Taking everything into account, FOR scores 4 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. FOR was compared to 62 industry peers in the Real Estate Management & Development industry. FOR has an excellent profitability rating, but there are concerns on its financial health. FOR has a correct valuation and a medium growth rate.

Quickly go to:

1. Profitability

2. Health

3. Growth

4. Valuation

5. Dividend

1. Profitability

1.1 Basic Checks

FOR had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year FOR has reported a negative cash flow from operations.
In the past 5 years FOR has always been profitable.
The reported operating cash flow has been mixed in the past 5 years: FOR reported negative operating cash flow in multiple years.

1.2 Ratios

With an excellent Return On Assets value of 5.35%, FOR belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 90.32% of the companies in the same industry.
FOR has a better Return On Equity (9.50%) than 85.48% of its industry peers.
The Return On Invested Capital of FOR (6.15%) is better than 77.42% of its industry peers.
The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for FOR is in line with the industry average of 5.44%.

		Industry Rank	Sector Rank
ROA	5.35%
ROE	9.5%
ROIC	6.15%

ROA(3y)6.42%

ROA(5y)6.43%

ROE(3y)11.48%

ROE(5y)12.05%

ROIC(3y)7.33%

ROIC(5y)7.6%

1.3 Margins

With a decent Profit Margin value of 10.10%, FOR is doing good in the industry, outperforming 79.03% of the companies in the same industry.
FOR's Profit Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
FOR has a Operating Margin of 13.01%. This is amongst the best in the industry. FOR outperforms 82.26% of its industry peers.
FOR's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
The Gross Margin of FOR (22.30%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of FOR has grown nicely.

		Industry Rank	Sector Rank
OM	13.01%
PM (TTM)	10.1%
GM	22.3%

OM growth 3Y-5.5%

OM growth 5Y10.86%

PM growth 3Y-4.97%

PM growth 5Y9.13%

GM growth 3Y1.1%

GM growth 5Y11.96%

More info and screens

ROA

ROE

ROIC

Operating and Profit Margin

Show most profitable peers

2. Health

2.1 Basic Checks

With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) below the Cost of Capital (WACC), FOR is destroying value.
FOR has more shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
The number of shares outstanding for FOR has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, FOR has a worse debt to assets ratio.

2.2 Solvency

Based on the Altman-Z score of 1.77, we must say that FOR is in the distress zone and has some risk of bankruptcy.
FOR has a Altman-Z score (1.77) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
FOR has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.45. This is a healthy value indicating a solid balance between debt and equity.
FOR has a Debt to Equity ratio of 0.45. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: FOR outperforms 56.45% of its industry peers.

		Industry Rank	Sector Rank
Debt/Equity	0.45
Debt/FCF	N/A
Altman-Z	1.77

ROIC/WACC0.82

WACC7.54%

2.3 Liquidity

A Current Ratio of 0.89 indicates that FOR may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
With a Current ratio value of 0.89, FOR is not doing good in the industry: 82.26% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
A Quick Ratio of 0.89 indicates that FOR may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
FOR has a worse Quick ratio (0.89) than 79.03% of its industry peers.

		Industry Rank	Sector Rank
Current Ratio	0.89
Quick Ratio	0.89

More info and screens

WACC

Debt/Equity

How to determine the health of a company

Altman-Z score

Show peers with great health

3. Growth

3.1 Past

FOR shows a slight negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has decreased by -6.00%.
The Earnings Per Share has been growing by 22.29% on average over the past years. This is a very strong growth
FOR shows quite a strong growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 10.14%.
The Revenue has been growing by 12.27% on average over the past years. This is quite good.

EPS 1Y (TTM)-6%

EPS 3Y-3.21%

EPS 5Y22.29%

EPS Q2Q%-6.25%

Revenue 1Y (TTM)10.14%

Revenue growth 3Y3.05%

Revenue growth 5Y12.27%

Sales Q2Q%9.03%

3.2 Future

The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 3.24% on average over the next years.
FOR is expected to show a small growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will grow by 7.81% yearly.

EPS Next Y-7.65%

EPS Next 2Y3.24%

EPS Next 3YN/A

EPS Next 5YN/A

Revenue Next Year6.91%

Revenue Next 2Y7.81%

Revenue Next 3YN/A

Revenue Next 5YN/A

3.3 Evolution

When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.

More info and screens

Find the best growth stocks

Show best growing peers

4. Valuation

4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio

With a Price/Earnings ratio of 7.53, the valuation of FOR can be described as very cheap.
FOR's Price/Earnings ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. FOR is cheaper than 93.55% of the companies in the same industry.
The average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio is at 27.30. FOR is valued rather cheaply when compared to this.
A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 7.02 indicates a rather cheap valuation of FOR.
98.39% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than FOR, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
The average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio is at 24.32. FOR is valued rather cheaply when compared to this.

		Industry Rank	Sector Rank
PE	7.53
Fwd PE	7.02

4.2 Price Multiples

FOR's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. FOR is cheaper than 96.77% of the companies in the same industry.