164.89 USD
-1.07 (-0.64%)
At close: Feb 10, 2026
163.78 USD
-1.11 (-0.67%)
After Hours: 2/10/2026, 8:03:46 PM
Taking everything into account, FANG scores 5 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. FANG was compared to 206 industry peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. FANG scores excellent on profitability, but there are concerns on its financial health. FANG has a decent growth rate and is not valued too expensively.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
- In the past year FANG was profitable.
- FANG had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
- Of the past 5 years FANG 4 years were profitable.
- FANG had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
- Looking at the Return On Assets, with a value of 5.48%, FANG is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 67.96% of the companies in the same industry.
- With a decent Return On Equity value of 10.69%, FANG is doing good in the industry, outperforming 64.56% of the companies in the same industry.
- FANG has a Return On Invested Capital (6.23%) which is in line with its industry peers.
- The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for FANG is significantly below the industry average of 22.01%.
- The 3 year average ROIC (13.71%) for FANG is well above the current ROIC(6.23%). The reason for the recent decline needs to be investigated.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 5.48% | ||
| ROE | 10.69% | ||
| ROIC | 6.23% |
ROA(3y)10.76%
ROA(5y)3.23%
ROE(3y)18.84%
ROE(5y)4.64%
ROIC(3y)13.71%
ROIC(5y)11.82%
1.3 Margins
- FANG has a Profit Margin of 27.20%. This is amongst the best in the industry. FANG outperforms 84.47% of its industry peers.
- FANG's Profit Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
- With an excellent Operating Margin value of 36.35%, FANG belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 84.95% of the companies in the same industry.
- In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of FANG has grown nicely.
- FANG's Gross Margin of 70.42% is amongst the best of the industry. FANG outperforms 80.10% of its industry peers.
- FANG's Gross Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 36.35% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 27.2% | ||
| GM | 70.42% |
OM growth 3Y-10.89%
OM growth 5Y2.54%
PM growth 3Y-2.26%
PM growth 5Y37.7%
GM growth 3Y-4.27%
GM growth 5Y-1.55%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
- With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), FANG is creating some value.
- The number of shares outstanding for FANG has been increased compared to 1 year ago.
- FANG has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
- Compared to 1 year ago, FANG has an improved debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
- FANG has an Altman-Z score of 1.30. This is a bad value and indicates that FANG is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
- With a Altman-Z score value of 1.30, FANG perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 51.46% of the companies in the same industry.
- A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.41 indicates that FANG is not too dependend on debt financing.
- Looking at the Debt to Equity ratio, with a value of 0.41, FANG is in line with its industry, outperforming 55.34% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.41 | ||
| Debt/FCF | N/A | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.3 |
ROIC/WACC0.81
WACC7.72%
2.3 Liquidity
- FANG has a Current Ratio of 0.62. This is a bad value and indicates that FANG is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
- With a Current ratio value of 0.62, FANG is not doing good in the industry: 78.64% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
- FANG has a Quick Ratio of 0.62. This is a bad value and indicates that FANG is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
- The Quick ratio of FANG (0.60) is worse than 72.33% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.62 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.6 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
- FANG shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -18.73%.
- Measured over the past years, FANG shows a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been growing by 19.84% on average per year.
- The Revenue has grown by 60.29% in the past year. This is a very strong growth!
- The Revenue has been growing by 22.79% on average over the past years. This is a very strong growth!
EPS 1Y (TTM)-18.73%
EPS 3Y12.48%
EPS 5Y19.84%
EPS Q2Q%-8.88%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)60.29%
Revenue growth 3Y17.64%
Revenue growth 5Y22.79%
Sales Q2Q%48.36%
3.2 Future
- The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 1.85% on average over the next years.
- The Revenue is expected to grow by 8.44% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
EPS Next Y-19.55%
EPS Next 2Y-18.64%
EPS Next 3Y-4.27%
EPS Next 5Y1.85%
Revenue Next Year39.98%
Revenue Next 2Y13.21%
Revenue Next 3Y11.75%
Revenue Next 5Y8.44%
3.3 Evolution
- The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
- When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- A Price/Earnings ratio of 11.84 indicates a reasonable valuation of FANG.
- Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, FANG is valued a bit cheaper than 76.21% of the companies in the same industry.
- The average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio is at 28.03. FANG is valued rather cheaply when compared to this.
- Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 15.53, the valuation of FANG can be described as correct.
- Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, FANG is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 60.68% of the companies are valued more expensively.
- FANG's Price/Forward Earnings ratio indicates a valuation a bit cheaper than the S&P500 average which is at 27.97.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.84 | ||
| Fwd PE | 15.53 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- 72.33% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than FANG, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- FANG has a very decent profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
- A cheap valuation may be justified as FANG's earnings are expected to decrease with -4.27% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)0.6
EPS Next 2Y-18.64%
EPS Next 3Y-4.27%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
- With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 2.43%, FANG has a reasonable but not impressive dividend return.
- Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 3.64, FANG has a dividend in line with its industry peers.
- Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.80, FANG pays a bit more dividend than the S&P500 average.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.43% |
5.2 History
- The dividend of FANG is nicely growing with an annual growth rate of 57.49%!
- FANG has been paying a dividend for over 5 years, so it has already some track record.
- FANG has decreased its dividend recently.
Dividend Growth(5Y)57.49%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
5.3 Sustainability
- FANG pays out 27.09% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
- FANG's earnings are growing slower than its dividend. This means the dividend growth is not sustainable.
DP27.09%
EPS Next 2Y-18.64%
EPS Next 3Y-4.27%
164.89
-1.07 (-0.64%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorEnergy
GICS IndustryGroupEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Earnings (Last)11-03 2025-11-03/amc
Earnings (Next)02-23 2026-02-23/amc
Inst Owners62.3%
Inst Owner Change-2.56%
Ins Owners0.71%
Ins Owner Change-3.98%
Market Cap47.25B
Revenue(TTM)15.36B
Net Income(TTM)4.18B
Analysts84.74
Price Target188.01 (14.02%)
Short Float %4.77%
Short Ratio4.7
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.43% |
Yearly Dividend6.72
Dividend Growth(5Y)57.49%
DP27.09%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)-1.91%
Min EPS beat(2)-7.02%
Max EPS beat(2)3.2%
EPS beat(4)3
Avg EPS beat(4)2.65%
Min EPS beat(4)-7.02%
Max EPS beat(4)7.78%
EPS beat(8)3
Avg EPS beat(8)-1.08%
EPS beat(12)4
Avg EPS beat(12)-1.37%
EPS beat(16)8
Avg EPS beat(16)0.45%
Revenue beat(2)2
Avg Revenue beat(2)8.1%
Min Revenue beat(2)7.01%
Max Revenue beat(2)9.18%
Revenue beat(4)4
Avg Revenue beat(4)6.44%
Min Revenue beat(4)3.11%
Max Revenue beat(4)9.18%
Revenue beat(8)8
Avg Revenue beat(8)6.08%
Revenue beat(12)9
Avg Revenue beat(12)3.43%
Revenue beat(16)13
Avg Revenue beat(16)6.03%
PT rev (1m)1.47%
PT rev (3m)1.65%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-17.34%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-14.54%
EPS NY rev (1m)-2.85%
EPS NY rev (3m)-2.02%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)-4.66%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-1.93%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0.18%
Revenue NY rev (3m)2.88%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.84 | ||
| Fwd PE | 15.53 | ||
| P/S | 3.08 | ||
| P/FCF | N/A | ||
| P/OCF | 5.4 | ||
| P/B | 1.21 | ||
| P/tB | 1.21 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1 |
EPS(TTM)13.93
EY8.45%
EPS(NY)10.62
Fwd EY6.44%
FCF(TTM)-3.82
FCFYN/A
OCF(TTM)30.56
OCFY18.53%
SpS53.61
BVpS136.42
TBVpS136.42
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)0.6
Graham Number206.78
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 5.48% | ||
| ROE | 10.69% | ||
| ROCE | 7.75% | ||
| ROIC | 6.23% | ||
| ROICexc | 6.24% | ||
| ROICexgc | 6.24% | ||
| OM | 36.35% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 27.2% | ||
| GM | 70.42% | ||
| FCFM | N/A |
ROA(3y)10.76%
ROA(5y)3.23%
ROE(3y)18.84%
ROE(5y)4.64%
ROIC(3y)13.71%
ROIC(5y)11.82%
ROICexc(3y)13.87%
ROICexc(5y)12.01%
ROICexgc(3y)13.87%
ROICexgc(5y)12.01%
ROCE(3y)17.06%
ROCE(5y)14.7%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-27.28%
ROICexgc growth 5Y2.37%
ROICexc growth 3Y-27.28%
ROICexc growth 5Y2.37%
OM growth 3Y-10.89%
OM growth 5Y2.54%
PM growth 3Y-2.26%
PM growth 5Y37.7%
GM growth 3Y-4.27%
GM growth 5Y-1.55%
F-Score7
Asset Turnover0.2
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.41 | ||
| Debt/FCF | N/A | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.53 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 205% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 64.12% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 84.28% | ||
| Profit Quality | N/A | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.62 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.6 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.3 |
F-Score7
WACC7.72%
ROIC/WACC0.81
Cap/Depr(3y)314.79%
Cap/Depr(5y)256.28%
Cap/Sales(3y)66.3%
Cap/Sales(5y)61.08%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-18.73%
EPS 3Y12.48%
EPS 5Y19.84%
EPS Q2Q%-8.88%
EPS Next Y-19.55%
EPS Next 2Y-18.64%
EPS Next 3Y-4.27%
EPS Next 5Y1.85%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)60.29%
Revenue growth 3Y17.64%
Revenue growth 5Y22.79%
Sales Q2Q%48.36%
Revenue Next Year39.98%
Revenue Next 2Y13.21%
Revenue Next 3Y11.75%
Revenue Next 5Y8.44%
EBIT growth 1Y25.15%
EBIT growth 3Y4.83%
EBIT growth 5Y25.91%
EBIT Next Year117.36%
EBIT Next 3Y30.89%
EBIT Next 5Y20.16%
FCF growth 1Y-208.1%
FCF growth 3YN/A
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y52.62%
OCF growth 3Y17.59%
OCF growth 5Y18.59%
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC / FANG FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC (FANG) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to FANG.
What is the valuation status of DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC (FANG) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 4 / 10 to DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC (FANG). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
What is the profitability of FANG stock?
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC (FANG) has a profitability rating of 7 / 10.
What is the valuation of DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC based on its PE and PB ratios?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC (FANG) is 11.84 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 1.21.
Can you provide the dividend sustainability for FANG stock?
The dividend rating of DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC (FANG) is 5 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 27.09%.