FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) Stock Fundamental Analysis
USA - New York Stock Exchange - NYSE:FRT - US3137451015 - REIT
101.8 USD
-0.22 (-0.22%)
101.8 USD
0 (0%)
Taking everything into account, FRT scores 5 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. FRT was compared to 126 industry peers in the Diversified REITs industry. While FRT has a great profitability rating, there are quite some concerns on its financial health. While showing a medium growth rate, FRT is valued expensive at the moment.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
- In the past year FRT was profitable.
- FRT had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
- In the past 5 years FRT has always been profitable.
- FRT had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
- FRT's Return On Assets of 3.81% is amongst the best of the industry. FRT outperforms 80.95% of its industry peers.
- FRT has a better Return On Equity (10.50%) than 87.30% of its industry peers.
- Looking at the Return On Invested Capital, with a value of 4.10%, FRT is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 78.57% of the companies in the same industry.
- Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for FRT is in line with the industry average of 3.06%.
- The last Return On Invested Capital (4.10%) for FRT is above the 3 year average (3.87%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 3.81% | ||
| ROE | 10.5% | ||
| ROIC | 4.1% |
ROA(3y)3.54%
ROA(5y)3.11%
ROE(3y)9.81%
ROE(5y)8.84%
ROIC(3y)3.87%
ROIC(5y)3.53%
1.3 Margins
- FRT has a Profit Margin of 26.90%. This is in the better half of the industry: FRT outperforms 78.57% of its industry peers.
- FRT's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
- With a decent Operating Margin value of 34.86%, FRT is doing good in the industry, outperforming 72.22% of the companies in the same industry.
- FRT's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
- FRT has a Gross Margin (67.29%) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
- In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of FRT has remained more or less at the same level.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 34.86% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 26.9% | ||
| GM | 67.29% |
OM growth 3Y2.79%
OM growth 5Y-1.69%
PM growth 3Y-3.57%
PM growth 5Y-8.39%
GM growth 3Y0.35%
GM growth 5Y-0.19%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
- With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) below the Cost of Capital (WACC), FRT is destroying value.
- The number of shares outstanding for FRT has been increased compared to 1 year ago.
- Compared to 5 years ago, FRT has more shares outstanding
- FRT has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
- Based on the Altman-Z score of 1.07, we must say that FRT is in the distress zone and has some risk of bankruptcy.
- With a decent Altman-Z score value of 1.07, FRT is doing good in the industry, outperforming 79.37% of the companies in the same industry.
- A Debt/Equity ratio of 1.47 is on the high side and indicates that FRT has dependencies on debt financing.
- FRT has a Debt to Equity ratio (1.47) which is in line with its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.47 | ||
| Debt/FCF | N/A | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.07 |
ROIC/WACC0.6
WACC6.79%
2.3 Liquidity
- A Current Ratio of 1.57 indicates that FRT should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
- Looking at the Current ratio, with a value of 1.57, FRT is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 73.02% of the companies in the same industry.
- A Quick Ratio of 1.57 indicates that FRT should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
- FRT's Quick ratio of 1.57 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. FRT outperforms 73.81% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.57 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.57 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
- FRT shows a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has been growing by 40.21%, which is quite impressive.
- Measured over the past years, FRT shows a decrease in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been decreasing by -9.41% on average per year.
- Looking at the last year, FRT shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has grown by 6.05% in the last year.
- Measured over the past years, FRT shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 5.14% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)40.21%
EPS 3Y-3.13%
EPS 5Y-9.41%
EPS Q2Q%-1.43%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)6.05%
Revenue growth 3Y8.13%
Revenue growth 5Y5.14%
Sales Q2Q%3.15%
3.2 Future
- The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 8.40% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
- The Revenue is expected to grow by 5.20% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y39.46%
EPS Next 2Y5.19%
EPS Next 3Y5.32%
EPS Next 5Y8.4%
Revenue Next Year5.04%
Revenue Next 2Y5.15%
Revenue Next 3Y4.43%
Revenue Next 5Y5.2%
3.3 Evolution
- When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
- When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is stable.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- With a Price/Earnings ratio of 25.84, FRT can be considered very expensive at the moment.
- Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of FRT indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: FRT is cheaper than 72.22% of the companies listed in the same industry.
- When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of FRT to the average of the S&P500 Index (27.54), we can say FRT is valued inline with the index average.
- A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 32.86 indicates a quite expensive valuation of FRT.
- Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, FRT is valued a bit cheaper than 74.60% of the companies in the same industry.
- FRT is valuated rather expensively when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 24.31, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 25.84 | ||
| Fwd PE | 32.86 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, FRT is valued a bit more expensive than 64.29% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 16.87 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- FRT's low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
- The decent profitability rating of FRT may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)0.65
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y5.19%
EPS Next 3Y5.32%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
- With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 4.40%, FRT is a good candidate for dividend investing.
- FRT's Dividend Yield is slightly below the industry average, which is at 6.86.
- Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.92, FRT pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.4% |
5.2 History
- The dividend of FRT has a limited annual growth rate of 1.04%.
- FRT has paid a dividend for at least 10 years, which is a reliable track record.
- FRT has decreased its dividend recently.
Dividend Growth(5Y)1.04%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
5.3 Sustainability
- FRT pays out 113.83% of its income as dividend. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
- The dividend of FRT is growing, but earnings are growing more, so the dividend growth is sustainable.
DP113.83%
EPS Next 2Y5.19%
EPS Next 3Y5.32%
101.8
-0.22 (-0.22%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorReal Estate
GICS IndustryGroupEquity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
GICS IndustryDiversified REITs
Earnings (Last)10-31 2025-10-31/bmo
Earnings (Next)02-13 2026-02-13/amc
Inst Owners98.66%
Inst Owner Change0.18%
Ins Owners1%
Ins Owner Change0.74%
Market Cap8.78B
Revenue(TTM)1.25B
Net Income(TTM)337.38M
Analysts78.26
Price Target112.34 (10.35%)
Short Float %2.55%
Short Ratio3.27
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.4% |
Yearly Dividend4.41
Dividend Growth(5Y)1.04%
DP113.83%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
Ex-Date01-02 2026-01-02 (1.13)
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)62.7%
Min EPS beat(2)-13.16%
Max EPS beat(2)138.56%
EPS beat(4)3
Avg EPS beat(4)32.29%
Min EPS beat(4)-13.16%
Max EPS beat(4)138.56%
EPS beat(8)4
Avg EPS beat(8)16.47%
EPS beat(12)7
Avg EPS beat(12)22.23%
EPS beat(16)11
Avg EPS beat(16)43.27%
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-1.01%
Min Revenue beat(2)-1.57%
Max Revenue beat(2)-0.45%
Revenue beat(4)0
Avg Revenue beat(4)-0.76%
Min Revenue beat(4)-1.57%
Max Revenue beat(4)-0.1%
Revenue beat(8)1
Avg Revenue beat(8)-0.63%
Revenue beat(12)3
Avg Revenue beat(12)-0.54%
Revenue beat(16)7
Avg Revenue beat(16)0.29%
PT rev (1m)1.33%
PT rev (3m)1.73%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-0.58%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-4.46%
EPS NY rev (1m)-0.29%
EPS NY rev (3m)9.45%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)0.12%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 25.84 | ||
| Fwd PE | 32.86 | ||
| P/S | 7 | ||
| P/FCF | N/A | ||
| P/OCF | 14.71 | ||
| P/B | 2.73 | ||
| P/tB | 2.73 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 16.87 |
EPS(TTM)3.94
EY3.87%
EPS(NY)3.1
Fwd EY3.04%
FCF(TTM)-0.75
FCFYN/A
OCF(TTM)6.92
OCFY6.8%
SpS14.54
BVpS37.26
TBVpS37.26
PEG (NY)0.65
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number57.47
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 3.81% | ||
| ROE | 10.5% | ||
| ROCE | 5.18% | ||
| ROIC | 4.1% | ||
| ROICexc | 4.15% | ||
| ROICexgc | 4.15% | ||
| OM | 34.86% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 26.9% | ||
| GM | 67.29% | ||
| FCFM | N/A |
ROA(3y)3.54%
ROA(5y)3.11%
ROE(3y)9.81%
ROE(5y)8.84%
ROIC(3y)3.87%
ROIC(5y)3.53%
ROICexc(3y)3.94%
ROICexc(5y)3.66%
ROICexgc(3y)3.95%
ROICexgc(5y)3.67%
ROCE(3y)4.89%
ROCE(5y)4.47%
ROICexgc growth 3Y6.41%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-1.68%
ROICexc growth 3Y6.44%
ROICexc growth 5Y-1.7%
OM growth 3Y2.79%
OM growth 5Y-1.69%
PM growth 3Y-3.57%
PM growth 5Y-8.39%
GM growth 3Y0.35%
GM growth 5Y-0.19%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover0.14
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.47 | ||
| Debt/FCF | N/A | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 5.96 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 185.12% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 52.77% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2.62 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 75.13% | ||
| Profit Quality | N/A | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.57 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.57 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.07 |
F-Score6
WACC6.79%
ROIC/WACC0.6
Cap/Depr(3y)183.44%
Cap/Depr(5y)207.83%
Cap/Sales(3y)51.91%
Cap/Sales(5y)60.36%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)40.21%
EPS 3Y-3.13%
EPS 5Y-9.41%
EPS Q2Q%-1.43%
EPS Next Y39.46%
EPS Next 2Y5.19%
EPS Next 3Y5.32%
EPS Next 5Y8.4%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)6.05%
Revenue growth 3Y8.13%
Revenue growth 5Y5.14%
Sales Q2Q%3.15%
Revenue Next Year5.04%
Revenue Next 2Y5.15%
Revenue Next 3Y4.43%
Revenue Next 5Y5.2%
EBIT growth 1Y6.3%
EBIT growth 3Y11.14%
EBIT growth 5Y3.37%
EBIT Next Year89.62%
EBIT Next 3Y27.88%
EBIT Next 5Y18.35%
FCF growth 1Y-156.9%
FCF growth 3YN/A
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y8.43%
OCF growth 3Y6.82%
OCF growth 5Y4.46%
FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST / FRT FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to FRT.
What is the valuation status of FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 3 / 10 to FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT). This can be considered as Overvalued.
How profitable is FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) stock?
FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) has a profitability rating of 7 / 10.
How financially healthy is FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST?
The financial health rating of FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) is 3 / 10.
Can you provide the expected EPS growth for FRT stock?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) is expected to grow by 39.46% in the next year.