LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Paris - EPA:LNA - FR0004170017 - Common Stock
24.2 EUR
+0.4 (+1.68%)
We assign a fundamental rating of 4 out of 10 to LNA. LNA was compared to 33 industry peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. LNA has a medium profitability rating, but doesn't score so well on its financial health evaluation. LNA is valued quite cheap, while showing a decent growth score. This is a good combination! Finally LNA also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year LNA was profitable.
LNA had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
In the past 5 years LNA has always been profitable.
LNA had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
LNA's Return On Assets of 1.42% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. LNA is outperformed by 69.70% of its industry peers.
Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 6.95%, LNA is in line with its industry, outperforming 48.48% of the companies in the same industry.
With a Return On Invested Capital value of 3.65%, LNA is not doing good in the industry: 63.64% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for LNA is below the industry average of 6.56%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.42% | ||
| ROE | 6.95% | ||
| ROIC | 3.65% |
ROA(3y)1.56%
ROA(5y)1.35%
ROE(3y)7.9%
ROE(5y)7.74%
ROIC(3y)3.69%
ROIC(5y)3.39%
1.3 Margins
With a Profit Margin value of 2.70%, LNA perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 51.52% of the companies in the same industry.
LNA's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
LNA has a better Operating Margin (8.28%) than 69.70% of its industry peers.
LNA's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
With an excellent Gross Margin value of 89.45%, LNA belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 87.88% of the companies in the same industry.
LNA's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 8.28% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.7% | ||
| GM | 89.45% |
OM growth 3Y0.38%
OM growth 5Y-4.37%
PM growth 3Y-7.43%
PM growth 5Y-7.27%
GM growth 3Y1.46%
GM growth 5Y0.83%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) below the Cost of Capital (WACC), LNA is destroying value.
Compared to 1 year ago, LNA has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
Compared to 5 years ago, LNA has more shares outstanding
Compared to 1 year ago, LNA has an improved debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
LNA has an Altman-Z score of 0.94. This is a bad value and indicates that LNA is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
With a Altman-Z score value of 0.94, LNA is not doing good in the industry: 75.76% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
LNA has a debt to FCF ratio of 7.86. This is a slightly negative value and a sign of low solvency as LNA would need 7.86 years to pay back of all of its debts.
The Debt to FCF ratio of LNA (7.86) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 2.19 is on the high side and indicates that LNA has dependencies on debt financing.
The Debt to Equity ratio of LNA (2.19) is worse than 75.76% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.19 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 7.86 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.94 |
ROIC/WACC0.95
WACC3.85%
2.3 Liquidity
LNA has a Current Ratio of 0.91. This is a bad value and indicates that LNA is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
With a Current ratio value of 0.91, LNA perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 42.42% of the companies in the same industry.
A Quick Ratio of 0.47 indicates that LNA may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
LNA has a Quick ratio of 0.47. This is amonst the worse of the industry: LNA underperforms 84.85% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.91 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.47 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for LNA have decreased by -6.83% in the last year.
The Earnings Per Share has been decreasing by -0.23% on average over the past years.
Looking at the last year, LNA shows a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue has grown by 9.58% in the last year.
Measured over the past years, LNA shows a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 8.85% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-6.83%
EPS 3Y-4.5%
EPS 5Y-0.23%
EPS Q2Q%-17.9%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)9.58%
Revenue growth 3Y5.37%
Revenue growth 5Y8.85%
Sales Q2Q%11.97%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 13.07% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 7.90% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y-0.02%
EPS Next 2Y10.96%
EPS Next 3Y13.07%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year12.72%
Revenue Next 2Y9.38%
Revenue Next 3Y7.9%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is stable.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio of 11.36, the valuation of LNA can be described as reasonable.
81.82% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than LNA, based on the Price/Earnings ratio.
The average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio is at 26.59. LNA is valued rather cheaply when compared to this.
A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 10.27 indicates a reasonable valuation of LNA.
81.82% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than LNA, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
LNA's Price/Forward Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 24.03.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.36 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.27 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, LNA is valued cheaper than 90.91% of the companies in the same industry.
LNA's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. LNA is cheaper than 90.91% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 2.64 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 5.46 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
LNA's earnings are expected to grow with 13.07% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y10.96%
EPS Next 3Y13.07%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
LNA has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 2.75%. Purely for dividend investing, there may be better candidates out there.
LNA's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 1.57. LNA pays more dividend than 84.85% of the companies in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.88, LNA pays a bit more dividend than the S&P500 average.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.75% |
5.2 History
The dividend of LNA is nicely growing with an annual growth rate of 9.57%!
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.57%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
5.3 Sustainability
LNA pays out 28.13% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
The dividend of LNA is growing, but earnings are growing more, so the dividend growth is sustainable.
DP28.13%
EPS Next 2Y10.96%
EPS Next 3Y13.07%
EPA:LNA (12/24/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
24.2
+0.4 (+1.68%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorHealth Care
GICS IndustryGroupHealth Care Equipment & Services
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & Services
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners9.81%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners1.23%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap259.18M
Revenue(TTM)806.60M
Net Income(TTM)21.82M
Analysts84.44
Price Target31.62 (30.66%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.75% |
Yearly Dividend0.6
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.57%
DP28.13%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)-1.27%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)-3.16%
EPS NY rev (3m)-13.11%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)1.07%
Revenue NY rev (3m)1.18%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.36 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.27 | ||
| P/S | 0.32 | ||
| P/FCF | 2.64 | ||
| P/OCF | 2.35 | ||
| P/B | 0.83 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 5.46 |
EPS(TTM)2.13
EY8.8%
EPS(NY)2.36
Fwd EY9.73%
FCF(TTM)9.18
FCFY37.92%
OCF(TTM)10.31
OCFY42.61%
SpS75.31
BVpS29.3
TBVpS-24.71
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number37.47
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.42% | ||
| ROE | 6.95% | ||
| ROCE | 5.93% | ||
| ROIC | 3.65% | ||
| ROICexc | 3.89% | ||
| ROICexgc | 7.89% | ||
| OM | 8.28% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.7% | ||
| GM | 89.45% | ||
| FCFM | 12.18% |
ROA(3y)1.56%
ROA(5y)1.35%
ROE(3y)7.9%
ROE(5y)7.74%
ROIC(3y)3.69%
ROIC(5y)3.39%
ROICexc(3y)3.98%
ROICexc(5y)3.73%
ROICexgc(3y)8.5%
ROICexgc(5y)8.01%
ROCE(3y)5.91%
ROCE(5y)5.67%
ROICexgc growth 3Y1.6%
ROICexgc growth 5Y1.57%
ROICexc growth 3Y2.72%
ROICexc growth 5Y-1.59%
OM growth 3Y0.38%
OM growth 5Y-4.37%
PM growth 3Y-7.43%
PM growth 5Y-7.27%
GM growth 3Y1.46%
GM growth 5Y0.83%
F-Score5
Asset Turnover0.52
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.19 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 7.86 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 4.33 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 13.25% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.51% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2.34 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 69.64% | ||
| Profit Quality | 450.48% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.91 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.47 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.94 |
F-Score5
WACC3.85%
ROIC/WACC0.95
Cap/Depr(3y)14.64%
Cap/Depr(5y)16.09%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.69%
Cap/Sales(5y)1.89%
Profit Quality(3y)386.77%
Profit Quality(5y)628.45%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-6.83%
EPS 3Y-4.5%
EPS 5Y-0.23%
EPS Q2Q%-17.9%
EPS Next Y-0.02%
EPS Next 2Y10.96%
EPS Next 3Y13.07%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)9.58%
Revenue growth 3Y5.37%
Revenue growth 5Y8.85%
Sales Q2Q%11.97%
Revenue Next Year12.72%
Revenue Next 2Y9.38%
Revenue Next 3Y7.9%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y5.74%
EBIT growth 3Y5.76%
EBIT growth 5Y4.09%
EBIT Next Year148.59%
EBIT Next 3Y41.89%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y16.06%
FCF growth 3Y14.06%
FCF growth 5Y-2.49%
OCF growth 1Y13.27%
OCF growth 3Y11.38%
OCF growth 5Y-1.32%
LNA SANTE / LNA.PA FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 4 / 10 to LNA.PA.
Can you provide the valuation status for LNA SANTE?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to LNA SANTE (LNA.PA). This can be considered as Undervalued.
How profitable is LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) has a profitability rating of 4 / 10.
What is the valuation of LNA SANTE based on its PE and PB ratios?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) is 11.36 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 0.83.
Can you provide the expected EPS growth for LNA stock?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) is expected to decline by -0.02% in the next year.