EMAK SPA (EM.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Milan - BIT:EM - IT0001237053 - Common Stock
0.919 EUR
0 (-0.43%)
EM gets a fundamental rating of 6 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 32 industry peers in the Household Durables industry. Both the profitability and the financial health of EM get a neutral evaluation. Nothing too spectacular is happening here. EM may be a bit undervalued, certainly considering the very reasonable score on growth This makes EM very considerable for value investing!
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year EM was profitable.
EM had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
Each year in the past 5 years EM has been profitable.
EM had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
The Return On Assets of EM (3.03%) is better than 78.13% of its industry peers.
EM's Return On Equity of 7.77% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. EM outperforms 71.88% of its industry peers.
EM has a better Return On Invested Capital (8.07%) than 78.13% of its industry peers.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for EM is below the industry average of 9.55%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (8.07%) for EM is above the 3 year average (5.51%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 3.03% | ||
| ROE | 7.77% | ||
| ROIC | 8.07% |
ROA(3y)2.68%
ROA(5y)3.25%
ROE(3y)6.67%
ROE(5y)8.32%
ROIC(3y)5.51%
ROIC(5y)6.18%
1.3 Margins
EM has a better Profit Margin (2.31%) than 65.63% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of EM has declined.
EM has a Operating Margin of 6.26%. This is in the better half of the industry: EM outperforms 62.50% of its industry peers.
EM's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
With a decent Gross Margin value of 48.73%, EM is doing good in the industry, outperforming 65.63% of the companies in the same industry.
EM's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 6.26% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.31% | ||
| GM | 48.73% |
OM growth 3Y-19.36%
OM growth 5Y-3.12%
PM growth 3Y-44.28%
PM growth 5Y-20.36%
GM growth 3Y0.43%
GM growth 5Y0.61%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
EM has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is creating some value.
Compared to 1 year ago, EM has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
Compared to 5 years ago, EM has less shares outstanding
Compared to 1 year ago, EM has about the same debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 2.64 indicates that EM is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
EM has a Altman-Z score of 2.64. This is in the better half of the industry: EM outperforms 71.88% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of EM is 102.66, which is on the high side as it means it would take EM, 102.66 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
EM has a Debt to FCF ratio of 102.66. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: EM outperforms 40.63% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.75 indicates that EM is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
EM has a Debt to Equity ratio of 0.75. This is in the lower half of the industry: EM underperforms 62.50% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.75 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 102.66 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.64 |
ROIC/WACC1.4
WACC5.76%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 2.28 indicates that EM has no problem at all paying its short term obligations.
EM has a Current ratio of 2.28. This is in the better half of the industry: EM outperforms 75.00% of its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 1.19 indicates that EM should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
With a decent Quick ratio value of 1.19, EM is doing good in the industry, outperforming 78.13% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.28 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.19 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
EM shows a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has been growing by 11.98%, which is quite good.
EM shows a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been decreasing by -14.92% yearly.
EM shows quite a strong growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 8.92%.
EM shows a small growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 6.76% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)11.98%
EPS 3Y-43.79%
EPS 5Y-14.92%
EPS Q2Q%40.84%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)8.92%
Revenue growth 3Y0.77%
Revenue growth 5Y6.76%
Sales Q2Q%6.94%
3.2 Future
EM is expected to show a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 29.78% yearly.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 2.91% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y24.29%
EPS Next 2Y34.16%
EPS Next 3Y29.78%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year2.67%
Revenue Next 2Y2.88%
Revenue Next 3Y2.91%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
EM is valuated cheaply with a Price/Earnings ratio of 7.07.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of EM indicates a rather cheap valuation: EM is cheaper than 96.88% of the companies listed in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio of 27.00, EM is valued rather cheaply.
A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 7.08 indicates a rather cheap valuation of EM.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, EM is valued cheaper than 81.25% of the companies in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of EM to the average of the S&P500 Index (23.70), we can say EM is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 7.07 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.08 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio of EM indicates a rather cheap valuation: EM is cheaper than 90.63% of the companies listed in the same industry.
EM's Price/Free Cash Flow is on the same level as the industry average.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 53.37 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 4 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
EM has a very decent profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
A more expensive valuation may be justified as EM's earnings are expected to grow with 29.78% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)0.29
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y34.16%
EPS Next 3Y29.78%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 2.71%, EM has a reasonable but not impressive dividend return.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 2.69, EM has a dividend in line with its industry peers.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.94, EM pays a bit more dividend than the S&P500 average.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.71% |
5.2 History
The dividend of EM has a limited annual growth rate of 0.17%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)0.17%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
EM pays out 19.96% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
The dividend of EM is growing, but earnings are growing more, so the dividend growth is sustainable.
DP19.96%
EPS Next 2Y34.16%
EPS Next 3Y29.78%
BIT:EM (1/8/2026, 5:29:46 PM)
0.919
0 (-0.43%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryGroupConsumer Durables & Apparel
GICS IndustryHousehold Durables
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners5.19%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins OwnersN/A
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap150.65M
Revenue(TTM)947.07M
Net Income(TTM)21.90M
Analysts84.44
Price Target1.63 (77.37%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.71% |
Yearly Dividend0.05
Dividend Growth(5Y)0.17%
DP19.96%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)0%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)-4.4%
EPS NY rev (3m)-4.4%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)-1.6%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-1.6%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 7.07 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.08 | ||
| P/S | 0.16 | ||
| P/FCF | 53.37 | ||
| P/OCF | 6.12 | ||
| P/B | 0.53 | ||
| P/tB | 0.81 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 4 |
EPS(TTM)0.13
EY14.15%
EPS(NY)0.13
Fwd EY14.12%
FCF(TTM)0.02
FCFY1.87%
OCF(TTM)0.15
OCFY16.35%
SpS5.78
BVpS1.72
TBVpS1.13
PEG (NY)0.29
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number2.24
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 3.03% | ||
| ROE | 7.77% | ||
| ROCE | 11.59% | ||
| ROIC | 8.07% | ||
| ROICexc | 9.37% | ||
| ROICexgc | 11.95% | ||
| OM | 6.26% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.31% | ||
| GM | 48.73% | ||
| FCFM | 0.3% |
ROA(3y)2.68%
ROA(5y)3.25%
ROE(3y)6.67%
ROE(5y)8.32%
ROIC(3y)5.51%
ROIC(5y)6.18%
ROICexc(3y)6.58%
ROICexc(5y)7.59%
ROICexgc(3y)8.69%
ROICexgc(5y)10.3%
ROCE(3y)7.91%
ROCE(5y)8.86%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-25.8%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-4.07%
ROICexc growth 3Y-24.35%
ROICexc growth 5Y-3.05%
OM growth 3Y-19.36%
OM growth 5Y-3.12%
PM growth 3Y-44.28%
PM growth 5Y-20.36%
GM growth 3Y0.43%
GM growth 5Y0.61%
F-Score7
Asset Turnover1.31
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.75 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 102.66 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 2.3 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 67.67% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 2.3% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 26.92% | ||
| Profit Quality | 12.89% | ||
| Current Ratio | 2.28 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.19 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.64 |
F-Score7
WACC5.76%
ROIC/WACC1.4
Cap/Depr(3y)75.55%
Cap/Depr(5y)71.77%
Cap/Sales(3y)3.86%
Cap/Sales(5y)3.5%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)11.98%
EPS 3Y-43.79%
EPS 5Y-14.92%
EPS Q2Q%40.84%
EPS Next Y24.29%
EPS Next 2Y34.16%
EPS Next 3Y29.78%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)8.92%
Revenue growth 3Y0.77%
Revenue growth 5Y6.76%
Sales Q2Q%6.94%
Revenue Next Year2.67%
Revenue Next 2Y2.88%
Revenue Next 3Y2.91%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y26.63%
EBIT growth 3Y-18.74%
EBIT growth 5Y3.43%
EBIT Next Year116.13%
EBIT Next 3Y35.43%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-92.03%
FCF growth 3Y-12.04%
FCF growth 5Y-13.15%
OCF growth 1Y-58.35%
OCF growth 3Y3.36%
OCF growth 5Y-1.36%
EMAK SPA / EM.MI FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for EMAK SPA?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to EM.MI.
What is the valuation status for EM stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 8 / 10 to EMAK SPA (EM.MI). This can be considered as Undervalued.
How profitable is EMAK SPA (EM.MI) stock?
EMAK SPA (EM.MI) has a profitability rating of 6 / 10.
What is the financial health of EMAK SPA (EM.MI) stock?
The financial health rating of EMAK SPA (EM.MI) is 5 / 10.
How sustainable is the dividend of EMAK SPA (EM.MI) stock?
The dividend rating of EMAK SPA (EM.MI) is 6 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 19.96%.