FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) Stock Fundamental Analysis
USA - New York Stock Exchange - NYSE:FRT - US3137451015 - REIT
101.8 USD
-0.22 (-0.22%)
101.8 USD
0 (0%)
FRT gets a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 126 industry peers in the Diversified REITs industry. While FRT belongs to the best of the industry regarding profitability, there are concerns on its financial health. While showing a medium growth rate, FRT is valued expensive at the moment.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
- FRT had positive earnings in the past year.
- FRT had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
- Each year in the past 5 years FRT has been profitable.
- Each year in the past 5 years FRT had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
- FRT's Return On Assets of 3.81% is amongst the best of the industry. FRT outperforms 80.95% of its industry peers.
- FRT has a Return On Equity of 10.50%. This is amongst the best in the industry. FRT outperforms 87.30% of its industry peers.
- FRT has a Return On Invested Capital of 4.10%. This is in the better half of the industry: FRT outperforms 78.57% of its industry peers.
- The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for FRT is in line with the industry average of 3.06%.
- The 3 year average ROIC (3.87%) for FRT is below the current ROIC(4.10%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 3.81% | ||
| ROE | 10.5% | ||
| ROIC | 4.1% |
ROA(3y)3.54%
ROA(5y)3.11%
ROE(3y)9.81%
ROE(5y)8.84%
ROIC(3y)3.87%
ROIC(5y)3.53%
1.3 Margins
- FRT's Profit Margin of 26.90% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. FRT outperforms 78.57% of its industry peers.
- In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of FRT has declined.
- FRT's Operating Margin of 34.86% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. FRT outperforms 72.22% of its industry peers.
- FRT's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
- FRT has a Gross Margin (67.29%) which is in line with its industry peers.
- In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of FRT has remained more or less at the same level.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 34.86% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 26.9% | ||
| GM | 67.29% |
OM growth 3Y2.79%
OM growth 5Y-1.69%
PM growth 3Y-3.57%
PM growth 5Y-8.39%
GM growth 3Y0.35%
GM growth 5Y-0.19%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
- The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), so FRT is destroying value.
- FRT has more shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
- Compared to 5 years ago, FRT has more shares outstanding
- FRT has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
- FRT has an Altman-Z score of 1.07. This is a bad value and indicates that FRT is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
- FRT's Altman-Z score of 1.07 is amongst the best of the industry. FRT outperforms 80.95% of its industry peers.
- A Debt/Equity ratio of 1.47 is on the high side and indicates that FRT has dependencies on debt financing.
- FRT has a Debt to Equity ratio (1.47) which is in line with its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.47 | ||
| Debt/FCF | N/A | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.07 |
ROIC/WACC0.6
WACC6.79%
2.3 Liquidity
- FRT has a Current Ratio of 1.57. This is a normal value and indicates that FRT is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
- The Current ratio of FRT (1.57) is better than 73.02% of its industry peers.
- A Quick Ratio of 1.57 indicates that FRT should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
- FRT has a better Quick ratio (1.57) than 73.81% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.57 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.57 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
- FRT shows a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has been growing by 40.21%, which is quite impressive.
- Measured over the past years, FRT shows a decrease in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been decreasing by -9.41% on average per year.
- Looking at the last year, FRT shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has grown by 6.05% in the last year.
- FRT shows a small growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 5.14% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)40.21%
EPS 3Y-3.13%
EPS 5Y-9.41%
EPS Q2Q%-1.43%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)6.05%
Revenue growth 3Y8.13%
Revenue growth 5Y5.14%
Sales Q2Q%3.15%
3.2 Future
- FRT is expected to show quite a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 8.40% yearly.
- The Revenue is expected to grow by 5.20% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y39.46%
EPS Next 2Y5.19%
EPS Next 3Y5.32%
EPS Next 5Y8.4%
Revenue Next Year5.04%
Revenue Next 2Y5.15%
Revenue Next 3Y4.43%
Revenue Next 5Y5.2%
3.3 Evolution
- When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
- The Revenue growth rate is stable: in the next years the growth will be about the same than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- A Price/Earnings ratio of 25.84 indicates a quite expensive valuation of FRT.
- 72.22% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than FRT, based on the Price/Earnings ratio.
- FRT is valuated at similar levels of the S&P average when we compare the Price/Earnings ratio to 27.54, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
- A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 32.86 indicates a quite expensive valuation of FRT.
- 73.81% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than FRT, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
- The average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio is at 24.31. FRT is valued slightly more expensive when compared to this.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 25.84 | ||
| Fwd PE | 32.86 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, FRT is valued a bit more expensive than the industry average as 65.08% of the companies are valued more cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 16.89 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- FRT's low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
- The decent profitability rating of FRT may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)0.65
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y5.19%
EPS Next 3Y5.32%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
- FRT has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 4.40%, which is a nice return.
- Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 6.86, FRT is paying slightly less dividend.
- FRT's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 1.92.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.4% |
5.2 History
- The dividend of FRT has a limited annual growth rate of 1.04%.
- FRT has been paying a dividend for at least 10 years, so it has a reliable track record.
- The dividend of FRT decreased recently.
Dividend Growth(5Y)1.04%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
5.3 Sustainability
- 113.83% of the earnings are spent on dividend by FRT. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
- The dividend of FRT is growing, but earnings are growing more, so the dividend growth is sustainable.
DP113.83%
EPS Next 2Y5.19%
EPS Next 3Y5.32%
101.8
-0.22 (-0.22%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorReal Estate
GICS IndustryGroupEquity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
GICS IndustryDiversified REITs
Earnings (Last)10-31 2025-10-31/bmo
Earnings (Next)02-13 2026-02-13/amc
Inst Owners98.66%
Inst Owner Change0.18%
Ins Owners1%
Ins Owner Change0.74%
Market Cap8.78B
Revenue(TTM)1.25B
Net Income(TTM)337.38M
Analysts78.26
Price Target112.34 (10.35%)
Short Float %2.55%
Short Ratio3.27
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.4% |
Yearly Dividend4.41
Dividend Growth(5Y)1.04%
DP113.83%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
Ex-Date01-02 2026-01-02 (1.13)
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)62.7%
Min EPS beat(2)-13.16%
Max EPS beat(2)138.56%
EPS beat(4)3
Avg EPS beat(4)32.29%
Min EPS beat(4)-13.16%
Max EPS beat(4)138.56%
EPS beat(8)4
Avg EPS beat(8)16.47%
EPS beat(12)7
Avg EPS beat(12)22.23%
EPS beat(16)11
Avg EPS beat(16)43.27%
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-1.01%
Min Revenue beat(2)-1.57%
Max Revenue beat(2)-0.45%
Revenue beat(4)0
Avg Revenue beat(4)-0.76%
Min Revenue beat(4)-1.57%
Max Revenue beat(4)-0.1%
Revenue beat(8)1
Avg Revenue beat(8)-0.63%
Revenue beat(12)3
Avg Revenue beat(12)-0.54%
Revenue beat(16)7
Avg Revenue beat(16)0.29%
PT rev (1m)1.33%
PT rev (3m)1.73%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-0.58%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-4.46%
EPS NY rev (1m)-0.29%
EPS NY rev (3m)9.45%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)0.12%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 25.84 | ||
| Fwd PE | 32.86 | ||
| P/S | 7 | ||
| P/FCF | N/A | ||
| P/OCF | 14.71 | ||
| P/B | 2.73 | ||
| P/tB | 2.73 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 16.89 |
EPS(TTM)3.94
EY3.87%
EPS(NY)3.1
Fwd EY3.04%
FCF(TTM)-0.75
FCFYN/A
OCF(TTM)6.92
OCFY6.8%
SpS14.54
BVpS37.26
TBVpS37.26
PEG (NY)0.65
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number57.47
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 3.81% | ||
| ROE | 10.5% | ||
| ROCE | 5.18% | ||
| ROIC | 4.1% | ||
| ROICexc | 4.15% | ||
| ROICexgc | 4.15% | ||
| OM | 34.86% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 26.9% | ||
| GM | 67.29% | ||
| FCFM | N/A |
ROA(3y)3.54%
ROA(5y)3.11%
ROE(3y)9.81%
ROE(5y)8.84%
ROIC(3y)3.87%
ROIC(5y)3.53%
ROICexc(3y)3.94%
ROICexc(5y)3.66%
ROICexgc(3y)3.95%
ROICexgc(5y)3.67%
ROCE(3y)4.89%
ROCE(5y)4.47%
ROICexgc growth 3Y6.41%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-1.68%
ROICexc growth 3Y6.44%
ROICexc growth 5Y-1.7%
OM growth 3Y2.79%
OM growth 5Y-1.69%
PM growth 3Y-3.57%
PM growth 5Y-8.39%
GM growth 3Y0.35%
GM growth 5Y-0.19%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover0.14
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.47 | ||
| Debt/FCF | N/A | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 5.96 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 185.12% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 52.77% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2.62 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 75.13% | ||
| Profit Quality | N/A | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.57 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.57 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.07 |
F-Score6
WACC6.79%
ROIC/WACC0.6
Cap/Depr(3y)183.44%
Cap/Depr(5y)207.83%
Cap/Sales(3y)51.91%
Cap/Sales(5y)60.36%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)40.21%
EPS 3Y-3.13%
EPS 5Y-9.41%
EPS Q2Q%-1.43%
EPS Next Y39.46%
EPS Next 2Y5.19%
EPS Next 3Y5.32%
EPS Next 5Y8.4%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)6.05%
Revenue growth 3Y8.13%
Revenue growth 5Y5.14%
Sales Q2Q%3.15%
Revenue Next Year5.04%
Revenue Next 2Y5.15%
Revenue Next 3Y4.43%
Revenue Next 5Y5.2%
EBIT growth 1Y6.3%
EBIT growth 3Y11.14%
EBIT growth 5Y3.37%
EBIT Next Year89.62%
EBIT Next 3Y27.88%
EBIT Next 5Y18.35%
FCF growth 1Y-156.9%
FCF growth 3YN/A
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y8.43%
OCF growth 3Y6.82%
OCF growth 5Y4.46%
FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST / FRT FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to FRT.
What is the valuation status of FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 3 / 10 to FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT). This can be considered as Overvalued.
How profitable is FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) stock?
FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) has a profitability rating of 7 / 10.
How financially healthy is FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST?
The financial health rating of FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) is 3 / 10.
Can you provide the expected EPS growth for FRT stock?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) is expected to grow by 39.46% in the next year.