LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - EPA:LNA - FR0004170017 - Common Stock
24.5 EUR
0 (0%)
LNA gets a fundamental rating of 4 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 30 industry peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. There are concerns on the financial health of LNA while its profitability can be described as average. LNA may be a bit undervalued, certainly considering the very reasonable score on growth
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year LNA was profitable.
LNA had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
LNA had positive earnings in each of the past 5 years.
LNA had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
LNA's Return On Assets of 1.42% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. LNA is outperformed by 70.00% of its industry peers.
Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 6.95%, LNA is in line with its industry, outperforming 50.00% of the companies in the same industry.
The Return On Invested Capital of LNA (3.65%) is worse than 60.00% of its industry peers.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for LNA is below the industry average of 6.66%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.42% | ||
| ROE | 6.95% | ||
| ROIC | 3.65% |
ROA(3y)1.56%
ROA(5y)1.35%
ROE(3y)7.9%
ROE(5y)7.74%
ROIC(3y)3.69%
ROIC(5y)3.39%
1.3 Margins
LNA has a Profit Margin of 2.70%. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: LNA outperforms 53.33% of its industry peers.
LNA's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
LNA has a Operating Margin of 8.28%. This is in the better half of the industry: LNA outperforms 73.33% of its industry peers.
LNA's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
Looking at the Gross Margin, with a value of 89.45%, LNA belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 86.67% of the companies in the same industry.
LNA's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 8.28% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.7% | ||
| GM | 89.45% |
OM growth 3Y0.38%
OM growth 5Y-4.37%
PM growth 3Y-7.43%
PM growth 5Y-7.27%
GM growth 3Y1.46%
GM growth 5Y0.83%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) below the Cost of Capital (WACC), LNA is destroying value.
The number of shares outstanding for LNA remains at a similar level compared to 1 year ago.
Compared to 5 years ago, LNA has more shares outstanding
Compared to 1 year ago, LNA has an improved debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
Based on the Altman-Z score of 0.94, we must say that LNA is in the distress zone and has some risk of bankruptcy.
LNA's Altman-Z score of 0.94 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. LNA is outperformed by 73.33% of its industry peers.
LNA has a debt to FCF ratio of 7.86. This is a slightly negative value and a sign of low solvency as LNA would need 7.86 years to pay back of all of its debts.
LNA has a Debt to FCF ratio (7.86) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 2.19 is on the high side and indicates that LNA has dependencies on debt financing.
With a Debt to Equity ratio value of 2.19, LNA is not doing good in the industry: 70.00% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.19 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 7.86 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.94 |
ROIC/WACC0.94
WACC3.88%
2.3 Liquidity
LNA has a Current Ratio of 0.91. This is a bad value and indicates that LNA is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
LNA has a Current ratio (0.91) which is in line with its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 0.47 indicates that LNA may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
With a Quick ratio value of 0.47, LNA is not doing good in the industry: 83.33% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.91 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.47 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for LNA have decreased by -6.83% in the last year.
The Earnings Per Share has been decreasing by -0.23% on average over the past years.
The Revenue has grown by 9.58% in the past year. This is quite good.
LNA shows quite a strong growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 8.85% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-6.83%
EPS 3Y-4.5%
EPS 5Y-0.23%
EPS Q2Q%-17.9%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)9.58%
Revenue growth 3Y5.37%
Revenue growth 5Y8.85%
Sales Q2Q%11.97%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 14.18% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 7.68% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y3.24%
EPS Next 2Y14.2%
EPS Next 3Y14.18%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year11.53%
Revenue Next 2Y9.29%
Revenue Next 3Y7.68%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is stable.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
A Price/Earnings ratio of 11.50 indicates a reasonable valuation of LNA.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, LNA is valued cheaper than 90.00% of the companies in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of LNA to the average of the S&P500 Index (26.34), we can say LNA is valued rather cheaply.
LNA is valuated reasonably with a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 10.07.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of LNA indicates a rather cheap valuation: LNA is cheaper than 83.33% of the companies listed in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of LNA to the average of the S&P500 Index (34.43), we can say LNA is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.5 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.07 |
4.2 Price Multiples
86.67% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than LNA, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
90.00% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than LNA, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 2.67 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 5.48 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates an expensive valuation of the company.
LNA's earnings are expected to grow with 14.18% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)3.55
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y14.2%
EPS Next 3Y14.18%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
LNA has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 2.74%. Purely for dividend investing, there may be better candidates out there.
LNA's Dividend Yield is a higher than the industry average which is at 2.55.
LNA's Dividend Yield is comparable with the S&P500 average which is at 2.36.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.74% |
5.2 History
The dividend of LNA is nicely growing with an annual growth rate of 9.57%!
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.57%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
5.3 Sustainability
LNA pays out 28.13% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
The dividend of LNA is growing, but earnings are growing more, so the dividend growth is sustainable.
DP28.13%
EPS Next 2Y14.2%
EPS Next 3Y14.18%
EPA:LNA (11/12/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
24.5
0 (0%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorHealth Care
GICS IndustryGroupHealth Care Equipment & Services
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & Services
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners9.22%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners1.23%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap262.39M
Revenue(TTM)806.60M
Net Income(TTM)21.82M
Analysts84.44
Price Target31.62 (29.06%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.74% |
Yearly Dividend0.6
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.57%
DP28.13%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)-0.64%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)-11.31%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0.29%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.5 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.07 | ||
| P/S | 0.33 | ||
| P/FCF | 2.67 | ||
| P/OCF | 2.38 | ||
| P/B | 0.84 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 5.48 |
EPS(TTM)2.13
EY8.69%
EPS(NY)2.43
Fwd EY9.93%
FCF(TTM)9.18
FCFY37.45%
OCF(TTM)10.31
OCFY42.09%
SpS75.31
BVpS29.3
TBVpS-24.71
PEG (NY)3.55
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number37.47
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.42% | ||
| ROE | 6.95% | ||
| ROCE | 5.93% | ||
| ROIC | 3.65% | ||
| ROICexc | 3.89% | ||
| ROICexgc | 7.89% | ||
| OM | 8.28% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.7% | ||
| GM | 89.45% | ||
| FCFM | 12.18% |
ROA(3y)1.56%
ROA(5y)1.35%
ROE(3y)7.9%
ROE(5y)7.74%
ROIC(3y)3.69%
ROIC(5y)3.39%
ROICexc(3y)3.98%
ROICexc(5y)3.73%
ROICexgc(3y)8.5%
ROICexgc(5y)8.01%
ROCE(3y)5.91%
ROCE(5y)5.67%
ROICexgc growth 3Y1.6%
ROICexgc growth 5Y1.57%
ROICexc growth 3Y2.72%
ROICexc growth 5Y-1.59%
OM growth 3Y0.38%
OM growth 5Y-4.37%
PM growth 3Y-7.43%
PM growth 5Y-7.27%
GM growth 3Y1.46%
GM growth 5Y0.83%
F-Score5
Asset Turnover0.52
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.19 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 7.86 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 4.33 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 13.25% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.51% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2.34 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 69.64% | ||
| Profit Quality | 450.48% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.91 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.47 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.94 |
F-Score5
WACC3.88%
ROIC/WACC0.94
Cap/Depr(3y)14.64%
Cap/Depr(5y)16.09%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.69%
Cap/Sales(5y)1.89%
Profit Quality(3y)386.77%
Profit Quality(5y)628.45%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-6.83%
EPS 3Y-4.5%
EPS 5Y-0.23%
EPS Q2Q%-17.9%
EPS Next Y3.24%
EPS Next 2Y14.2%
EPS Next 3Y14.18%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)9.58%
Revenue growth 3Y5.37%
Revenue growth 5Y8.85%
Sales Q2Q%11.97%
Revenue Next Year11.53%
Revenue Next 2Y9.29%
Revenue Next 3Y7.68%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y5.74%
EBIT growth 3Y5.76%
EBIT growth 5Y4.09%
EBIT Next Year127.78%
EBIT Next 3Y38.33%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y16.06%
FCF growth 3Y14.06%
FCF growth 5Y-2.49%
OCF growth 1Y13.27%
OCF growth 3Y11.38%
OCF growth 5Y-1.32%
LNA SANTE / LNA.PA FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 4 / 10 to LNA.PA.
Can you provide the valuation status for LNA SANTE?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to LNA SANTE (LNA.PA). This can be considered as Undervalued.
How profitable is LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) has a profitability rating of 4 / 10.
What is the valuation of LNA SANTE based on its PE and PB ratios?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) is 11.5 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 0.84.
Can you provide the expected EPS growth for LNA stock?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) is expected to grow by 3.24% in the next year.