LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) Fundamental Analysis & Valuation
EPA:LNA • FR0004170017
Current stock price
26.4 EUR
+0.7 (+2.72%)
Last:
This LNA.PA fundamental analysis includes valuation metrics, fair value assessment, financial health analysis, profitability trends, growth metrics and dividend sustainability analysis.
1. LNA.PA Profitability Analysis
1.1 Basic Checks
- LNA had positive earnings in the past year.
- LNA had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
- Each year in the past 5 years LNA has been profitable.
- Each year in the past 5 years LNA had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
- With a Return On Assets value of 1.32%, LNA is not doing good in the industry: 66.67% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
- Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 6.51%, LNA is in line with its industry, outperforming 48.15% of the companies in the same industry.
- LNA's Return On Invested Capital of 3.39% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. LNA is outperformed by 66.67% of its industry peers.
- LNA had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 3.69%. This is below the industry average of 5.91%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.32% | ||
| ROE | 6.51% | ||
| ROIC | 3.39% |
ROA(3y)1.56%
ROA(5y)1.35%
ROE(3y)7.9%
ROE(5y)7.74%
ROIC(3y)3.69%
ROIC(5y)3.39%
1.3 Margins
- LNA has a Profit Margin of 2.40%. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: LNA outperforms 55.56% of its industry peers.
- LNA's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
- With a decent Operating Margin value of 7.34%, LNA is doing good in the industry, outperforming 62.96% of the companies in the same industry.
- In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of LNA has declined.
- LNA has a Gross Margin of 88.24%. This is amongst the best in the industry. LNA outperforms 88.89% of its industry peers.
- In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of LNA has remained more or less at the same level.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 7.34% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.4% | ||
| GM | 88.24% |
OM growth 3Y0.38%
OM growth 5Y-4.37%
PM growth 3Y-7.43%
PM growth 5Y-7.27%
GM growth 3Y1.46%
GM growth 5Y0.83%
2. LNA.PA Health Analysis
2.1 Basic Checks
- The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), so LNA is destroying value.
- Compared to 1 year ago, LNA has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
- LNA has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
- The debt/assets ratio for LNA has been reduced compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
- LNA has an Altman-Z score of 0.96. This is a bad value and indicates that LNA is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
- With a Altman-Z score value of 0.96, LNA is not doing good in the industry: 62.96% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
- LNA has a debt to FCF ratio of 10.13. This is a negative value and a sign of low solvency as LNA would need 10.13 years to pay back of all of its debts.
- With a Debt to FCF ratio value of 10.13, LNA perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 48.15% of the companies in the same industry.
- A Debt/Equity ratio of 2.22 is on the high side and indicates that LNA has dependencies on debt financing.
- With a Debt to Equity ratio value of 2.22, LNA is not doing good in the industry: 74.07% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.22 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 10.13 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.96 |
ROIC/WACC0.86
WACC3.94%
2.3 Liquidity
- A Current Ratio of 0.92 indicates that LNA may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
- With a Current ratio value of 0.92, LNA perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 55.56% of the companies in the same industry.
- A Quick Ratio of 0.46 indicates that LNA may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
- The Quick ratio of LNA (0.46) is worse than 70.37% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.92 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.46 |
3. LNA.PA Growth Analysis
3.1 Past
- LNA shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -12.51%.
- LNA shows a decrease in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been decreasing by -0.23% yearly.
- LNA shows quite a strong growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 13.31%.
- LNA shows quite a strong growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 8.85% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-12.51%
EPS 3Y-4.5%
EPS 5Y-0.23%
EPS Q2Q%-8.81%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)13.31%
Revenue growth 3Y5.37%
Revenue growth 5Y8.85%
Sales Q2Q%14.58%
3.2 Future
- LNA is expected to show quite a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 10.91% yearly.
- Based on estimates for the next years, LNA will show a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 8.57% on average per year.
EPS Next Y-0.79%
EPS Next 2Y8.98%
EPS Next 3Y10.91%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year13.59%
Revenue Next 2Y10.15%
Revenue Next 3Y8.57%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
- The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
- The Revenue growth rate is stable: in the next years the growth will be about the same than in the last years.
4. LNA.PA Valuation Analysis
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- With a Price/Earnings ratio of 12.94, LNA is valued correctly.
- Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, LNA is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 74.07% of the companies are valued more expensively.
- When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of LNA to the average of the S&P500 Index (24.88), we can say LNA is valued slightly cheaper.
- LNA is valuated reasonably with a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 9.44.
- Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, LNA is valued cheaper than 88.89% of the companies in the same industry.
- When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of LNA to the average of the S&P500 Index (22.19), we can say LNA is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 12.94 | ||
| Fwd PE | 9.44 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- 85.19% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than LNA, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
- Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, LNA is valued cheaply inside the industry as 85.19% of the companies are valued more expensively.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 3.6 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y8.98%
EPS Next 3Y10.91%
5. LNA.PA Dividend Analysis
5.1 Amount
- LNA has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 2.53%.
- Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 1.96, LNA pays a bit more dividend than its industry peers.
- LNA's Dividend Yield is a higher than the S&P500 average which is at 1.90.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.53% |
5.2 History
- The dividend of LNA is nicely growing with an annual growth rate of 9.57%!
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.57%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
5.3 Sustainability
- 29.57% of the earnings are spent on dividend by LNA. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
- LNA's earnings are growing around the same pace than its dividend. As long as the earnings growth is kept the dividend growth is sustainable.
DP29.57%
EPS Next 2Y8.98%
EPS Next 3Y10.91%
LNA.PA Fundamentals: All Metrics, Ratios and Statistics
EPA:LNA (3/27/2026, 7:00:00 PM)
26.4
+0.7 (+2.72%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorHealth Care
GICS IndustryGroupHealth Care Equipment & Services
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & Services
Earnings (Last)01-02 2026-01-02
Earnings (Next)03-25 2026-03-25
Inst Owners9.92%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners1.23%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap282.74M
Revenue(TTM)863.42M
Net Income(TTM)20.77M
Analysts84.44
Price Target32.03 (21.33%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.53% |
Yearly Dividend0.6
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.57%
DP29.57%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)1.29%
PT rev (3m)1.29%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)1.67%
EPS NY rev (3m)-0.77%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0.77%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0.77%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 12.94 | ||
| Fwd PE | 9.44 | ||
| P/S | 0.33 | ||
| P/FCF | 3.6 | ||
| P/OCF | 3.05 | ||
| P/B | 0.89 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3 |
EPS(TTM)2.04
EY7.73%
EPS(NY)2.8
Fwd EY10.6%
FCF(TTM)7.34
FCFY27.82%
OCF(TTM)8.65
OCFY32.78%
SpS80.62
BVpS29.78
TBVpS-24.34
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number36.97
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.32% | ||
| ROE | 6.51% | ||
| ROCE | 5.5% | ||
| ROIC | 3.39% | ||
| ROICexc | 3.4% | ||
| ROICexgc | 6.4% | ||
| OM | 7.34% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.4% | ||
| GM | 88.24% | ||
| FCFM | 9.11% |
ROA(3y)1.56%
ROA(5y)1.35%
ROE(3y)7.9%
ROE(5y)7.74%
ROIC(3y)3.69%
ROIC(5y)3.39%
ROICexc(3y)3.98%
ROICexc(5y)3.73%
ROICexgc(3y)8.5%
ROICexgc(5y)8.01%
ROCE(3y)5.91%
ROCE(5y)5.67%
ROICexgc growth 3Y1.6%
ROICexgc growth 5Y1.57%
ROICexc growth 3Y2.72%
ROICexc growth 5Y-1.59%
OM growth 3Y0.38%
OM growth 5Y-4.37%
PM growth 3Y-7.43%
PM growth 5Y-7.27%
GM growth 3Y1.46%
GM growth 5Y0.83%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover0.55
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.22 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 10.13 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 4.56 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 15.31% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.63% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2.17 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 59.77% | ||
| Profit Quality | 378.76% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.92 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.46 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.96 |
F-Score6
WACC3.94%
ROIC/WACC0.86
Cap/Depr(3y)14.64%
Cap/Depr(5y)16.09%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.69%
Cap/Sales(5y)1.89%
Profit Quality(3y)386.77%
Profit Quality(5y)628.45%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-12.51%
EPS 3Y-4.5%
EPS 5Y-0.23%
EPS Q2Q%-8.81%
EPS Next Y-0.79%
EPS Next 2Y8.98%
EPS Next 3Y10.91%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)13.31%
Revenue growth 3Y5.37%
Revenue growth 5Y8.85%
Sales Q2Q%14.58%
Revenue Next Year13.59%
Revenue Next 2Y10.15%
Revenue Next 3Y8.57%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y-5.53%
EBIT growth 3Y5.76%
EBIT growth 5Y4.09%
EBIT Next Year148.65%
EBIT Next 3Y41.78%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y49.94%
FCF growth 3Y14.06%
FCF growth 5Y-2.49%
OCF growth 1Y40.17%
OCF growth 3Y11.38%
OCF growth 5Y-1.32%
LNA SANTE / LNA.PA Fundamental Analysis FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 4 / 10 to LNA.PA.
What is the valuation status for LNA stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 6 / 10 to LNA SANTE (LNA.PA). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
How profitable is LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) has a profitability rating of 4 / 10.
What are the PE and PB ratios of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) is 12.94 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 0.89.
How sustainable is the dividend of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
The dividend rating of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) is 6 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 29.57%.