BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Canada - Toronto Stock Exchange - TSX:DOO - CA05577W2004 - Common Stock
108.96 CAD
-0.34 (-0.31%)
We assign a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10 to DOO. DOO was compared to 3 industry peers in the Leisure Products industry. While DOO has a great profitability rating, there are some minor concerns on its financial health. DOO has a decent growth rate and is not valued too expensively.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
- In the past year DOO was profitable.
- DOO had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
- DOO had positive earnings in 4 of the past 5 years.
- DOO had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
- DOO has a Return On Assets of 0.37%. This is in the better half of the industry: DOO outperforms 66.67% of its industry peers.
- DOO has a better Return On Equity (4.29%) than 100.00% of its industry peers.
- The Return On Invested Capital of DOO (8.52%) is better than 100.00% of its industry peers.
- DOO had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 16.59%. This is significantly above the industry average of 7.62%.
- The 3 year average ROIC (16.59%) for DOO is well above the current ROIC(8.52%). The reason for the recent decline needs to be investigated.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.37% | ||
| ROE | 4.29% | ||
| ROIC | 8.52% |
ROA(3y)6.98%
ROA(5y)8.83%
ROE(3y)55.03%
ROE(5y)N/A
ROIC(3y)16.59%
ROIC(5y)18.66%
1.3 Margins
- Looking at the Profit Margin, with a value of 0.30%, DOO is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 66.67% of the companies in the same industry.
- DOO has a Operating Margin of 6.88%. This is in the better half of the industry: DOO outperforms 66.67% of its industry peers.
- In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of DOO has declined.
- The Gross Margin of DOO (21.81%) is better than 66.67% of its industry peers.
- DOO's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 6.88% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 0.3% | ||
| GM | 21.81% |
OM growth 3Y-18.97%
OM growth 5Y-2.95%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-6.69%
GM growth 5Y-1.17%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
- The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so DOO is creating value.
- DOO has less shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
- Compared to 5 years ago, DOO has less shares outstanding
- The debt/assets ratio for DOO is higher compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
- An Altman-Z score of 2.48 indicates that DOO is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
- DOO has a Altman-Z score of 2.48. This is in the better half of the industry: DOO outperforms 66.67% of its industry peers.
- DOO has a debt to FCF ratio of 3.73. This is a good value and a sign of high solvency as DOO would need 3.73 years to pay back of all of its debts.
- The Debt to FCF ratio of DOO (3.73) is better than 66.67% of its industry peers.
- A Debt/Equity ratio of 4.71 is on the high side and indicates that DOO has dependencies on debt financing.
- DOO has a Debt to Equity ratio of 4.71. This is in the lower half of the industry: DOO underperforms 66.67% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 4.71 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.73 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.48 |
ROIC/WACC1.05
WACC8.15%
2.3 Liquidity
- DOO has a Current Ratio of 1.23. This is a normal value and indicates that DOO is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
- DOO has a Current ratio of 1.23. This is in the better half of the industry: DOO outperforms 66.67% of its industry peers.
- A Quick Ratio of 0.49 indicates that DOO may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
- DOO has a Quick ratio of 0.49. This is in the lower half of the industry: DOO underperforms 66.67% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.23 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.49 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
- DOO shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -23.55%.
- The Earnings Per Share has been decreasing by -0.95% on average over the past years.
- The Revenue for DOO has decreased by -22.69% in the past year. This is quite bad
- The Revenue has been growing slightly by 5.28% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-23.55%
EPS 3Y-27.97%
EPS 5Y-0.95%
EPS Q2Q%37.07%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-22.69%
Revenue growth 3Y0.79%
Revenue growth 5Y5.28%
Sales Q2Q%15.06%
3.2 Future
- The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 23.75% on average over the next years. This is a very strong growth
- The Revenue is expected to grow by 4.34% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y34.44%
EPS Next 2Y28.76%
EPS Next 3Y27.56%
EPS Next 5Y23.75%
Revenue Next Year7.43%
Revenue Next 2Y6.72%
Revenue Next 3Y6.33%
Revenue Next 5Y4.34%
3.3 Evolution
- The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
- The Revenue growth rate is stable: in the next years the growth will be about the same than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- A Price/Earnings ratio of 27.52 indicates a quite expensive valuation of DOO.
- Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, DOO is valued a bit cheaper than 66.67% of the companies in the same industry.
- DOO's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a similar valuation than the S&P500 average which is at 27.47.
- The Price/Forward Earnings ratio is 17.76, which indicates a rather expensive current valuation of DOO.
- Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, DOO is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 66.67% of the companies are valued more expensively.
- DOO is valuated rather cheaply when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 24.26, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 27.52 | ||
| Fwd PE | 17.76 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, DOO is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 66.67% of the companies are valued more expensively.
- Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, DOO is valued a bit cheaper than 66.67% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 10.67 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 10.44 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- DOO's low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
- DOO has a very decent profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
- DOO's earnings are expected to grow with 27.56% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)0.8
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y28.76%
EPS Next 3Y27.56%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
- With a yearly dividend of 0.85%, DOO is not a good candidate for dividend investing.
- Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 1.05, DOO pays a bit more dividend than its industry peers.
- Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.89, DOO's dividend is way lower than the S&P500 average.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.85% |
5.2 History
- On average, the dividend of DOO grows each year by 15.83%, which is quite nice.
- DOO has been paying a dividend for over 5 years, so it has already some track record.
Dividend Growth(5Y)15.83%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
- DOO pays out 256.15% of its income as dividend. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
- DOO's earnings are growing more than its dividend. This makes the dividend growth sustainable.
DP256.15%
EPS Next 2Y28.76%
EPS Next 3Y27.56%
TSX:DOO (1/16/2026, 7:00:00 PM)
108.96
-0.34 (-0.31%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryGroupConsumer Durables & Apparel
GICS IndustryLeisure Products
Earnings (Last)12-04 2025-12-04/bmo
Earnings (Next)03-24 2026-03-24/amc
Inst Owners92.79%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners0.48%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap7.97B
Revenue(TTM)8.08B
Net Income(TTM)24.40M
Analysts77.39
Price Target119.22 (9.42%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.85% |
Yearly Dividend0.84
Dividend Growth(5Y)15.83%
DP256.15%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)2
Avg EPS beat(2)59.07%
Min EPS beat(2)27.46%
Max EPS beat(2)90.68%
EPS beat(4)4
Avg EPS beat(4)35.89%
Min EPS beat(4)9.9%
Max EPS beat(4)90.68%
EPS beat(8)7
Avg EPS beat(8)30.23%
EPS beat(12)10
Avg EPS beat(12)20.89%
EPS beat(16)14
Avg EPS beat(16)23.59%
Revenue beat(2)2
Avg Revenue beat(2)5.79%
Min Revenue beat(2)4.73%
Max Revenue beat(2)6.85%
Revenue beat(4)4
Avg Revenue beat(4)5.18%
Min Revenue beat(4)4.05%
Max Revenue beat(4)6.85%
Revenue beat(8)6
Avg Revenue beat(8)2.66%
Revenue beat(12)9
Avg Revenue beat(12)2.16%
Revenue beat(16)12
Avg Revenue beat(16)2.68%
PT rev (1m)7.06%
PT rev (3m)16.19%
EPS NQ rev (1m)2.39%
EPS NQ rev (3m)4.77%
EPS NY rev (1m)9.11%
EPS NY rev (3m)12.77%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)-2.65%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-3.01%
Revenue NY rev (1m)1.02%
Revenue NY rev (3m)1.07%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 27.52 | ||
| Fwd PE | 17.76 | ||
| P/S | 0.99 | ||
| P/FCF | 10.67 | ||
| P/OCF | 7.3 | ||
| P/B | 14.01 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 10.44 |
EPS(TTM)3.96
EY3.63%
EPS(NY)6.13
Fwd EY5.63%
FCF(TTM)10.21
FCFY9.37%
OCF(TTM)14.93
OCFY13.7%
SpS110.53
BVpS7.78
TBVpS-0.83
PEG (NY)0.8
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number26.33
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.37% | ||
| ROE | 4.29% | ||
| ROCE | 14.39% | ||
| ROIC | 8.52% | ||
| ROICexc | 9.21% | ||
| ROICexgc | 11.18% | ||
| OM | 6.88% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 0.3% | ||
| GM | 21.81% | ||
| FCFM | 9.24% |
ROA(3y)6.98%
ROA(5y)8.83%
ROE(3y)55.03%
ROE(5y)N/A
ROIC(3y)16.59%
ROIC(5y)18.66%
ROICexc(3y)18.49%
ROICexc(5y)24.92%
ROICexgc(3y)22.73%
ROICexgc(5y)33.81%
ROCE(3y)28.09%
ROCE(5y)31.56%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-38.03%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-14.78%
ROICexc growth 3Y-35.14%
ROICexc growth 5Y-10.86%
OM growth 3Y-18.97%
OM growth 5Y-2.95%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-6.69%
GM growth 5Y-1.17%
F-Score4
Asset Turnover1.24
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 4.71 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.73 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 2.68 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 77.52% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 4.27% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 3.09 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 109.02% | ||
| Profit Quality | 3060.25% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.23 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.49 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.48 |
F-Score4
WACC8.15%
ROIC/WACC1.05
Cap/Depr(3y)153.9%
Cap/Depr(5y)164.81%
Cap/Sales(3y)5.97%
Cap/Sales(5y)6.34%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-23.55%
EPS 3Y-27.97%
EPS 5Y-0.95%
EPS Q2Q%37.07%
EPS Next Y34.44%
EPS Next 2Y28.76%
EPS Next 3Y27.56%
EPS Next 5Y23.75%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-22.69%
Revenue growth 3Y0.79%
Revenue growth 5Y5.28%
Sales Q2Q%15.06%
Revenue Next Year7.43%
Revenue Next 2Y6.72%
Revenue Next 3Y6.33%
Revenue Next 5Y4.34%
EBIT growth 1Y-39.44%
EBIT growth 3Y-18.34%
EBIT growth 5Y2.18%
EBIT Next Year106.88%
EBIT Next 3Y37.55%
EBIT Next 5Y22.68%
FCF growth 1Y1.07%
FCF growth 3Y63.1%
FCF growth 5Y6.89%
OCF growth 1Y-19.77%
OCF growth 3Y-1.31%
OCF growth 5Y5.91%
BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING / DOO.CA FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to DOO.CA.
Can you provide the valuation status for BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 6 / 10 to BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
How profitable is BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) stock?
BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) has a profitability rating of 7 / 10.
What is the financial health of BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) stock?
The financial health rating of BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) is 5 / 10.
What is the earnings growth outlook for BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) is expected to grow by 34.44% in the next year.