BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Canada - Toronto Stock Exchange - TSX:DOO - CA05577W2004 - Common Stock
98.23 CAD
+7.8 (+8.63%)
Overall DOO gets a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10. We evaluated DOO against 3 industry peers in the Leisure Products industry. DOO has only an average score on both its financial health and profitability. DOO has a valuation in line with the averages, but on the other hand it scores bad on growth.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year DOO was profitable.
In the past year DOO had a positive cash flow from operations.
Of the past 5 years DOO 4 years were profitable.
In the past 5 years DOO always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
1.2 Ratios
With a decent Return On Assets value of -0.60%, DOO is doing good in the industry, outperforming 66.67% of the companies in the same industry.
DOO has a better Return On Equity (-7.74%) than 66.67% of its industry peers.
DOO has a better Return On Invested Capital (7.46%) than 100.00% of its industry peers.
The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for DOO is significantly above the industry average of 7.09%.
The 3 year average ROIC (16.59%) for DOO is well above the current ROIC(7.46%). The reason for the recent decline needs to be investigated.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -0.6% | ||
| ROE | -7.74% | ||
| ROIC | 7.46% |
ROA(3y)6.98%
ROA(5y)8.83%
ROE(3y)55.03%
ROE(5y)N/A
ROIC(3y)16.59%
ROIC(5y)18.66%
1.3 Margins
The Operating Margin of DOO (6.51%) is better than 66.67% of its industry peers.
DOO's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
The Gross Margin of DOO (21.21%) is better than 66.67% of its industry peers.
DOO's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 6.51% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 21.21% |
OM growth 3Y-18.97%
OM growth 5Y-2.95%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-6.69%
GM growth 5Y-1.17%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), DOO is creating some value.
DOO has less shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
DOO has less shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, DOO has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
DOO has an Altman-Z score of 2.37. This is not the best score and indicates that DOO is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
DOO has a better Altman-Z score (2.37) than 66.67% of its industry peers.
DOO has a debt to FCF ratio of 6.31. This is a slightly negative value and a sign of low solvency as DOO would need 6.31 years to pay back of all of its debts.
Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 6.31, DOO is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 66.67% of the companies in the same industry.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 6.04 is on the high side and indicates that DOO has dependencies on debt financing.
The Debt to Equity ratio of DOO (6.04) is worse than 66.67% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 6.04 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 6.31 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.37 |
ROIC/WACC0.81
WACC9.26%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.34 indicates that DOO should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
The Current ratio of DOO (1.34) is better than 66.67% of its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 0.55 indicates that DOO may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
DOO has a worse Quick ratio (0.55) than 66.67% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.34 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.55 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
DOO shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -50.14%.
DOO shows a decrease in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been decreasing by -0.95% yearly.
Looking at the last year, DOO shows a very negative growth in Revenue. The Revenue has decreased by -28.99% in the last year.
Measured over the past years, DOO shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 5.28% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-50.14%
EPS 3Y-27.97%
EPS 5Y-0.95%
EPS Q2Q%50.82%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-28.99%
Revenue growth 3Y0.79%
Revenue growth 5Y5.28%
Sales Q2Q%2.51%
3.2 Future
DOO is expected to show a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 21.97% yearly.
Based on estimates for the next years, DOO will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 4.14% on average per year.
EPS Next Y23.42%
EPS Next 2Y25.32%
EPS Next 3Y28.46%
EPS Next 5Y21.97%
Revenue Next Year6.3%
Revenue Next 2Y6.25%
Revenue Next 3Y6.65%
Revenue Next 5Y4.14%
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio of 27.83, the valuation of DOO can be described as expensive.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, DOO is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 66.67% of the companies are valued more expensively.
DOO's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a similar valuation than the S&P500 average which is at 25.98.
The Price/Forward Earnings ratio is 16.90, which indicates a correct valuation of DOO.
66.67% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than DOO, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
DOO is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 35.79, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 27.83 | ||
| Fwd PE | 16.9 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, DOO is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 66.67% of the companies are valued more expensively.
66.67% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than DOO, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 14.94 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 9.87 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a correct valuation of the company.
The decent profitability rating of DOO may justify a higher PE ratio.
DOO's earnings are expected to grow with 28.46% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)1.19
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y25.32%
EPS Next 3Y28.46%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a yearly dividend of 0.98%, DOO is not a good candidate for dividend investing.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 1.75, DOO pays a bit more dividend than its industry peers.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.41, DOO's dividend is way lower than the S&P500 average.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% |
5.2 History
On average, the dividend of DOO grows each year by 15.83%, which is quite nice.
DOO has been paying a dividend for over 5 years, so it has already some track record.
Dividend Growth(5Y)15.83%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
DOO has negative earnings and hence a negative payout ratio. The dividend may be in danger.
DOO's earnings are growing more than its dividend. This makes the dividend growth sustainable.
DP-165.16%
EPS Next 2Y25.32%
EPS Next 3Y28.46%
TSX:DOO (11/25/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
98.23
+7.8 (+8.63%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryGroupConsumer Durables & Apparel
GICS IndustryLeisure Products
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners91.22%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners3.33%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap7.18B
Revenue(TTM)7.79B
Net Income(TTM)-37.60M
Analysts76.36
Price Target106.32 (8.24%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% |
Yearly Dividend0.84
Dividend Growth(5Y)15.83%
DP-165.16%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)2
Avg EPS beat(2)53.1%
Min EPS beat(2)15.53%
Max EPS beat(2)90.68%
EPS beat(4)4
Avg EPS beat(4)45.75%
Min EPS beat(4)9.9%
Max EPS beat(4)90.68%
EPS beat(8)6
Avg EPS beat(8)26.63%
EPS beat(12)10
Avg EPS beat(12)22.99%
EPS beat(16)14
Avg EPS beat(16)22.52%
Revenue beat(2)2
Avg Revenue beat(2)4.39%
Min Revenue beat(2)4.05%
Max Revenue beat(2)4.73%
Revenue beat(4)4
Avg Revenue beat(4)4.94%
Min Revenue beat(4)4.05%
Max Revenue beat(4)5.89%
Revenue beat(8)5
Avg Revenue beat(8)0.83%
Revenue beat(12)9
Avg Revenue beat(12)2.68%
Revenue beat(16)11
Avg Revenue beat(16)1.64%
PT rev (1m)3.61%
PT rev (3m)45.78%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-0.19%
EPS NQ rev (3m)11.96%
EPS NY rev (1m)3.52%
EPS NY rev (3m)28.87%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0.05%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)5.14%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0.01%
Revenue NY rev (3m)4.51%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 27.83 | ||
| Fwd PE | 16.9 | ||
| P/S | 0.92 | ||
| P/FCF | 14.94 | ||
| P/OCF | 8.35 | ||
| P/B | 14.79 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 9.87 |
EPS(TTM)3.53
EY3.59%
EPS(NY)5.81
Fwd EY5.92%
FCF(TTM)6.57
FCFY6.69%
OCF(TTM)11.76
OCFY11.97%
SpS106.5
BVpS6.64
TBVpS-1.94
PEG (NY)1.19
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number22.97
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -0.6% | ||
| ROE | -7.74% | ||
| ROCE | 12.59% | ||
| ROIC | 7.46% | ||
| ROICexc | 8.12% | ||
| ROICexgc | 9.78% | ||
| OM | 6.51% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 21.21% | ||
| FCFM | 6.17% |
ROA(3y)6.98%
ROA(5y)8.83%
ROE(3y)55.03%
ROE(5y)N/A
ROIC(3y)16.59%
ROIC(5y)18.66%
ROICexc(3y)18.49%
ROICexc(5y)24.92%
ROICexgc(3y)22.73%
ROICexgc(5y)33.81%
ROCE(3y)28.09%
ROCE(5y)31.56%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-38.03%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-14.78%
ROICexc growth 3Y-35.14%
ROICexc growth 5Y-10.86%
OM growth 3Y-18.97%
OM growth 5Y-2.95%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-6.69%
GM growth 5Y-1.17%
F-Score3
Asset Turnover1.24
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 6.04 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 6.31 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 3.11 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 86.96% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 4.87% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2.89 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 91.21% | ||
| Profit Quality | N/A | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.34 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.55 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.37 |
F-Score3
WACC9.26%
ROIC/WACC0.81
Cap/Depr(3y)153.9%
Cap/Depr(5y)164.81%
Cap/Sales(3y)5.97%
Cap/Sales(5y)6.34%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-50.14%
EPS 3Y-27.97%
EPS 5Y-0.95%
EPS Q2Q%50.82%
EPS Next Y23.42%
EPS Next 2Y25.32%
EPS Next 3Y28.46%
EPS Next 5Y21.97%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-28.99%
Revenue growth 3Y0.79%
Revenue growth 5Y5.28%
Sales Q2Q%2.51%
Revenue Next Year6.3%
Revenue Next 2Y6.25%
Revenue Next 3Y6.65%
Revenue Next 5Y4.14%
EBIT growth 1Y-53.26%
EBIT growth 3Y-18.34%
EBIT growth 5Y2.18%
EBIT Next Year98.42%
EBIT Next 3Y37.58%
EBIT Next 5Y22.55%
FCF growth 1Y-35.03%
FCF growth 3Y63.1%
FCF growth 5Y6.89%
OCF growth 1Y-38.5%
OCF growth 3Y-1.31%
OCF growth 5Y5.91%
BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING / DOO.CA FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to DOO.CA.
What is the valuation status for DOO stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 6 / 10 to BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
How profitable is BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) stock?
BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) has a profitability rating of 6 / 10.
What are the PE and PB ratios of BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) stock?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) is 27.83 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 14.79.
How financially healthy is BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING?
The financial health rating of BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) is 4 / 10.