LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Paris - EPA:LNA - FR0004170017 - Common Stock
24.3 EUR
0 (0%)
Overall LNA gets a fundamental rating of 4 out of 10. We evaluated LNA against 29 industry peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. There are concerns on the financial health of LNA while its profitability can be described as average. LNA scores decently on growth, while it is valued quite cheap. This could make an interesting combination. LNA also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
LNA had positive earnings in the past year.
LNA had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
LNA had positive earnings in each of the past 5 years.
Each year in the past 5 years LNA had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
LNA has a worse Return On Assets (1.42%) than 62.07% of its industry peers.
Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 6.95%, LNA is in line with its industry, outperforming 51.72% of the companies in the same industry.
With a Return On Invested Capital value of 3.65%, LNA is not doing good in the industry: 62.07% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
LNA had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 3.69%. This is below the industry average of 6.33%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.42% | ||
| ROE | 6.95% | ||
| ROIC | 3.65% |
ROA(3y)1.56%
ROA(5y)1.35%
ROE(3y)7.9%
ROE(5y)7.74%
ROIC(3y)3.69%
ROIC(5y)3.39%
1.3 Margins
LNA's Profit Margin of 2.70% is in line compared to the rest of the industry. LNA outperforms 55.17% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of LNA has declined.
LNA's Operating Margin of 8.28% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. LNA outperforms 65.52% of its industry peers.
LNA's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
LNA's Gross Margin of 89.45% is amongst the best of the industry. LNA outperforms 89.66% of its industry peers.
LNA's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 8.28% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.7% | ||
| GM | 89.45% |
OM growth 3Y0.38%
OM growth 5Y-4.37%
PM growth 3Y-7.43%
PM growth 5Y-7.27%
GM growth 3Y1.46%
GM growth 5Y0.83%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), so LNA is destroying value.
LNA has about the same amout of shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
The number of shares outstanding for LNA has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
The debt/assets ratio for LNA has been reduced compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
Based on the Altman-Z score of 0.94, we must say that LNA is in the distress zone and has some risk of bankruptcy.
Looking at the Altman-Z score, with a value of 0.94, LNA is doing worse than 72.41% of the companies in the same industry.
The Debt to FCF ratio of LNA is 7.86, which is on the high side as it means it would take LNA, 7.86 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
LNA has a Debt to FCF ratio (7.86) which is in line with its industry peers.
LNA has a Debt/Equity ratio of 2.19. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
LNA's Debt to Equity ratio of 2.19 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. LNA is outperformed by 68.97% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.19 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 7.86 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.94 |
ROIC/WACC0.95
WACC3.85%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 0.91 indicates that LNA may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
With a Current ratio value of 0.91, LNA perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 48.28% of the companies in the same industry.
A Quick Ratio of 0.47 indicates that LNA may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
Looking at the Quick ratio, with a value of 0.47, LNA is doing worse than 79.31% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.91 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.47 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for LNA have decreased by -6.83% in the last year.
Measured over the past years, LNA shows a decrease in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been decreasing by -0.23% on average per year.
The Revenue has grown by 9.58% in the past year. This is quite good.
The Revenue has been growing by 8.85% on average over the past years. This is quite good.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-6.83%
EPS 3Y-4.5%
EPS 5Y-0.23%
EPS Q2Q%-17.9%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)9.58%
Revenue growth 3Y5.37%
Revenue growth 5Y8.85%
Sales Q2Q%11.97%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 13.07% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
Based on estimates for the next years, LNA will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 7.90% on average per year.
EPS Next Y-0.02%
EPS Next 2Y10.96%
EPS Next 3Y13.07%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year12.72%
Revenue Next 2Y9.38%
Revenue Next 3Y7.9%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is stable.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
With a Price/Earnings ratio of 11.41, the valuation of LNA can be described as very reasonable.
86.21% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than LNA, based on the Price/Earnings ratio.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of LNA to the average of the S&P500 Index (27.19), we can say LNA is valued rather cheaply.
LNA is valuated reasonably with a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 10.32.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, LNA is valued cheaper than 86.21% of the companies in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of LNA to the average of the S&P500 Index (23.88), we can say LNA is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.41 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.32 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, LNA is valued cheaper than 93.10% of the companies in the same industry.
89.66% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than LNA, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 2.65 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 5.47 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
LNA's earnings are expected to grow with 13.07% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y10.96%
EPS Next 3Y13.07%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
LNA has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 2.65%. Purely for dividend investing, there may be better candidates out there.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 1.55, LNA pays a better dividend. On top of this LNA pays more dividend than 86.21% of the companies listed in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.90, LNA pays a bit more dividend than the S&P500 average.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.65% |
5.2 History
The dividend of LNA is nicely growing with an annual growth rate of 9.57%!
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.57%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
5.3 Sustainability
28.13% of the earnings are spent on dividend by LNA. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
LNA's earnings are growing more than its dividend. This makes the dividend growth sustainable.
DP28.13%
EPS Next 2Y10.96%
EPS Next 3Y13.07%
EPA:LNA (1/9/2026, 7:00:00 PM)
24.3
0 (0%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorHealth Care
GICS IndustryGroupHealth Care Equipment & Services
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & Services
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners9.95%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners1.23%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap260.25M
Revenue(TTM)806.60M
Net Income(TTM)21.82M
Analysts84.44
Price Target31.62 (30.12%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.65% |
Yearly Dividend0.6
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.57%
DP28.13%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)-3.12%
PT rev (3m)-1.27%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)-3.16%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)1.18%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.41 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.32 | ||
| P/S | 0.32 | ||
| P/FCF | 2.65 | ||
| P/OCF | 2.36 | ||
| P/B | 0.83 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 5.47 |
EPS(TTM)2.13
EY8.77%
EPS(NY)2.36
Fwd EY9.69%
FCF(TTM)9.18
FCFY37.76%
OCF(TTM)10.31
OCFY42.44%
SpS75.31
BVpS29.3
TBVpS-24.71
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number37.47
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.42% | ||
| ROE | 6.95% | ||
| ROCE | 5.93% | ||
| ROIC | 3.65% | ||
| ROICexc | 3.89% | ||
| ROICexgc | 7.89% | ||
| OM | 8.28% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.7% | ||
| GM | 89.45% | ||
| FCFM | 12.18% |
ROA(3y)1.56%
ROA(5y)1.35%
ROE(3y)7.9%
ROE(5y)7.74%
ROIC(3y)3.69%
ROIC(5y)3.39%
ROICexc(3y)3.98%
ROICexc(5y)3.73%
ROICexgc(3y)8.5%
ROICexgc(5y)8.01%
ROCE(3y)5.91%
ROCE(5y)5.67%
ROICexgc growth 3Y1.6%
ROICexgc growth 5Y1.57%
ROICexc growth 3Y2.72%
ROICexc growth 5Y-1.59%
OM growth 3Y0.38%
OM growth 5Y-4.37%
PM growth 3Y-7.43%
PM growth 5Y-7.27%
GM growth 3Y1.46%
GM growth 5Y0.83%
F-Score5
Asset Turnover0.52
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.19 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 7.86 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 4.33 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 13.25% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.51% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2.34 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 69.64% | ||
| Profit Quality | 450.48% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.91 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.47 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.94 |
F-Score5
WACC3.85%
ROIC/WACC0.95
Cap/Depr(3y)14.64%
Cap/Depr(5y)16.09%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.69%
Cap/Sales(5y)1.89%
Profit Quality(3y)386.77%
Profit Quality(5y)628.45%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-6.83%
EPS 3Y-4.5%
EPS 5Y-0.23%
EPS Q2Q%-17.9%
EPS Next Y-0.02%
EPS Next 2Y10.96%
EPS Next 3Y13.07%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)9.58%
Revenue growth 3Y5.37%
Revenue growth 5Y8.85%
Sales Q2Q%11.97%
Revenue Next Year12.72%
Revenue Next 2Y9.38%
Revenue Next 3Y7.9%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y5.74%
EBIT growth 3Y5.76%
EBIT growth 5Y4.09%
EBIT Next Year148.59%
EBIT Next 3Y41.89%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y16.06%
FCF growth 3Y14.06%
FCF growth 5Y-2.49%
OCF growth 1Y13.27%
OCF growth 3Y11.38%
OCF growth 5Y-1.32%
LNA SANTE / LNA.PA FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 4 / 10 to LNA.PA.
What is the valuation status for LNA stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to LNA SANTE (LNA.PA). This can be considered as Undervalued.
How profitable is LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) has a profitability rating of 4 / 10.
What are the PE and PB ratios of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) is 11.41 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 0.83.
How sustainable is the dividend of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
The dividend rating of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) is 7 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 28.13%.