LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - EPA:LNA - FR0004170017 - Common Stock
22.9 EUR
0 (0%)
Overall LNA gets a fundamental rating of 4 out of 10. We evaluated LNA against 31 industry peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. LNA has a medium profitability rating, but doesn't score so well on its financial health evaluation. LNA is valued quite cheap, while showing a decent growth score. This is a good combination! LNA also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year LNA was profitable.
In the past year LNA had a positive cash flow from operations.
In the past 5 years LNA has always been profitable.
LNA had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
With a Return On Assets value of 1.42%, LNA is not doing good in the industry: 74.19% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
With a Return On Equity value of 6.95%, LNA perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 51.61% of the companies in the same industry.
LNA has a Return On Invested Capital of 3.65%. This is in the lower half of the industry: LNA underperforms 61.29% of its industry peers.
The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for LNA is below the industry average of 6.26%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.42% | ||
| ROE | 6.95% | ||
| ROIC | 3.65% |
ROA(3y)1.56%
ROA(5y)1.35%
ROE(3y)7.9%
ROE(5y)7.74%
ROIC(3y)3.69%
ROIC(5y)3.39%
1.3 Margins
LNA has a Profit Margin (2.70%) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
LNA's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
LNA has a Operating Margin of 8.28%. This is in the better half of the industry: LNA outperforms 70.97% of its industry peers.
LNA's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
With an excellent Gross Margin value of 89.45%, LNA belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 90.32% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of LNA has remained more or less at the same level.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 8.28% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.7% | ||
| GM | 89.45% |
OM growth 3Y0.38%
OM growth 5Y-4.37%
PM growth 3Y-7.43%
PM growth 5Y-7.27%
GM growth 3Y1.46%
GM growth 5Y0.83%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
LNA has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is destroying value.
Compared to 1 year ago, LNA has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
The number of shares outstanding for LNA has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
LNA has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
LNA has an Altman-Z score of 0.93. This is a bad value and indicates that LNA is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
With a Altman-Z score value of 0.93, LNA is not doing good in the industry: 70.97% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
The Debt to FCF ratio of LNA is 7.86, which is on the high side as it means it would take LNA, 7.86 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 7.86, LNA is in line with its industry, outperforming 58.06% of the companies in the same industry.
LNA has a Debt/Equity ratio of 2.19. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
Looking at the Debt to Equity ratio, with a value of 2.19, LNA is doing worse than 77.42% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.19 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 7.86 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.93 |
ROIC/WACC0.96
WACC3.81%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 0.91 indicates that LNA may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
The Current ratio of LNA (0.91) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
A Quick Ratio of 0.47 indicates that LNA may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
LNA has a Quick ratio of 0.47. This is amonst the worse of the industry: LNA underperforms 87.10% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.91 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.47 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
LNA shows a slight negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has decreased by -6.83%.
LNA shows a decrease in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been decreasing by -0.23% yearly.
LNA shows quite a strong growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 9.58%.
The Revenue has been growing by 8.85% on average over the past years. This is quite good.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-6.83%
EPS 3Y-4.5%
EPS 5Y-0.23%
EPS Q2Q%-17.9%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)9.58%
Revenue growth 3Y5.37%
Revenue growth 5Y8.85%
Sales Q2Q%11.97%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, LNA will show a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 14.18% on average per year.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 7.68% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y3.24%
EPS Next 2Y14.2%
EPS Next 3Y14.18%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year11.53%
Revenue Next 2Y9.29%
Revenue Next 3Y7.68%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
The Revenue growth rate is stable: in the next years the growth will be about the same than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
With a Price/Earnings ratio of 10.75, the valuation of LNA can be described as very reasonable.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of LNA indicates a rather cheap valuation: LNA is cheaper than 83.87% of the companies listed in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of LNA to the average of the S&P500 Index (27.57), we can say LNA is valued rather cheaply.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 9.42, the valuation of LNA can be described as reasonable.
83.87% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than LNA, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 23.09, LNA is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 10.75 | ||
| Fwd PE | 9.42 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, LNA is valued cheaply inside the industry as 90.32% of the companies are valued more expensively.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, LNA is valued cheaper than 90.32% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 2.5 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 5.38 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates LNA does not grow enough to justify the current Price/Earnings ratio.
A more expensive valuation may be justified as LNA's earnings are expected to grow with 14.18% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)3.32
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y14.2%
EPS Next 3Y14.18%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
LNA has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 2.71%. Purely for dividend investing, there may be better candidates out there.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 2.52, LNA pays a better dividend. On top of this LNA pays more dividend than 83.87% of the companies listed in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.32, LNA has a dividend comparable with the average S&P500 company.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.71% |
5.2 History
The dividend of LNA is nicely growing with an annual growth rate of 9.57%!
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.57%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
5.3 Sustainability
LNA pays out 28.13% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
LNA's earnings are growing more than its dividend. This makes the dividend growth sustainable.
DP28.13%
EPS Next 2Y14.2%
EPS Next 3Y14.18%
EPA:LNA (10/23/2025, 1:01:02 PM)
22.9
0 (0%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorHealth Care
GICS IndustryGroupHealth Care Equipment & Services
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & Services
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners9.22%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners1.23%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap245.26M
Revenue(TTM)806.60M
Net Income(TTM)21.82M
Analysts84.44
Price Target31.62 (38.08%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.71% |
Yearly Dividend0.6
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.57%
DP28.13%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)-1.27%
PT rev (3m)-3.88%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)-10.28%
EPS NY rev (3m)-11.31%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0.11%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.75%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 10.75 | ||
| Fwd PE | 9.42 | ||
| P/S | 0.3 | ||
| P/FCF | 2.5 | ||
| P/OCF | 2.22 | ||
| P/B | 0.78 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 5.38 |
EPS(TTM)2.13
EY9.3%
EPS(NY)2.43
Fwd EY10.62%
FCF(TTM)9.18
FCFY40.07%
OCF(TTM)10.31
OCFY45.03%
SpS75.31
BVpS29.3
TBVpS-24.71
PEG (NY)3.32
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number37.47
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.42% | ||
| ROE | 6.95% | ||
| ROCE | 5.93% | ||
| ROIC | 3.65% | ||
| ROICexc | 3.89% | ||
| ROICexgc | 7.89% | ||
| OM | 8.28% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.7% | ||
| GM | 89.45% | ||
| FCFM | 12.18% |
ROA(3y)1.56%
ROA(5y)1.35%
ROE(3y)7.9%
ROE(5y)7.74%
ROIC(3y)3.69%
ROIC(5y)3.39%
ROICexc(3y)3.98%
ROICexc(5y)3.73%
ROICexgc(3y)8.5%
ROICexgc(5y)8.01%
ROCE(3y)5.91%
ROCE(5y)5.67%
ROICexgc growth 3Y1.6%
ROICexgc growth 5Y1.57%
ROICexc growth 3Y2.72%
ROICexc growth 5Y-1.59%
OM growth 3Y0.38%
OM growth 5Y-4.37%
PM growth 3Y-7.43%
PM growth 5Y-7.27%
GM growth 3Y1.46%
GM growth 5Y0.83%
F-Score5
Asset Turnover0.52
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.19 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 7.86 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 4.33 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 13.25% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.51% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2.34 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 69.64% | ||
| Profit Quality | 450.48% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.91 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.47 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.93 |
F-Score5
WACC3.81%
ROIC/WACC0.96
Cap/Depr(3y)14.64%
Cap/Depr(5y)16.09%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.69%
Cap/Sales(5y)1.89%
Profit Quality(3y)386.77%
Profit Quality(5y)628.45%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-6.83%
EPS 3Y-4.5%
EPS 5Y-0.23%
EPS Q2Q%-17.9%
EPS Next Y3.24%
EPS Next 2Y14.2%
EPS Next 3Y14.18%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)9.58%
Revenue growth 3Y5.37%
Revenue growth 5Y8.85%
Sales Q2Q%11.97%
Revenue Next Year11.53%
Revenue Next 2Y9.29%
Revenue Next 3Y7.68%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y5.74%
EBIT growth 3Y5.76%
EBIT growth 5Y4.09%
EBIT Next Year127.78%
EBIT Next 3Y38.33%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y16.06%
FCF growth 3Y14.06%
FCF growth 5Y-2.49%
OCF growth 1Y13.27%
OCF growth 3Y11.38%
OCF growth 5Y-1.32%