BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Canada - Toronto Stock Exchange - TSX:DOO - CA05577W2004 - Common Stock
97.36 CAD
0 (0%)
Taking everything into account, DOO scores 5 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. DOO was compared to 3 industry peers in the Leisure Products industry. Both the profitability and the financial health of DOO get a neutral evaluation. Nothing too spectacular is happening here. DOO has a valuation in line with the averages, but on the other hand it scores bad on growth.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year DOO was profitable.
In the past year DOO had a positive cash flow from operations.
DOO had positive earnings in 4 of the past 5 years.
Each year in the past 5 years DOO had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
DOO has a better Return On Assets (-0.60%) than 66.67% of its industry peers.
Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of -7.74%, DOO is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 66.67% of the companies in the same industry.
DOO has a better Return On Invested Capital (7.46%) than 100.00% of its industry peers.
The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for DOO is significantly above the industry average of 7.09%.
The 3 year average ROIC (16.59%) for DOO is well above the current ROIC(7.46%). The reason for the recent decline needs to be investigated.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -0.6% | ||
| ROE | -7.74% | ||
| ROIC | 7.46% |
ROA(3y)6.98%
ROA(5y)8.83%
ROE(3y)55.03%
ROE(5y)N/A
ROIC(3y)16.59%
ROIC(5y)18.66%
1.3 Margins
With a decent Operating Margin value of 6.51%, DOO is doing good in the industry, outperforming 66.67% of the companies in the same industry.
DOO's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
Looking at the Gross Margin, with a value of 21.21%, DOO is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 66.67% of the companies in the same industry.
DOO's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 6.51% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 21.21% |
OM growth 3Y-18.97%
OM growth 5Y-2.95%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-6.69%
GM growth 5Y-1.17%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so DOO is still creating some value.
Compared to 1 year ago, DOO has less shares outstanding
The number of shares outstanding for DOO has been reduced compared to 5 years ago.
The debt/assets ratio for DOO is higher compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 2.41 indicates that DOO is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
The Altman-Z score of DOO (2.41) is better than 66.67% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of DOO is 6.31, which is on the high side as it means it would take DOO, 6.31 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
The Debt to FCF ratio of DOO (6.31) is better than 66.67% of its industry peers.
DOO has a Debt/Equity ratio of 6.04. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
DOO has a worse Debt to Equity ratio (6.04) than 66.67% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 6.04 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 6.31 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.41 |
ROIC/WACC0.8
WACC9.33%
2.3 Liquidity
DOO has a Current Ratio of 1.34. This is a normal value and indicates that DOO is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
DOO has a better Current ratio (1.34) than 66.67% of its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 0.55 indicates that DOO may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
With a Quick ratio value of 0.55, DOO is not doing good in the industry: 66.67% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.34 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.55 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
DOO shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -50.14%.
Measured over the past years, DOO shows a decrease in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been decreasing by -0.95% on average per year.
DOO shows a very negative growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has decreased by -28.99%.
Measured over the past years, DOO shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 5.28% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-50.14%
EPS 3Y-27.97%
EPS 5Y-0.95%
EPS Q2Q%50.82%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-28.99%
Revenue growth 3Y0.79%
Revenue growth 5Y5.28%
Sales Q2Q%2.51%
3.2 Future
DOO is expected to show a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 21.97% yearly.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 4.14% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y23.42%
EPS Next 2Y25.32%
EPS Next 3Y28.46%
EPS Next 5Y21.97%
Revenue Next Year6.3%
Revenue Next 2Y6.25%
Revenue Next 3Y6.65%
Revenue Next 5Y4.14%
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
The Price/Earnings ratio is 27.58, which means the current valuation is very expensive for DOO.
DOO's Price/Earnings ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. DOO is cheaper than 66.67% of the companies in the same industry.
The average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio is at 26.15. DOO is around the same levels.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 16.75, the valuation of DOO can be described as correct.
DOO's Price/Forward Earnings ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. DOO is cheaper than 66.67% of the companies in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of DOO to the average of the S&P500 Index (36.12), we can say DOO is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 27.58 | ||
| Fwd PE | 16.75 |
4.2 Price Multiples
66.67% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than DOO, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, DOO is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 66.67% of the companies are valued more expensively.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 14.81 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 10.36 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
DOO's PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a correct valuation of the company.
DOO has a very decent profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
A more expensive valuation may be justified as DOO's earnings are expected to grow with 28.46% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)1.18
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y25.32%
EPS Next 3Y28.46%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
DOO has a yearly dividend return of 0.98%, which is pretty low.
DOO's Dividend Yield is a higher than the industry average which is at 1.75.
With a Dividend Yield of 0.98, DOO pays less dividend than the S&P500 average, which is at 2.41.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% |
5.2 History
On average, the dividend of DOO grows each year by 15.83%, which is quite nice.
DOO has been paying a dividend for over 5 years, so it has already some track record.
Dividend Growth(5Y)15.83%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
DOO has negative earnings and hence a negative payout ratio. The dividend may be in danger.
The dividend of DOO is growing, but earnings are growing more, so the dividend growth is sustainable.
DP-165.16%
EPS Next 2Y25.32%
EPS Next 3Y28.46%
TSX:DOO (11/27/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
97.36
0 (0%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryGroupConsumer Durables & Apparel
GICS IndustryLeisure Products
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners91.22%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners3.33%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap7.12B
Revenue(TTM)7.79B
Net Income(TTM)-37.60M
Analysts76.36
Price Target106.32 (9.2%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% |
Yearly Dividend0.84
Dividend Growth(5Y)15.83%
DP-165.16%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)2
Avg EPS beat(2)53.1%
Min EPS beat(2)15.53%
Max EPS beat(2)90.68%
EPS beat(4)4
Avg EPS beat(4)45.75%
Min EPS beat(4)9.9%
Max EPS beat(4)90.68%
EPS beat(8)6
Avg EPS beat(8)26.63%
EPS beat(12)10
Avg EPS beat(12)22.99%
EPS beat(16)14
Avg EPS beat(16)22.52%
Revenue beat(2)2
Avg Revenue beat(2)4.39%
Min Revenue beat(2)4.05%
Max Revenue beat(2)4.73%
Revenue beat(4)4
Avg Revenue beat(4)4.94%
Min Revenue beat(4)4.05%
Max Revenue beat(4)5.89%
Revenue beat(8)5
Avg Revenue beat(8)0.83%
Revenue beat(12)9
Avg Revenue beat(12)2.68%
Revenue beat(16)11
Avg Revenue beat(16)1.64%
PT rev (1m)3.61%
PT rev (3m)45.78%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-0.19%
EPS NQ rev (3m)11.96%
EPS NY rev (1m)3.52%
EPS NY rev (3m)28.87%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0.05%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)5.14%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0.01%
Revenue NY rev (3m)4.51%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 27.58 | ||
| Fwd PE | 16.75 | ||
| P/S | 0.91 | ||
| P/FCF | 14.81 | ||
| P/OCF | 8.28 | ||
| P/B | 14.66 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 10.36 |
EPS(TTM)3.53
EY3.63%
EPS(NY)5.81
Fwd EY5.97%
FCF(TTM)6.57
FCFY6.75%
OCF(TTM)11.76
OCFY12.08%
SpS106.5
BVpS6.64
TBVpS-1.94
PEG (NY)1.18
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number22.97
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -0.6% | ||
| ROE | -7.74% | ||
| ROCE | 12.59% | ||
| ROIC | 7.46% | ||
| ROICexc | 8.12% | ||
| ROICexgc | 9.78% | ||
| OM | 6.51% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 21.21% | ||
| FCFM | 6.17% |
ROA(3y)6.98%
ROA(5y)8.83%
ROE(3y)55.03%
ROE(5y)N/A
ROIC(3y)16.59%
ROIC(5y)18.66%
ROICexc(3y)18.49%
ROICexc(5y)24.92%
ROICexgc(3y)22.73%
ROICexgc(5y)33.81%
ROCE(3y)28.09%
ROCE(5y)31.56%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-38.03%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-14.78%
ROICexc growth 3Y-35.14%
ROICexc growth 5Y-10.86%
OM growth 3Y-18.97%
OM growth 5Y-2.95%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-6.69%
GM growth 5Y-1.17%
F-Score3
Asset Turnover1.24
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 6.04 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 6.31 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 3.11 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 86.96% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 4.87% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2.89 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 91.21% | ||
| Profit Quality | N/A | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.34 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.55 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.41 |
F-Score3
WACC9.33%
ROIC/WACC0.8
Cap/Depr(3y)153.9%
Cap/Depr(5y)164.81%
Cap/Sales(3y)5.97%
Cap/Sales(5y)6.34%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-50.14%
EPS 3Y-27.97%
EPS 5Y-0.95%
EPS Q2Q%50.82%
EPS Next Y23.42%
EPS Next 2Y25.32%
EPS Next 3Y28.46%
EPS Next 5Y21.97%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-28.99%
Revenue growth 3Y0.79%
Revenue growth 5Y5.28%
Sales Q2Q%2.51%
Revenue Next Year6.3%
Revenue Next 2Y6.25%
Revenue Next 3Y6.65%
Revenue Next 5Y4.14%
EBIT growth 1Y-53.26%
EBIT growth 3Y-18.34%
EBIT growth 5Y2.18%
EBIT Next Year98.42%
EBIT Next 3Y37.58%
EBIT Next 5Y22.55%
FCF growth 1Y-35.03%
FCF growth 3Y63.1%
FCF growth 5Y6.89%
OCF growth 1Y-38.5%
OCF growth 3Y-1.31%
OCF growth 5Y5.91%
BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING / DOO.CA FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to DOO.CA.
What is the valuation status for DOO stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 6 / 10 to BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
How profitable is BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) stock?
BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) has a profitability rating of 6 / 10.
What are the PE and PB ratios of BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) stock?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) is 27.58 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 14.66.
How financially healthy is BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING?
The financial health rating of BRP INC/CA- SUB VOTING (DOO.CA) is 4 / 10.