165.96 USD
-0.97 (-0.58%)
At close: Feb 9, 2026
165.96 USD
0 (0%)
After Hours: 2/9/2026, 4:43:22 PM
We assign a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10 to FANG. FANG was compared to 206 industry peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. While FANG has a great profitability rating, there are quite some concerns on its financial health. FANG has a decent growth rate and is not valued too expensively.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
- FANG had positive earnings in the past year.
- FANG had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
- FANG had positive earnings in 4 of the past 5 years.
- FANG had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
- FANG has a Return On Assets of 5.48%. This is in the better half of the industry: FANG outperforms 67.96% of its industry peers.
- Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 10.69%, FANG is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 65.05% of the companies in the same industry.
- FANG has a Return On Invested Capital (6.23%) which is in line with its industry peers.
- FANG had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 13.71%. This is significantly below the industry average of 22.02%.
- The last Return On Invested Capital (6.23%) for FANG is well below the 3 year average (13.71%), which needs to be investigated, but indicates that FANG had better years and this may not be a problem.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 5.48% | ||
| ROE | 10.69% | ||
| ROIC | 6.23% |
ROA(3y)10.76%
ROA(5y)3.23%
ROE(3y)18.84%
ROE(5y)4.64%
ROIC(3y)13.71%
ROIC(5y)11.82%
1.3 Margins
- FANG's Profit Margin of 27.20% is amongst the best of the industry. FANG outperforms 84.47% of its industry peers.
- In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of FANG has grown nicely.
- FANG's Operating Margin of 36.35% is amongst the best of the industry. FANG outperforms 84.95% of its industry peers.
- FANG's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
- With an excellent Gross Margin value of 70.42%, FANG belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 80.10% of the companies in the same industry.
- FANG's Gross Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 36.35% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 27.2% | ||
| GM | 70.42% |
OM growth 3Y-10.89%
OM growth 5Y2.54%
PM growth 3Y-2.26%
PM growth 5Y37.7%
GM growth 3Y-4.27%
GM growth 5Y-1.55%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
- The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so FANG is still creating some value.
- FANG has more shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
- FANG has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
- Compared to 1 year ago, FANG has an improved debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
- FANG has an Altman-Z score of 1.31. This is a bad value and indicates that FANG is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
- FANG has a Altman-Z score of 1.31. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: FANG outperforms 51.46% of its industry peers.
- FANG has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.41. This is a healthy value indicating a solid balance between debt and equity.
- The Debt to Equity ratio of FANG (0.41) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.41 | ||
| Debt/FCF | N/A | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.31 |
ROIC/WACC0.81
WACC7.72%
2.3 Liquidity
- A Current Ratio of 0.62 indicates that FANG may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
- Looking at the Current ratio, with a value of 0.62, FANG is doing worse than 78.64% of the companies in the same industry.
- FANG has a Quick Ratio of 0.62. This is a bad value and indicates that FANG is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
- FANG has a worse Quick ratio (0.60) than 72.33% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.62 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.6 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
- FANG shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -18.73%.
- FANG shows quite a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been growing by 19.84% yearly.
- FANG shows a strong growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 60.29%.
- The Revenue has been growing by 22.79% on average over the past years. This is a very strong growth!
EPS 1Y (TTM)-18.73%
EPS 3Y12.48%
EPS 5Y19.84%
EPS Q2Q%-8.88%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)60.29%
Revenue growth 3Y17.64%
Revenue growth 5Y22.79%
Sales Q2Q%48.36%
3.2 Future
- Based on estimates for the next years, FANG will show a small growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 1.85% on average per year.
- Based on estimates for the next years, FANG will show a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 8.44% on average per year.
EPS Next Y-19.55%
EPS Next 2Y-18.64%
EPS Next 3Y-4.27%
EPS Next 5Y1.85%
Revenue Next Year39.98%
Revenue Next 2Y13.21%
Revenue Next 3Y11.75%
Revenue Next 5Y8.44%
3.3 Evolution
- The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
- When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- Based on the Price/Earnings ratio of 11.91, the valuation of FANG can be described as reasonable.
- Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, FANG is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 75.24% of the companies are valued more expensively.
- Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio of 27.93, FANG is valued rather cheaply.
- A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 15.63 indicates a correct valuation of FANG.
- Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of FANG is on the same level as its industry peers.
- When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of FANG to the average of the S&P500 Index (27.77), we can say FANG is valued slightly cheaper.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.91 | ||
| Fwd PE | 15.63 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- FANG's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. FANG is cheaper than 71.84% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 6.15 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- FANG has a very decent profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
- FANG's earnings are expected to decrease with -4.27% in the coming years. This may justify a cheaper valuation.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)0.6
EPS Next 2Y-18.64%
EPS Next 3Y-4.27%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
- With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 2.43%, FANG has a reasonable but not impressive dividend return.
- FANG's Dividend Yield is comparable with the industry average which is at 3.64.
- Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.81, FANG pays a bit more dividend than the S&P500 average.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.43% |
5.2 History
- On average, the dividend of FANG grows each year by 57.49%, which is quite nice.
- FANG has been paying a dividend for over 5 years, so it has already some track record.
- The dividend of FANG decreased recently.
Dividend Growth(5Y)57.49%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
5.3 Sustainability
- FANG pays out 27.09% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
- FANG's earnings are growing slower than its dividend. This means the dividend growth is not sustainable.
DP27.09%
EPS Next 2Y-18.64%
EPS Next 3Y-4.27%
165.96
-0.97 (-0.58%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorEnergy
GICS IndustryGroupEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Earnings (Last)11-03 2025-11-03/amc
Earnings (Next)02-23 2026-02-23/amc
Inst Owners62.3%
Inst Owner Change-2.56%
Ins Owners0.71%
Ins Owner Change-3.98%
Market Cap47.55B
Revenue(TTM)15.36B
Net Income(TTM)4.18B
Analysts84.74
Price Target188.01 (13.29%)
Short Float %4.77%
Short Ratio4.7
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.43% |
Yearly Dividend6.72
Dividend Growth(5Y)57.49%
DP27.09%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)-1.91%
Min EPS beat(2)-7.02%
Max EPS beat(2)3.2%
EPS beat(4)3
Avg EPS beat(4)2.65%
Min EPS beat(4)-7.02%
Max EPS beat(4)7.78%
EPS beat(8)3
Avg EPS beat(8)-1.08%
EPS beat(12)4
Avg EPS beat(12)-1.37%
EPS beat(16)8
Avg EPS beat(16)0.45%
Revenue beat(2)2
Avg Revenue beat(2)8.1%
Min Revenue beat(2)7.01%
Max Revenue beat(2)9.18%
Revenue beat(4)4
Avg Revenue beat(4)6.44%
Min Revenue beat(4)3.11%
Max Revenue beat(4)9.18%
Revenue beat(8)8
Avg Revenue beat(8)6.08%
Revenue beat(12)9
Avg Revenue beat(12)3.43%
Revenue beat(16)13
Avg Revenue beat(16)6.03%
PT rev (1m)1.47%
PT rev (3m)1.65%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-17.34%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-14.54%
EPS NY rev (1m)-2.85%
EPS NY rev (3m)-2.02%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)-4.66%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-1.93%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0.18%
Revenue NY rev (3m)2.88%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.91 | ||
| Fwd PE | 15.63 | ||
| P/S | 3.1 | ||
| P/FCF | N/A | ||
| P/OCF | 5.43 | ||
| P/B | 1.22 | ||
| P/tB | 1.22 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 6.15 |
EPS(TTM)13.93
EY8.39%
EPS(NY)10.62
Fwd EY6.4%
FCF(TTM)-3.82
FCFYN/A
OCF(TTM)30.56
OCFY18.41%
SpS53.61
BVpS136.42
TBVpS136.42
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)0.6
Graham Number206.78
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 5.48% | ||
| ROE | 10.69% | ||
| ROCE | 7.75% | ||
| ROIC | 6.23% | ||
| ROICexc | 6.24% | ||
| ROICexgc | 6.24% | ||
| OM | 36.35% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 27.2% | ||
| GM | 70.42% | ||
| FCFM | N/A |
ROA(3y)10.76%
ROA(5y)3.23%
ROE(3y)18.84%
ROE(5y)4.64%
ROIC(3y)13.71%
ROIC(5y)11.82%
ROICexc(3y)13.87%
ROICexc(5y)12.01%
ROICexgc(3y)13.87%
ROICexgc(5y)12.01%
ROCE(3y)17.06%
ROCE(5y)14.7%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-27.28%
ROICexgc growth 5Y2.37%
ROICexc growth 3Y-27.28%
ROICexc growth 5Y2.37%
OM growth 3Y-10.89%
OM growth 5Y2.54%
PM growth 3Y-2.26%
PM growth 5Y37.7%
GM growth 3Y-4.27%
GM growth 5Y-1.55%
F-Score7
Asset Turnover0.2
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.41 | ||
| Debt/FCF | N/A | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.53 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 205% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 64.12% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 84.28% | ||
| Profit Quality | N/A | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.62 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.6 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.31 |
F-Score7
WACC7.72%
ROIC/WACC0.81
Cap/Depr(3y)314.79%
Cap/Depr(5y)256.28%
Cap/Sales(3y)66.3%
Cap/Sales(5y)61.08%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-18.73%
EPS 3Y12.48%
EPS 5Y19.84%
EPS Q2Q%-8.88%
EPS Next Y-19.55%
EPS Next 2Y-18.64%
EPS Next 3Y-4.27%
EPS Next 5Y1.85%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)60.29%
Revenue growth 3Y17.64%
Revenue growth 5Y22.79%
Sales Q2Q%48.36%
Revenue Next Year39.98%
Revenue Next 2Y13.21%
Revenue Next 3Y11.75%
Revenue Next 5Y8.44%
EBIT growth 1Y25.15%
EBIT growth 3Y4.83%
EBIT growth 5Y25.91%
EBIT Next Year117.36%
EBIT Next 3Y30.89%
EBIT Next 5Y20.16%
FCF growth 1Y-208.1%
FCF growth 3YN/A
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y52.62%
OCF growth 3Y17.59%
OCF growth 5Y18.59%
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC / FANG FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC (FANG) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to FANG.
What is the valuation status of DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC (FANG) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 4 / 10 to DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC (FANG). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
What is the profitability of FANG stock?
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC (FANG) has a profitability rating of 7 / 10.
What is the valuation of DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC based on its PE and PB ratios?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC (FANG) is 11.91 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 1.22.
Can you provide the dividend sustainability for FANG stock?
The dividend rating of DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC (FANG) is 5 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 27.09%.