LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
EPA:LNA - Euronext Paris - Matif - FR0004170017 - Common Stock - Currency: EUR
Overall LNA gets a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10. We evaluated LNA against 25 industry peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. LNA has a medium profitability rating, but doesn't score so well on its financial health evaluation. LNA scores decently on growth, while it is valued quite cheap. This could make an interesting combination. Finally LNA also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year LNA was profitable.
LNA had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
In the past 5 years LNA has always been profitable.
Each year in the past 5 years LNA had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
The Return On Assets of LNA (1.55%) is worse than 62.50% of its industry peers.
With a Return On Equity value of 7.76%, LNA perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 58.33% of the companies in the same industry.
With a Return On Invested Capital value of 3.58%, LNA perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 50.00% of the companies in the same industry.
LNA had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 3.40%. This is below the industry average of 5.68%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (3.58%) for LNA is above the 3 year average (3.40%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.55% | ||
| ROE | 7.76% | ||
| ROIC | 3.58% |
ROA(3y)1.6%
ROA(5y)1.4%
ROE(3y)9.21%
ROE(5y)8.55%
ROIC(3y)3.4%
ROIC(5y)3.27%
1.3 Margins
The Profit Margin of LNA (3.13%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
LNA's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
The Operating Margin of LNA (8.80%) is better than 75.00% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of LNA has grown nicely.
With an excellent Gross Margin value of 89.87%, LNA belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 91.67% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of LNA has grown nicely.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 8.8% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 3.13% | ||
| GM | 89.87% |
OM growth 3Y2.66%
OM growth 5Y1.65%
PM growth 3Y32.72%
PM growth 5Y-4.46%
GM growth 3Y1.36%
GM growth 5Y2.99%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), LNA is creating some value.
The number of shares outstanding for LNA has been reduced compared to 1 year ago.
Compared to 5 years ago, LNA has more shares outstanding
Compared to 1 year ago, LNA has an improved debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
Based on the Altman-Z score of 0.89, we must say that LNA is in the distress zone and has some risk of bankruptcy.
LNA has a Altman-Z score of 0.89. This is in the lower half of the industry: LNA underperforms 66.67% of its industry peers.
LNA has a debt to FCF ratio of 7.08. This is a slightly negative value and a sign of low solvency as LNA would need 7.08 years to pay back of all of its debts.
LNA has a Debt to FCF ratio (7.08) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
LNA has a Debt/Equity ratio of 2.21. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
LNA has a worse Debt to Equity ratio (2.21) than 70.83% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.21 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 7.08 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.89 |
ROIC/WACC1.06
WACC3.39%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 0.91 indicates that LNA may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
LNA has a Current ratio of 0.91. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: LNA outperforms 58.33% of its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 0.51 indicates that LNA may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
LNA has a Quick ratio of 0.51. This is in the lower half of the industry: LNA underperforms 79.17% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.91 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.51 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for LNA have decreased by -0.20% in the last year.
The Earnings Per Share has been growing slightly by 0.57% on average over the past years.
Looking at the last year, LNA shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has grown by 4.10% in the last year.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 6.44% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-0.2%
EPS 3Y41.13%
EPS 5Y0.57%
EPS Q2Q%3.88%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)4.1%
Revenue growth 3Y8.65%
Revenue growth 5Y6.44%
Sales Q2Q%7.13%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, LNA will show a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 11.16% on average per year.
Based on estimates for the next years, LNA will show a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 8.00% on average per year.
EPS Next Y4.36%
EPS Next 2Y11.38%
EPS Next 3Y11.16%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year7.2%
Revenue Next 2Y8.3%
Revenue Next 3Y8%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio of 9.34, the valuation of LNA can be described as reasonable.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, LNA is valued cheaply inside the industry as 87.50% of the companies are valued more expensively.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of LNA to the average of the S&P500 Index (28.47), we can say LNA is valued rather cheaply.
LNA is valuated cheaply with a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 7.80.
LNA's Price/Forward Earnings ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. LNA is cheaper than 87.50% of the companies in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of LNA to the average of the S&P500 Index (92.74), we can say LNA is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 9.34 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.8 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, LNA is valued a bit cheaper than 79.17% of the companies in the same industry.
91.67% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than LNA, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 2.16 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 5.59 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates an expensive valuation of the company.
The decent profitability rating of LNA may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)2.14
PEG (5Y)16.28
EPS Next 2Y11.38%
EPS Next 3Y11.16%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
LNA has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 2.71%.
LNA's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 2.89. LNA pays more dividend than 83.33% of the companies in the same industry.
LNA's Dividend Yield is comparable with the S&P500 average which is at 2.28.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.71% |
5.2 History
On average, the dividend of LNA grows each year by 9.08%, which is quite nice.
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.08%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
5.3 Sustainability
21.45% of the earnings are spent on dividend by LNA. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
The dividend of LNA is growing, but earnings are growing more, so the dividend growth is sustainable.
DP21.45%
EPS Next 2Y11.38%
EPS Next 3Y11.16%
LNA SANTE
EPA:LNA (2/5/2025, 11:18:11 AM)
21.85
-0.05 (-0.23%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorHealth Care
GICS IndustryGroupHealth Care Equipment & Services
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & Services
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners8.34%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners1%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap234.01M
Analysts85
Price Target34.34 (57.16%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.71% |
Yearly Dividend0.5
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.08%
DP21.45%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)7.73%
PT rev (3m)16.09%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)5.78%
EPS NY rev (3m)8.74%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0.53%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0.53%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 9.34 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.8 | ||
| P/S | 0.31 | ||
| P/FCF | 2.16 | ||
| P/OCF | 1.94 | ||
| P/B | 0.76 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 5.59 |
EPS(TTM)2.34
EY10.71%
EPS(NY)2.8
Fwd EY12.82%
FCF(TTM)10.1
FCFY46.24%
OCF(TTM)11.25
OCFY51.47%
SpS71.15
BVpS28.67
TBVpS-25.44
PEG (NY)2.14
PEG (5Y)16.28
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.55% | ||
| ROE | 7.76% | ||
| ROCE | 5.91% | ||
| ROIC | 3.58% | ||
| ROICexc | 3.81% | ||
| ROICexgc | 7.82% | ||
| OM | 8.8% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 3.13% | ||
| GM | 89.87% | ||
| FCFM | 14.2% |
ROA(3y)1.6%
ROA(5y)1.4%
ROE(3y)9.21%
ROE(5y)8.55%
ROIC(3y)3.4%
ROIC(5y)3.27%
ROICexc(3y)3.75%
ROICexc(5y)3.67%
ROICexgc(3y)8.09%
ROICexgc(5y)7.62%
ROCE(3y)5.85%
ROCE(5y)5.72%
ROICexcg growth 3Y1.58%
ROICexcg growth 5Y-22.98%
ROICexc growth 3Y5.91%
ROICexc growth 5Y-10.8%
OM growth 3Y2.66%
OM growth 5Y1.65%
PM growth 3Y32.72%
PM growth 5Y-4.46%
GM growth 3Y1.36%
GM growth 5Y2.99%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover0.49
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.21 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 7.08 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 4.38 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 13.92% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.61% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2.37 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 77.69% | ||
| Profit Quality | 453.89% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.91 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.51 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.89 |
F-Score6
WACC3.39%
ROIC/WACC1.06
Cap/Depr(3y)15.81%
Cap/Depr(5y)15.75%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.85%
Cap/Sales(5y)1.84%
Profit Quality(3y)330.5%
Profit Quality(5y)645.43%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-0.2%
EPS 3Y41.13%
EPS 5Y0.57%
EPS Q2Q%3.88%
EPS Next Y4.36%
EPS Next 2Y11.38%
EPS Next 3Y11.16%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)4.1%
Revenue growth 3Y8.65%
Revenue growth 5Y6.44%
Sales Q2Q%7.13%
Revenue Next Year7.2%
Revenue Next 2Y8.3%
Revenue Next 3Y8%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y2.84%
EBIT growth 3Y11.54%
EBIT growth 5Y8.2%
EBIT Next Year106.69%
EBIT Next 3Y33.18%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-4.21%
FCF growth 3Y-13.92%
FCF growth 5Y17.09%
OCF growth 1Y-3.27%
OCF growth 3Y-12.69%
OCF growth 5Y15.22%