.67%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-15.02%
FCF growth 3Y4.95%
FCF growth 5Y6.26%
OCF growth 1Y-8.3%
OCF growth 3Y8.91%
OCF growth 5Y7.93%
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE / MN.MI FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to MN.MI.
What is the valuation status for MN stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI). This can be considered as Undervalued.
What is the profitability of MN stock?
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) has a profitability rating of 8 / 10.
What are the PE and PB ratios of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is 5.86 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 1.97.
Can you provide the expected EPS growth for MN stock?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is expected to grow by 0.81% in the next year.