FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) Stock Fundamental Analysis
USA - New York Stock Exchange - NYSE:FRT - US3137451015 - REIT
103.67 USD
+1.87 (+1.84%)
103.67 USD
0 (0%)
Taking everything into account, FRT scores 5 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. FRT was compared to 125 industry peers in the Diversified REITs industry. While FRT belongs to the best of the industry regarding profitability, there are concerns on its financial health. FRT is valied quite expensively at the moment, while it does show a decent growth rate.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
- In the past year FRT was profitable.
- FRT had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
- Each year in the past 5 years FRT has been profitable.
- Each year in the past 5 years FRT had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
- FRT has a Return On Assets of 3.81%. This is amongst the best in the industry. FRT outperforms 80.80% of its industry peers.
- Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 10.50%, FRT belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 87.20% of the companies in the same industry.
- The Return On Invested Capital of FRT (4.10%) is better than 78.40% of its industry peers.
- FRT had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 3.87%. This is in line with the industry average of 3.07%.
- The last Return On Invested Capital (4.10%) for FRT is above the 3 year average (3.87%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 3.81% | ||
| ROE | 10.5% | ||
| ROIC | 4.1% |
ROA(3y)3.54%
ROA(5y)3.11%
ROE(3y)9.81%
ROE(5y)8.84%
ROIC(3y)3.87%
ROIC(5y)3.53%
1.3 Margins
- FRT's Profit Margin of 26.90% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. FRT outperforms 78.40% of its industry peers.
- In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of FRT has declined.
- FRT has a Operating Margin of 34.86%. This is in the better half of the industry: FRT outperforms 72.00% of its industry peers.
- FRT's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
- FRT has a Gross Margin of 67.29%. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: FRT outperforms 52.00% of its industry peers.
- FRT's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 34.86% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 26.9% | ||
| GM | 67.29% |
OM growth 3Y2.79%
OM growth 5Y-1.69%
PM growth 3Y-3.57%
PM growth 5Y-8.39%
GM growth 3Y0.35%
GM growth 5Y-0.19%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
- FRT has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is destroying value.
- FRT has more shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
- Compared to 5 years ago, FRT has more shares outstanding
- FRT has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
- FRT has an Altman-Z score of 1.09. This is a bad value and indicates that FRT is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
- FRT's Altman-Z score of 1.09 is amongst the best of the industry. FRT outperforms 80.80% of its industry peers.
- FRT has a Debt/Equity ratio of 1.47. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
- With a Debt to Equity ratio value of 1.47, FRT perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 43.20% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.47 | ||
| Debt/FCF | N/A | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.09 |
ROIC/WACC0.6
WACC6.88%
2.3 Liquidity
- A Current Ratio of 1.57 indicates that FRT should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
- FRT has a Current ratio of 1.57. This is in the better half of the industry: FRT outperforms 73.60% of its industry peers.
- A Quick Ratio of 1.57 indicates that FRT should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
- The Quick ratio of FRT (1.57) is better than 74.40% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.57 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.57 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
- The Earnings Per Share has grown by an impressive 40.21% over the past year.
- Measured over the past years, FRT shows a decrease in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been decreasing by -9.41% on average per year.
- FRT shows a small growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 6.05%.
- FRT shows a small growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 5.14% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)40.21%
EPS 3Y-3.13%
EPS 5Y-9.41%
EPS Q2Q%-1.43%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)6.05%
Revenue growth 3Y8.13%
Revenue growth 5Y5.14%
Sales Q2Q%3.15%
3.2 Future
- The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 8.40% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
- Based on estimates for the next years, FRT will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 5.20% on average per year.
EPS Next Y39.46%
EPS Next 2Y5.19%
EPS Next 3Y5.32%
EPS Next 5Y8.4%
Revenue Next Year5.2%
Revenue Next 2Y5.19%
Revenue Next 3Y4.43%
Revenue Next 5Y5.2%
3.3 Evolution
- The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
- The Revenue growth rate is stable: in the next years the growth will be about the same than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- A Price/Earnings ratio of 26.31 indicates a quite expensive valuation of FRT.
- Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of FRT indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: FRT is cheaper than 72.00% of the companies listed in the same industry.
- FRT is valuated at similar levels of the S&P average when we compare the Price/Earnings ratio to 27.38, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
- A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 33.46 indicates a quite expensive valuation of FRT.
- Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of FRT indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: FRT is cheaper than 74.40% of the companies listed in the same industry.
- The average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio is at 24.29. FRT is valued slightly more expensive when compared to this.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 26.31 | ||
| Fwd PE | 33.46 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, FRT is valued a bit more expensive than the industry average as 64.80% of the companies are valued more cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 17.07 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- FRT's low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
- FRT has a very decent profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)0.67
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y5.19%
EPS Next 3Y5.32%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
- With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 6.21%, FRT is a good candidate for dividend investing.
- FRT's Dividend Yield is comparable with the industry average which is at 6.59.
- FRT's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 1.84.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.21% |
5.2 History
- The dividend of FRT has a limited annual growth rate of 1.04%.
- FRT has been paying a dividend for at least 10 years, so it has a reliable track record.
- The dividend of FRT decreased recently.
Dividend Growth(5Y)1.04%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
5.3 Sustainability
- FRT pays out 113.83% of its income as dividend. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
- FRT's earnings are growing more than its dividend. This makes the dividend growth sustainable.
DP113.83%
EPS Next 2Y5.19%
EPS Next 3Y5.32%
103.67
+1.87 (+1.84%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorReal Estate
GICS IndustryGroupEquity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
GICS IndustryDiversified REITs
Earnings (Last)10-31 2025-10-31/bmo
Earnings (Next)02-12 2026-02-12/amc
Inst Owners98.66%
Inst Owner Change0.19%
Ins Owners1%
Ins Owner Change0.74%
Market Cap8.94B
Revenue(TTM)1.25B
Net Income(TTM)337.38M
Analysts78.26
Price Target112.68 (8.69%)
Short Float %2.55%
Short Ratio3.27
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.21% |
Yearly Dividend4.41
Dividend Growth(5Y)1.04%
DP113.83%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
Ex-Date01-02 2026-01-02 (1.13)
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)62.7%
Min EPS beat(2)-13.16%
Max EPS beat(2)138.56%
EPS beat(4)3
Avg EPS beat(4)32.29%
Min EPS beat(4)-13.16%
Max EPS beat(4)138.56%
EPS beat(8)4
Avg EPS beat(8)16.47%
EPS beat(12)7
Avg EPS beat(12)22.23%
EPS beat(16)11
Avg EPS beat(16)43.27%
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-1.01%
Min Revenue beat(2)-1.57%
Max Revenue beat(2)-0.45%
Revenue beat(4)0
Avg Revenue beat(4)-0.76%
Min Revenue beat(4)-1.57%
Max Revenue beat(4)-0.1%
Revenue beat(8)1
Avg Revenue beat(8)-0.63%
Revenue beat(12)3
Avg Revenue beat(12)-0.54%
Revenue beat(16)7
Avg Revenue beat(16)0.29%
PT rev (1m)1.64%
PT rev (3m)2.04%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-0.58%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-7.17%
EPS NY rev (1m)-0.29%
EPS NY rev (3m)9.45%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)0.53%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0.16%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0.16%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 26.31 | ||
| Fwd PE | 33.46 | ||
| P/S | 7.13 | ||
| P/FCF | N/A | ||
| P/OCF | 14.98 | ||
| P/B | 2.78 | ||
| P/tB | 2.78 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 17.07 |
EPS(TTM)3.94
EY3.8%
EPS(NY)3.1
Fwd EY2.99%
FCF(TTM)-0.75
FCFYN/A
OCF(TTM)6.92
OCFY6.68%
SpS14.54
BVpS37.26
TBVpS37.26
PEG (NY)0.67
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number57.47
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 3.81% | ||
| ROE | 10.5% | ||
| ROCE | 5.18% | ||
| ROIC | 4.1% | ||
| ROICexc | 4.15% | ||
| ROICexgc | 4.15% | ||
| OM | 34.86% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 26.9% | ||
| GM | 67.29% | ||
| FCFM | N/A |
ROA(3y)3.54%
ROA(5y)3.11%
ROE(3y)9.81%
ROE(5y)8.84%
ROIC(3y)3.87%
ROIC(5y)3.53%
ROICexc(3y)3.94%
ROICexc(5y)3.66%
ROICexgc(3y)3.95%
ROICexgc(5y)3.67%
ROCE(3y)4.89%
ROCE(5y)4.47%
ROICexgc growth 3Y6.41%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-1.68%
ROICexc growth 3Y6.44%
ROICexc growth 5Y-1.7%
OM growth 3Y2.79%
OM growth 5Y-1.69%
PM growth 3Y-3.57%
PM growth 5Y-8.39%
GM growth 3Y0.35%
GM growth 5Y-0.19%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover0.14
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.47 | ||
| Debt/FCF | N/A | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 5.96 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 185.12% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 52.77% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2.62 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 75.13% | ||
| Profit Quality | N/A | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.57 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.57 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.09 |
F-Score6
WACC6.88%
ROIC/WACC0.6
Cap/Depr(3y)183.44%
Cap/Depr(5y)207.83%
Cap/Sales(3y)51.91%
Cap/Sales(5y)60.36%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)40.21%
EPS 3Y-3.13%
EPS 5Y-9.41%
EPS Q2Q%-1.43%
EPS Next Y39.46%
EPS Next 2Y5.19%
EPS Next 3Y5.32%
EPS Next 5Y8.4%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)6.05%
Revenue growth 3Y8.13%
Revenue growth 5Y5.14%
Sales Q2Q%3.15%
Revenue Next Year5.2%
Revenue Next 2Y5.19%
Revenue Next 3Y4.43%
Revenue Next 5Y5.2%
EBIT growth 1Y6.3%
EBIT growth 3Y11.14%
EBIT growth 5Y3.37%
EBIT Next Year89.62%
EBIT Next 3Y27.88%
EBIT Next 5Y18.35%
FCF growth 1Y-156.9%
FCF growth 3YN/A
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y8.43%
OCF growth 3Y6.82%
OCF growth 5Y4.46%
FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST / FRT FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to FRT.
What is the valuation status of FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 3 / 10 to FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT). This can be considered as Overvalued.
How profitable is FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) stock?
FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) has a profitability rating of 7 / 10.
How financially healthy is FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST?
The financial health rating of FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) is 3 / 10.
Can you provide the expected EPS growth for FRT stock?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) is expected to grow by 39.46% in the next year.