LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Paris - EPA:LNA - FR0004170017 - Common Stock
23.5 EUR
+0.1 (+0.43%)
Taking everything into account, LNA scores 4 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. LNA was compared to 30 industry peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. While LNA is still in line with the averages on profitability rating, there are concerns on its financial health. LNA is valued quite cheap, while showing a decent growth score. This is a good combination! Finally LNA also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
- In the past year LNA was profitable.
- LNA had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
- In the past 5 years LNA has always been profitable.
- LNA had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
- LNA's Return On Assets of 1.32% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. LNA is outperformed by 63.33% of its industry peers.
- The Return On Equity of LNA (6.51%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
- With a Return On Invested Capital value of 3.39%, LNA is not doing good in the industry: 63.33% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
- The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for LNA is below the industry average of 6.46%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.32% | ||
| ROE | 6.51% | ||
| ROIC | 3.39% |
ROA(3y)1.56%
ROA(5y)1.35%
ROE(3y)7.9%
ROE(5y)7.74%
ROIC(3y)3.69%
ROIC(5y)3.39%
1.3 Margins
- With a Profit Margin value of 2.40%, LNA perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 60.00% of the companies in the same industry.
- LNA's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
- With a decent Operating Margin value of 7.34%, LNA is doing good in the industry, outperforming 70.00% of the companies in the same industry.
- In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of LNA has declined.
- The Gross Margin of LNA (88.24%) is better than 90.00% of its industry peers.
- LNA's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 7.34% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.4% | ||
| GM | 88.24% |
OM growth 3Y0.38%
OM growth 5Y-4.37%
PM growth 3Y-7.43%
PM growth 5Y-7.27%
GM growth 3Y1.46%
GM growth 5Y0.83%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
- LNA has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is destroying value.
- Compared to 1 year ago, LNA has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
- LNA has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
- Compared to 1 year ago, LNA has an improved debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
- LNA has an Altman-Z score of 0.95. This is a bad value and indicates that LNA is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
- With a Altman-Z score value of 0.95, LNA is not doing good in the industry: 76.67% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
- LNA has a debt to FCF ratio of 10.13. This is a negative value and a sign of low solvency as LNA would need 10.13 years to pay back of all of its debts.
- LNA's Debt to FCF ratio of 10.13 is in line compared to the rest of the industry. LNA outperforms 53.33% of its industry peers.
- A Debt/Equity ratio of 2.22 is on the high side and indicates that LNA has dependencies on debt financing.
- LNA has a worse Debt to Equity ratio (2.22) than 70.00% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.22 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 10.13 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.95 |
ROIC/WACC0.83
WACC4.09%
2.3 Liquidity
- A Current Ratio of 0.92 indicates that LNA may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
- LNA has a Current ratio of 0.92. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: LNA outperforms 50.00% of its industry peers.
- LNA has a Quick Ratio of 0.92. This is a bad value and indicates that LNA is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
- Looking at the Quick ratio, with a value of 0.46, LNA is doing worse than 83.33% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.92 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.46 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
- LNA shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -12.51%.
- The Earnings Per Share has been decreasing by -0.23% on average over the past years.
- LNA shows quite a strong growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 13.31%.
- The Revenue has been growing by 8.85% on average over the past years. This is quite good.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-12.51%
EPS 3Y-4.5%
EPS 5Y-0.23%
EPS Q2Q%-8.81%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)13.31%
Revenue growth 3Y5.37%
Revenue growth 5Y8.85%
Sales Q2Q%14.58%
3.2 Future
- Based on estimates for the next years, LNA will show a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 13.07% on average per year.
- The Revenue is expected to grow by 7.90% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y-2.42%
EPS Next 2Y10.85%
EPS Next 3Y13.07%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year12.72%
Revenue Next 2Y9.38%
Revenue Next 3Y7.9%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
- The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
- The Revenue growth rate is stable: in the next years the growth will be about the same than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- A Price/Earnings ratio of 11.52 indicates a reasonable valuation of LNA.
- LNA's Price/Earnings ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. LNA is cheaper than 86.67% of the companies in the same industry.
- The average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio is at 27.32. LNA is valued rather cheaply when compared to this.
- Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 8.12, the valuation of LNA can be described as reasonable.
- Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of LNA indicates a rather cheap valuation: LNA is cheaper than 96.67% of the companies listed in the same industry.
- The average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio is at 24.32. LNA is valued rather cheaply when compared to this.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.52 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.12 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- 86.67% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than LNA, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
- LNA's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. LNA is cheaper than 90.00% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 3.2 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 6.14 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- A more expensive valuation may be justified as LNA's earnings are expected to grow with 13.07% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y10.85%
EPS Next 3Y13.07%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
- With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 2.66%, LNA has a reasonable but not impressive dividend return.
- LNA's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 1.73. LNA pays more dividend than 83.33% of the companies in the same industry.
- Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.83, LNA pays a bit more dividend than the S&P500 average.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.66% |
5.2 History
- The dividend of LNA is nicely growing with an annual growth rate of 9.57%!
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.57%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
5.3 Sustainability
- LNA pays out 29.57% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
- LNA's earnings are growing more than its dividend. This makes the dividend growth sustainable.
DP29.57%
EPS Next 2Y10.85%
EPS Next 3Y13.07%
EPA:LNA (1/22/2026, 7:00:00 PM)
23.5
+0.1 (+0.43%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorHealth Care
GICS IndustryGroupHealth Care Equipment & Services
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & Services
Earnings (Last)01-02 2026-01-02
Earnings (Next)02-05 2026-02-05
Inst Owners9.95%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners1.23%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap251.69M
Revenue(TTM)863.42M
Net Income(TTM)20.77M
Analysts84.44
Price Target31.62 (34.55%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.66% |
Yearly Dividend0.6
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.57%
DP29.57%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)0%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)-2.4%
EPS NY rev (3m)-5.48%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)1.07%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.52 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.12 | ||
| P/S | 0.29 | ||
| P/FCF | 3.2 | ||
| P/OCF | 2.72 | ||
| P/B | 0.79 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 6.14 |
EPS(TTM)2.04
EY8.68%
EPS(NY)2.89
Fwd EY12.32%
FCF(TTM)7.34
FCFY31.25%
OCF(TTM)8.65
OCFY36.83%
SpS80.62
BVpS29.78
TBVpS-24.34
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number36.97
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.32% | ||
| ROE | 6.51% | ||
| ROCE | 5.5% | ||
| ROIC | 3.39% | ||
| ROICexc | 3.4% | ||
| ROICexgc | 6.4% | ||
| OM | 7.34% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.4% | ||
| GM | 88.24% | ||
| FCFM | 9.11% |
ROA(3y)1.56%
ROA(5y)1.35%
ROE(3y)7.9%
ROE(5y)7.74%
ROIC(3y)3.69%
ROIC(5y)3.39%
ROICexc(3y)3.98%
ROICexc(5y)3.73%
ROICexgc(3y)8.5%
ROICexgc(5y)8.01%
ROCE(3y)5.91%
ROCE(5y)5.67%
ROICexgc growth 3Y1.6%
ROICexgc growth 5Y1.57%
ROICexc growth 3Y2.72%
ROICexc growth 5Y-1.59%
OM growth 3Y0.38%
OM growth 5Y-4.37%
PM growth 3Y-7.43%
PM growth 5Y-7.27%
GM growth 3Y1.46%
GM growth 5Y0.83%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover0.55
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.22 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 10.13 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 4.56 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 15.31% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.63% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2.17 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 59.77% | ||
| Profit Quality | 378.76% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.92 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.46 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.95 |
F-Score6
WACC4.09%
ROIC/WACC0.83
Cap/Depr(3y)14.64%
Cap/Depr(5y)16.09%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.69%
Cap/Sales(5y)1.89%
Profit Quality(3y)386.77%
Profit Quality(5y)628.45%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-12.51%
EPS 3Y-4.5%
EPS 5Y-0.23%
EPS Q2Q%-8.81%
EPS Next Y-2.42%
EPS Next 2Y10.85%
EPS Next 3Y13.07%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)13.31%
Revenue growth 3Y5.37%
Revenue growth 5Y8.85%
Sales Q2Q%14.58%
Revenue Next Year12.72%
Revenue Next 2Y9.38%
Revenue Next 3Y7.9%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y-5.53%
EBIT growth 3Y5.76%
EBIT growth 5Y4.09%
EBIT Next Year148.59%
EBIT Next 3Y41.89%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y49.94%
FCF growth 3Y14.06%
FCF growth 5Y-2.49%
OCF growth 1Y40.17%
OCF growth 3Y11.38%
OCF growth 5Y-1.32%
LNA SANTE / LNA.PA FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 4 / 10 to LNA.PA.
What is the valuation status for LNA stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to LNA SANTE (LNA.PA). This can be considered as Undervalued.
How profitable is LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) has a profitability rating of 4 / 10.
What are the PE and PB ratios of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) is 11.52 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 0.79.
How sustainable is the dividend of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) stock?
The dividend rating of LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) is 7 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 29.57%.