ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Milan - BIT:MN - IT0001469383 - Common Stock
2.06 EUR
+0.02 (+0.73%)
We assign a fundamental rating of 6 out of 10 to MN. MN was compared to 70 industry peers in the Media industry. MN scores excellent on profitability, but there are some minor concerns on its financial health. MN is cheap, but on the other hand it scores bad on growth. Finally MN also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
MN had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year MN had a positive cash flow from operations.
Each year in the past 5 years MN has been profitable.
In the past 5 years MN always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
1.2 Ratios
MN has a better Return On Assets (8.78%) than 95.65% of its industry peers.
MN has a Return On Equity of 34.27%. This is amongst the best in the industry. MN outperforms 92.75% of its industry peers.
MN has a Return On Invested Capital of 19.38%. This is amongst the best in the industry. MN outperforms 97.10% of its industry peers.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for MN is above the industry average of 8.06%.
The 3 year average ROIC (11.34%) for MN is below the current ROIC(19.38%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
1.3 Margins
MN has a better Profit Margin (6.75%) than 72.46% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of MN has grown nicely.
MN's Operating Margin of 10.52% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. MN outperforms 66.67% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of MN has grown nicely.
With a Gross Margin value of 34.59%, MN is not doing good in the industry: 68.12% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
MN's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% |
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so MN is creating value.
Compared to 1 year ago, MN has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
Compared to 5 years ago, MN has more shares outstanding
Compared to 1 year ago, MN has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 2.14 indicates that MN is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
MN's Altman-Z score of 2.14 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. MN outperforms 72.46% of its industry peers.
MN has a debt to FCF ratio of 3.46. This is a good value and a sign of high solvency as MN would need 3.46 years to pay back of all of its debts.
MN's Debt to FCF ratio of 3.46 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. MN outperforms 68.12% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.69 indicates that MN is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
The Debt to Equity ratio of MN (0.69) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.14 |
ROIC/WACC3.25
WACC5.97%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 0.97 indicates that MN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
MN has a Current ratio (0.97) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
A Quick Ratio of 0.62 indicates that MN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
Looking at the Quick ratio, with a value of 0.62, MN is doing worse than 75.36% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for MN have decreased by -8.79% in the last year.
MN shows quite a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been growing by 15.47% yearly.
MN shows a small growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 0.49%.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 1.10% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, MN will show a small growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 1.31% on average per year.
Based on estimates for the next years, MN will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 0.71% on average per year.
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year1.2%
Revenue Next 2Y1.17%
Revenue Next 3Y1.25%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
With a Price/Earnings ratio of 5.72, the valuation of MN can be described as very cheap.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of MN indicates a rather cheap valuation: MN is cheaper than 91.30% of the companies listed in the same industry.
MN's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 26.22.
The Price/Forward Earnings ratio is 7.97, which indicates a rather cheap valuation of MN.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, MN is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 76.81% of the companies are valued more expensively.
MN's Price/Forward Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 23.58.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.72 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.97 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, MN is valued cheaply inside the industry as 85.51% of the companies are valued more expensively.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio of MN indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: MN is cheaper than 72.46% of the companies listed in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 6.4 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.76 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates an expensive valuation of the company.
MN has an outstanding profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)7.02
PEG (5Y)0.37
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 6.83%, MN is a good candidate for dividend investing.
MN's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 3.30. MN pays more dividend than 88.41% of the companies in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.87, MN pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.83% |
5.2 History
The dividend of MN decreases each year by -6.82%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
19.05% of the earnings are spent on dividend by MN. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
DP19.05%
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
BIT:MN (12/18/2025, 11:20:33 AM)
2.06
+0.02 (+0.73%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorCommunication Services
GICS IndustryGroupMedia & Entertainment
GICS IndustryMedia
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners25.97%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners53.3%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap538.61M
Revenue(TTM)1.42B
Net Income(TTM)95.81M
Analysts85
Price Target2.78 (34.95%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.83% |
Yearly Dividend0.12
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
DP19.05%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)-0.91%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.03%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.28%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.72 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.97 | ||
| P/S | 0.38 | ||
| P/FCF | 6.4 | ||
| P/OCF | 5.22 | ||
| P/B | 1.93 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.76 |
EPS(TTM)0.36
EY17.48%
EPS(NY)0.26
Fwd EY12.55%
FCF(TTM)0.32
FCFY15.62%
OCF(TTM)0.39
OCFY19.15%
SpS5.43
BVpS1.07
TBVpS-0.44
PEG (NY)7.02
PEG (5Y)0.37
Graham Number2.94
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROCE | 25.55% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% | ||
| ROICexc | 20.09% | ||
| ROICexgc | 66.52% | ||
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% | ||
| FCFM | 5.92% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
ROICexc(3y)12.8%
ROICexc(5y)11.61%
ROICexgc(3y)52.6%
ROICexgc(5y)44.45%
ROCE(3y)14.93%
ROCE(5y)12.88%
ROICexgc growth 3Y21.82%
ROICexgc growth 5Y18.04%
ROICexc growth 3Y17.34%
ROICexc growth 5Y2.38%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.3
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 0.91 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 29.53% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.34% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 51.7 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 48.24% | ||
| Profit Quality | 87.81% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.14 |
F-Score6
WACC5.97%
ROIC/WACC3.25
Cap/Depr(3y)19.72%
Cap/Depr(5y)13.93%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.34%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.97%
Profit Quality(3y)177.69%
Profit Quality(5y)503.09%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
Revenue Next Year1.2%
Revenue Next 2Y1.17%
Revenue Next 3Y1.25%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%
EBIT growth 1Y-5.07%
EBIT growth 3Y21.04%
EBIT growth 5Y7.37%
EBIT Next Year67.44%
EBIT Next 3Y19.67%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-15.02%
FCF growth 3Y4.95%
FCF growth 5Y6.26%
OCF growth 1Y-8.3%
OCF growth 3Y8.91%
OCF growth 5Y7.93%
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE / MN.MI FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to MN.MI.
What is the valuation status of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI). This can be considered as Undervalued.
How profitable is ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) has a profitability rating of 8 / 10.
What is the earnings growth outlook for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is expected to grow by 0.81% in the next year.
How sustainable is the dividend of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
The dividend rating of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is 7 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 19.05%.