LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Paris - EPA:LNA - FR0004170017 - Common Stock
24.35 EUR
+0.05 (+0.21%)
We assign a fundamental rating of 4 out of 10 to LNA. LNA was compared to 32 industry peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. While LNA is still in line with the averages on profitability rating, there are concerns on its financial health. LNA is valued quite cheap, while showing a decent growth score. This is a good combination! LNA also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year LNA was profitable.
In the past year LNA had a positive cash flow from operations.
Each year in the past 5 years LNA has been profitable.
Each year in the past 5 years LNA had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
LNA's Return On Assets of 1.32% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. LNA is outperformed by 65.63% of its industry peers.
The Return On Equity of LNA (6.51%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
Looking at the Return On Invested Capital, with a value of 3.39%, LNA is doing worse than 65.63% of the companies in the same industry.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for LNA is below the industry average of 7.02%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.32% | ||
| ROE | 6.51% | ||
| ROIC | 3.39% |
ROA(3y)1.56%
ROA(5y)1.35%
ROE(3y)7.9%
ROE(5y)7.74%
ROIC(3y)3.69%
ROIC(5y)3.39%
1.3 Margins
LNA has a Profit Margin (2.40%) which is in line with its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of LNA has declined.
LNA has a Operating Margin of 7.34%. This is in the better half of the industry: LNA outperforms 71.88% of its industry peers.
LNA's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
LNA has a better Gross Margin (88.24%) than 90.63% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of LNA has remained more or less at the same level.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 7.34% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.4% | ||
| GM | 88.24% |
OM growth 3Y0.38%
OM growth 5Y-4.37%
PM growth 3Y-7.43%
PM growth 5Y-7.27%
GM growth 3Y1.46%
GM growth 5Y0.83%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), so LNA is destroying value.
Compared to 1 year ago, LNA has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
The number of shares outstanding for LNA has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, LNA has an improved debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
LNA has an Altman-Z score of 0.96. This is a bad value and indicates that LNA is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
LNA has a Altman-Z score of 0.96. This is in the lower half of the industry: LNA underperforms 75.00% of its industry peers.
LNA has a debt to FCF ratio of 10.13. This is a negative value and a sign of low solvency as LNA would need 10.13 years to pay back of all of its debts.
LNA has a Debt to FCF ratio of 10.13. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: LNA outperforms 50.00% of its industry peers.
LNA has a Debt/Equity ratio of 2.22. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
With a Debt to Equity ratio value of 2.22, LNA is not doing good in the industry: 71.88% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.22 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 10.13 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.96 |
ROIC/WACC0.86
WACC3.93%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 0.92 indicates that LNA may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
LNA has a Current ratio (0.92) which is in line with its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 0.46 indicates that LNA may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
With a Quick ratio value of 0.46, LNA is not doing good in the industry: 81.25% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.92 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.46 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
LNA shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -12.51%.
The Earnings Per Share has been decreasing by -0.23% on average over the past years.
Looking at the last year, LNA shows a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue has grown by 13.31% in the last year.
Measured over the past years, LNA shows a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 8.85% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-12.51%
EPS 3Y-4.5%
EPS 5Y-0.23%
EPS Q2Q%-8.81%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)13.31%
Revenue growth 3Y5.37%
Revenue growth 5Y8.85%
Sales Q2Q%14.58%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 13.07% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
Based on estimates for the next years, LNA will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 7.90% on average per year.
EPS Next Y-0.02%
EPS Next 2Y10.96%
EPS Next 3Y13.07%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year12.72%
Revenue Next 2Y9.38%
Revenue Next 3Y7.9%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is stable: in the next years the growth will be about the same than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
A Price/Earnings ratio of 11.94 indicates a reasonable valuation of LNA.
LNA's Price/Earnings ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. LNA is cheaper than 75.00% of the companies in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of LNA to the average of the S&P500 Index (27.25), we can say LNA is valued rather cheaply.
The Price/Forward Earnings ratio is 8.39, which indicates a very decent valuation of LNA.
LNA's Price/Forward Earnings ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. LNA is cheaper than 96.88% of the companies in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of LNA to the average of the S&P500 Index (23.98), we can say LNA is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.94 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.39 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, LNA is valued cheaply inside the industry as 84.38% of the companies are valued more expensively.
90.63% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than LNA, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 3.32 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 6.2 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
A more expensive valuation may be justified as LNA's earnings are expected to grow with 13.07% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y10.96%
EPS Next 3Y13.07%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
LNA has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 2.67%.
LNA's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 1.57. LNA pays more dividend than 84.38% of the companies in the same industry.
LNA's Dividend Yield is a higher than the S&P500 average which is at 1.92.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.67% |
5.2 History
On average, the dividend of LNA grows each year by 9.57%, which is quite nice.
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.57%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
5.3 Sustainability
29.57% of the earnings are spent on dividend by LNA. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
The dividend of LNA is growing, but earnings are growing more, so the dividend growth is sustainable.
DP29.57%
EPS Next 2Y10.96%
EPS Next 3Y13.07%
EPA:LNA (1/13/2026, 10:10:42 AM)
24.35
+0.05 (+0.21%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorHealth Care
GICS IndustryGroupHealth Care Equipment & Services
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & Services
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners9.95%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners1.23%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap260.79M
Revenue(TTM)863.42M
Net Income(TTM)20.77M
Analysts84.44
Price Target31.62 (29.86%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.67% |
Yearly Dividend0.6
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.57%
DP29.57%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)0%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)-3.16%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)1.07%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.94 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.39 | ||
| P/S | 0.3 | ||
| P/FCF | 3.32 | ||
| P/OCF | 2.81 | ||
| P/B | 0.82 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 6.2 |
EPS(TTM)2.04
EY8.38%
EPS(NY)2.9
Fwd EY11.91%
FCF(TTM)7.34
FCFY30.16%
OCF(TTM)8.65
OCFY35.54%
SpS80.62
BVpS29.78
TBVpS-24.34
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number36.97
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.32% | ||
| ROE | 6.51% | ||
| ROCE | 5.5% | ||
| ROIC | 3.39% | ||
| ROICexc | 3.4% | ||
| ROICexgc | 6.4% | ||
| OM | 7.34% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.4% | ||
| GM | 88.24% | ||
| FCFM | 9.11% |
ROA(3y)1.56%
ROA(5y)1.35%
ROE(3y)7.9%
ROE(5y)7.74%
ROIC(3y)3.69%
ROIC(5y)3.39%
ROICexc(3y)3.98%
ROICexc(5y)3.73%
ROICexgc(3y)8.5%
ROICexgc(5y)8.01%
ROCE(3y)5.91%
ROCE(5y)5.67%
ROICexgc growth 3Y1.6%
ROICexgc growth 5Y1.57%
ROICexc growth 3Y2.72%
ROICexc growth 5Y-1.59%
OM growth 3Y0.38%
OM growth 5Y-4.37%
PM growth 3Y-7.43%
PM growth 5Y-7.27%
GM growth 3Y1.46%
GM growth 5Y0.83%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover0.55
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.22 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 10.13 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 4.56 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 15.31% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.63% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2.17 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 59.77% | ||
| Profit Quality | 378.76% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.92 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.46 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.96 |
F-Score6
WACC3.93%
ROIC/WACC0.86
Cap/Depr(3y)14.64%
Cap/Depr(5y)16.09%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.69%
Cap/Sales(5y)1.89%
Profit Quality(3y)386.77%
Profit Quality(5y)628.45%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-12.51%
EPS 3Y-4.5%
EPS 5Y-0.23%
EPS Q2Q%-8.81%
EPS Next Y-0.02%
EPS Next 2Y10.96%
EPS Next 3Y13.07%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)13.31%
Revenue growth 3Y5.37%
Revenue growth 5Y8.85%
Sales Q2Q%14.58%
Revenue Next Year12.72%
Revenue Next 2Y9.38%
Revenue Next 3Y7.9%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y-5.53%
EBIT growth 3Y5.76%
EBIT growth 5Y4.09%
EBIT Next Year148.59%
EBIT Next 3Y41.89%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y49.94%
FCF growth 3Y14.06%
FCF growth 5Y-2.49%
OCF growth 1Y40.17%
OCF growth 3Y11.38%
OCF growth 5Y-1.32%
LNA SANTE / LNA.PA FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 4 / 10 to LNA.PA.
What is the valuation status for LNA stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to LNA SANTE (LNA.PA). This can be considered as Undervalued.
How profitable is LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) has a profitability rating of 4 / 10.
What are the PE and PB ratios of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) is 11.94 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 0.82.
How sustainable is the dividend of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
The dividend rating of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) is 7 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 29.57%.