JABIL INC (JBL)
US4663131039 - Common Stock
Taking everything into account, JBL scores 5 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. JBL was compared to 124 industry peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. While JBL belongs to the best of the industry regarding profitability, there are some minor concerns on its financial health. JBL has a valuation in line with the averages, but on the other hand it scores bad on growth.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
JBL had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year JBL had a positive cash flow from operations.
Each year in the past 5 years JBL has been profitable.
JBL had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
The Return On Assets of JBL (8.00%) is better than 87.80% of its industry peers.
The Return On Equity of JBL (79.91%) is better than 100.00% of its industry peers.
JBL's Return On Invested Capital of 18.59% is amongst the best of the industry. JBL outperforms 96.75% of its industry peers.
JBL had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 17.51%. This is significantly above the industry average of 8.68%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (18.59%) for JBL is above the 3 year average (17.51%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8% | ||
| ROE | 79.91% | ||
| ROIC | 18.59% |
ROA(3y)5.75%
ROA(5y)4.36%
ROE(3y)49.7%
ROE(5y)36.93%
ROIC(3y)17.51%
ROIC(5y)15.41%
1.3 Margins
JBL has a better Profit Margin (4.81%) than 71.54% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of JBL has grown nicely.
JBL has a Operating Margin of 4.98%. This is in the better half of the industry: JBL outperforms 65.85% of its industry peers.
JBL's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
JBL's Gross Margin of 9.26% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. JBL is outperformed by 81.30% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of JBL has grown nicely.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 4.98% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 4.81% | ||
| GM | 9.26% |
OM growth 3Y8.62%
OM growth 5Y11.56%
PM growth 3Y26.45%
PM growth 5Y33.46%
GM growth 3Y3.73%
GM growth 5Y4.13%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so JBL is creating value.
JBL has less shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
The number of shares outstanding for JBL has been reduced compared to 5 years ago.
JBL has a worse debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 3.04 indicates that JBL is not in any danger for bankruptcy at the moment.
With a Altman-Z score value of 3.04, JBL perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 51.22% of the companies in the same industry.
The Debt to FCF ratio of JBL is 3.09, which is a good value as it means it would take JBL, 3.09 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
JBL has a better Debt to FCF ratio (3.09) than 68.29% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 1.66 is on the high side and indicates that JBL has dependencies on debt financing.
JBL has a Debt to Equity ratio of 1.66. This is amonst the worse of the industry: JBL underperforms 93.50% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.66 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.09 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.04 |
ROIC/WACC1.93
WACC9.65%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.09 indicates that JBL should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
JBL has a worse Current ratio (1.09) than 91.87% of its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 0.72 indicates that JBL may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
The Quick ratio of JBL (0.72) is worse than 90.24% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.09 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.72 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
JBL shows a slight negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has decreased by -1.85%.
The Earnings Per Share has been growing by 23.15% on average over the past years. This is a very strong growth
The Revenue for JBL has decreased by -16.77% in the past year. This is quite bad
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 2.70% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-1.85%
EPS 3Y14.72%
EPS 5Y23.15%
EPS Q2Q%-6.12%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-16.77%
Revenue growth 3Y-0.46%
Revenue growth 5Y2.7%
Sales Q2Q%-17.66%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 9.55% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 1.21% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y3.58%
EPS Next 2Y9.23%
EPS Next 3Y9.55%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-5.22%
Revenue Next 2Y0.05%
Revenue Next 3Y1.21%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
JBL is valuated correctly with a Price/Earnings ratio of 15.42.
JBL's Price/Earnings ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. JBL is cheaper than 86.18% of the companies in the same industry.
The average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio is at 28.96. JBL is valued slightly cheaper when compared to this.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 14.89, the valuation of JBL can be described as correct.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, JBL is valued cheaply inside the industry as 82.11% of the companies are valued more expensively.
JBL's Price/Forward Earnings ratio indicates a valuation a bit cheaper than the S&P500 average which is at 23.82.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 15.42 | ||
| Fwd PE | 14.89 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, JBL is valued cheaper than 90.24% of the companies in the same industry.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, JBL is valued cheaply inside the industry as 81.30% of the companies are valued more expensively.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 15.82 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 7.23 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates JBL does not grow enough to justify the current Price/Earnings ratio.
The excellent profitability rating of JBL may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)4.3
PEG (5Y)0.67
EPS Next 2Y9.23%
EPS Next 3Y9.55%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a yearly dividend of 0.25%, JBL is not a good candidate for dividend investing.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 1.95, JBL pays a bit more dividend than its industry peers.
With a Dividend Yield of 0.25, JBL pays less dividend than the S&P500 average, which is at 2.23.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% |
5.2 History
The dividend of JBL has a limited annual growth rate of 1.06%.
JBL has paid a dividend for at least 10 years, which is a reliable track record.
Dividend Growth(5Y)1.06%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
JBL pays out 3.03% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
The dividend of JBL is growing, but earnings are growing more, so the dividend growth is sustainable.
DP3.03%
EPS Next 2Y9.23%
EPS Next 3Y9.55%
JABIL INC
NYSE:JBL (11/21/2024, 8:04:00 PM)
After market: 130.64 0 (0%)130.64
+2.46 (+1.92%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorInformation Technology
GICS IndustryGroupTechnology Hardware & Equipment
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners
Inst Owner Change
Ins Owners
Ins Owner Change
Market Cap14.74B
Analysts
Price Target
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% |
Dividend Growth(5Y)
DP
Div Incr Years
Div Non Decr Years
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)
Avg EPS beat(2)
Min EPS beat(2)
Max EPS beat(2)
EPS beat(4)
Avg EPS beat(4)
Min EPS beat(4)
Max EPS beat(4)
EPS beat(8)
Avg EPS beat(8)
EPS beat(12)
Avg EPS beat(12)
EPS beat(16)
Avg EPS beat(16)
Revenue beat(2)
Avg Revenue beat(2)
Min Revenue beat(2)
Max Revenue beat(2)
Revenue beat(4)
Avg Revenue beat(4)
Min Revenue beat(4)
Max Revenue beat(4)
Revenue beat(8)
Avg Revenue beat(8)
Revenue beat(12)
Avg Revenue beat(12)
Revenue beat(16)
Avg Revenue beat(16)
PT rev (1m)
PT rev (3m)
EPS NQ rev (1m)
EPS NQ rev (3m)
EPS NY rev (1m)
EPS NY rev (3m)
Revenue NQ rev (1m)
Revenue NQ rev (3m)
Revenue NY rev (1m)
Revenue NY rev (3m)
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 15.42 | ||
| Fwd PE | 14.89 | ||
| P/S | |||
| P/FCF | |||
| P/OCF | |||
| P/B | |||
| P/tB | |||
| EV/EBITDA |
EPS(TTM)
EY
EPS(NY)
Fwd EY
FCF(TTM)
FCFY
OCF(TTM)
OCFY
SpS
BVpS
TBVpS
PEG (NY)4.3
PEG (5Y)0.67
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8% | ||
| ROE | 79.91% | ||
| ROCE | |||
| ROIC | |||
| ROICexc | |||
| ROICexgc | |||
| OM | 4.98% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 4.81% | ||
| GM | 9.26% | ||
| FCFM |
ROA(3y)
ROA(5y)
ROE(3y)
ROE(5y)
ROIC(3y)
ROIC(5y)
ROICexc(3y)
ROICexc(5y)
ROICexgc(3y)
ROICexgc(5y)
ROCE(3y)
ROCE(5y)
ROICexcg growth 3Y
ROICexcg growth 5Y
ROICexc growth 3Y
ROICexc growth 5Y
OM growth 3Y
OM growth 5Y
PM growth 3Y
PM growth 5Y
GM growth 3Y
GM growth 5Y
F-Score
Asset Turnover1.66
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.66 | ||
| Debt/FCF | |||
| Debt/EBITDA | |||
| Cap/Depr | |||
| Cap/Sales | |||
| Interest Coverage | |||
| Cash Conversion | |||
| Profit Quality | |||
| Current Ratio | 1.09 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.72 | ||
| Altman-Z |
F-Score
WACC
ROIC/WACC
Cap/Depr(3y)
Cap/Depr(5y)
Cap/Sales(3y)
Cap/Sales(5y)
Profit Quality(3y)
Profit Quality(5y)
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-1.85%
EPS 3Y14.72%
EPS 5Y
EPS Q2Q%
EPS Next Y3.58%
EPS Next 2Y
EPS Next 3Y
EPS Next 5Y
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-16.77%
Revenue growth 3Y-0.46%
Revenue growth 5Y
Sales Q2Q%
Revenue Next Year
Revenue Next 2Y
Revenue Next 3Y
Revenue Next 5Y
EBIT growth 1Y
EBIT growth 3Y
EBIT growth 5Y
EBIT Next Year
EBIT Next 3Y
EBIT Next 5Y
FCF growth 1Y
FCF growth 3Y
FCF growth 5Y
OCF growth 1Y
OCF growth 3Y
OCF growth 5Y