ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Milan - BIT:MN - IT0001469383 - Common Stock
2.058 EUR
+0.03 (+1.63%)
We assign a fundamental rating of 6 out of 10 to MN. MN was compared to 68 industry peers in the Media industry. While MN has a great profitability rating, there are some minor concerns on its financial health. MN is valued quite cheap, but it does not seem to be growing. MN also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year MN was profitable.
In the past year MN had a positive cash flow from operations.
Each year in the past 5 years MN has been profitable.
In the past 5 years MN always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
1.2 Ratios
MN's Return On Assets of 8.78% is amongst the best of the industry. MN outperforms 95.52% of its industry peers.
Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 34.27%, MN belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 92.54% of the companies in the same industry.
MN has a better Return On Invested Capital (19.38%) than 97.01% of its industry peers.
MN had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 11.34%. This is above the industry average of 8.03%.
The 3 year average ROIC (11.34%) for MN is below the current ROIC(19.38%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
1.3 Margins
Looking at the Profit Margin, with a value of 6.75%, MN is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 71.64% of the companies in the same industry.
MN's Profit Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
MN has a better Operating Margin (10.52%) than 65.67% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of MN has grown nicely.
The Gross Margin of MN (34.59%) is worse than 67.16% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of MN has grown nicely.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% |
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so MN is creating value.
The number of shares outstanding for MN remains at a similar level compared to 1 year ago.
MN has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, MN has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 2.14 indicates that MN is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
MN has a Altman-Z score of 2.14. This is in the better half of the industry: MN outperforms 71.64% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of MN is 3.46, which is a good value as it means it would take MN, 3.46 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
The Debt to FCF ratio of MN (3.46) is better than 70.15% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.69 indicates that MN is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
MN has a Debt to Equity ratio (0.69) which is in line with its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.14 |
ROIC/WACC3.26
WACC5.95%
2.3 Liquidity
MN has a Current Ratio of 0.97. This is a bad value and indicates that MN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
MN has a Current ratio (0.97) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
MN has a Quick Ratio of 0.97. This is a bad value and indicates that MN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
The Quick ratio of MN (0.62) is worse than 77.61% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
MN shows a slight negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has decreased by -8.79%.
The Earnings Per Share has been growing by 15.47% on average over the past years. This is quite good.
MN shows a small growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 0.49%.
Measured over the past years, MN shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 1.10% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
3.2 Future
MN is expected to show a small growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 1.31% yearly.
MN is expected to show a small growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will grow by 0.71% yearly.
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year1.2%
Revenue Next 2Y1.17%
Revenue Next 3Y1.25%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
A Price/Earnings ratio of 5.72 indicates a rather cheap valuation of MN.
MN's Price/Earnings ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. MN is cheaper than 91.04% of the companies in the same industry.
MN is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Earnings ratio to 26.34, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 7.96 indicates a rather cheap valuation of MN.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, MN is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 74.63% of the companies are valued more expensively.
MN is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 23.56, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.72 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.96 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio of MN indicates a rather cheap valuation: MN is cheaper than 83.58% of the companies listed in the same industry.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, MN is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 71.64% of the companies are valued more expensively.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 6.4 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.74 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates MN does not grow enough to justify the current Price/Earnings ratio.
MN has an outstanding profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)7.02
PEG (5Y)0.37
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 6.86%, MN is a good candidate for dividend investing.
MN's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 6.03. MN pays more dividend than 88.06% of the companies in the same industry.
MN's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 2.31.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.86% |
5.2 History
The dividend of MN decreases each year by -6.82%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
19.05% of the earnings are spent on dividend by MN. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
DP19.05%
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
BIT:MN (12/9/2025, 4:08:01 PM)
2.058
+0.03 (+1.63%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorCommunication Services
GICS IndustryGroupMedia & Entertainment
GICS IndustryMedia
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners25.97%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners53.3%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap538.08M
Revenue(TTM)1.42B
Net Income(TTM)95.81M
Analysts85
Price Target2.78 (35.08%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.86% |
Yearly Dividend0.12
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
DP19.05%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)-0.91%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.03%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.28%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.72 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.96 | ||
| P/S | 0.38 | ||
| P/FCF | 6.4 | ||
| P/OCF | 5.22 | ||
| P/B | 1.92 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.74 |
EPS(TTM)0.36
EY17.49%
EPS(NY)0.26
Fwd EY12.56%
FCF(TTM)0.32
FCFY15.63%
OCF(TTM)0.39
OCFY19.17%
SpS5.43
BVpS1.07
TBVpS-0.44
PEG (NY)7.02
PEG (5Y)0.37
Graham Number2.94
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROCE | 25.55% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% | ||
| ROICexc | 20.09% | ||
| ROICexgc | 66.52% | ||
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% | ||
| FCFM | 5.92% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
ROICexc(3y)12.8%
ROICexc(5y)11.61%
ROICexgc(3y)52.6%
ROICexgc(5y)44.45%
ROCE(3y)14.93%
ROCE(5y)12.88%
ROICexgc growth 3Y21.82%
ROICexgc growth 5Y18.04%
ROICexc growth 3Y17.34%
ROICexc growth 5Y2.38%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.3
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 0.91 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 29.53% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.34% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 51.7 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 48.24% | ||
| Profit Quality | 87.81% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.14 |
F-Score6
WACC5.95%
ROIC/WACC3.26
Cap/Depr(3y)19.72%
Cap/Depr(5y)13.93%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.34%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.97%
Profit Quality(3y)177.69%
Profit Quality(5y)503.09%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
Revenue Next Year1.2%
Revenue Next 2Y1.17%
Revenue Next 3Y1.25%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%
EBIT growth 1Y-5.07%
EBIT growth 3Y21.04%
EBIT growth 5Y7.37%
EBIT Next Year67.44%
EBIT Next 3Y19.67%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-15.02%
FCF growth 3Y4.95%
FCF growth 5Y6.26%
OCF growth 1Y-8.3%
OCF growth 3Y8.91%
OCF growth 5Y7.93%
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE / MN.MI FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to MN.MI.
What is the valuation status of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI). This can be considered as Undervalued.
How profitable is ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) has a profitability rating of 8 / 10.
What is the earnings growth outlook for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is expected to grow by 0.81% in the next year.
How sustainable is the dividend of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
The dividend rating of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is 7 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 19.05%.