BOUYGUES SA (EN.PA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Paris - EPA:EN - FR0000120503 - Common Stock
44.49 EUR
-0.79 (-1.74%)
Taking everything into account, EN scores 4 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. EN was compared to 43 industry peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. EN has a medium profitability rating, but doesn't score so well on its financial health evaluation. EN has a decent growth rate and is not valued too expensively. Finally EN also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
- EN had positive earnings in the past year.
- In the past year EN had a positive cash flow from operations.
- EN had positive earnings in each of the past 5 years.
- Each year in the past 5 years EN had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
- EN has a worse Return On Assets (1.68%) than 74.42% of its industry peers.
- EN has a worse Return On Equity (8.66%) than 79.07% of its industry peers.
- EN has a Return On Invested Capital of 5.55%. This is in the lower half of the industry: EN underperforms 67.44% of its industry peers.
- EN had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 4.50%. This is significantly below the industry average of 11.17%.
- The last Return On Invested Capital (5.55%) for EN is above the 3 year average (4.50%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.68% | ||
| ROE | 8.66% | ||
| ROIC | 5.55% |
ROA(3y)1.66%
ROA(5y)1.85%
ROE(3y)8.23%
ROE(5y)8.29%
ROIC(3y)4.5%
ROIC(5y)4.45%
1.3 Margins
- The Profit Margin of EN (1.83%) is worse than 76.74% of its industry peers.
- EN's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
- EN has a worse Operating Margin (4.52%) than 69.77% of its industry peers.
- EN's Operating Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
- EN has a better Gross Margin (55.87%) than 65.12% of its industry peers.
- EN's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 4.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 1.83% | ||
| GM | 55.87% |
OM growth 3Y-1.75%
OM growth 5Y-1.42%
PM growth 3Y-14.6%
PM growth 5Y-9.8%
GM growth 3Y0.03%
GM growth 5Y0.83%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
- With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), EN is creating some value.
- Compared to 1 year ago, EN has less shares outstanding
- Compared to 5 years ago, EN has less shares outstanding
- EN has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
- EN has an Altman-Z score of 1.20. This is a bad value and indicates that EN is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
- EN has a Altman-Z score of 1.20. This is in the lower half of the industry: EN underperforms 76.74% of its industry peers.
- EN has a debt to FCF ratio of 5.61. This is a neutral value as EN would need 5.61 years to pay back of all of its debts.
- The Debt to FCF ratio of EN (5.61) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
- A Debt/Equity ratio of 1.15 is on the high side and indicates that EN has dependencies on debt financing.
- With a Debt to Equity ratio value of 1.15, EN is not doing good in the industry: 60.47% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.15 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 5.61 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.2 |
ROIC/WACC1.05
WACC5.27%
2.3 Liquidity
- EN has a Current Ratio of 0.90. This is a bad value and indicates that EN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
- EN's Current ratio of 0.90 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. EN is outperformed by 83.72% of its industry peers.
- A Quick Ratio of 0.80 indicates that EN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
- EN has a worse Quick ratio (0.80) than 76.74% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.9 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.8 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
- EN shows a small growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has grown by 3.24%.
- Measured over the past years, EN shows a decrease in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been decreasing by -2.38% on average per year.
- Looking at the last year, EN shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has grown by 1.31% in the last year.
- EN shows quite a strong growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 8.39% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)3.24%
EPS 3Y-1.61%
EPS 5Y-2.38%
EPS Q2Q%0.75%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)1.31%
Revenue growth 3Y14.72%
Revenue growth 5Y8.39%
Sales Q2Q%0.07%
3.2 Future
- The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 9.27% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
- The Revenue is expected to grow by 1.83% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y3.55%
EPS Next 2Y13.1%
EPS Next 3Y14.3%
EPS Next 5Y9.27%
Revenue Next Year0.09%
Revenue Next 2Y0.95%
Revenue Next 3Y1.41%
Revenue Next 5Y1.83%
3.3 Evolution
- When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
- The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- A Price/Earnings ratio of 15.50 indicates a correct valuation of EN.
- The rest of the industry has a similar Price/Earnings ratio as EN.
- When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of EN to the average of the S&P500 Index (27.21), we can say EN is valued slightly cheaper.
- EN is valuated correctly with a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 12.38.
- Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of EN is on the same level as its industry peers.
- When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of EN to the average of the S&P500 Index (24.26), we can say EN is valued slightly cheaper.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 15.5 | ||
| Fwd PE | 12.38 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, EN is valued cheaper than 86.05% of the companies in the same industry.
- EN's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. EN is cheaper than 88.37% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 6.42 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 4.8 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates EN does not grow enough to justify the current Price/Earnings ratio.
- A more expensive valuation may be justified as EN's earnings are expected to grow with 14.30% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)4.36
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y13.1%
EPS Next 3Y14.3%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
- With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 4.41%, EN is a good candidate for dividend investing.
- Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 2.47, EN pays a better dividend. On top of this EN pays more dividend than 83.72% of the companies listed in the same industry.
- Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.81, EN pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.41% |
5.2 History
- The dividend of EN has a limited annual growth rate of 2.50%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)2.5%
Div Incr Years2
Div Non Decr Years4
5.3 Sustainability
- 72.15% of the earnings are spent on dividend by EN. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
- EN's earnings are growing more than its dividend. This makes the dividend growth sustainable.
DP72.15%
EPS Next 2Y13.1%
EPS Next 3Y14.3%
BOUYGUES SA / EN.PA FAQ
What is the fundamental rating for EN stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 4 / 10 to EN.PA.
Can you provide the valuation status for BOUYGUES SA?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 5 / 10 to BOUYGUES SA (EN.PA). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
Can you provide the profitability details for BOUYGUES SA?
BOUYGUES SA (EN.PA) has a profitability rating of 4 / 10.
Can you provide the PE and PB ratios for EN stock?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for BOUYGUES SA (EN.PA) is 15.5 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 1.42.
How financially healthy is BOUYGUES SA?
The financial health rating of BOUYGUES SA (EN.PA) is 2 / 10.