Fonciere Lyonnaise (FLY.PA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - EPA:FLY - FR0000033409 - REIT
73.8 EUR
+2.8 (+3.94%)
FLY gets a fundamental rating of 4 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 41 industry peers in the Diversified REITs industry. FLY has a medium profitability rating, but doesn't score so well on its financial health evaluation. FLY is valied quite expensively at the moment, while it does show a decent growth rate.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
FLY had positive earnings in the past year.
FLY had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
Of the past 5 years FLY 4 years were profitable.
FLY had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
FLY has a Return On Assets of 2.97%. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: FLY outperforms 59.52% of its industry peers.
FLY has a Return On Equity of 6.35%. This is in the better half of the industry: FLY outperforms 69.05% of its industry peers.
The Return On Invested Capital of FLY (2.12%) is worse than 76.19% of its industry peers.
FLY had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 2.02%. This is in line with the industry average of 3.46%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (2.12%) for FLY is above the 3 year average (2.02%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 2.97% | ||
| ROE | 6.35% | ||
| ROIC | 2.12% |
ROA(3y)-1.39%
ROA(5y)0.69%
ROE(3y)-3.03%
ROE(5y)0.75%
ROIC(3y)2.02%
ROIC(5y)1.81%
1.3 Margins
With an excellent Profit Margin value of 92.16%, FLY belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 88.10% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of FLY has declined.
The Operating Margin of FLY (86.50%) is better than 90.48% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of FLY has remained more or less at the same level.
The Gross Margin of FLY (96.74%) is better than 92.86% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of FLY has remained more or less at the same level.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 86.5% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 92.16% | ||
| GM | 96.74% |
OM growth 3Y4.42%
OM growth 5Y0.13%
PM growth 3Y-20.77%
PM growth 5Y-22.47%
GM growth 3Y0.7%
GM growth 5Y0.33%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) below the Cost of Capital (WACC), FLY is destroying value.
Compared to 1 year ago, FLY has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
Compared to 5 years ago, FLY has less shares outstanding
FLY has a worse debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
Based on the Altman-Z score of 1.10, we must say that FLY is in the distress zone and has some risk of bankruptcy.
With a decent Altman-Z score value of 1.10, FLY is doing good in the industry, outperforming 71.43% of the companies in the same industry.
FLY has a debt to FCF ratio of 22.19. This is a negative value and a sign of low solvency as FLY would need 22.19 years to pay back of all of its debts.
With a Debt to FCF ratio value of 22.19, FLY perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 42.86% of the companies in the same industry.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.78 indicates that FLY is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
The Debt to Equity ratio of FLY (0.78) is worse than 64.29% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.78 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 22.19 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.1 |
ROIC/WACC0.39
WACC5.45%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 0.20 indicates that FLY may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
The Current ratio of FLY (0.20) is worse than 73.81% of its industry peers.
FLY has a Quick Ratio of 0.20. This is a bad value and indicates that FLY is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
FLY's Quick ratio of 0.20 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. FLY is outperformed by 73.81% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.2 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.2 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
FLY shows a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has been growing by 159.68%, which is quite impressive.
FLY shows a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been decreasing by -17.63% yearly.
FLY shows a small growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 2.11%.
FLY shows a small growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 4.60% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)159.68%
EPS 3Y-9.45%
EPS 5Y-17.63%
EPS Q2Q%29.81%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)2.11%
Revenue growth 3Y12.53%
Revenue growth 5Y4.6%
Sales Q2Q%0.81%
3.2 Future
FLY is expected to show a decrease in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will decrease by -1.02% yearly.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 5.70% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y-12.34%
EPS Next 2Y-1.17%
EPS Next 3Y-1.02%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-0.95%
Revenue Next 2Y4.7%
Revenue Next 3Y5.7%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
The Revenue growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
A Price/Earnings ratio of 13.79 indicates a correct valuation of FLY.
FLY's Price/Earnings is on the same level as the industry average.
FLY is valuated rather cheaply when we compare the Price/Earnings ratio to 25.07, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
FLY is valuated quite expensively with a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 26.77.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of FLY indicates a slightly more expensive valuation: FLY is more expensive than 76.19% of the companies listed in the same industry.
The average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio is at 34.08. FLY is valued slightly cheaper when compared to this.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 13.79 | ||
| Fwd PE | 26.77 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, FLY is valued a bit more expensive than 71.43% of the companies in the same industry.
FLY's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is a bit more expensive when compared to the industry. FLY is more expensive than 71.43% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 24.92 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 25.02 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The decent profitability rating of FLY may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y-1.17%
EPS Next 3Y-1.02%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
FLY has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 4.01%, which is a nice return.
FLY's Dividend Yield is slightly below the industry average, which is at 5.79.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.44, FLY pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.01% |
5.2 History
The dividend of FLY decreases each year by -1.96%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-1.96%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years3
5.3 Sustainability
FLY pays out 53.17% of its income as dividend. This is a bit on the high side, but may be sustainable.
FLY's earnings and Dividend Rate are declining. This means the current dividend is most likely not sustainable.
DP53.17%
EPS Next 2Y-1.17%
EPS Next 3Y-1.02%
EPA:FLY (9/30/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
73.8
+2.8 (+3.94%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorReal Estate
GICS IndustryGroupEquity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
GICS IndustryDiversified REITs
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners0.29%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners0.04%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap3.17B
Revenue(TTM)249.81M
Net Income(TTM)230.23M
Analysts42.86
Price Target74.26 (0.62%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.01% |
Yearly Dividend2.4
Dividend Growth(5Y)-1.96%
DP53.17%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years3
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0.76%
PT rev (3m)0.76%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 13.79 | ||
| Fwd PE | 26.77 | ||
| P/S | 12.71 | ||
| P/FCF | 24.92 | ||
| P/OCF | 28.4 | ||
| P/B | 0.88 | ||
| P/tB | 0.88 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 25.02 |
EPS(TTM)5.35
EY7.25%
EPS(NY)2.76
Fwd EY3.74%
FCF(TTM)2.96
FCFY4.01%
OCF(TTM)2.6
OCFY3.52%
SpS5.81
BVpS84.22
TBVpS84.13
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham NumberN/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 2.97% | ||
| ROE | 6.35% | ||
| ROCE | 3.07% | ||
| ROIC | 2.12% | ||
| ROICexc | 2.14% | ||
| ROICexgc | 2.14% | ||
| OM | 86.5% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 92.16% | ||
| GM | 96.74% | ||
| FCFM | 51% |
ROA(3y)-1.39%
ROA(5y)0.69%
ROE(3y)-3.03%
ROE(5y)0.75%
ROIC(3y)2.02%
ROIC(5y)1.81%
ROICexc(3y)2.04%
ROICexc(5y)1.83%
ROICexgc(3y)2.04%
ROICexgc(5y)1.83%
ROCE(3y)2.89%
ROCE(5y)2.55%
ROICexgc growth 3Y19.38%
ROICexgc growth 5Y4.47%
ROICexc growth 3Y19.37%
ROICexc growth 5Y4.46%
OM growth 3Y4.42%
OM growth 5Y0.13%
PM growth 3Y-20.77%
PM growth 5Y-22.47%
GM growth 3Y0.7%
GM growth 5Y0.33%
F-Score4
Asset Turnover0.03
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.78 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 22.19 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 12.98 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 1039.88% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 6.25% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 3.49 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 51.38% | ||
| Profit Quality | 55.34% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.2 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.2 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.1 |
F-Score4
WACC5.45%
ROIC/WACC0.39
Cap/Depr(3y)454.49%
Cap/Depr(5y)335.66%
Cap/Sales(3y)3.65%
Cap/Sales(5y)2.54%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)159.68%
EPS 3Y-9.45%
EPS 5Y-17.63%
EPS Q2Q%29.81%
EPS Next Y-12.34%
EPS Next 2Y-1.17%
EPS Next 3Y-1.02%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)2.11%
Revenue growth 3Y12.53%
Revenue growth 5Y4.6%
Sales Q2Q%0.81%
Revenue Next Year-0.95%
Revenue Next 2Y4.7%
Revenue Next 3Y5.7%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y0.91%
EBIT growth 3Y17.5%
EBIT growth 5Y4.74%
EBIT Next Year-22.09%
EBIT Next 3Y-2.52%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y19.59%
FCF growth 3Y-3.92%
FCF growth 5Y-7.28%
OCF growth 1Y-11%
OCF growth 3Y-3.24%
OCF growth 5Y-6.82%
Fonciere Lyonnaise / FLY.PA FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for Fonciere Lyonnaise?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 4 / 10 to FLY.PA.
Can you provide the valuation status for Fonciere Lyonnaise?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 2 / 10 to Fonciere Lyonnaise (FLY.PA). This can be considered as Overvalued.
Can you provide the profitability details for Fonciere Lyonnaise?
Fonciere Lyonnaise (FLY.PA) has a profitability rating of 6 / 10.
What is the expected EPS growth for Fonciere Lyonnaise (FLY.PA) stock?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of Fonciere Lyonnaise (FLY.PA) is expected to decline by -12.34% in the next year.
How sustainable is the dividend of Fonciere Lyonnaise (FLY.PA) stock?
The dividend rating of Fonciere Lyonnaise (FLY.PA) is 4 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 53.17%.