LANDSEA HOMES CORP (LSEA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
USA - NASDAQ:LSEA - US51509P1030 - Common Stock
11.31 USD
0 (0%)
11.31 USD
0 (0%)
LSEA gets a fundamental rating of 3 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 61 industry peers in the Household Durables industry. Both the profitability and financial health of LSEA have multiple concerns. LSEA is quite expensive at the moment. It does show a decent growth rate.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year LSEA was profitable.
In the past year LSEA had a positive cash flow from operations.
Of the past 5 years LSEA 4 years were profitable.
Of the past 5 years LSEA 4 years had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
With a Return On Assets value of 0.58%, LSEA is not doing good in the industry: 60.94% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
LSEA has a worse Return On Equity (1.48%) than 60.94% of its industry peers.
LSEA has a worse Return On Invested Capital (0.89%) than 68.75% of its industry peers.
The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for LSEA is significantly below the industry average of 10.36%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.58% | ||
| ROE | 1.48% | ||
| ROIC | 0.89% |
ROA(3y)2.66%
ROA(5y)-4.25%
ROE(3y)6%
ROE(5y)-8.19%
ROIC(3y)3.35%
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
LSEA's Profit Margin of 0.62% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. LSEA is outperformed by 60.94% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of LSEA has declined.
The Operating Margin of LSEA (1.11%) is worse than 65.63% of its industry peers.
LSEA's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
Looking at the Gross Margin, with a value of 14.29%, LSEA is doing worse than 93.75% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of LSEA has declined.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 1.11% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 0.62% | ||
| GM | 14.29% |
OM growth 3Y-32.72%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3Y-39.59%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-6.27%
GM growth 5YN/A
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
LSEA has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is destroying value.
LSEA has less shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
LSEA has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, LSEA has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
LSEA has an Altman-Z score of 2.14. This is not the best score and indicates that LSEA is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
LSEA has a worse Altman-Z score (2.14) than 62.50% of its industry peers.
LSEA has a debt to FCF ratio of 15.51. This is a negative value and a sign of low solvency as LSEA would need 15.51 years to pay back of all of its debts.
Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 15.51, LSEA is in line with its industry, outperforming 46.88% of the companies in the same industry.
LSEA has a Debt/Equity ratio of 1.10. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
The Debt to Equity ratio of LSEA (1.10) is worse than 76.56% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.1 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 15.51 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.14 |
ROIC/WACC0.12
WACC7.51%
2.3 Liquidity
LSEA has a Current Ratio of 4.80. This indicates that LSEA is financially healthy and has no problem in meeting its short term obligations.
LSEA has a better Current ratio (4.80) than 73.44% of its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 0.14 indicates that LSEA may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
LSEA has a Quick ratio of 0.14. This is amonst the worse of the industry: LSEA underperforms 93.75% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.8 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.14 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for LSEA have decreased strongly by -61.76% in the last year.
The Earnings Per Share has been growing by 63.78% on average over the past years. This is a very strong growth
The Revenue has grown by 24.16% in the past year. This is a very strong growth!
The Revenue has been growing by 14.85% on average over the past years. This is quite good.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-61.76%
EPS 3Y-30.16%
EPS 5Y63.78%
EPS Q2Q%-2100%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)24.16%
Revenue growth 3Y14.85%
Revenue growth 5YN/A
Sales Q2Q%5.7%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to decrease by -60.38% on average over the next years. This is quite bad
Based on estimates for the next years, LSEA will show a decrease in Revenue. The Revenue will decrease by -2.41% on average per year.
EPS Next Y-146.3%
EPS Next 2Y-60.38%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-7.42%
Revenue Next 2Y-2.41%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio of 43.50, the valuation of LSEA can be described as expensive.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, LSEA is valued a bit more expensive than the industry average as 70.31% of the companies are valued more cheaply.
LSEA's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a rather expensive valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 27.77.
LSEA is valuated quite expensively with a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 153.30.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, LSEA is valued a bit more expensive than the industry average as 71.88% of the companies are valued more cheaply.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of LSEA to the average of the S&P500 Index (23.23), we can say LSEA is valued expensively.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 43.5 | ||
| Fwd PE | 153.3 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, LSEA is valued a bit more expensive than the industry average as 73.44% of the companies are valued more cheaply.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, LSEA is valued cheaply inside the industry as 84.38% of the companies are valued more expensively.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 8.78 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 43.13 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
LSEA's earnings are expected to decrease with -60.38% in the coming years. This may justify a cheaper valuation.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)0.68
EPS Next 2Y-60.38%
EPS Next 3YN/A
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
No dividends for LSEA!.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
11.31
0 (0%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryGroupConsumer Durables & Apparel
GICS IndustryHousehold Durables
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners60.71%
Inst Owner Change0%
Ins Owners14.2%
Ins Owner Change-13.27%
Market Cap411.80M
Revenue(TTM)1.57B
Net Income(TTM)9.79M
Analysts48.89
Price Target11.37 (0.53%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
Yearly DividendN/A
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DPN/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)0
Avg EPS beat(2)-100.66%
Min EPS beat(2)-122.18%
Max EPS beat(2)-79.14%
EPS beat(4)1
Avg EPS beat(4)18.92%
Min EPS beat(4)-122.18%
Max EPS beat(4)297.46%
EPS beat(8)4
Avg EPS beat(8)16.67%
EPS beat(12)6
Avg EPS beat(12)12.26%
EPS beat(16)9
Avg EPS beat(16)35.14%
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-5.4%
Min Revenue beat(2)-8.47%
Max Revenue beat(2)-2.33%
Revenue beat(4)1
Avg Revenue beat(4)2.55%
Min Revenue beat(4)-8.47%
Max Revenue beat(4)24.84%
Revenue beat(8)5
Avg Revenue beat(8)7.09%
Revenue beat(12)7
Avg Revenue beat(12)5.14%
Revenue beat(16)9
Avg Revenue beat(16)6.09%
PT rev (1m)4.53%
PT rev (3m)1.36%
EPS NQ rev (1m)0%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-217.77%
EPS NY rev (1m)-160.69%
EPS NY rev (3m)-141.2%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-11.43%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-7.48%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 43.5 | ||
| Fwd PE | 153.3 | ||
| P/S | 0.26 | ||
| P/FCF | 8.78 | ||
| P/OCF | 7.8 | ||
| P/B | 0.62 | ||
| P/tB | 0.82 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 43.13 |
EPS(TTM)0.26
EY2.3%
EPS(NY)0.07
Fwd EY0.65%
FCF(TTM)1.29
FCFY11.39%
OCF(TTM)1.45
OCFY12.81%
SpS43.04
BVpS18.13
TBVpS13.86
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)0.68
Graham NumberN/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.58% | ||
| ROE | 1.48% | ||
| ROCE | 1.24% | ||
| ROIC | 0.89% | ||
| ROICexc | 0.91% | ||
| ROICexgc | 1.14% | ||
| OM | 1.11% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 0.62% | ||
| GM | 14.29% | ||
| FCFM | 2.99% |
ROA(3y)2.66%
ROA(5y)-4.25%
ROE(3y)6%
ROE(5y)-8.19%
ROIC(3y)3.35%
ROIC(5y)N/A
ROICexc(3y)3.7%
ROICexc(5y)N/A
ROICexgc(3y)4.26%
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)4.7%
ROCE(5y)N/A
ROICexgc growth 3Y-34.43%
ROICexgc growth 5YN/A
ROICexc growth 3Y-36.82%
ROICexc growth 5YN/A
OM growth 3Y-32.72%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3Y-39.59%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-6.27%
GM growth 5YN/A
F-Score5
Asset Turnover0.93
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.1 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 15.51 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 28.46 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 71.3% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 0.37% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 206.38% | ||
| Profit Quality | 479.4% | ||
| Current Ratio | 4.8 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.14 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.14 |
F-Score5
WACC7.51%
ROIC/WACC0.12
Cap/Depr(3y)108.2%
Cap/Depr(5y)N/A
Cap/Sales(3y)0.46%
Cap/Sales(5y)N/A
Profit Quality(3y)73.27%
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-61.76%
EPS 3Y-30.16%
EPS 5Y63.78%
EPS Q2Q%-2100%
EPS Next Y-146.3%
EPS Next 2Y-60.38%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)24.16%
Revenue growth 3Y14.85%
Revenue growth 5YN/A
Sales Q2Q%5.7%
Revenue Next Year-7.42%
Revenue Next 2Y-2.41%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y-49.43%
EBIT growth 3Y-22.72%
EBIT growth 5YN/A
EBIT Next Year49.97%
EBIT Next 3YN/A
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-2.48%
FCF growth 3Y-7.73%
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y-1.6%
OCF growth 3Y-3.94%
OCF growth 5YN/A