FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) Stock Fundamental Analysis
USA - New York Stock Exchange - NYSE:FRT - US3137451015 - REIT
103.67 USD
+1.87 (+1.84%)
103.67 USD
0 (0%)
Overall FRT gets a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10. We evaluated FRT against 125 industry peers in the Diversified REITs industry. FRT has an excellent profitability rating, but there are concerns on its financial health. FRT is quite expensive at the moment. It does show a decent growth rate.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
- In the past year FRT was profitable.
- In the past year FRT had a positive cash flow from operations.
- FRT had positive earnings in each of the past 5 years.
- In the past 5 years FRT always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
1.2 Ratios
- Looking at the Return On Assets, with a value of 3.81%, FRT belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 80.95% of the companies in the same industry.
- FRT's Return On Equity of 10.50% is amongst the best of the industry. FRT outperforms 87.30% of its industry peers.
- FRT has a Return On Invested Capital of 4.10%. This is in the better half of the industry: FRT outperforms 78.57% of its industry peers.
- Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for FRT is in line with the industry average of 3.07%.
- The 3 year average ROIC (3.87%) for FRT is below the current ROIC(4.10%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 3.81% | ||
| ROE | 10.5% | ||
| ROIC | 4.1% |
ROA(3y)3.54%
ROA(5y)3.11%
ROE(3y)9.81%
ROE(5y)8.84%
ROIC(3y)3.87%
ROIC(5y)3.53%
1.3 Margins
- The Profit Margin of FRT (26.90%) is better than 78.57% of its industry peers.
- In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of FRT has declined.
- FRT's Operating Margin of 34.86% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. FRT outperforms 72.22% of its industry peers.
- In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of FRT has declined.
- FRT has a Gross Margin (67.29%) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
- FRT's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 34.86% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 26.9% | ||
| GM | 67.29% |
OM growth 3Y2.79%
OM growth 5Y-1.69%
PM growth 3Y-3.57%
PM growth 5Y-8.39%
GM growth 3Y0.35%
GM growth 5Y-0.19%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
- With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) below the Cost of Capital (WACC), FRT is destroying value.
- The number of shares outstanding for FRT has been increased compared to 1 year ago.
- The number of shares outstanding for FRT has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
- The debt/assets ratio for FRT has been reduced compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
- FRT has an Altman-Z score of 1.09. This is a bad value and indicates that FRT is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
- FRT's Altman-Z score of 1.09 is amongst the best of the industry. FRT outperforms 80.95% of its industry peers.
- A Debt/Equity ratio of 1.47 is on the high side and indicates that FRT has dependencies on debt financing.
- Looking at the Debt to Equity ratio, with a value of 1.47, FRT is in line with its industry, outperforming 42.86% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.47 | ||
| Debt/FCF | N/A | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.09 |
ROIC/WACC0.6
WACC6.88%
2.3 Liquidity
- FRT has a Current Ratio of 1.57. This is a normal value and indicates that FRT is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
- FRT has a better Current ratio (1.57) than 73.02% of its industry peers.
- FRT has a Quick Ratio of 1.57. This is a normal value and indicates that FRT is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
- Looking at the Quick ratio, with a value of 1.57, FRT is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 73.81% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.57 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.57 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
- FRT shows a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has been growing by 40.21%, which is quite impressive.
- The Earnings Per Share has been decreasing by -9.41% on average over the past years.
- FRT shows a small growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 6.05%.
- FRT shows a small growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 5.14% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)40.21%
EPS 3Y-3.13%
EPS 5Y-9.41%
EPS Q2Q%-1.43%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)6.05%
Revenue growth 3Y8.13%
Revenue growth 5Y5.14%
Sales Q2Q%3.15%
3.2 Future
- The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 8.40% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
- FRT is expected to show a small growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will grow by 5.20% yearly.
EPS Next Y39.46%
EPS Next 2Y5.19%
EPS Next 3Y5.32%
EPS Next 5Y8.4%
Revenue Next Year5.2%
Revenue Next 2Y5.19%
Revenue Next 3Y4.43%
Revenue Next 5Y5.2%
3.3 Evolution
- The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
- When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is stable.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- The Price/Earnings ratio is 26.31, which means the current valuation is very expensive for FRT.
- 72.22% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than FRT, based on the Price/Earnings ratio.
- When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of FRT to the average of the S&P500 Index (27.38), we can say FRT is valued inline with the index average.
- With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 33.46, FRT can be considered very expensive at the moment.
- FRT's Price/Forward Earnings ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. FRT is cheaper than 74.60% of the companies in the same industry.
- When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of FRT to the average of the S&P500 Index (24.29), we can say FRT is valued slightly more expensively.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 26.31 | ||
| Fwd PE | 33.46 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, FRT is valued a bit more expensive than 65.08% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 17.07 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- FRT's low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
- FRT has a very decent profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)0.67
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y5.19%
EPS Next 3Y5.32%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
- FRT has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 6.21%, which is a nice return.
- FRT's Dividend Yield is a higher than the industry average which is at 6.59.
- FRT's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 1.85.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.21% |
5.2 History
- The dividend of FRT has a limited annual growth rate of 1.04%.
- FRT has been paying a dividend for at least 10 years, so it has a reliable track record.
- The dividend of FRT decreased recently.
Dividend Growth(5Y)1.04%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
5.3 Sustainability
- FRT pays out 113.83% of its income as dividend. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
- FRT's earnings are growing more than its dividend. This makes the dividend growth sustainable.
DP113.83%
EPS Next 2Y5.19%
EPS Next 3Y5.32%
103.67
+1.87 (+1.84%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorReal Estate
GICS IndustryGroupEquity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
GICS IndustryDiversified REITs
Earnings (Last)10-31 2025-10-31/bmo
Earnings (Next)02-12 2026-02-12/amc
Inst Owners98.66%
Inst Owner Change0.19%
Ins Owners1%
Ins Owner Change0.74%
Market Cap8.94B
Revenue(TTM)1.25B
Net Income(TTM)337.38M
Analysts78.26
Price Target112.68 (8.69%)
Short Float %2.55%
Short Ratio3.27
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.21% |
Yearly Dividend4.41
Dividend Growth(5Y)1.04%
DP113.83%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
Ex-Date01-02 2026-01-02 (1.13)
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)62.7%
Min EPS beat(2)-13.16%
Max EPS beat(2)138.56%
EPS beat(4)3
Avg EPS beat(4)32.29%
Min EPS beat(4)-13.16%
Max EPS beat(4)138.56%
EPS beat(8)4
Avg EPS beat(8)16.47%
EPS beat(12)7
Avg EPS beat(12)22.23%
EPS beat(16)11
Avg EPS beat(16)43.27%
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-1.01%
Min Revenue beat(2)-1.57%
Max Revenue beat(2)-0.45%
Revenue beat(4)0
Avg Revenue beat(4)-0.76%
Min Revenue beat(4)-1.57%
Max Revenue beat(4)-0.1%
Revenue beat(8)1
Avg Revenue beat(8)-0.63%
Revenue beat(12)3
Avg Revenue beat(12)-0.54%
Revenue beat(16)7
Avg Revenue beat(16)0.29%
PT rev (1m)1.64%
PT rev (3m)2.04%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-0.58%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-7.17%
EPS NY rev (1m)-0.29%
EPS NY rev (3m)9.45%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)0.53%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0.16%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0.16%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 26.31 | ||
| Fwd PE | 33.46 | ||
| P/S | 7.13 | ||
| P/FCF | N/A | ||
| P/OCF | 14.98 | ||
| P/B | 2.78 | ||
| P/tB | 2.78 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 17.07 |
EPS(TTM)3.94
EY3.8%
EPS(NY)3.1
Fwd EY2.99%
FCF(TTM)-0.75
FCFYN/A
OCF(TTM)6.92
OCFY6.68%
SpS14.54
BVpS37.26
TBVpS37.26
PEG (NY)0.67
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number57.47
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 3.81% | ||
| ROE | 10.5% | ||
| ROCE | 5.18% | ||
| ROIC | 4.1% | ||
| ROICexc | 4.15% | ||
| ROICexgc | 4.15% | ||
| OM | 34.86% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 26.9% | ||
| GM | 67.29% | ||
| FCFM | N/A |
ROA(3y)3.54%
ROA(5y)3.11%
ROE(3y)9.81%
ROE(5y)8.84%
ROIC(3y)3.87%
ROIC(5y)3.53%
ROICexc(3y)3.94%
ROICexc(5y)3.66%
ROICexgc(3y)3.95%
ROICexgc(5y)3.67%
ROCE(3y)4.89%
ROCE(5y)4.47%
ROICexgc growth 3Y6.41%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-1.68%
ROICexc growth 3Y6.44%
ROICexc growth 5Y-1.7%
OM growth 3Y2.79%
OM growth 5Y-1.69%
PM growth 3Y-3.57%
PM growth 5Y-8.39%
GM growth 3Y0.35%
GM growth 5Y-0.19%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover0.14
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.47 | ||
| Debt/FCF | N/A | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 5.96 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 185.12% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 52.77% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2.62 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 75.13% | ||
| Profit Quality | N/A | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.57 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.57 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.09 |
F-Score6
WACC6.88%
ROIC/WACC0.6
Cap/Depr(3y)183.44%
Cap/Depr(5y)207.83%
Cap/Sales(3y)51.91%
Cap/Sales(5y)60.36%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)40.21%
EPS 3Y-3.13%
EPS 5Y-9.41%
EPS Q2Q%-1.43%
EPS Next Y39.46%
EPS Next 2Y5.19%
EPS Next 3Y5.32%
EPS Next 5Y8.4%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)6.05%
Revenue growth 3Y8.13%
Revenue growth 5Y5.14%
Sales Q2Q%3.15%
Revenue Next Year5.2%
Revenue Next 2Y5.19%
Revenue Next 3Y4.43%
Revenue Next 5Y5.2%
EBIT growth 1Y6.3%
EBIT growth 3Y11.14%
EBIT growth 5Y3.37%
EBIT Next Year89.62%
EBIT Next 3Y27.88%
EBIT Next 5Y18.35%
FCF growth 1Y-156.9%
FCF growth 3YN/A
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y8.43%
OCF growth 3Y6.82%
OCF growth 5Y4.46%
FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST / FRT FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to FRT.
What is the valuation status of FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 3 / 10 to FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT). This can be considered as Overvalued.
How profitable is FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) stock?
FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) has a profitability rating of 7 / 10.
How financially healthy is FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST?
The financial health rating of FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) is 3 / 10.
Can you provide the expected EPS growth for FRT stock?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of FEDERAL REALTY INVS TRUST (FRT) is expected to grow by 39.46% in the next year.