CHINA GOLD INTERNATIONAL RES (CGG.CA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
TSX:CGG - Toronto Stock Exchange - CA16890P1036 - Common Stock - Currency: CAD
Overall CGG gets a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10. We evaluated CGG against 825 industry peers in the Metals & Mining industry. Both the profitability and the financial health of CGG get a neutral evaluation. Nothing too spectacular is happening here. CGG is valued quite cheap, while showing a decent growth score. This is a good combination!
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
CGG had negative earnings in the past year.
In the past year CGG had a positive cash flow from operations.
In multiple years CGG reported negative net income over the last 5 years.
CGG had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
With an excellent Return On Assets value of -0.74%, CGG belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 84.73% of the companies in the same industry.
CGG's Return On Equity of -1.31% is amongst the best of the industry. CGG outperforms 84.36% of its industry peers.
CGG has a Return On Invested Capital of 0.44%. This is amongst the best in the industry. CGG outperforms 88.85% of its industry peers.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for CGG is significantly below the industry average of 11.94%.
The 3 year average ROIC (6.85%) for CGG is well above the current ROIC(0.44%). The reason for the recent decline needs to be investigated.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -0.74% | ||
| ROE | -1.31% | ||
| ROIC | 0.44% |
ROA(3y)4.76%
ROA(5y)3.33%
ROE(3y)8.35%
ROE(5y)5.97%
ROIC(3y)6.85%
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
The Operating Margin of CGG (2.63%) is better than 89.45% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of CGG has declined.
The Gross Margin of CGG (11.76%) is better than 86.42% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of CGG has declined.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 2.63% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 11.76% |
OM growth 3Y-26.95%
OM growth 5Y-1.59%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-10.37%
GM growth 5Y-2.05%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) below the Cost of Capital (WACC), CGG is destroying value.
Compared to 1 year ago, CGG has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
Compared to 5 years ago, CGG has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
Compared to 1 year ago, CGG has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
Based on the Altman-Z score of 1.62, we must say that CGG is in the distress zone and has some risk of bankruptcy.
CGG has a Altman-Z score (1.62) which is in line with its industry peers.
CGG has a debt to FCF ratio of 5.79. This is a neutral value as CGG would need 5.79 years to pay back of all of its debts.
Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 5.79, CGG belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 91.76% of the companies in the same industry.
CGG has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.38. This is a healthy value indicating a solid balance between debt and equity.
With a Debt to Equity ratio value of 0.38, CGG is not doing good in the industry: 69.82% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.38 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 5.79 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.62 |
ROIC/WACC0.05
WACC8.83%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.68 indicates that CGG should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
Looking at the Current ratio, with a value of 1.68, CGG is in line with its industry, outperforming 53.09% of the companies in the same industry.
CGG has a Quick Ratio of 1.68. This is a bad value and indicates that CGG is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
Looking at the Quick ratio, with a value of 0.95, CGG is in line with its industry, outperforming 44.73% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.68 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.95 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for CGG have decreased strongly by -156.70% in the last year.
CGG shows a very negative growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has decreased by -16.76%.
CGG shows a decrease in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been decreasing by -4.24% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-156.7%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%185.5%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-16.76%
Revenue growth 3Y-18.98%
Revenue growth 5Y-4.24%
Sales Q2Q%308.64%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, CGG will show a very strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 418.06% on average per year.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 29.28% on average over the next years. This is a very strong growth
EPS Next Y3618.52%
EPS Next 2Y1039.2%
EPS Next 3Y418.06%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year56.6%
Revenue Next 2Y44.95%
Revenue Next 3Y29.28%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
CGG reported negative earnings for the last year, which makes the Price/Earnings Ratio negative.
With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 8.67, the valuation of CGG can be described as very reasonable.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of CGG indicates a rather cheap valuation: CGG is cheaper than 94.06% of the companies listed in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 22.10, CGG is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | N/A | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.67 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, CGG is valued cheaply inside the industry as 89.94% of the companies are valued more expensively.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, CGG is valued cheaply inside the industry as 94.67% of the companies are valued more expensively.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 17.35 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 20.93 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
CGG's low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
The decent profitability rating of CGG may justify a higher PE ratio.
CGG's earnings are expected to grow with 418.06% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y1039.2%
EPS Next 3Y418.06%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
CGG does not give a dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
TSX:CGG (3/7/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
8.75
0 (0%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorMaterials
GICS IndustryGroupMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & Mining
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners15.02%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners0.03%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap3.47B
Analysts82.86
Price Target10.13 (15.77%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
Yearly Dividend0.53
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DP0.2%
Div Incr Years2
Div Non Decr Years2
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)3%
PT rev (3m)7.09%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)-40.62%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-1.9%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | N/A | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.67 | ||
| P/S | 4.53 | ||
| P/FCF | 17.35 | ||
| P/OCF | 10.83 | ||
| P/B | 1.41 | ||
| P/tB | 2.52 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 20.93 |
EPS(TTM)-0.08
EYN/A
EPS(NY)1.01
Fwd EY11.53%
FCF(TTM)0.5
FCFY5.76%
OCF(TTM)0.81
OCFY9.23%
SpS1.93
BVpS6.22
TBVpS3.47
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -0.74% | ||
| ROE | -1.31% | ||
| ROCE | 0.54% | ||
| ROIC | 0.44% | ||
| ROICexc | 0.5% | ||
| ROICexgc | 0.74% | ||
| OM | 2.63% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 11.76% | ||
| FCFM | 26.1% |
ROA(3y)4.76%
ROA(5y)3.33%
ROE(3y)8.35%
ROE(5y)5.97%
ROIC(3y)6.85%
ROIC(5y)N/A
ROICexc(3y)7.78%
ROICexc(5y)N/A
ROICexgc(3y)7.95%
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)8.36%
ROCE(5y)N/A
ROICexcg growth 3Y-30.93%
ROICexcg growth 5Y3.51%
ROICexc growth 3Y-39.2%
ROICexc growth 5Y-4.11%
OM growth 3Y-26.95%
OM growth 5Y-1.59%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-10.37%
GM growth 5Y-2.05%
F-Score3
Asset Turnover0.18
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.38 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 5.79 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 4.85 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 68.93% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 15.69% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 164.55% | ||
| Profit Quality | N/A | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.68 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.95 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.62 |
F-Score3
WACC8.83%
ROIC/WACC0.05
Cap/Depr(3y)51.6%
Cap/Depr(5y)62.17%
Cap/Sales(3y)10.08%
Cap/Sales(5y)13.52%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-156.7%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%185.5%
EPS Next Y3618.52%
EPS Next 2Y1039.2%
EPS Next 3Y418.06%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-16.76%
Revenue growth 3Y-18.98%
Revenue growth 5Y-4.24%
Sales Q2Q%308.64%
Revenue Next Year56.6%
Revenue Next 2Y44.95%
Revenue Next 3Y29.28%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y-87.96%
EBIT growth 3Y-40.82%
EBIT growth 5Y-5.76%
EBIT Next Year1423.58%
EBIT Next 3Y222.14%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-56.87%
FCF growth 3YN/A
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y-41.48%
OCF growth 3Y-81.79%
OCF growth 5Y-60.06%